The purpose of this instrumental case study was to observe music educators and special education paraprofessionals (SEPs) in a learning community that examined their perceptions and necessary practices needed to teach music to students with disabilities. The primary question of this study was: How may a community of practice (CoP) offer collaboration and instructional support for music educators and SEPs? Participants found the collaborative nature of the group to be the most beneficial. While instructional practices were moderately impacted, participants’ perceptions of their colleagues were changed. Participants also discovered similarities between their positions and shared concerns over systemic issues in education which impacted their positions within their school communities.
BarresiD. (1993). Training special education teachers and paraprofessionals of developmentally disabled and behaviorally disordered children and youth in applied behavior analysis. Practicum Report, Nova University. https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/5564845
2.
BarryN. (2004). Integrated curriculum and the music teacher: Case studies of four public school elementary music teachers. Contributions to Music Education, 31(2), 57–72. https://www-jstor-org.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/stable/24126993
3.
BattersbyS.VerdiB. (2015). The culture of professional learning communities and connections to improve teacher efficacy and support student learning. Arts Education Policy Review, 116(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10/1080/10632913.2015.970096
4.
Bell-RobertsonC. G. (2014). “Staying on our feet”: Novice music teachers’ sharing of emotions and experiences within an online community. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(4), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413508410
5.
Bell-RobertsonC. G. (2015). Beyond mentoring: A review of literature detailing the need for additional and alternative forms of support for novice teachers. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 33(2), 41–48.
6.
BernardR. (2009). Uncovering pre-service music teachers’ assumptions of teaching, learning, and music. Music Education Research, 11(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800802700974
7.
BrockE.SeamanR. L.DowningC. (2017). Promoting learning for a student with a severe disability through paraprofessional training. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(4), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917729682
8.
BursteinN.SearsS.WilcoxenA.CabelloB.SpagnaM. (2004). Moving toward inclusive practices. Remedial and Special Education, 25(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250020501
9.
CarterN.PraterM. A.JacksonA.MarchantM. (2009). Educators’ perceptions of collaborative planning processes for students with disabilities.Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.54.1.60-70
10.
ConwayC. M. (2008). Experienced music teacher perceptions of professional development throughout their careers. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 176, 7–18. https://www-jstor-org.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/stable/40319429
11.
CulpM. E.SalvadorK. (2021). Music teacher education program practices: Preparing teachers to work with diverse learners. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 30(2), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083720984365
12.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
13.
EtscheidtS. (2005). Paraprofessional services for students with disabilities: A legal analysis of issues. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(2), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.2.60
14.
FisherM.PleasantsS. L. (2012). Roles, responsibilities, and concerns of paraeducators: Findings from a statewide survey. Remedial and Special Education, 33(5), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510397762
15.
FitzpatrickK. (2014). Blogging through the music student teaching experience: Developing virtual communities of practice. Research Studies in Music Education, 36(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X13509350
16.
GfellerK.DarrowA.-A.HeddenS. K. (1990). Perceived effectiveness of mainstreaming in Iowa and Kansas schools. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344929
17.
GhereG.York-BarrJ. (2007). Paraprofessional turnover and retention in inclusive programs: Hidden costs and promising practices. Remedial and Special Education, 28(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280010301
18.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.BroerS. M. (2001). Respect, appreciation, and acknowledgment of paraprofessionals who support students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67(4), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290106700404
19.
GiangrecoM. F.BackusL.CichoskiK. E.ShermanP.MabropoulosY. (2003). Paraeducator training materials to facilitate inclusive education: Initial field-test data. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 22(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051103000104
20.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M.Edelman. (2002). That was then, this is now! Paraprofessional supports for students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptionality, 10(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327035EX1001_4
21.
GrimsbyR. (2018). “Paid babysitter?!,” “musical baggage,” and “patience, please!”: Perceived needs of music educators and paraprofessionals in working with students with special needs [Poster presentation]. Big Ten Academic Alliance Music Conference, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. http://www.btaamusiced.com/
22.
