The primary purposes of this study were (1) to determine the effect of three encoding conditions (singing, playing, studying silently) on participants’ music memorization accuracy; (2) to examine potential differences between choral, jazz, and concert band musicians’ accuracy in completing the music memorization task; and (3) to determine whether ensemble affiliation yielded any performance advantages among the three presentation conditions. Three folk melodies were selected for memorization under the three encoding conditions. Participants (N = 81) had 75 s to commit each melody to memory while studying silently, singing, or playing on a keyboard. Participants then notated the three melodies using conventional staff notation. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures on one factor revealed significant differences based on participants’ ensemble affiliation. A Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) post hoc test revealed the jazz group had higher accuracy scores than the band group. No significant differences were found based on encoding conditions, and no significant interactions were found between the encoding conditions and ensemble groups. The experiment is framed by questions related to memory, reading, and differing notions of literacy.
AzzaraC. D. (1993). Audiation-based improvisation techniques and elementary instrumental students’ music achievement. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 328–342.
2.
BerlinerP. F. (2009). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BernardiN. F.SchoriesA.JabuschH. C.ColomboB.AltenmüllerE. (2012). Mental practice in music memorization: An ecological, empirical study. Music Perception, 30, 275–290. doi:10.1525/mp2012.30.3.275
4.
BoltzM. G. (1999). The processing of melodic and temporal information: Independent or unified dimensions?Journal of New Music Research, 28, 67–79.
5.
BrittinR. V. (2005). Preservice and experienced teachers’ lesson plans for beginning instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 26–39.
6.
BurakoffG.HettrickW. E. (1980). The sweet pipes recorder book: Adult method book 2. Arlington, TX: Sweet Pipes.
7.
CampbellP. S. (2003). Ethnomusicology and music education: Crossroads for knowing music, education, and culture. Research Studies in Music Education, 21, 16–30.
8.
ChoksyL.KodályZ. (1981). The Kodály context: Creating an environment for musical learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
CokerJ.CasaleJ.CampbellG. (1970). Patterns for jazz. Miami, FL: Warner Brothers Publications.
10.
ColtheartM. (1972). Visual information-processing. In DodwellP. C. (Ed.), New horizons in psychology (pp. 62–85). Oxford, UK: Penguin.
11.
CooperJ.KigerN. (2003). Literacy: Helping children construct literacy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
12.
CreechA.PapageorgiI.DuffyC.MortonF.HaddenE.PotterJ.WelchG. (2008). Investigating musical performance: Commonality and diversity among classical and non-classical musicians. Music Education Research, 10, 215–234.
13.
de BruinL. R. (2017). Evolving regulatory processes used by students and experts in the acquiring of improvisational skills: A qualitative study. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65, 483–507. doi:10.1177/0022429417744348
14.
DemorestS. M. (2001). Building choral excellence: Teaching sight-singing in the choral rehearsal. London, England: Oxford University Press.
15.
ElliottD. J. (1995). Music matters: A new philosophy of music education. London, England: Oxford University Press.
16.
EricssonK. A.ChaseW. G. (1982). Exceptional memory: Extraordinary feats of memory can be matched or surpassed by people with average memories that have been improved by training. American Scientist, 70, 607–615.
17.
GaabN.SchlaugG. (2003). The effect of musicianship on pitch memory in performance matched groups. NeuroReport, 14, 2291–2295.
GoldmanA.JacksonT.SajdaP. (2020). Improvisation experience predicts how musicians categorize musical structures. Psychology of Music, 48, 18–34.
20.
GreenL. (2002). How popular musicians learn: A way ahead for music education. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
21.
GrutzmacherP. A. (1987). The effect of tonal pattern training on the aural perception, reading recognition, and melodic sight-reading achievement of first-year instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 171–181.
22.
HalpernA. R.BowerG. H. (1982). Musical expertise and melodic structure in memory for musical notation. The American Journal of Psychology, 95, 31–50.
23.
HarrisR.de JongB. M. (2015). Differential parietal and temporal contributions to music perception in improvising and score-dependent musicians, an fMRI study. Brain Research, 1624, 253–264.
24.
HaywardC. M.GromkoJ. (2009). Relationships among music sight-reading and technical proficiency, spatial visualization, and aural discrimination. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 26–36.
25.
KarpinskiG. S. (2000). Aural skills acquisition: The development of listening, reading, and performing skills in college-level musicians. London, England: Oxford University Press.
26.
KnechtM. G. (2003). Music expertise and memory: The relationship between music expertise and memory of music patterns, within various degrees of contextual constraint. Music Education Research, 5, 227–242.
27.
KopiezR.In LeeJ. (2008). Towards a general model of skills involved in sight-reading music. Music Education Research, 10, 41–62.
28.
LautzenheiserT. (1999). Essential elements for band. Milwaukee, WI: Hal Leonard.
29.
LuceJ. R. (1965). Sight-reading and ear-playing abilities as related to instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 13(2), 101–109.
30.
McPhersonG. E. (1995). Five aspects of musical performance and their correlates. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 127, 115–121.
31.
McPhersonG. E. (1997). Cognitive strategies and skill acquisition in musical performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 133, 64–71.
32.
MillsJ.McPhersonG. E. (2006). Musical literacy. In McPhersonG. E. (Ed.), The child as musician: A handbook of musical development (pp. 177–191). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
MishraJ. (2002). A qualitative analysis of strategies employed in efficient and inefficient memorization. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 152, 74–86.
34.
MishraJ. (2014). Factors related to sight-reading accuracy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61, 452–465.
35.
NettlB. (2013). Contemplating the concept of improvisation and its history in scholarship. Music Theory Online, 19, 1–4.
36.
PinhoA. L.de ManzanoÖ.FranssonP.ErikssonH.UllénF. (2014). Connecting to create: Expertise in musical improvisation is associated with increased functional connectivity between premotor and prefrontal areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 6156–6163.
37.
SerafineM. L. (1988). Music as cognition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
38.
SlobodaJ. A. (1974). The eye-hand span: An approach to the study of sight-reading. Psychology of Music, 2, 4–10.
39.
SlobodaJ. A. (1976). Visual perception of musical notation: Registering pitch symbols in memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 1–16.
40.
SlobodaJ. A. (1985). The musical mind: The cognitive psychology of music. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41.
SlobodaJ. A.ParkerD. H. H. (1985). Immediate recall of melodies. In HowellP.CrossI.WestR. (Eds.), Musical structure and cognition (pp. 143–167). New York, NY: Academic Press.
42.
SmithB.SataloffR. T. (2013). Choral pedagogy. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
43.
SnyderB. (2000). Music and memory: An introduction. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
44.
SteinelM. (2000). Essential elements-jazz. Milwaukee, WI: Hal Leonard.
45.
TervaniemiM.JanhunenL.KruckS.PutkinenV.HuotilainenM. (2015). Auditory profiles of classical, jazz, and rock musicians: Genre-specific sensitivity to musical sound features. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1900.
46.
WatkinsK. T. (2011). An analysis of select beginning band method books and the level to which they address the national standards for music education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus.
WishD.SpeicherC.ZellnerR.HejnaK. (2015). Music as a second language & the modern band movement. Verona, NJ: Little Kids Rock.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
