The descriptive collective case study reported in this article explored the experiences of three music educators who teach students with disabilities in self-contained elementary classroom settings. Utilizing Shaffer’s epistemic frame theory, this study sought to consider how teachers made pedagogical decisions and justified their choices in their teaching situations. Analysis of cross-case data collected through on-site multiday observations, interviews, and researcher memos identified three themes: challenges of planning and delivering instruction, teacher ideology, and developing self-efficacy. In particular, teachers discussed the lack of support for making pedagogical decisions, leaned into their own ideologies about student value and musical capability, highlighted the importance of reflexivity, and talked about ways they have developed self-efficacy in their teaching. Implications for the music education profession are shared in conclusion.
AbramoJ. M.ReynoldsA. (2014). “Pedagogical creativity” as a framework for music teacher education. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 25(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083714543744
2.
AdamekM. S.DarrowA. A. (2005). Music in special education. American Music Therapy Association.
3.
ArmesJ. W.HarryA. G.GrimsbyR. (2022). Implementing universal design principles in music teaching. Music Educators Journal, 109(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/00274321221114869
4.
AzadG. F.MarcusS. C.MandellD. S. (2021). Partners in school: Optimizing communication between parents and teachers of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 31(4), 438–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/10374412.2020.1830100
5.
BartolomeS. J. (2017). Comparing field-teaching experiences: A longitudinal examination of preservice and first-year teacher perspectives. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65, 264–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417730043
6.
BrownL. S.JellisonJ. A. (2012). Music research with children and youth with disabilities and typically developing peers: A systematic review. Journal of Music Therapy, 49(3), 335–364. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/49.3.335
7.
ChenY. (2007). A research procedure and study of elementary music curriculum for children with special needs in inclusive music programs [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Idaho.
8.
ChurchillW. N.BernardC. F. (2020). Disability and the ideology of ability: How might music educators respond?Philosophy of Music Education Review, 28(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.2979/philmusiceducrevi.28.1.03
ConwayC.HolcombA. (2008). Perceptions of experienced music teachers regarding their work as music mentors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429408323073
11.
CulpM. E.SalvadorK. (2021). Characteristics of early childhood and elementary general music methods coursework for preservice music teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 31(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/10570837211024529
12.
DarrowA.-A.AdamekM. (2018). Instructional strategies for the inclusive music classroom. General Music Today, 31(3), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048371318756625
13.
DraperA. R. (2022). Music education for students with autism spectrum disorder in a full-inclusion context. Journal of Research in Music Education, 70(2), 132–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294211042833
14.
DraperE. A. (2019). Creating a meaningful music curriculum for students with disabilities. General Music Today, 33(1), 47–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/10483713198663792
15.
GerrityK. W.HouriganR. M.HortonP. W. (2013). Conditions that facilitate music learning among students with special needs: A mixed-methods inquiry. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(2), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413485428
16.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University Press.
17.
GrimsbyR. (2020). “Anything is better than nothing!” Inservice teacher preparation for teaching students with disabilities. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 29(3), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083719893116
18.
GrimsbyR. (2023). “A meeting of equals”: Music educators and special education paraprofessionals in a community of practice. Research Studies in Music Education, 45(3), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X221078521
19.
HalberstadtA. G.ParkerA. E.CastroV. L. (2013). Nonverbal communication: Developmental perspectives. In HallJ. A.KnappM. L. (Eds.), Handbooks of communication sciences (pp. 93–128). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238150.93
20.
HammelA. M.GerrityK. W. (2012). The effect of instruction on teacher perceptions of competence when including students with special needs in music classrooms. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 31(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123312457882
21.
HoffmanE. C. (2011). The status of students with special needs in the instrumental musical ensemble and the effect of selected educator and institutional variables on rates of inclusion (Publication No. 3465567) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
22.
HollandK.HaegeleJ. A.ZhuX.BobzienJ. (2023). “Everybody wants to be included”: Experiences with “inclusive” strategies in physical education. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 35, 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-022-09852-x
23.
