Cinema theatres have historically functioned as vital cultural and social hubs for cinema audiences and have remained a popular mode of experiencing cinema. This study examines the spatial transformations of single-screen cinema exhibition spaces in the Kozhikode district of Kerala, India. Drawing on New Cinema History and Henri Lefebvre’s theory of spatial production, the research traces cinema theatres’ historical and cultural significance, foregrounding their role in shaping collective memory and facilitating social interactions among Kozhikode’s cinemagoers. While the proliferation of multi-screen and multiplex cinemas reflects contemporary trends, the findings underscore the enduring relevance of single-screen cinema theatres as cultural landmarks embedded in urban and social fabric. Framing the analysis within the context of Sustainable Development Goal 11.7, the study also reflects on the implications of urban transformation for preserving cinema as cultural infrastructure. Ultimately, this research contributes to broader conversations on space, memory and the evolving geographies of cultural experience.
AllenR. C. (2011). Reimagining the history of the experience of cinema in a post-moviegoing age. In MaltbyR.BiltereystD.MeersP. (Eds.), Explorations in new cinema history (pp. 41–57). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444396416.ch2
2.
AllenR. C.GomeryD. (1985). Film history: Theory and practice. McGraw-Hill.
AthiqueA. (2009). Leisure capital in the new economy: The rapid rise of the multiplex in India. Contemporary South Asia, 17(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584930902860843
5.
BiltereystD.MeersP. (2016). New cinema history and the comparative mode: Reflections on comparing historical cinema cultures. Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media, 11, 13–32.
Helmut WittenzellnerR. C. V. B. (2023). Cinema visit or home theatre: The threat of video-on-demand for German cinemas. Economy & Business Journal, 17(1), 146–165.
11.
JancovichM.FaireL.StubbingsS. (2003). The place of the audience: Cultural geographies of film consumption. British Film Institute.
KoszarskiR. (1994). An evening’s entertainment: The age of the silent feature picture, 1915-1928. University of California Press.
17.
KulkarniD. (2022). Screening bodies: Women watching cinema in post-pandemic India. Interactive Film & Media Journal, 2(3), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.32920/ifmj.v2i3.1507
18.
KumarB. V.VardhanB. A.GuptaC. H.SurekhaP. (2019, November21–22). Reduction of movie piracy using an automated anti-piracy Screen Recording System: Anti-piracy Screen Recording System [Conference session]. 2019 4th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Networks (ISCON), pp. 301–304. https://doi.org/10.1109/iscon47742.2019.9036271
ManningS. (2020). Cinemas and cinema-going in the United Kingdom: Decades of decline, 1945–65 (p. 254). University of London Press.
24.
MarxL. (2014). Making cinephiles: An ethnographic study of audience socialization. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 11(1), 88–98.
MiniD. S. (2016). The spectral duration of Malayalam soft-porn: Disappearance, desire, and haunting. Bioscope: South Asian Screen Studies, 7(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974927616667971
27.
MiniD. S. (2019). The rise of soft porn in Malayalam cinema and the precarious stardom of Shakeela. Feminist Media Histories, 5(2), 49–82. https://doi.org/10.1525/fmh.2019.5.2.49
NagarajS.SinghS.YasaV. R. (2021). Factors affecting consumers’ willingness to subscribe to over-the-top (OTT) video streaming services in India. Technology in Society, 65, 101534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101534
ÖzÖ.ÖzkaracalarK. (2021). At the Nexus of cinema, city and memory: Resisting the demolition of Istanbul’s historical Emek movie theatre. Emotion, Space and Society, 40, 100804. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2021.100804
33.
PerksR.ThomsonA. (Eds.). (2006). The oral history reader (2nd ed.). Routledge.
RadhakrishnanR. (2009). The Gulf in the imagination: Migration, Malayalam cinema and regional identity. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 43(2), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/006996670904300202
36.
RamuK. (Director). (1974). Nellu [Paddy] [Film]. Jammu Films International.
37.
RavazzoliE. (2016). Cinemagoing as spatially contextualised cultural and social practice. Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media, 11, 33–44.
38.
RecuberT. (2007). Immersion cinema: The rationalization and reenchantment of cinematic space. Space and Culture, 10(3), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331207304352
SadanaM.SharmaD. (2021). How over-the-top (OTT) platforms engage young consumers over traditional pay television service? An analysis of changing consumer preferences and gamification. Young Consumers, 22(3), 348–367. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-10-2020-1231
41.
SreesanthK.BalasaravananT. (2020). Adapting to new media: A case study on exhibition and publicity practices of a rural single screen theatre in the digital era. South Asian Popular Culture, 18(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2020.1774135
42.
SreesanthK.BalasaravananT. (2023). From grandeur to decay: Decline of Kozhikode’s cinema talkies. Journal of Media and Communication, 7(1), 86–101.
43.
SrinivasL. (2002). The active audience: Spectatorship, social relations and the experience of cinema in India. Media, Culture & Society, 24(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344370202400201
44.
StaceyJ. (2002). Hollywood cinema: The Great Escape. In TurnerG. (Ed.), The film cultures reader (pp. 420–444). Routledge.
45.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
46.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development.
VandeveldeI.MeersP.Van BauwelS.WinkelR. V. (2015). Sharing the silver screen: The social experience of cinemagoing in the Indian diaspora. Bioscope: South Asian Screen Studies, 6(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974927615586932
49.
Van De VijverL. (2017). The cinema is dead, long live the cinema! Understanding the social experience of cinema-going today. Participations, 14(1), 129–144.
WangK.-C. (2017). Who owns ‘place of people’ cinema? Glocalizing ‘Taiwan new cinema’ in the neoliberal era. Space and Culture, 20(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331216647352
53.
WeavingS.HightC.NobesK.PasvolskyC. (2020). Working with the Australian cinema industry to understand the movie-going experience. Studies in Australasian Cinema, 14(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503175.2020.1810459
54.
WeinbergC. B.OttenC.OrbachB.McKenzieJ.GilR.ChisholmD. C.BasuroyS. (2021). Technological change and managerial challenges in the movie theater industry. Journal of Cultural Economics, 45(2), 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-019-09374-z
55.
WillemsenS. (2016). The widescreen anamorphic lens. Amsterdam University Press.
56.
YashodaL.BabithaB. S.VaibhaviJ. (2023). The effect of covid-19 pandemic on Indian cinema: The rise of OTT viewership. The Ciência and Engenharia – Science and Engineering Journal, 11(1), 1589–1607. https://doi.org/10.52783/cienceng.v11i1.309
