Grounded in discard studies and space-attentive discourse studies, this article reports a social semiotic analysis of the Throwaway exhibition at the Museum of European History in Brussels, Belgium (2023–2024). Paying particular attention to the exhibition’s compositional and interactive meanings, my analysis documents how waste and waste-making are narrated through a range of different visual-material-spatial resources; for example, diegetic and extra-diegetic framing, informational value and salience; stylistic and aesthetic choices; and tactile, auditory and interactive formats. As a form of public pedagogy, Throwaway encodes a contradictory way of (un)knowing waste whereby its core instructional objective of engagement is unhelpfully undermined by its disengaging design. Methodologically speaking, the article makes the case for reading exhibitions as multimodal, spatial texts rather than over-attending to their obvious representational content.
AielloG. (2012). All Tögethé® now: The recontextualization of branding and the stylization of diversity in EU public communication. Social Semiotics, 22(4), 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2012.693291
AllonF.BarcanR.Eddison-CoganK. (2021). Out of joint: The time of waste. In AllonF.BarcanR.Eddison-CoganK. (Eds.), The temporalities of waste: Out of sight, out of time (pp. 1–17). Routledge.
BarnesT. J.DuncanJ. S. (Eds.). (1992). Writing worlds: Discourse, text, and metaphor in the representation of landscape. Routledge.
6.
BarrS. (2006). Environmental action in the home: Investigating the “value-action” gap. Geography, 91(1), 43–54.
7.
BlackwoodR.TufiS.AmosW. (Eds.). (2024). The Bloomsbury handbook of linguistic landscapes. Bloomsbury.
8.
BucholtzM.HallK. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
9.
CavanaughJ. R. (2022). Trash talk: Language as waste practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26(3), 404–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12546
10.
DavisH. (2022). Plastic matter. Duke University Press.
11.
DiamantopoulouS.ChristidouD.BlundenJ. (2024). Multimodality and museums: Innovative research methods and interpretive frameworks. Multimodality & Society, 4(3), 249–258.
12.
DupontC.GonçalvesS.TeworteE. (2022). Throwaway: The history of a modern crisis. Publications Office of the European Union.
13.
FaircloughN. (2003). Intertextuality and assumptions. In Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research (pp. 89–90). Routledge.
14.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (GordonC., Ed.). Pantheon Books.
15.
GilleZ. (2007). From the cult of waste to the trash heap of history: The politics of waste in socialist and postsocialist Hungary. Indiana University Press.
16.
GirouxH. A. (2004). Cultural studies, public pedagogy, and the responsibility of intellectuals. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 1(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/1479142042000180926
17.
GregsonN. (2023). The waste of the world: Consumption, economies and the making of the global waste problem. Bristol University Press.
18.
HallidayM. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. University Park Press.
19.
HawkinsG. (2006). The ethics of waste: How we relate to rubbish. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
20.
HawkinsG.MueckeS. (2003). Introduction: The cultural economies of waste. In HawkinsG.MueckeS. (Eds.), Culture and waste: The creation and destruction of value (pp. ix–xvii). Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
HuberM. T. (2019). Ecological politics for the working class. Catalyst, 3(1), 7–45.
JuffermansK. (2019). Micro-landscapes and the double semiotic horizon of mobility in the Global South. In PeckA.StroudC.WilliamsQ. (Eds.), Making sense of people and place in linguistic landscapes (pp. 201–222). Bloomsbury.
24.
KosaticaM. (2019). Sarajevo’s War Childhood Museum: A social semiotic analysis of “combi-memorials” as spatial texts. In BlackwoodR.MacalisterJ. (Eds.), Multilingual memories: Monuments, museums and the linguistic landscape (pp. 161–184). Bloomsbury.
25.
KressG.SelanderS. (2012). Introduction to the special issue on museum identities, exhibition designs and visitors’ meaning-making. Designs for Learning, 5(1–2), 6–10.
26.
KressG.van LeeuwenT. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
27.
