The purpose of this article is to use the lens of the author’s teaching experience to examine the complexities and understand the difficulties involved in transforming instructional practices in secondary schools in the USA. The study is an autoethnography, which is a research approach that examines personal experiences to understand how beliefs are shaped and thereby allow us to interpret our work and the world in a meaningful manner. The paper reviews concerns that critics have expressed regarding the difficulties of reforming large ensemble music instruction in secondary schools. The author’s experiences in attempting to transform his own practice suggest that unexamined underlying values, axioms and power relationships inhibit meaningful change and reform in public school music education. Lessons from testing reform-based ideas by actually working with students and teachers in secondary settings provide insights into the intransient nature of school music practice. The article concludes with suggestions as to how reform and transformation might be realized.
AllsupR. E. (2002). Crossing over: Mutual learning and democratic action in instrumental music education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Teachers College Columbia University, New York, NY.
2.
AllsupR. A. (2012). The moral ends of band. Theory Into Practice, 51(3), 179–187. doi: 10.1080/00405841.2012.690288
3.
AllsupR. A.BenedictC. (2008). The problems of band: An inquiry into the future of instrumental music education. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 16(2), 156–173.
4.
BenhamJ. L. (2011). Music advocacy: Moving from survival to vision. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
BudianskyS. (2005a, January30). The kids play great but that music…. Washington Post, p. B3. Retrieved from http://www.budiansky.com/wpost.html
BudianskyS.FoleyT. W. (2005). The quality of repertoire in school music programs: Literature review, analysis, and discussion. Journal of the World Association for Symphonic Bands and Ensembles, 12, 17–39.
8.
ClementsA. C. (2010). Alternative approaches in music education: Case studies from the field. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
9.
CollinsC. L.WellsJ. (2014). Professional notes: 21st-century ensembles−−What we imagine, we can become!Music Educators Journal, 100, 18.
10.
DenzinN. K. (2014). Interpretative autoethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
ElliottD. J. (1994). Music, education, and schooling. In McCarthyM. (Ed.), Winds of change: A colloquium with Charles Fowler and David J. Elliott. New York, NY: American Council for the Arts.
12.
EllisC.AdamsT. E.BochnerA. P. (2010). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 10. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101108
13.
FergusonL. (2006, April). Methods class preparation for teaching popular ensembles and reluctant middle school students. Paper presented at the National MENC Conferences, Salt Lake City, UT.
14.
FriedR. LSarasonS. B. (2003). The skeptical visionary: A Seymour Sarason educational reader. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
15.
FonderM. (2014). No default or reset necessary—Large ensembles enrich many. Music Educators Journal, 101(2), 89. doi: 10.1177/0027432114553776
16.
GarafaloR. J. (1972). Guides to band masterworks. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Meredith Music.
17.
GreenL. (2002). How popular musicians learn. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
18.
HalpernD. F. (2000). Dissing science: Selling scientifically based educational practices to a nation that distrusts science. In PhyeG. D.RobinsonD.LevinJ. (Eds.), Empirical methods for evaluating educational interventions (pp. 60–61). Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
19.
HeuserF. (2014). Juxtapositional pedagogy as an organizing principle in university music education programs. In. KaschubM.SmithJ. (Eds.), Promising practices in 21st century music teacher education (pp. 105–124). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
JorgensenE. (2003). Transforming music education. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
21.
JungC. G. (1969). The archetypes and the collective unconscious (HullR. F. C., Trans.). New York, NY: Princeton University Press.
22.
KaschubM.SmithJ. (Eds.). (2014). Promising practices in 21st century music teacher education. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
KratusJ. (2007). Music education at the tipping point. Music Educators Journal, 94(2), 42–48.doi: 10.1177/002743210709400209
24.
LabutaJ. A. (1972). Teaching musicianship in the high school band. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Meredith Music.
25.
LaineK. (2007). American band: Music, dreams, and coming of age in the heartland. New York, NY: Gotham Books.
26.
LiperoteK. A. (2006). Audiation for beginning instrumentalists: Listen, speak, read, write. Music Educators Journal, 93(1), 46–52.
27.
MantieR. (2012). Bands and/as music education: Antinomies and the struggle for legitimacy. Philosophy of Music Education review, 20(1), 63–81. doi: 10.1353/pme.2012.0007
28.
MantieR.TuckerL. (2012). Pluralism, the right and the good in choirs, orchestras and bands. International Journal of Music Education, 30, 260–271.
29.
MarkM. (1996). Contemporary music education. New York, NY: Schirmer.
30.
McGillenC. (2007). The whiz bang orkestra: An alternative approach to band classes and classroom ensembles. Australian Journal of Music Education, 1, 17–28.
31.
McPhersonG. E.GabrielssonA. (2002). From sound to sign. In ParncuttR. (Ed.), The science and psychology of music performance (pp. 99–116). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
MeskeE. B. (1982). Educating the music teacher: Participation in a metamorphosis. In CowellR. (Ed.), Symposium in music education (pp. 249–268). Urbana: University of Illinois.
33.
MyersD. (2009, September). Contemplating values in music teacher education: Can we achieve what we believe?Keynote address presented at the Symposium on Music Teacher Education, the Society for Music Teacher Education, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC.
34.
MezirowJ. (2000). Learning as transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35.
MoonK.HumphreysJ. T. (2010). The Manhattanville music curriculum program: 1966–1970. Journal of Historical Research in Music Education, 31, 75–98.
36.
OakesE. T. (2000). Philosophy in an old key. First Things, 108, 27–34.
SarasonS. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it’s too late?San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39.
SarasonS. B. (1996). Revisiting “The culture of the school and the problem of change”. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
40.
SindbergL. (2012). Just good teaching: Comprehensive musicianship through performance in theory and practice. Sinsinawa, WI: Rowan & Littlefield.
41.
SindbergL.LipscombS. D. (2005). Professional isolation and the public school music teacher. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 166, 43–56.
42.
ThomasR. B. (1970). Manhattanville music curriculum program: Final report (ERIC Number: ED045865). Purchase, NY: Manhattanville College of the Sacred Heart.
43.
TraharS. (2009). Beyond the story itself: Narrative inquiry and autoethnography in intercultural research in higher education. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1), Art. 30. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1218/2653
44.
WillsonM. (1957). Seventy-six trombones. New York, NY: Meredith Willson Music.
45.
WilliamsD. A. (2011). The elephant in the room. Music Educators Journal, 98(1), 51–57. doi: 10.1177/0027432111415538
46.
WinnW. (1993). Perception principles in instructional message design. In FlemingM.LevieW. H. (Eds.), Instructional message design: Principles from behavioral and cognitive sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
