The laptop ensemble is a platform that has recently been made possible by computer technology that enables individuals to perform music collaboratively. Research in this area has largely focused on the performance aspects, with very few studies focusing on the development of musical competency through participation in a laptop ensemble. This article reports the findings of a study that assessed the development of participants’ (n = 80) perceived musical and non-musical competencies in a laptop ensemble affiliated to a tertiary institution in Hong Kong. A mixed methods approach consisting of a questionnaire survey and semi-structured interviews was used to investigate their learning experiences. For comparison, the questionnaire was also administered to participants in a conventional acoustic orchestra (n = 80). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the laptop ensemble group to examine the participants’ perceptions of the development of their musical and non-musical competencies. A three-way dependency model was developed based on the findings, which revealed the technologically-oriented aspects of musical and non-musical competency development in the laptop ensemble. Participating in the laptop ensemble fostered students’ ability to develop both musical and technological skills, which fits with the framework of digital musicianship of essential skills for musicians and music educators in the digital era.
BassettP. (2013). Benefits beyond music: Transferable skills for adult life (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Sheffield, UK.
2.
Ben-TalO.SalazarD. (2014). Rethinking the musical ensemble: A model for collaborative learning in higher education music technology. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 7(3), 279–294.
3.
BoothG. (2010). Inclusive interconnections: Towards open-ended parameter-sharing for laptop ensemble (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Huddersfield, UK.
4.
BrownA. R. (2015). Music technology and education: Amplifying musicality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BrownA. R.DillonS. (2012). Collaborative digital media performance with generative music systems. In McPhersonG.WelchG. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education (Volume 2, pp. 549–566). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
ChenC. W. J. (2015). Mobile learning: Using application Auralbook to learn aural skills. International Journal of Music Education, 33, 244–259.
7.
ChengL. (2016, May). Digital musicianship training for classically trained music students in a laptop orchestra. Paper presented at the 22nd International Symposium on Electronic Art, Hong Kong, China.
8.
CrookC. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. London, UK: Routledge.
9.
DemorestS. M. (1998). Improving sight-singing performance in the choral ensemble: The effect of individual testing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(2), 182–192.
10.
DillonS.AdkinsB. A.BrownA. R.HircheK. L. (2009). Communities of sound: examining meaningful engagement with generative music making and virtual ensembles. International Journal of Community Music, 1(3), 357–374.
11.
EngeströmY. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analysing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In EngeströmY.MiettinenR.PunamäkiR. L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377–406). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
13.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J.GrahamW. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274.
14.
HarkerA.AtmadjajaA.BagustJ.FieldA. (2008). The worldscape laptop orchestra: Creating live, interactive digital music for an ensemble of fifty performers. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.
15.
HancockO. (2014). Play-based, constructivist learning of Pure Data: A case study. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 7(1), 93–112.
16.
HuangC.-F.NienW.-P.YehY.-S. (2015). Learning effectiveness of applying automated music composition software in the high grades of elementary school. Computer and Education, 83, 74–89.
17.
HugillA. (2012). The Digital Musician. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
JohnsonE. (2011). Developing listening skills through peer interaction. Music Educators Journal, 98(2), 49–54.
19.
KaschubM.SmithJ. (2014). Music teacher education in transition. In KaschubM.SmithJ. (Eds.), Promising practices in 21st century music teacher education (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Oxford.
20.
KingE.GinsborgJ. (2011). Gestures and glances: Interactions in ensemble rehearsal. In GrittenA.KingE. (Eds.), New perspectives on music and gesture (pp. 177–202). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
21.
KnottsS.CollinsN. (2014). The politics of laptop ensembles: A survey of 160 laptop ensembles and their organizational structures. In CaramiauxB.TahiroğluK.FiebrinkR.TanakaA. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (pp. 191–194). Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK.
KokotsakiD.HallamS. (2007). Higher education music students’ perceptions of the benefits of participative music making. Music Education Research, 9(1), 93–109.
24.
KokotsakiD.HallamS. (2011). The perceived benefits of participative music making for non-music university students: A comparison with music students. Music Education Research, 13(2), 149–172.
25.
LeongS. (2011). Navigating the emerging futures in music education. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 4(2–3), 233–243.
26.
LeongS.ChengL. (2014). Effects of real-time visual feedback on pre-service teachers’ singing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 285–296.
27.
ManarisB.StevensB.BrownA. R. (2016). JythonMusic: An environment for teaching algorithmic music composition, dynamic coding and musical performativity. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 9(1), 33–56.
28.
MuddT. (2012). Developing transferable skills through engagement with higher education laptop ensembles. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 5(1), 29–41.
29.
MullenC.RahnJ. (2010). Introduction. In MullenC.RahnJ. (Eds.), Viewfinding: Perspectives on new media curriculum in the arts (pp. 1–30). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
30.
National Association of Schools of Music. (2014). NASM handbook 2014–15. Reston, VA: Author.
31.
OzcimenA. (2015). Pre-service music teachers’ opinions about the significance of choir lesson. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(7), 879–886.
32.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2011). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/
33.
ParttiH. (2014). Cosmopolitan musicianship under construction: Digital musicians illuminating emerging values in music education. International Journal of Music Education, 32(1), 3–18.
34.
SaritiD. (2007). Ensemble skills: Do we really teach them?American Music Teacher, 56(6), 16–19.
35.
SavageJ. (2009). Hand2Hand and Dot2Dot – developing instruments for the music classroom. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 2(2–3), 141–157.
36.
SmallwoodS.TruemanD.CookP. R.WangG. (2008). Composing for laptop orchestra. Computer Music Journal, 32(1), 9–25.
37.
TruemanD. (2007). Why a laptop orchestra?Organised Sound, 12(2), 171–179.
38.
VlachakisG.KalaentzisA.AkoumianakisD. (2014). Collaborative music composition as virtual work across boundaries. In Proceedings of Telecommunications and Multimedia (TEMU) 2014 Conference (pp. 202–207). Heraklion, Greece: IEEE Computer Press.
39.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