HouriganR. (2009). Preservice music teachers’ perceptions of fieldwork experiences in a special needs classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429409335880
24.
JellisonJ. A.DraperE. A. (2015). Music research in inclusive school settings: 1975–2013. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(4), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429414554808
25.
KellerR. M.GalgayC. E. (2010). Microaggressive experiences of people with disabilities. In SueD. W. (Ed.), Microaggressions and marginality: Manifestation, dynamics, and impact (pp. 241–267). Wiley & Sons.
26.
KlehmM. (2014). The effects of teacher beliefs on teaching practices and achievement of students with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(3), 216–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406414525050
27.
KnappE. J. (2022). “I want to be a better person and a better teacher”: Exploring the constructs of race and dis/ability in a music educator collaborative teacher study group (Publication No. 29170065) [Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
28.
KnappE. J. (2024). “I want to be a better person and a better teacher”: Exploring the constructs of race and dis/ability in a music educator collaborative teacher study group. Journal of Music Teacher Education. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10570837241277778
29.
McCordK. A.WattsE. H. (2010). Music educators’ involvement in the individual education program process and their knowledge of assistive technology. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 28(2), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123310361683
30.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
31.
NashP.ShafferD. W. (2011). Mentor modeling: The internalization of modeled professional thinking in an epistemic game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00385.x
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
34.
PaulsrudD.NilholmC. (2023). Teaching for inclusion–a review of research on the cooperation between regular teachers and special educators in the work with students in need of special support. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(4), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.10808/13603116.2020.1846799
35.
PellegrinoK. (2010). The meanings and values of music-making in the lives of string teachers: Exploring the intersections of music-making and teaching (Publication No. 3429263) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
36.
PhillipsM.Siebert-EvenstoneA.KesslerA.GasevicD.ShafferD. W. (2021). Professional decision making: Reframing teachers’ work using epistemic frame theory. In RuisA. R.LeeS. B. (Eds.), Advances in quantitative ethnography. ICQE 2021. Communications in computer and information science, vol. 1312 (pp. 265–276). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67788-6_18
37.
RegusM.FitzpatrickK. R.GrierS. (2024). “I’ve sat in your seat before”: A study of the experiences of three Black women music educators. Journal of Research in Music Education, 72, 442–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294241229073
38.
RupparA.KurthJ.BubashS.Lockman TurnerE. (2022). A framework for preparing to teach students with extensive support needs in the 21st century. Teacher Education and Special Education, 46(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211059853
39.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage.
40.
SalvadorK. (2010). Who isn’t a special learner? A survey of how music teacher education programs prepare future educators to work with exceptional populations. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 20(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083710362462
41.
SalvadorK. (2015). Music instruction for elementary students with moderate to severe cognitive impairments: A case study. Research Studies in Music Education, 37(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X15613645
42.
ShafferD. W. (2006). How computer games help children learn. Macmillan.
43.
UrbaniJ. M.LePageP.Watson-AlvaradoS. (2024). Building and sustaining a collaborative educational team: Teachers and paraprofessionals. Teaching Exceptional Children, 57, 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599241231215
van ManenM. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Left Coast Press.
46.
VanWeeldenK.MeehanL. (2016). Teaching children with disabilities: Preparation through state music educators association conferences. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 35(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123315582069
47.
VanWeeldenK.WhippleJ. (2007). An exploratory study of the impact of field experiences on music education majors’ attitudes and perceptions of music for secondary students with special needs. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 16, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/10570837070160020105
48.
VanWeeldenK.WhippleJ. (2014). Music educators’ perceived effectiveness of inclusion. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429414530453
49.
YingerO. S.VasilM.RobinsonA. S.JaspersenM. (2022). Universal design for learning in a music camp: Perspectives and musical self-efficacy of children with disabilities. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 42(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233221118905
50.
YingerO. S.VasilM.SheridanA. (2023). Centring perspectives of disabled children in music education research. Music Education Research, 25(4), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2023.2242365
