This article notes the invocation of a notion of miniaturization in characterizing the new technological revolution and a relative silence in discussion thereof. It considers the influence of miniaturization in its moderate form on artifacts of everyday culture and on the design of those artifacts. In so doing, it invokes notions of affordance and below-the-line design.
Achia, S. (2002). The history of the razor and the act of shaving. Unpublished paper, Carleton University.
2.
Bell, D. (1980). The winding passage. Cambridge, MA: ABT Books.
3.
Bell, D. (1989). The third technological revolution. Dissent, 36, 164-176.
4.
Brain, D. (1994). Cultural production as “society in the making”: Architecture as an exemplar of the social construction of cultural artifacts. In D. Crane (Ed.), The sociology of culture. Emerging theoretical perspectives(pp. 192-220). London: Blackwell.
5.
Brewer, P. (2000). From fireplace to cookstove. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
6.
Cockburn, C., & Ormrud, S. (1993). Gender and technology in the making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Cowan, R. S. (1983). More work for mother—The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books.
8.
Doordan, D. P. (2003). On materials. Design Issues, 19(4), 3-8.
9.
Dormer, P. (1990). The meanings of modern design. London: Thames and Hudson.
10.
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456.
11.
Jeffrey, K. (1995). Pacing the heart: Growth and redefinition of a medical technology, 1952-1975. Technology and Culture, 36(3), 583-622.
12.
Maines, R. P. (1999). The technology of orgasm. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
Press, M., & Cooper, R. (2003). The design experience: The role of design and designers in the twenty-first century. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
14.
Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 277-391.
15.
Van Oost, E. (2003). Materialized gender: How shavers configure the users’ masculinity and femininity. In N. Oudshorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How users matter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
