The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of closed and opened setup conditions on students’ and teachers’ reported immediacy, affect, motivation, and group cohesion in band and orchestra classrooms. A secondary purpose was to explore relationships among students’ and teachers’ reported immediacy, affect, motivation, and group cohesion. Six teachers and 379 of their students participated in the study. In this within-subjects experiment, teachers were asked to teach with their classrooms arranged in closed and opened setup conditions. In the closed condition, teachers used a traditional setup of arcs and were not asked to change their use of space when teaching. In the opened condition, an aisle was added to the ensemble setup and teachers were provided with strategies to encourage movement toward and among students when teaching. At the end of each condition, teachers and students completed measures of constructs related to immediacy, affect, motivation, and group cohesion. Results indicate the effect of the intervention increased negative affect among students, teacher proximity was associated with negative affect among students, and students’ perceptions of their teacher’s immediacy was found to have positive relationships with student affect, motivation, and group cohesion.
AndersenJ. F. (1978). The relationship between teacher immediacy and teaching effectiveness (UMI No. 7900859) [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database.
2.
AndersenJ. F.NortonR. W.NussbaumJ. F. (1981). Three investigations exploring relationships between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 30(4), 377–392. http://doi.org/10.1080/03634528109378493
3.
AxelrodS.HallR. V.TamsA. (1979). Comparison of two common classroom seating arrangements. Academic Therapy, 15(1), 29–36. http://doi.org/10.1177/105345127901500103
4.
BaringerD. K.McCroskeyJ. C. (2000). Immediacy in the classroom: Student immediacy. Communication Education, 49(2), 178–186. http://doi.org/10.1080/03634520009379204
5.
BenedictM. E.HoagJ. (2004). Seating location in large lectures: Are seating preferences or location related to course performance?The Journal of Economic Education, 35(3), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.35.3.215-231
6.
BrewerW. D.RickelsD. A. (2014). A content analysis of social media interactions in the Facebook band directors group. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 201, 7–22. http://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.201.0007
7.
BurgessB.KayaN. (2007). Gender differences in student attitude for seating layout in college classrooms. College Student Journal, 41(4), 940–947.
8.
ByoJ. L.AustinK. R. (1994). Comparison of expert and novice conductors: An approach to the analysis of nonverbal behaviors. Journal of Band Research, 30(1), 11–34.
9.
CarronA. V.WidmeyerW. N.BrawleyL. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sports teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.7.3.244
10.
ChesebroJ. L. (2003). Effects of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy on student learning, receiver apprehension, and affect. Communication Education, 52(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520302471
11.
ChristophelD. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39(4), 323–340. http://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378813
12.
ComadenaM. E.HuntS. K.SimondsC. J. (2007). The effects of teacher clarity, nonverbal immediacy, and caring on student motivation, affective, and cognitive learning. Communication Research Reports, 24(3), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090701446617
13.
ComstockJ.RowellE.BowersJ. W. (1995). Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity. Communication Education, 44(3), 251–266. http://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509379015
14.
DavisV. W. (2006). Beginning music education students’ and student teachers’ opinions of skills and behaviors important to successful music teaching. Contributions to Music Education, 33(1), 27–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24127198
15.
FrymierA. B. (1993). The impact of teacher immediacy on students’ motivation: Is it the same for all students?Communication Quarterly, 41(4), 454–464. http://doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369905
16.
GoodboyA. K.WeberK.BolkanS. (2009). The effects of nonverbal and verbal immediacy on recall and multiple student learning indicators. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 44(1), 4–12. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23869286
17.
GorhamJ.CohenS. H.MorrisT. L. (1997). Fashion in the classroom II: Instructor immediacy and attire. Communication Research Reports, 14(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099709388641
18.
GorhamJ.CohenS. H.MorrisT. L. (1999). Fashion in the classroom III: Effects of instructor attire and immediacy in natural classroom interactions. Communication Quarterly, 47(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379909385560
19.
HeslerM. W. (1972). An investigation of instructor use of space (UMI No. 64125687) [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database.
