Inquiry-based learning in music: Indicators and relationships between key pedagogical practices and the quality of critical thinking

Abstract

Many scholars have advocated the addition of more intellectual activities in music classrooms, the most prominent being critical thinking through inquiry. Inquiry-based learning (IBL) has been recognized as necessary for teaching and learning that increases critical thinking skills and dispositions. This study describes an extensive list of indicators that could ascertain the pedagogical practices and intellectual quality of knowledge work indicating the strength of inquiry in music classrooms. It shows the relationships between these indicators that help us understand the enablers and hindrances to critical thinking as an aspect of IBL in music. The article focuses on the Descriptive Statistics results of 114 classroom observations for music at the Primary and Secondary levels, using coding schemes developed in the Singapore Core3-PP project from 2018 to 2020. The results confirm the gap identified in the literature that music classes lack significant inquiry work that would nurture critical thinking skills and dispositions. The findings provide pedagogical insights that can (a) inform educators on how to examine and grow their IBL practice in music lessons; (b) move music education’s objective toward a balanced development of music skills and knowledge construction; (c) develop critical musicality and independent musicianship among students; and (d) provide concrete measures for researchers to design interventions in the areas of teacher learning in IBL.

Keywords

critical musicality critical thinking higher order thinking skills inquiry-based learning music inquiry

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alton-Lee

Nuthall

(1992). A generative methodology for classroom research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 24(2), 29–55.

Bell

(2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39–43.

Bensley

D. A.

(2011). Rules for reasoning revisited: Toward a scientific conception of critical thinking. In Horvath

C. P.

Forte

J. M.

(Eds.), Critical thinking (pp. 1–36). Nova Science Publishers.

Chu

S. K. W.

Reynolds

R. B.

Tavares

N. J.

Notari

Lee

C. W. Y.

(2017). 21st century skills development through inquiry-based learning: From theory to practice. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-981-10-2481-8

Costes-Onishi

(2016). Negotiating the boundaries between the formal and the informal: An experienced teacher’s reflective adaptations of informal learning in a keyboard class for at-risk students. British Journal of Music Education, 33(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051716000140

Costes-Onishi

P. G.

Caleon

(2018). Measuring critical musicality. Music Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2018.1516744

Costes-Onishi

P. G.

Caleon

(2019). Community music-based structures of learning (CoMu-based SL): Artistic thinking and processes. In Costes-Onishi

(Ed.), Artistic thinking in the schools: Toward innovative arts in/education research for future-ready learners (pp. 195–211). Springer.

Costes-Onishi

P. G.

Baildon

Aghazadeh

(2020a). Moving inquiry-based learning forward: A meta-synthesis on inquiry-based classroom practices for pedagogical innovation and school improvement in the humanities and arts. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, 40, 552–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1838883

Costes-Onishi

P. G.

Kwek

Peacock

Ganeson

(2020b). Core 3 research programme: Baseline investigation of subject-domain pedagogies in Singapore’s primary and secondary classrooms (C3-PP): Significant findings for music (P5 and Sec1). National Institute of Education (Singapore), Office of Education Research. https://hdl.handle.net/10497/22930

10.

Davie

(2019). Streaming into Normal and Express in secondary schools to stop in 2024; to be replaced by full subject-based banding. The Straits Times (Singapore). https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/streaming-into-normal-and-express-in-secondary-schools-to-stop-in-2024-to-be

11.

Dewey

(1910). How we think. D. C. Heath & Co.

12.

Dewey

(1934). Art as experience. Penguin Group.

13.

Dewey

(1938a). Experience and education. Touchstone.

14.

Dewey

(1938b). Logic: The theory of inquiry. Henry Holt and Company.

15.

Ennis

R. H.

(1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In Baron

J. B.

Sternberg

R. F.

(Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9–26). Freeman.

16.

Garrett

M. L.

(2013). An examination of critical thinking skills in high school choral rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(3), 303–317.

17.

