Accessing the strategies implemented during real-time musical creative processes represents a challenge for researchers. Retrospective verbal protocol with subjective aided recall (RVPwSAR), where a first-person video is used as an aid to elicit feedback from a subject, has shown great potential for the study of real-time decision-making in sport, therapy, emergency situations, and consumer behavior. This article reviews research methods studying real-time decision-making and discusses the implications of a previous study using RVPwSAR to observe decision-making strategies during musical improvisation. The objective of this article is twofold: (1) to present the contributions and limitations of the RVPwSAR to arrive at a better understanding of the strategies implemented in real-time during musical improvisation; (2) to discuss the potential of the RVPwSAR for studying the strategies implemented in other real-time musical creative tasks. I argue that research where the RVPwSAR is applied may contribute to a better understanding of the strategies used during the real-time musical process, and, ultimately, contribute to the promotion of creative musical teaching and learning.
AlexanderP. A.JudyJ. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 375–404.
2.
AndersonL. W.KrathwohlD. R.BloomB. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
3.
AugustyniakS. (2014). The impact of formal and informal learning on students’ improvisational processes. International Journal of Music Education, 32(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761413502440
4.
BarrettJ. R.RasmussenN. S. (1996). What observation reveals: Videotaped cases as windows to preservice teachers’ beliefs about music teaching and learning. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 130, 75–88.
5.
BeegleA. C. (2010). A classroom-based study of small-group planned improvisation with fifth-grade children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(3), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429410379916
6.
BengtssonS. L.CsíkszentmihályiM.UllénF. (2007). Cortical regions involved in the generation of musical structures during improvisation in pianists. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 830–842.
7.
BennettC. M.MillerM. B. (2010). How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging?Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191(1), 133–155.
8.
BerkowitzA. L. (2009). Cognition in improvisation: The art and science of spontaneous musical performance [Doctoral thesis]. Harvard University.
9.
BerkowitzA. L. (2010). The improvising mind: Cognition and creativity in the musical moment. Oxford University Press.
10.
BerkowitzA. L.AnsariD. (2008). Generation of novel motor sequences: The neural correlates of musical improvisation. NeuroImage, 41(2), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.028
11.
BerkowitzA. L.AnsariD. (2010). Expertise-related deactivation of the right temporoparietal junction during musical improvisation. NeuroImage, 49(1), 712–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.042
12.
BerlinerP. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. University of Chicago Press.
13.
BiasuttiM.FrezzaL. (2009). Dimensions of music improvisation. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2–3), 232–242.
14.
BonneraveJ. (2010). Improviser ensemble. De l’interaction à l’écologie sonore [Improvising together. From interaction to sound ecology]. Tracés. Revue de Sciences humaines, 18, 87–103. https://doi.org/10.4000/traces.4627
15.
BrownK. M.DilleyR.MarshallK. (2008). Using a head-mounted video camera to understand social worlds and experiences. Sociological Research Online, 13(6), 31–40.
BurnardP. (2002). Investigating children’s meaning-making and the emergence of musical interaction in group improvisation. British Journal of Music Education, 19(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051702000244
18.
BurnardP. (2012). Musical creativities in practice. Oxford University Press.
19.
BüttnerO. B.SilbererG. (2008). Video-cued thought protocols: A method for tracing cognitive processes at the point of purchase. In LowreyT. M. (Ed.), Brick & mortar shopping in the 21st century (pp. 221–241). Taylor & Francis.
20.
ChambleeC. (2008). Cognitive processes of improvisation: Performers and listeners in the organ tradition and contemporary gospel styles [Doctoral thesis]. University of Pennsylvania.
21.
ClarkeE. F. (1988). Generative principles in music performance. In SlobodaJ. A. (Ed.), Generative processes in music: The psychology of performance improvisation and composition (pp. 1–26). Clarendon Press.
22.
CropleyA. J. (2011). Definitions of creativity. In RuncoM. A.PritzkerS. R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd ed., pp. 358–368). Academic Press.
23.
de BruinL. R. (2019). The use of cognitive apprenticeship in the learning and teaching of improvisation: Teacher and student perspectives. Research Studies in Music Education, 41(3), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X18773110
24.
DesprésJ.-P.BurnardP.DubéF.StévanceS. (2015). Cadre pédagogique pour l’enseignement-apprentissage de l’improvisation musicale classique fondé sur la pratique des experts du domaine [Pedagogical framework for teaching and learning classical music improvisation based on the practice of experts in the field]. Intersections : Canadian Journal of Music / Intersections : Revue canadienne de musique, 35(2), 3–36.
25.
DesprésJ.-P.BurnardP.DubéF.StévanceS. (2016). Expert improvisers in Western classical music learning pathways. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 167–179.
26.
DesprésJ.-P.BurnardP.DubéF.StévanceS. (2017). Expert western classical music improvisers’ strategies. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(2), 139–162.
27.
DubéF.DesprésJ. P. (2012). Proposition d’un cadre conceptuel pour aider le professeur d’instrument à intégrer l’improvisation musicale à son acte pédagogique [Proposition of a conceptual framework to help the instrument teacher to integrate musical improvisation into his pedagogical practice]. Intersections : Revue canadienne de musique, 32(2), 143–165.