20.
KalinowskiS.TaperM. L. (2007). The effect of seat location on exam grades and student perceptions in an introductory biology class. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(4), 54–57.
KurkulW. W. (2007). Nonverbal communication in one-to-one music performance instruction. Psychology of Music, 35(2), 327–362. http://doi.org/10.1177/0305735607070385
23.
LevasseurS. J. (1994). Nonverbal communication in the applied voice studio (UMI No. 9432541) [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
24.
MartinS. H. (2002). The classroom environment and its effects on the practice of teachers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1–2), 139–156. http://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0239
25.
MarxA.FuhrerU.HartigT. (1999). Effects of classroom seating arrangements on children’s question-asking. Learning Environments Research, 2(3), 249–263. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009901922191
26.
MatthewsW. K.KitsantasA. (2007). Group cohesion, collective efficacy, and motivational climate as predictors of conductor support in music ensembles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940705500102
27.
MontelloD. R. (1988). Classroom seating location and its effect on course achievement, participation, and attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 8, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(88)80005-7
28.
ParkerT.HoopesO.EggettD. (2011). The effect of seat location and movement or permanence on student-initiated participation. College Teaching, 59(2), 79–84. http://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2010.538766
PerkinsK. K.WiemanC. E. (2005). The surprising impact of seat location on student performance. The Physics Teacher, 43, 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1845987
31.
PogueL. L.AhyunK. (2006). The effect of teacher nonverbal immediacy and credibility on student motivation and affective learning. Communication Education, 55(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520600748623
32.
PriceH. E.WinterS. (1991). Effect of strict and expressive conducting on performances and opinions of eighth-grade band students. Journal of Band Research, 27(1), 30–43.
33.
RichmondV. P.GorhamJ. S.McCroskeyJ. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. Annals of the International Communication Association, 10(1), 574–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1987.11678663
34.
RichmondV. P.McCroskeyJ. C.JohnsonA. D. (2003). Development of the Nonverbal Immediacy Scale (NIS): Measures of self-and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 51(4), 504–517. http://doi.org/10.1080/01463370309370170
35.
RosethN. E. (2020). A survey of secondary instrumental teachers’ immediacy, ensemble setup, and use of classroom space in Colorado and Indiana. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68(3), 305–327. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420944227
36.
SchwebelA. I.CherlinD. L. (1972). Physical and social distancing in teacher-pupil relationships. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(6), 543–550. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0034081
37.
TeachoutD. J. (1997). Preservice and experienced teachers’ opinions of skills and behaviors important to successful music teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(1), 41–50. http://doi.org/10.2307/3345464
38.
TitsworthB. S. (2001). The effects of teacher immediacy, use of organization lecture cues, and students’ notetaking on cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50(4), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520109379256
39.
VanWeeldenK. (2002). Relationships between perceptions of conducting effectiveness and ensemble performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(2), 165–176. http://doi.org/10.2307/3345820
40.
WangW. (2001). Verbal versus nonverbal communication in music performance instruction. Contributions to Music Education, 28(1), 41–60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24126965
41.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
42.
WheldallK.MorrisM.VaughanP.NgY. Y. (1981). Rows versus tables: An example of the use of behavioural ecology in two classes of eleven-year-old children. Educational Psychology, 1(2), 171–184. http://doi.org/10.1080/0144341810010206
43.
WittP. L.WheelessL. R. (2001). An experimental study of teachers’ verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students’ affective and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50(4), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520109379259
44.
YarbroughC. (1975). Effect of magnitude of conductor behavior on students in selected mixed choruses. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23(2), 134–146. http://doi.org/10.2307/3345286
45.
YarbroughC.PriceH. E. (1981). Prediction of performer attentiveness based on rehearsal activity and teacher behavior. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29(3), 209–217. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3344994
46.
ZhukovK. (2012). Interpersonal interactions in instrumental lessons: Teacher/student verbal and non-verbal behaviours. Psychology of Music, 41(4), 466–483. http://doi.org/10.1177/0305735611430434
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