Glaser

E. M.

(1941). An experiment in the development of critical thinking. Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.

18.

Green

(2008). Music, informal learning and the school: A new classroom pedagogy. Ashgate Publishing.

19.

Halpern

D. F.

(1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(53), 4449–4455.

20.

Halpern

(1992). Effects of historical and analytical teaching approaches on music appreciation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40(1), 39–46.

21.

Hattie

(2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

22.

Hattie

(2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.

23.

Hattie

Timperley

(2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

24.

Haynes

S. N.

Richard

D. C. S.

Kubany

E. S.

(1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247.

25.

Johnson

D. C.

(2011). The effect of critical thinking instruction on verbal descriptions of music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(3), 257–272.

26.

Jorgensen

E. R.

(2012). On informalities in music education. In Bowman

Frega

A. L.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy in music education (pp. 453–471). Oxford University Press.

27.

Kapur

(2011). Temporality matters: Advancing a method for analysing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 39–56.

28.

Kertz-Welzel

(2008). Mendelssohn’s last wish or case studies about aesthetics in music education. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 16(2), 193–209.

29.

Kidman

Casinader

(2017). Inquiry-based teaching and learning across disciplines: Comparative theory and practice in schools. Springer.

30.

Landis

J. R.

Koch

G. G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.

31.

Laprise

(2018). What’s the problem? Exploring the potential of problem-based learning in an ensemble setting. Music Educator’s Journal, 104, 48–53.

32.

Lee

Greene

Odom

Schechter

Slatta

R. W.

(2004). What is inquiry guided learning? In Lee

V. S.

(Ed.), Teaching and learning through inquiry: A guidebook for institutions and instructors (pp. 3–16). Stylus.

33.

Lefstein

Snell

(2014). Better than best practice: Developing dialogic pedagogy. Routledge.

34.

Lewis

B. E.

Schmidt

C. P.

(1991). Listeners’ response to music as a function of personality type. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39(4), 311–321.

35.

Mills

Donnelly

(2001). From the ground up: Creating a culture of inquiry. Heinemann.

36.

Ministry of Education. (2015). Music teaching and learning syllabus (Primary and lower secondary).

37.

Ministry of Education. (2016). Enhancing 21st century competencies in physical education, art and music: PAM research report.

38.

Ministry of Education. (2021). Express course for secondary school. https://www.moe.gov.sg/secondary/courses/express

39.

Payne

(1980). Towards an understanding of music appreciation. Psychology of Music, 8(2), 31–41.

40.

Pedaste

Maeots

Siiman

L. A.

de Jong

van Riesen

S. A. N.

Kamp

E. T.

Tsourlidaki

(2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

41.

Ritchhart

(2001). From IQ to IC: A dispositional view of intelligence. Roeper Review, 23(3), 143–150.

42.

Rourke

Anderson

(2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 5–18.

43.

Schmidt

D. A.

Baran

Thompson

A. D.

Mishra

Koehler

M. J.

Shin

T. S.

(2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.

44.

Schmidt-Jones

(2014). Music Inquiry. Connexions. http://cnx.org/content/col11455/1.4/

45.

Shaw

(2014). How critical is critical thinking? Music Educators Journal, 101(2), 65–70.

46.

Singapore Examination Assessment Board. (2020). About PSLE. https://www.seab.gov.sg/home/examinations/psle/about-psle

47.

Spronken-Smith

W. R. R.

Batchelor

O’Steen

Angelo

(2012). Evaluating student perceptions of learning processes and intended learning outcomes under inquiry approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 57–72.

48.

Väkevä

(2012). The world well lost, found: Reality and authenticity in Green’s “new classroom pedagogy.” In Karlsen

Väkevä

(Eds.), Future prospects for music education: Corroborating informal learning pedagogy (pp. 23–49). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

49.

Woody

R. H. K. J.

Burns

J. J.

(2001). Predicting music appreciation with past emotional responses to music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(1), 57–70.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB