The many ways in which culture is spatially structured and formatted through space, as well as how spaces become places of culture, is routinely explored within social sciences, and especially in the journal Space and Culture. Yet how culture itself changes via the medium of space remains a neglected topic. This persistent absence could be tied to the fact that social change itself is a thoroughly temporal concept. Although social science disciplines including urban geography, sociology, cultural studies, studies of time-space, architectural theory, ethnography, media and urban studies, or environmental studies refer a great deal to social change, it has not yet been possible to design the category of change in a way that the spatial structuring inherent to processes of change is clearly emphasized or examined. This special collection seeks to address this omission by exploring how urban culture is changing spatially. This is not a question of deducing how spatial arrangements are merely an expression of social change. Instead, the contributions in this collection start from the assumption that changes in these spatial arrangements instigate and implement wider and more extensive social transformation.
AlatasS. F. (2017). Max Weber (1864–1920). In AlatasS. F.SinhaV. (Eds.), Sociological theory beyond the canon (pp. 113–142). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41134-1_5
2.
BaradK. M. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
3.
BenfordR. D.SnowD. (2000). Framing process and social movements. An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
4.
BhambraG. K. (2019). European colonial entanglements. Questions of historical sociology and progress. In BurzanN. (Ed.), Komplexe Dynamiken globaler und lokaler Entwicklungen. Verhandlungen des 39. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Göttingen 2018. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. https://publikationen.soziologie.de/index.php/kongressband_2018/article/view/1194
5.
BlumerH. (2005). Society as symbolic interaction. In HierS. P. (Ed.), Contemporary sociological thought. Themes and theories (pp. 91–100). Canadian Scholars’ Press.
6.
BrowneC. (2015). Change is central to sociology. In BammerG. (Ed.), Change! Combining analytic approaches with street wisdom (pp. 55–80). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/CCAASW.07.2015.05
7.
Castillo UlloaI.HeinrichA. J.MillionA.SchwererJ. (2023). The evolving spatial knowledge of children and young people. Routledge.
8.
ConnellR. (2010). The Northern theory of globalization. In PatelS. (Ed.), The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions (pp. 40–51). Sage.
9.
DahrendorfR. (1958). Out of Utopia. American Journal of Sociology, 64, 115–127.
10.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (MassumiB., Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
11.
DelitzH. (2010). Gebaute Gesellschaft. Architektur als Medium des Sozialen. Campus.
12.
el-OjeiliC. (2012). Politics, social theory, Utopia and the world-system. Arguments in political sociology. Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
ElvenJ. (2020). Sozialer Wandel als Wandel sozialer Praxis. Eine praxistheoretische Forschungsperspektive. Transcript.
FariasI.PaulusJ. (2021). Die Räume der Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie. Über die Formation, Deformation und Transformation des Sozialen. In HeinrichJ.MarguinS.MillionA.StollmannJ. (Eds.), Handbuch qualitative und visuelle Methoden der Raumforschung (pp. 37–52). Transcript.
16.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society. University of California Press.
17.
GiesenB. (2016). Strukturation und Sozialer Wandel. In GiesenB. (Ed.), Sozialer Wandel. Modellbildung und theoretische Ansätze (pp. 228–266). Suhrkamp.
18.
HallS. (1992). The West and the rest. In HallS.GiebenB. (Eds.), Formations of Modernity (pp. 275–320). Polity Press.
19.
HallS. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage.
20.
HarawayD. J. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
KnoblauchH. (2017). Die kommunikative Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Springer VS.
23.
KnoblauchH. (2022). Multiple Säkularität, Multiple Räumlichkeit oder Multipolarität—Auch eine Kritik der postkolonialen Vernunft. In KarsteinU.BurchardtM.Schmidt-LuxT. (Eds.), Verstehen als Zugang zur Welt. Soziologische Perspektiven (pp. 99–118). Campus.
24.
KnoblauchH.LöwM. (2020). Die Re-Figuration des Raums und die refigurierte Moderne—Konzepte und Diagnosen. Historical Social Research, 45(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.12759/HSR.45.2020.2.263-292
25.
KulzC. (2021). British migrants in Berlin: Negotiating postcolonial melancholia and racialised nationalism in the wake of Brexit. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 45(7), 1326–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2021.1924390
26.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
27.
LatourB.YanevaA. (2008). “Give me a gun and I will make all buildings move”: An ANT’s view of architecture. In GeiserR. (Ed.), Explorations in architecture: Teaching, design, research (pp. 80–89). Birkhäuser.
LöwM. (2016). The sociology of space. Materiality, social structures, and action. Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
LöwM. (2022). Sozialen Wandel verstehen: Refiguration. In KarsteinU.BurchardtM.Schmidt-LuxT. (Eds.) Verstehen als Zugang zur Welt. Soziologische Perspektiven (pp. 81–97). Campus.
31.
LöwM. (2024). Understanding social change. Refiguration. In BartmanskiD.FüllerH.HoerningJ.WeidenhausG. (Eds.), Considering space. A critical concept for the social sciences (pp. 19–33). Routledge.
32.
LöwM.KnoblauchH. (2021). Raumfiguren, Raumkulturen und die Refiguration von Räumen. In LöwM.SaymanV.SchwererJ.WolfH. (Eds.), Am Ende der Globalisierung: Über die Refiguration von Räumen (pp. 25–57). Transcript.
33.
LöwM.SaymanV.SchwererJ.WolfH. (Eds.) (2021). Am Ende der Globalisierung. Über die Refiguration von Räumen. Transcript.
34.
LugonesM. (1994). Purity, impurity, and separation. Signs, 19(2), 458–479.
35.
MazruiA. (1968). From social Darwinism to current theories of modernization. World Politics, 21, 68–83.
36.
McLeishJ. (2013). The theory of social change. Routledge.
37.
MüllerH.-P.SchmidM. (2016). Paradigm lost? Von der Theorie sozialen Wandels zur Theorie dynamischer Systeme. In MüllerH.-P.SchmidM. (Eds.), Sozialer Wandel. Modellbildung und theoretische Ansätze (pp. 9–55). Suhrkamp.
38.
NisbetR. (2009). Metaphor and history. The Western idea of social development. Transaction.
39.
OgburnW. F. (1922). Social change with respect to culture and original nature. B.W. Huebsch Incorporated.
40.
OgburnW. F. (1937). Social change. In MackenzieF. (Ed.), Planned society. Yesterday, today, tomorrow. A symposium by thirty-five economists, sociologists, and statesmen (pp. 587–605). Prentice Hall.
41.
ParsonsT. (1961). Theories of society, foundations of modern sociological theory, Vol. I. The Free Press of Glencoe.
42.
RosaldoR. (1989). Culture & truth: The remaking of social analysis. Beacon Press.
StoltenbergD. (2024). The spaces of public issues: How social media discourses shape public imaginations of issue spatiality. Routledge.
47.
SunarL. (2016). Marx and Weber on oriental societies. In the shadow of Western modernity. Routledge.
48.
VinkenG. (2021). The crisis of the modern city. Place and trajectorial space. In VinkenG. (Ed.), Zones of tradition—Places of identity: Cities and their heritage (pp. 19–36). Transcript.