GrimsbyR. (2020). “Anything is better than nothing!” Inservice teacher preparation for teaching students with disabilities.”Journal of Music Teacher Education, 29(3), 77–99. https://doi.10.1177/1057083719893116
23.
HammelA. M.GerrityK. W. (2012). The effect of instruction on teacher perceptions of competence when including students with special needs in music classrooms. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 31(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123312457882
24.
HughesM. T.Valle-RiestraD. M. (2008). Responsibilities, preparedness, and job satisfaction of paraprofessionals: Working with young children with disabilities. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.10080/09669760701516892
25.
MarjerusC.TaylorD. M. (2020). Elementary music teachers’ experiences training and collaborating with paraprofessionals. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 39(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123320935635
26.
MarksS. U.SchraderC.LevineM. (1999). Paraeducator experiences in inclusive settings: Helping, hovering, or holding their own?Exceptional Children, 6(3), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299906500303
27.
MerriamS. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
28.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. SAGE.
29.
PellegrinoK.KastnerJ. D.ReeseJ.RussellH. (2017). Examining the long-term impact of participating in a professional development community of music teacher educators in the USA: An anchor through turbulent transitions. International Journal of Music Education, 36(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761417704214
30.
PellegrinoK.SweetB.KastnerJ. D.RussellH.ReeseJ. (2014). Becoming music teacher educators: Learning from and with each other in a professional development community. International Journal of Music Education, 32(4), 462–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761413515819
31.
RaschdorfT. K. (2015). Informal mentoring relationships: A multiple case study of novice music educators and their mentors (Publication No. 3743715, Doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
32.
SaldañaJ. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
33.
SalvadorK. (2010). Who isn’t a special learner? A survey of how music teacher education programs prepare future educators to work with exceptional populations. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 20(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083710362462
34.
ShawR. D. (2017). I can hardly wait to see what I am going to do today: Lesson planning perspectives of experienced band teachers. Contributions to Music Education, 42, 129–152. https://www-jstor-org.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/stable/26367440
35.
ShelfoK. L. (2007). The status of inclusive education in Maryland school band and orchestra programs(Publication No. 1443417, Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
36.
ShinJ. (2017). Using interactions among in-service music teachers in a graduate programme for teacher support. Music Education Research, 20(1), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2017.1301413
37.
SindbergL. K. (2011). Alone all together- the conundrum of music teacher isolation and connectedness. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 189, 7–22. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.189.0007
38.
SindbergL. K. (2016). Elements of a successful professional learning community for music teachers using comprehensive musicianship through performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64(2), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429416648945
39.
SindbergL. K.LipscombL. (2005). Professional isolation and the public-school music teacher. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 166, 43–56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319279
40.
TilleryC. Y.WertsM. G.RoarkR.HarrisS. (2003). Perceptions of paraeducators on job retention. Teacher Education and Special Education, 26(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640302600205
41.
VanWeeldenK.Heath-ReynoldsJ. (2018, March21–23). Perceptions of paraeducators’ responsibilities and knowledge needed to assist students with special needs in the general music classroom [Paper presentation]. National Research and Music Teacher Education Conference of the National Association for Music Education, Atlanta, GA, United States. https://nafme.org/
42.
VanWeeldenK.MeehanL. (2016). Teaching children with disabilities: Preparation through state music educators association conferences. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 35(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123315582069
43.
VanWeeldenK.WhippleJ. (2005). The effects of field experience on music education majors’ perceptions of music instruction for secondary students with special needs. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 14(2), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/10570837050140020109
44.
VanWeeldenK.WhippleJ. (2014). Music educators’ perceptions of preparation and supports available for inclusion. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 23(2), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083713484585
WallS.DavisK.Winkler-CrowleyA. L.WhiteL. L. (2005). The urban paraeducator goes to college. Remedial and Special Education, 26(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260030601
47.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
48.
WengerE.McDermottR.SnyderW. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Harvard Business School Publishing.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