28.
DonnayG. F.RankinS. K.Lopez-GonzalezM.JiradejvongP.LimbC. J. (2014). Neural substrates of interactive musical improvisation: An FMRI study of ‘trading fours’ in jazz. PLOS ONE, 9(2), Article e88665.
29.
EricssonK. A.SimonH. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Revised ed.). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
30.
ForresterS. H. (2018). Music teacher knowledge: An examination of the intersections between instrumental music teaching and conducting. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(4), 461–482.
31.
ForresterS. H. (2019). The evolution and use of verbal protocols in the study of music teacher cognition. Contributions to Music Education, 44, 127–144.
32.
HargreavesD. J.CorkC. A.SettonT. (1991). Cognitive strategies in jazz improvisation: An exploratory study. Canadian Journal of Research in Music Education, 33(1), 47–54.
33.
HocJ. M.LeplatJ. (1983). Evaluation of different modalities of verbalization in a sorting task. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18(3), 283–306.
34.
HsiehS.-C. (2009). Cognition and musical improvisation in individual and group contexts [Doctoral thesis]. Institute of Education, University of London.
35.
HunsakerS. L. (2005). Outcomes of creativity training programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 292–299.
36.
JohanssonK. (2008). Organ improvisation-activity, action and rhetorical practice [Doctoral thesis]. Malmö Academy of Music, Lund University.
37.
JohanssonK. (2011). Organ improvisation: Edition, extemporization, expansion, and instant composition. In HargreavesD.MiellD.MacDonaldR. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance and perception (pp. 220–232). Oxford University Press.
38.
KellerP. E.WeberA.EngelA. (2011). Practice makes too perfect: Fluctuations in loudness indicate spontaneity in musical improvisation. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2011.29.1.109
39.
KennyB. J.GellrichM. (2002). Improvisation. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance (pp. 117–134). Oxford University Press.
40.
KirkmanP. R. (2011). Exploring contexts for development: Secondary music students’ computer-mediated composing. Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 3(2–3), 107–124.
L’ÉcuyerR. (1987). L’analyse de contenu : notion et étapes [Content analysis: notion and steps]. In DeslauriersJ. P. (Ed.), Les méthodes de la recherche qualitative (pp. 49–65). Les Presses de l’Université du Québec.
43.
LemaireP.FabreL. (2005). Strategic aspects of human cognition: Implications for understanding human reasoning. In RobertsM. J.NewtonE. J. (Eds.), Methods of though: Individual differences in reasoning strategies (pp. 11–56).
44.
LimbC. J.BraunA. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An FMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLOS ONE, 3(2), Article e1679.
45.
LiuS.ChowH. M.XuY.ErkkinenM. G.SwettK. E.EagleM. W., . . . BraunA. R. (2012). Neural correlates of lyrical improvisation: An fMRI study of freestyle rap. Scientific Reports, 2, 834.
46.
López-GonzálezM.LimbC. J. (2012). Musical creativity and the brain. Cerebrum: The Dana Forum on Brain Science, 2012, 2.
47.
MackenzieS. H.KerrJ. H. (2012). Head-mounted cameras and stimulated recall in qualitative sport research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 4(1), 51–61.
48.
McPhersonM. J.BarrettF. S.Lopez-GonzalezM.JiradejvongP.LimbC. J. (2016). Emotional intent modulates the neural substrates of creativity: An fMRI study of emotionally targeted improvisation in Jazz musicians. Scientific Reports, 6, 18460.
49.
MendonçaD.WallaceW. A. (2004, August5–7). Cognition in jazz improvisation: An exploratory study [Paper presentation]. 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago, IL, United States.
50.
MenezesJ. M. A. (2010). Creative process in free improvisation [Master’s thesis]. University of Sheffield.
51.
MikszaP.AustinJ. R. (2010). Eyes wide open: High school student reflections on music teaching experiences within a pre-collegiate recruitment program. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 185, 7–20.
52.
MillerA. (2004). Video-cued recall: Its use in a work domain analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 48, 1643–1647.
53.
MonkA. (2013). Symbolic interactionism in music education eight strategies for collaborative improvisation. Music Educators Journal, 99(3), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432112467823
54.
MonsonI. (1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and Interaction. University of Chicago Press.
55.
NardoneP. L. (1996). The experience of improvisation in music: A phenomenological, psychological analysis [Doctoral thesis]. Saybrook Institute.
56.
NielsenS. G. (1999). Learning strategies in instrumental music practice. British Journal of Music Education, 16(3), 275–291.
57.
NorgaardM. (2008). Descriptions of improvisational thinking by artist-level jazz musicians [Doctoral thesis]. The University of Texas at Austin.
58.
NorgaardM. (2011). Descriptions of improvisational thinking by artist-level jazz musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(2), 109–127.
59.
OdendaalA. (2019). Individual differences between the practising behaviours of six pianists: A challenge to Perceptual Learning Style theory. Research Studies in Music Education, 41(3), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X18774365
60.