LabovW. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In LabovW. (Ed.), Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular (pp. 354–396). University of Pennsylvania Press.
28.
LatourB. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.
29.
LefebvreH. (1991). The production of space (Nicholson-SmithD., Trans.). Blackwell. (Original work published 1974)
30.
LiboironM.LepawskyJ. (2022). Discard studies: Wasting, systems, and power. MIT Press.
31.
LindstrandF.InsulanderE. (2012). Setting the ground for engagement: Multimodal perspectives on exhibition design. Designs for Learning, 5(1–2), 30–49.
32.
MasseyD. (2005). For space. Sage.
33.
McMurtrieR. J. (2017). The semiotics of movement in space: A user’s perspective. Routledge.
O’HareP. (2022). Rubbish belongs to the poor: Hygienic enclosure and the waste commons. Pluto Press.
36.
PellandaA. (2025). Garbage day as dispositive and semiotic landscape: A visual essay. Linguistic Landscape, 11(1), 32–46.
37.
PereiraA. (2018). Exploring the multimodal argument: The interplay of multimodality and attention economy. Pedagogies, 13(3), 201–221.
38.
PerryM.JuhlinO.NormarkD. (2010). Laying waste together: The shared creation and disposal of refuse in a social context. Space and Culture, 13(1), 75–94.
39.
Pimentel FuentesF. E. (2023). Heritage and waste in the Anthropocene: A museum perspective on environmental and social complexities. Curator: The Museum Journal, 67(1), 301–308.
40.
PortusR.Aarnio-LinnanvuoriE.DillonB.FahyF.GopinathD.Mansikka-AhoA.McEwenL. (2024). Exploring the environmental value action gap in education research: A semi-systematic literature review. Environmental Education Research, 30(6), 833–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2314060
41.
RavelliL. (2006). Extending the frameworks: Understanding exhibitions and museums as texts. In Museum texts: Communication frameworks (pp. 119–148). Routledge.
42.
RavelliL. J.McMurtrieR. J. (2016). Multimodality in the built environment: Spatial discourse analysis. Routledge.
43.
RenoJ. O. (2014). Toward a new theory of waste: From “matter out of place” to signs of life. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(6), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414537310
44.
RenoJ. O. (2016). Waste away: Working and living with a North American landfill. University of California Press.
RoppolaT. (2012). Designing for the museum visitor experience. Routledge.
47.
ScanlanJ. (2005). Garbage aesthetics. In On garbage (pp. 89–119). Reaktion Books.
48.
ScheinR. H. (1997). The place of landscape: A conceptual framework for interpreting an American scene. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87(4), 660–680.
49.
ScollonR.ScollonS. W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. Routledge.
50.
SmithS. P. (2025). Visual essay: “Banal sustainability.” In KosaticaM.SmithS. P. (Eds.), Framing sustainability in language and communication (pp. 23–35). Routledge.
51.
StenglinM. (2008). Binding: A resource for exploring interpersonal meaning in three-dimensional space. Social Semiotics, 18(4), 425–447.
52.
StöcklH.TseronisA. (2024). Multimodal rhetoric and argumentation: Applications, genres, methods. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 13(2), 167–176.
53.
StrasserS. (1999). Waste and want: A social history of trash. Metropolitan Books.
54.
ThompsonM. (1979). Rubbish theory: The creation and destruction of value. Oxford University Press.
55.
ThurlowC. (2022). Rubbish? Envisioning a sociolinguistics of waste. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26(3), 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12545
56.
ThurlowC. (2025). Seeing through sustainability and the wasteful rhetorics of (un)knowing. In KosaticaM.SmithS. P. (Eds.), Framing sustainability in language and communication (pp. 259–273). Routledge.
57.
ThurlowC.PellandaA.WohlgemuthL. (2022). The discursive chronotopes of waste: Temporal laminations and linguistic hauntings. Language in Society, 51(5), 819–837.
58.
van LeeuwenT. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. Routledge.
