This study examines how queer spaces in Seoul are shaped by ongoing spatial (re)organization and digitalization, highlighting how queer residents navigate and transform urban space through strategic (in)visibility. Based on ethnographic fieldwork (between 2022 and 2024) and 48 semi-structured interviews with 29 Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, Asexual, and other identities (LGBTQIA+) residents, it analyzes Seoul Plaza during the 2022 Seoul Queer Parade, the “Gay Building” in Jongno, and Instagram accounts of lesbian clubs in Hongdae. Using hybrid mapping, the study shows how physical threshold spaces, combined with controlled digital visibility on local map apps and Instagram, reduce exposure in a dense, heteronormative cityscape. Even when these strategies fail, queer patrons flexibly engage with multiple spatialities to mitigate risks. By conceptualizing queer threshold spaces within South Korea’s rapid urban refiguration, this study offers insights into lesser-discussed East Asian queer geographies.
Asunaro. (2024) “청소년 인권 행동 아수나로 부산 지부.부산 지역 학생 성 소수자 심판 조사 결과 [Youth human rights action Asunaro Busan branch: Survey results on LGBTQ+ students in the Busan area].” https://asunaro.or.kr/announce/?bmode=view&idx=17536311
2.
BaxterJ. S.MarguinS.MélixS.SchinaglM.SinghA.SommerV. (2021). Hybrid mapping methodology—A manifesto (SFB 1265 Working Paper 9). Technische Universität Berlin. https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-12060
3.
ChangK. (2022). The logic of compressed modernity. Polity.
4.
ChoS. (2022). Symbols and rituals on the grounds of queer culture festivals. Korean Anthropology Review, 6, 179–211.
5.
ChoiJ. (2024). Do I belong in Ikseon-Dong? Glocalized cosmopolitan spaces of belonging. In HanM. H.HanE.-J.LeeJ. (Eds.), Diaspora within homeland: Displacement, mobility, and diversity in Korea (pp. 199–218). Routledge.
EmersonR.FretzR.ShawL. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
11.
FaríasI.SteetsS. (2025). After the globe: Exploring spatial figures of the contemporary. In FaríasI.SteetsS.GanstererN. (Eds.), An atlas of spatial figures: Exploring spaces of the contemporary (pp. 11–25). Jovis.
GangS. (2025a). Experiences of placelessness: Rethinking queer economies and everyday exclusion in South Korea. Historical Social Review. (forthcoming).
14.
GangS. (2025b). Only a researcher’s struggle? Reconceiving the ethnographic field as a relational space. In BernroiderL.BornM.KulzC.GangS. (Eds.), Intersectionality and the city: Exploring violence and inequality in urban space (pp. 42–52). Routledge.
15.
GangS. (2025c). Don’t litter on my parade. In FaríasI.SteetsS.GanstererN. (Eds.), An atlas of spatial figures: Exploring spaces of the contemporary (pp. 104–105). Jovis.
16.
GangS. (2025d). We are everywhere. But where are we? In FaríasI.SteetsS.GanstererN. (Eds.), An atlas of spatial figures: Exploring spaces of the contemporary (pp. 50–51). Jovis.
17.
GangS.LöwM.StollmannJ. (2024). Verstädterung, Wohneigentum und Raumkonstitution. Räumliche Refiguration in Südkorea zwischen Familialismus und queeren Communities. Berlin Journal für Soziologie, 34, 647–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-024-00539-y
18.
GlissantE. (2010). Poetics of relation (WingB., Trans.). The University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1997)
HeinrichA. J. (2024). Integrating visual and verbal data. In HeinrichA. J.MarguinS.MillionA.StollmannJ. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative and visual methods in spatial research (pp. 91–102). transcript. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839467343-008
22.
Hŭijŏng. (2019). 퀴어는 당신 옆에서 일하고 있다. 당신이 모르는, 그러나 이미 알고 있는 사람들 [Queers are working beside you: People you don’t know, but already do]. 오월의 봄.
23.
HwangI. (2014). 작은 한옥 한 채를 짓다: 서촌 파 교수댁 어락당 탄생기 [Building a small Hanok: The birth story of professor Fa’s Eorakdang in Seochon]. Tolbegae.
