Investigative reports can now be candidates for creative output at the University of the Philippines even as the criteria for getting them counted as such remain steep. But getting them accepted as research or scholarly work is an altogether different story. Academia still needs a lot of convincing to accept that rigorous investigative journalism, considered the highest form of journalism, employs the scientific method and contributes to new knowledge like academic research.
CranbergL. (1989). Plea for recognition of scientific character of journalism,Journalism Educator, Winter, 46–49.
2.
EttemaJ.GlasserT. ([1984] 2005). On the epistemology of investigative journalism. In AdamG.ClarkR. (Eds), Journalism: The democratic craft. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
HunterM. (2012). The global investigative journalism casebook. Paris: UNESCO.
4.
HunterM.HansonN.SabbaghR.SengersL.SullivanD.SvithF.ThordsenP. (2009). Story-based inquiry: A manual for investigative journalists. Paris: UNESCO.
5.
KovachB.RosenstielT. (2014). The elements of journalism: What news people should know and the public should expect (3rd ed.). New York: Three Rivers Press.
6.
McBrideK.RosenstielT. (2013). The new ethics of journalism: Principles for the 21st century. Los Angeles: CQ Press.
7.
MeyerPhilip (2002). Precision journalism: A reporter’s introduction to social science methods (4th ed.). Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
8.
ProtessD.CookF. (1992). The journalism of outrage: Investigative reporting and agenda building in America. New York: The Guilford Press.
9.
SampsonC. (2014, November25). What counts as an academic publication? Retrieved on 31January2015, from http://theconversation.com/what-counts-as-an-academic-publication-34549
10.
WeinbergS. (1995). The reporter’s handbook: An investigator’s guide to documents and techniques (3rd ed.). Boston: St. Martin’s Press.