OmodeiM. M.McLennanJ. (1994). Studying complex decision making in natural settings: Using a head-mounted video camera to study competitive orienteering. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(3Pt 2), 1411–1425.
61.
OmodeiM. M.McLennanJ.WearingA. J. (2005). How expertise is applied in real-world dynamic environments: Head mounted video and cued recall as a methodology for studying routines of decision making. In BetschT.HaberstrohS. (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 271–288). Lawrence Erlbaum.
62.
PelacciaT.TardifJ.TribyE.CharlinB. (2017). A novel approach to study medical decision making in the clinical setting: The “own-point-of-view” perspective. Academic Emergency Medicine, 24(7), 785–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13209
63.
PerkinsR.AufeggerL.WilliamonA. (2015). Learning through teaching: Exploring what conservatoire students learn from teaching beginner older adults. International Journal of Music Education, 33(1), 80–90.
64.
PinhoA. L.de ManzanoÖ.FranssonP.ErikssonH.UllénF. (2014). Connecting to create: Expertise in musical improvisation is associated with increased functional connectivity between premotor and prefrontal areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(18), 6156–6163.
65.
PowellS. R. (2014). Examining preservice music teacher concerns in peer- and field-teaching settings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(4), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413508408
66.
PowellS. R. (2016). The self-authoring of a music educator: A journey through figured worlds. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 210, 25–41.
67.
PressingJ. (1984). Cognitive processes in improvisation. In ChapmanA. J.CrozierW. R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in the perception of art (Vol. 19, pp. 345–363). Elsevier.
68.
PressleyM.HarrisK. R. (2009). Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. Journal of Education, 189(1–2), 77–94.
69.
RichardsonC. P.WhitakerN. L. (1996). Thinking about think alouds in music education research. Research Studies in Music Education, 6(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X9600600105
70.
RixG.BiacheM.-J. (2004). Enregistrement en perspective subjective située et entretien en re situ subjectif: Une méthodologie de constitution de l’expérience [Recording in situated subjective perspective and the subjective re situ interview: A method for the constitution of experience]. Intellectica, 38, 363–396.
71.
Rix-LièvreG.RécopéM.BoyerS.GrimonprezM. (2013, June). Emotion in decision making: The case of sport refereeing [Paper presentation]. 18th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science, Barcelona, Spain. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01120747/
72.
RoweV. (2009). Using video-stimulated recall as a basis for interviews: Some experiences from the field. Music Education Research, 11(4), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800903390766
73.
RuncoM. A. (2001). Creativity and cognition. In SmelserN. J.BaltesP. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 2892–2895). Pergamon.
74.
RuncoM. A. (2011). Tactics and strategies for creativity. In RuncoM. A.PritzkerS. R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd ed., pp. 423–426). Academic Press.
75.
SavvaA.PetrieH.PowerC. (2015). Comparing concurrent and retrospective verbal protocols for blind and sighted users. In AbascalJ.BarbosaS.FetterM.GrossT.PalanqueP.WincklerM. (Eds.), Human-computer interaction (pp. 55–71). Springer.
76.
ScottG.LeritzL. E.MumfordM. D. (2004). Types of creativity training: Approaches and their effectiveness. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(3), 149–179.
77.
SeddonF. A. (2005). Modes of communication during jazz improvisation. British Journal of Music Education, 22(1), 47–61.
78.
SeddonF. A.BiasuttiM. (2010). Strategies students adopted when learning to play an improvised blues in an e-learning environment. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429410369226
SödermanJ.FolkestadG. (2004). How hip-hop musicians learn: Strategies in informal creative music making. Music Education Research, 6(3), 313–326.
81.
SparkesA. C.SmithB. (2012). Embodied research methodologies and seeking the senses in sport and physical culture: A fleshing out of problems and possibilities. Research in the Sociology of Sport, 6, 167–190.
82.
ThompsonS.LehmannA. C. (2004). Strategies for sight-reading and improvising music. In WilliamonA. (Ed.), Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance (pp. 143–159). Oxford University Press.
83.
TrickettS. B.TraftonJ. G. (2009). A primer on verbal protocol analysis. In SchmorrowD.CohnJ.NicholsonD. (Eds.), The PSI handbook of virtual environments for training and education (Vol. 1, pp. 332–346). Praeger Security International.
84.
UnsworthC. A. (2005). Using a head-mounted video camera to explore current conceptualizations of clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(1), 31–40.
85.
ValgeirsdottirD.OnarheimB. (2017). Studying creativity training programs: A methodological analysis. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(4), 430–439.
86.
van den HaakM.De JongM.SchellensP. J. (2003). Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(5), 339–351.
87.
Van SomerenM. W.BarnardY. F.SandbergJ. A. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. Academic Press.
88.
WilliamsA. M.EricssonK. A. (2005). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: Some considerations when applying the expert performance approach. Human Movement Science, 24(3), 283–307.
89.
ZhouK. (2018). What cognitive neuroscience tells us about creativity education: A literature review. Global Education Review, 5(1), 20–34.
