Arts programs are increasingly recognized for their role in promoting student development and cohesive school communities. Yet, most Australian schools are left to navigate a landscape characterized by shifting policy goals and external providers of diverse quality and intent. Drawing on interviews with 27 stakeholders from 19 Catholic primary schools in Melbourne, Australia, we explored key approaches to arts provision in this context, and conditions that hinder and support it. Approaches varied markedly, from school-wide programs embedded across the curriculum, to one-off incursions. Conditions consistently affecting provision ranged from leadership support to a community’s view of the arts. Programs regularly relied on individuals passionate about arts to go beyond their paid roles, yet this frequently jeopardized sustainability. Overall, the approaches identified, and conditions affecting their sustainability, reveal a lack of value for school arts at policy and administration levels. This lack of value is not demonstrated in the provision of other traditional school activities like math or literacy, which begs consideration by policymakers and school administrators.
BaboG. D. (2004). The relationship between instrumental music participation and standardized assessment achievement of middle school students. Research Studies in Music Education, 22(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103x040220010301
4.
BahriS. (2005, October27). Educating through art in secondary education [Conference session]. UNESCO Expert Panel Meeting, Education Through Art, Paris, France.
5.
BaïdakN.HorvathA.SharpC.KearneyC. (2009). Arts and cultural education at school in Europe. Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency
6.
BarrettM. S.FlynnL. M.WelchG. F. (2018). Music value and participation: An Australian case study of music provision and support in Early Childhood Education. Research Studies in Music Education, 40(2), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X18773098
7.
BryceJ.MendelovitsJ.BeavisA.McQueenJ.AdamsI. (2004). Evaluation of school-based arts education programmes in Australian schools. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
8.
CatterallJ.WaldorfL. (1999). Chicago Arts Partnerships in Education summary evaluation. In FiskeE. (Ed.), Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning (pp. 47–62). The Arts Education Partnership and The President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities.
9.
CatterallJ. S. (2009). Doing well and doing good by doing art: A 12-year longitudinal study of arts education–effects on the achievements and values of young adults. Los Angeles, CA: Imagination Group, ISBN 1449904335
10.
CharmazK. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In DenzinD. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed., pp. 507-536). SAGE.
11.
ChristopherD.QingG.PamS. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
12.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19(8), 418–427.
13.
CorrigallK. A.SchellenbergE. G.MisuraN. M. (2013). Music training, cognition, and personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 222.
14.
CrookeA. H. D.McFerranK. S. (2015). Barriers and enablers for implementing music in Australian schools: The perspective of four principals. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 7(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2015/16090
15.
CrookeA. H. D. (2015). Critical reflections on how research design and the attributes of a music program can affect investigations of the psychosocial wellbeing benefits of musical participation in mainstream schools [Doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne]. http://hdl.handle.net/11343/55104
16.
CrookeA.SmythP.McFerranK. S. (2016). The psychosocial benefits of school music: reviewing policy claims. (Journal of Music Research Online), 1-15. http://hdl.handle.net/11343/59174
17.
CrosswellL. J.ElliottR. G. (2004, November). Committed teachers, passionate teachers: The dimension of passion associated with teacher commitment and engagement [Conference session]. Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
DeyI. (2007). Grounding categories. In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 167–190). SAGE.
20.
EwingR. (2010). The Arts and Australian Education: Realising potential. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER Press.
21.
FinlayL. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research and practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230.
22.
FiskeE. (Ed.). (1999). Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning. The Arts Education Partnership and the President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities; South Australian Government.
23.
ForgeardM.WinnerE.NortonA.SchlaugG. (2008). Practicing a musical instrument in childhood is associated with enhanced verbal ability and nonverbal reasoning. PLOS ONE, 3(10), Article e3566. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003566
24.
FullanM. (2005). The meaning of educational change: A quarter of a century of learning. In HargreavesA.LiebermanA.FullanM.HopkinsD. (Eds.), The roots of educational change (pp. 202–216). Springer.
25.
GageN.LowB.ReyesF. L. (2019). Listen to the tastemakers: Building an urban arts high school music curriculum. Research Studies in Music Education, 42(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X19837758
26.
GlaserB. (2009). The novice GT researcher. The Grounded Theory Review, 8(2), 1–22.
27.
HarveyL. (2015). Beyond member-checking: A dialogic approach to the research interview. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(1), 23–38.
28.
HattieJ. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
29.
HoodJ. C. (2007). Orthodoxy vs. power: The defining traits of grounded theory In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 151-164). SAGE.
