The persistence of young men in choral singing activity has been widely studied in North America, with emerging parallel research in Europe (Freer, 2013; Harrison & Welch, 2012). There has been little such research in Asia. This study, of 12 young men enrolled in Singapore’s pre-university schools, collected both written narratives and drawn imagery to explore participants’ musical identities, perceptions of choral singing, and reasons for continued or discontinued participation in choral music. The report details the analytical methods used for understanding the visual imagery (Kress & van Leeuwen, 2006). Four a priori hypotheses were developed based on relevant, existing literature (Bell, 2001). Findings of the study related to these hypotheses were as follows: 1) individual decisions to enrol in choral music were mediated by peer influence; 2) individual decisions to remain or withdraw from choral singing were influenced by the perception of both individual vocal skills and musical issues within the ensemble; 3) there was no stated relationship between choral music and either masculinity or sexuality; and 4) there was no stated impact of the adolescent changing voice on choral participation or self-perception as a singer.
AbrahamsF. (2012). Changing voices, voices of change: Young men in middle school choirs. In HarrisonS.WelchG. (Eds.), Perspectives on males and singing (pp. 79–93). New York, NY: Springer.
2.
AbshireJ. (2011). The history of Singapore. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood.
3.
AllsupR. E. (2012). The moral ends of band. Theory into Practice, 51(3), 179–187.
4.
AllsupR. E.BenedictC. (2008). The problems of band: An inquiry into the future of instrumental music education. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 16(2), 156–173.
5.
BellP. (2001). Content analysis of visual imagery. In van LeeuwenT.JewittC. (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 10–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
ElorriagaA. (2011). The construction of male gender identity through choral singing at a Spanish secondary school. International Journal of Music Education, 29(4), 318–332.
8.
FreerP. K. (2009). “I’ll sing with my buddies”: Fostering the possible selves of male choral singers. International Journal of Music Education, 27(4), 341–355.
9.
FreerP. K. (2012). The successful transition and retention of boys from middle school to high school choral music. Choral Journal, 52(10), 8–17.
10.
FreerP. K. (2013, February). Perceptions of European adolescent boys about their singing and vocal music instruction in schools. Research paper presented for the biennial meeting of the European Association for Music in Schools/ISME European Regional Conference, Leuven, Belgium.
11.
FreerP. K.BennettD. (2012). Developing musical and educational identities in university music students. Music Education Research, 14(3), 265–284.
12.
FreerP. K.VerverisA. (2011). H μϵταφώνηση των αγoριών και ηχoρωδιακή μoυσική ϵκπαίδϵυση στις HΠA [Methaphonisi and choral music education in the United States: Research and philosophical perspectives]. MOYΣIKOΠAIΔAΓΩΓIKA [Musical Pedagogics], 9, 5–23.
13.
GlaserB. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
14.
GlaserB. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23–38.
15.
HarrisonS.WelchG. (Eds.). (2012). Perspectives on males and singing. New York, NY: Springer.
16.
Herman-GiddensM. E.SteffesJ.HarrisD.SloraE.HusseyM.DowshenS. A.ReiterE. O. (2012). Secondary sexual characteristics in boys: Data from the pediatric research in office settings network. Pediatrics, 130(5), e1058–e1068.
17.
JewittC.OyamaR. (2001). Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In van LeeuwenT.JewittC. (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 134–156). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
KennedyM. A. (2002). “It’s cool because we like to sing”: Junior high school boys’ experience of choral music as an elective. Research Studies in Music Education, 18, 24–34.
19.
KratusJ. (2007). Music education at the “tipping point.”Music Educators Journal, 94(2), 42–48.
20.
KressG.van LeeuwenT. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London, UK: Routledge.
21.
KressG.van LeeuwenT. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
22.
MarkusH.NuriusP. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.
TanA. G.YeeW. C. F. (2003). An exploratory study on Singaporean secondary school students’ perceptions of choral learning. Asia Pacific Education Review, 4(2), 161–169.
28.
TanA. N. H. (2005). The role and responsibility of a secondary school choral director (Unpublished master’s thesis). Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
29.
TanL. L. H. (2000). A study on the status of choral activities in secondary schools in Singapore (Unpublished master’s thesis). Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
30.
TingC. S.LeongY. P.TanB. (1990). Singapore. In RykerH. (Ed.), New music in the Orient (pp. 97–114). Buren, the Netherlands: Frits Knuf.
31.
TohB. S. (2011). A choral miracle on our tiny island: Singapore choirs. International Choral Bulletin, 30(2), 14–17.
32.
van CampL. (1987). The choral crisis and a plan for action (an open letter to my colleagues). Choral Journal, 28(5), 15–20.
33.
WilliamsD. A. (2011). The elephant in the room. Music Educators Journal, 98(1), 51–57.
34.
YeeW. C. F. (2003). Student perceptions of choral learning environment (Unpublished master’s thesis). Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