24.
JonesC. (2020). Balancing safety and visibility: Lesbian community building strategies in South Korea. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 24(3), 272–285. https://10.1080/10894160.2019.1678335
25.
KimH. (2013) 마포구,’ ‘홍대’에 대한 레즈비언의 장소감 형성 양상 [The lesbian sense of place surrounding “Mapo-gu,” ‘Hongdae’]. 대한지리학회 2013 학술 대회 눈문집[Proceedings of the Korean Geographical Society 2013], 450–452.
KnoblauchH.LöwM. (2021). Comparison, refiguration, and multiple spatialities. Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 22(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-22.3.3791
29.
KnoblauchH.LöwM. (2024). The refiguration of the global: Globalization and the spatial logics of digitalization. Critical Sociology. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205241262304
30.
KwonN.-H. (2014). 노비에서 양반으로, 그 머나먼 여정: 어느 노비 가계 2백년의 기록 [The long journey from slave to gentry: One Nobi family’s two-hundred-years’ of family register]. Yŏksa pip’yŏngsa.
31.
LeeC.ZohH. (2020). 지역 상권 활성화에 따른 종로 3가 게이 공간의 변화와 대응 [Changes and responses of Jongno 3-ga gay place according to the revitalization of local commercial area]. 한국지역지리학회지 [Journal of the Korean Association of Regional Geographers], 26(4), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.26863/JKARG.2020.11.26.4.395
32.
LeeK. (2021). The floor: A reinterpretation of the Korean home, focusing on theondol. Space and Culture, 26(4), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331220976486
33.
LöwM.WeidenhausG. (2017). Borders that relate: Conceptualizing boundaries in relational space. Current Sociology, 65(4), 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117694804
34.
MarguinS.SommerV. (2025). Raumgeschichten über Berliner Clubs. Reflexionen zur mediatisierten Raumsynthese im Film. In KibelJ.MeierN.SteetsS.WeidenhausG. (Eds.), Figuring out spaces. Über die Sozialität von Räumen und die Räumlichkeit des Sozialen (pp. 405–425). Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839475041-025
35.
MinM.ChangE.CoombsE.ShinbineD.NohH. J.YiH. J.MaroneyM. R.HorneS. G. (2024). “Between losing my family and asserting my identity”: Exploration of Korean LGBQ YouTubers’ experiences coming out to parents. Psychology & Sexuality, Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2024.2429763
36.
MuñozJ. E. (2019). Cruising utopia: The then and there of queer futurity (10th anniversary ed.). New York University Press. (Original work published 2009)
37.
NamS. (2019). A critical study on the relationship between regenerative governance and the production of the others’ space: Focused on gay ghetto in Jongno 3-ga. Midiŏ Chendŏ & Munhwa [Media, Gender & Culture], 34(3), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.38196/mgc.2019.09.34.3.5
38.
ParkC. (2018). 박철수의 거주 박물지 [The Park Cheolsoo Encyclopedia of Housing]. Tosŏ Ch’ulp’an Chip.
ParkJ. H. (2021, June13). 인스타그램을 통해 본 익선동의 장소 이미지 소비와 문화적 실천 [Place image consumption and cultural practices in Ikseon-dong through Instagram]. YouTube. The Korean Urban Geographical Society. https://youtu.be/mj-B4GaJDt8?feature=shared
42.
PRAN. (2022, July27). 성소수자라서 차별하는 건 아니고요? #퀴어 #퀴퍼 #서울퀴어문화축제 [Isn’t that still discrimination against queer people? #queer #queerparade #SQCF] [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XyL8h20rW4
TabačkováZ. (2024). Site visits. In HeinrichA. J.MarguinS.MillionA.StollmannJ. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative and visual methods in spatial research (pp. 199–212). Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839467343-017
YunJ. (2013). 전통 가옥의 담과 울타리에 반영된 바깥 세계에 대한 이해: 양반 가옥 과 평민 가옥의 비교를 중심으로 [The Understanding of outside that reflected in the fence (wall) of traditional Korean house]. Inmunhak Yon’gu [The Journal of Humanities Studies], 43, 149–177. https://kiss.kstudy.com/Detail/Ar?key=3634889