30.
HunterM. (2005). Education and the arts research overview. Sydney, NSW: Australian Council for the Arts, Australian Government.
31.
KimS.KvernoK.LeeE. M.ParkJ. H.LeeH. H.KimH. L. (2006). Development of a music group psychotherapy intervention for the primary prevention of adjustment difficulties in Korean adolescent girls. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 19(3), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6171.2006.00058.x
32.
LingardB.SellarS.SavageG. C. (2014). Re-articulating social justice as equity in schooling policy: The effects of testing and data infrastructures. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(5), 710–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.919846
33.
MartC. T. (2013). A passionate teacher: Teacher commitment and dedication to student learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 2(1), 442–437.
McFerranK. S.HuntM. (2008). Learning from experiences in action: Music in schools for coping with grief and loss. Educational Action Research, 16(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790701833097
37.
McFerranK. S.CrookeA. H. D. (2014). Enabling Tailored Music Programs in Elementary Schools: An Australian Exemplar. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(4), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v2i4.536
38.
McFerranK. S.CrookeA. H. D.BolgerL. (2017). Promoting engagement in school through tailored music programs. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 18(3), 1–28. http://www.ijea.org/v18n3/
39.
MehrS. A.SchachnerA.KatzR. C.SpelkeE. S. (2013). Two randomized trials provide no consistent evidence for nonmusical cognitive benefits of brief preschool music enrichment. PLOS ONE, 8(12), Article e82007. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082007
40.
MilbrathC.McPhersonG. E.OsborneM. (2015). Artistic development. In MüllerL. S. L. U. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Cognitive processes (2nd ed., pp. 897-928). Wiley & Sons.
41.
Ministry of Education (2012). Yiwu jiaoyu yinyue kecheng biaozhun (Curriculum standards for primary education and junior secondary education: Music). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
42.
NazarioL. C. (2021). Freedom as a trigger for musical creativity. Research Studies in Music Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X20974805
Nöcker-RibaupierreM.WölflA. (2010). Music to counter violence: A preventative approach for working with adolescents in schools. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 19(2), 151–161.
45.
O’TooleJ. (2009). The arts and creativity: A manifesto for schools. In SinclairC.JeanneretN.O’TooleJ. (Eds.), Education in the arts: Teaching and learning in the contemporary curriculum, pp.3–6. Oxford University Press.
46.
RobertsonA. (2009). Beyond music: Comparing extramusical rationales for music education in New South Wales, Australia and Finland. The Finnish Journal of Music Education, 12(2), 79–83.
47.
SA Department of Education & Children’s Services. (2002). ARTSsmart. A strategy for Arts Education in South Australian Schools, 2003–06. Adelaide: South Australian Government.
48.
Santos-LuizC. (2007). The learning of music as a means to improve mathematical skills. In WilliamonA.CoimbraD. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium of Performance Science (pp. 135–140). European Association of Conservatoires.
49.
SarasonS. B. (1996). Series on school reform. Revisiting “The culture of the school and the problem of change.” Teachers College Press.
50.
SchellenbergG. E. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychological Science, 15(4), 511–514.
SchellenbergG. E. (2016). Music and non musical abilities. In McPhersonG. E. (Ed.), The child as musician: A handbook of musical development (pp. 149–176). Oxford University Press.
53.
ShrockR. (2004). The perils they face: Using key texts to prepare passionate teachers for an unfriendly world. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(4), 65–71. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23478652
54.
SidhuR.TaylorS. (2007). Educational provision for refugee youth in Australia: Left to chance?Journal of Sociology, 43(3), 283–300.
55.
SowdenP. T.ClementsL.RedlichC.LewisC. (2015). Improvisation facilitates divergent thinking and creativity: Realizing a benefit of primary school arts education. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 128–138.
56.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE.
57.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1999, November3). Promotion of arts education and creativity at school as part of the construction of a culture of peace [Conference session]. UNESCO 30th General Conference, Paris, France. http://www.unesco.org/education/ecp/art_edu.htm
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). No Child Left Behind. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Secretary.
60.
VitaleJ. L. (2011). Music makes you smarter: A new paradigm? Perceptions and perspectives from four groups of elementary education stakeholders. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 34(3), 317–343.
61.
WisehartR. (2004). Nurturing passionate teachers: Making our work transparent. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(4), 45–53.
62.
YangY. (2014). Principals’ transformational leadership in school improvement. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(3), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2013-0063
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
