This study examines how piano-accompanied solfège reading practices of preservice music teachers (N = 28) affect their performance on their musical hearing, reading, and writing (MHRW) classes. A pretest–posttest design with control groups was employed. The data were analyzed by 2 × 2 split-plot analysis of variance (ANOVA) and one-way ANOVA. Consequently, a significant difference was not found between the MHRW performance scores of the experimental and control groups. An analysis of mean performance scores revealed that the scores received by the control group were higher than those of the experimental group after the practice. Follow-up interviews that were held with 14 students after the experimental implementation revealed that students believed piano-accompanied courses were more useful, and they felt more comfortable with piano accompaniment. Although MHRW performance scores indicated that piano-accompanied solfège reading practices did not have a significant effect on preservice music teachers’ MHRW performances, it helped them participate in courses more enthusiastically.
AtterburyB. W.SilcoxL. (1993). The effect of piano accompaniment on kindergartners’ developmental singing ability. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 40–47. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3345478
2.
BergonziL. (1997). Effects of finger markers and harmonic context on performance of beginning string students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 197–211. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3345580
3.
BoyleJ. D.LucasK. V. (1990). The effect of context on sightsinging. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 106, 1–9. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318858
4.
BrittinR. V. (2000). Children’s preference for sequenced accompaniments: The influence of style and perceived tempo. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 237–248. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3345396
5.
BrittinR. V. (2002). Instrumentalists’ assessment of solo performances with compact disc, piano, or no accompaniment. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 63–74. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3345693
6.
BurnsR. (2000). Introduction to research methods (4th ed.). Sydney, Australia: Pearson Education.
7.
Costa-GiomiE. (1994). Recognition of chord changes by 4- and 5-year-old American and Argentine children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 68–85. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3345338
8.
EnglishW. H. (1985). The relative effectiveness of the amount of piano accompaniment in beginning strings class instruction (Doctoral dissertation). University of Houston, Houston, TX.
9.
FineP.YoungerH. (2004). Sight-singing performance and piano accompaniment. In LipscombS. D.AshleyR.GjerdingenR. O.WebsterP. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on music perception and cognition: August 3–7, Evanston IL, USA, Northwestern University (pp. 778–781). Adelaide, South Australia, Australia: Casual Productions.
10.
GeringerJ. M. (1978). Intonational performance and perception of ascending scales. Journal of Research in Music Education, 26, 32–40. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3344787
11.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1998). Musicians’ ratings of good versus bad vocal and string performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 522–534. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3345348
12.
GrutzmacherP. A. (1987). The effect of tonal pattern training on the aural perception, reading recognition, and melodic sight-reading achievement of first-year instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 171–181. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3344959
13.
Guelker-ConeL. (1998). The unaccompanied choral rehearsal. Music Educators Journal, 85(2), 17–22. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3399167
14.
GuilbaultD. M. (2004). The effect of harmonic accompaniment on the tonal achievement and tonal improvisations of children in kindergarten and first grade. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 64–76. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3345525
15.
GuilbaultD. M. (2009). The effects of harmonic accompaniment on the tonal improvisations of students in first through sixth grade. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 81–91. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40204952
16.
HairH. I. (1981). Verbal identification of music concepts. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 11–21. doi:10.2307/3344675
17.
HaleM. R. (1977). An experimental study of the comparative effectiveness of harmonic and melodic accompaniment in singing as it relates to the development of a sense of tonality. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 53, 23–30. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40317479
18.
HeddenD. G.BakerV. A. (2010). Perceptual and acoustical analyses of second graders’ pitch-matching ability in singing a cappella or with piano accompaniment. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 184, 35–48. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27861481
19.
HenryM. L. (2004). The use of targeted pitch skills for sight-singing instruction in the choral rehearsal. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 206–217. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3345855
20.
HumphreysJ. T. (1986). Measurement, prediction, and training of harmonic audiation and performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 192–199. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3344748
21.
IlariB.SundaraM. (2009). Music listening preferences in early life: Infants’ responses to accompanied versus unaccompanied singing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 357–369. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40204939
22.
ImbertyM. (1981). Tonal acculturation and perceptual structuring of musical time in children. In Basic musical functions and musical ability: Papers given at a seminar arranged by the Royal Swedish Academy of Music, Stockholm, February 1981 (pp. 107–130). Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Swedish Academy.
23.
KuhnT. L.SimsW. L. (1983). The effect of simultaneous melodic and harmonic accompaniment, pitch level, and song tones on first-grade students’ ability to sing correct pitches. In TallaricoP. T. (Ed.), Contributions to symposium/83: The Bowling Green State University symposium on music teaching & research (pp. 153–167). Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University.
24.
PetzoldR. G. (1966). Auditory perceptions of musical sounds by children in the first six grades (Cooperative Research Project No. 1051). Washington, DC: Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
25.
ShawB.JacksM.SteinR.BlackW. C.BaileyG.NortonD. (1979). The idea bank: Teaching harmonic concepts at the elementary level. Music Educators Journal, 66, 66–68. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3395720
26.
SheldonD. A.ReeseS.GrashelJ. (1999). The effects of live accompaniment, intelligent digital accompaniment, and no accompaniment on musicians’ performance quality. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 251–265. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3345783
27.
StaufferS. L. (1985). An investigation of the effects of melodic and harmonic context on the development of singing ability in primary grade children (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 1862.
28.
SterlingP. (1985). The effects of accompanying harmonic context on vocal pitch accuracy of a melody. Psychology of Music, 13(2), 72–80. doi:10.1177/0305735685132001
