Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Drones have been widely applied in citizen journalism and media communication. During the COVID-19 pandemic, videographers used drone cameras to document lockdown cities, with their footage going viral across social media. This study examines “ghost town” drone imagery as both a documentary witness to disaster and the expression of postapocalyptic vision mediated through nonhuman agency. By analyzing these visuals, I interrogate how drone documentation reveals an “apocalyptic memory”—a temporal bridge linking historical precedents to speculative futures. Central to this inquiry is how drone visuals construct urban wastelands while evoking mourning through a negative sublime, manifested in grotesque and uncanny aesthetics. In addition, I investigate how drone documentation demonstrates nonhuman agency through a relational framework, analyzing human–machine interactions and broader social dynamics. Grounded in these observations, the research engages with contemporary postapocalyptic imaginaries, particularly those reflecting existential anxieties stemming from environmental crises.

Keywords

drone documentary ghost town visual affective witnessing urban wasteland nonhuman agency apocalyptic memory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

(2020). Dual control: Investigating the role of drone (UAV) operators in TV and online journalism. Media and Communication, 8(3), 93–100.

Baishya

A. K.

(2022). Through a drone darkly: Drone media as pandemic witnessing. Bioscope: South Asian Screen Studies, 13(1), 24–32.

Bendle

M. F.

(2005). The apocalyptic imagination and popular culture. Journal of Religion and Popular Culture, 11(1), 1.

Benjamin

(2022). Drone culture: Perspectives on autonomy and anonymity. AI & Society, 37(2), 635–645.

Bratchford

Zuev

(2020). Aerial visibilities: Towards a visual sociology of the sky. Visual Studies, 35(5), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2020.1843283.

Collins

J. J.

(1998). The apocalyptic imagination: An introduction to Jewish apocalyptic literature. William B Eerdmans Publishing Co.

Condis

(2017). Fantasizing about the apocalypse: A review of fallout 4. Resilience, 4(2), 185–190.

Freud

(2017). The uncanny. In Bygrave

(Ed.), Romantic writings (pp. 318–325). Routledge.

Garrett

B. L.

McCosker

(2017). Non-human sensing: New methodologies for the drone assemblage. In Cruz

E. G.

Sumartojo

Pink

(Eds.), Refiguring techniques in digital visual research (pp. 13–23). Palgrave Macmillan.

10.

Gell

(1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Clarendon Press.

11.

Gunn

Beard

D. E.

(2000). On the apocalyptic sublime. Southern Journal of Communication, 65(4), 269–286.

12.

Hildebrand

J. M.

(2021). Aerial play: Drone medium, mobility, communication, and culture (1st ed.). Springer.

13.

Hollman

V. C.

(2020). Drone photography and the re-aestheticisation of nature. In Schelhaas

Ferretti

Novaes

A. R.

Schmidt

Friedberg

(Eds.), Decolonising and internationalising geography: Historical geography and geosciences (pp. 57–66). Springer.

14.

Hussain

(2013). The sound of terror: Phenomenology of a drone strike. www.bostonreview.net/world/hussain-drone-phenomenology

15.

Jones

(2024). Threat trajectories: Cinema, FPV drones, and pandemic anxiety. In Serafinelli

(Ed.), Drones in society: New visual aesthetics (pp. 25–38). Palgrave Macmillan.

16.

Kim

(2021). Data visualizations, vlogs, drone imagery: Expanded documentary forms in the COVID-19 emergency. Film Criticism, 45(1), 115–124.

17.

Latour

(2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

18.

Ljungbäck

(2023). Vertical interference: Video, drone witnessing, and the myth of precision targeting. Media, War & Conflict, 17, 275–291.

19.

Lindroos

Möller

(2017). Art as a political witness ( Lindroos

Möller

, Eds.; 1st ed.). Verlag Barbara Budrich.

20.

Lyotard

J.-F.

Rottenberg

(1994). Lessons on the analytic of the sublime: Kant’s Critique of judgment, [sections] 23–29. Stanford University Press.

21.

Massumi

(2021). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Duke University Press. (Original work published 2002).

22.

McCosker

Wilken

(2020). Automating vision: The social impact of the new camera consciousness. Routledge.

23.

O’Leary

S. D.

(1993). A dramatistic theory of apocalyptic rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 79(4), 385–426.

24.

Parikka

(2023). Operational images: From the visual to the invisual. University of Minnesota Press.

25.

Parks

(2018). Rethinking media coverage: Vertical mediation and the war on terror. Routledge.

26.

Rettberg

J. W.

(2023). Machine vision: How algorithms are changing the way we see the world. Polity Press.

27.

Richardson

(2018). Climate trauma, or the affects of the catastrophe to come. Environmental Humanities, 10(1), 1–19.

28.

Richardson

(2020). Witnessing the anthropocene: Affect and the problem of scale. Parallax, 26(3), 339–359.

29.

Sayes

(2014). Actor-network theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science, 44(1), 134–149.

30.

Serafinelli

O’Hagan

L. A.

(2024). Drone views: A multimodal ethnographic perspective. Visual Communication, 23(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211065093

31.

Shinkle

(2014). Drone aesthetics. In Barnard

(Ed.), Hyenas of the battlefield, machines in the garden. (pp. 280–286). GOST Books.

32.

Stevens

E. C.

Shacklock

(2024). Monstrous mobilities and predatory perspectives: Drone shots and the gaze of monsters. In Serafinelli

(Ed.), Drones in Society: New visual aesthetics (pp. 39–49). Palgrave Macmillan.

33.

Thatcher

(1998). Empty metaphors and apocalyptic rhetoric. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 66(3), 549–570.

34.

Voice of America. (2021, June 24). Drone footage shows burials at Jakarta cemetery as COVID-19 cases peak. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjsPlE5jYXI

35.

Wilder

A. N.

(1971). The rhetoric of ancient and modern apocalyptic. Interpretation, 25(4), 436–453.

36.

Woodbury

(2019). Climate trauma: Toward a new taxonomy of trauma. Ecopsychology, 11(1), 1–8.

37.

Young

(2018, September 21). Documenting climate change—With a drone. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-backstory-drones/documenting-climate-change-with-a-drone-idUSKCN1M037T/

38.

YouTube. (2020, March 31). Ghost town: Flyovers of cities on COVID-19 lockdown. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PttvhYlV

39.

Zimmermann

P. R.

Kaplan

(2020, April 30). Coronavirus drone genres: Spectacles of distance and melancholia. Film Quarterly. https://filmquarterly.org/2020/04/30/coronavirus-drone-genres-spectacles-of-distance-and-melancholia/

40.

Zizek

(2021). Apocalypse, Catastrophe, and the End of History. Inauguration of The Käte Hamburger Centre for Apocalyptic and Post-Apocalyptic Studies celebrated its official inauguration. Heidelberg.

41.

Zlydneva

(2002). Wasteland as a text of culture. In Sarapik

Tüür

Laanemets

(Eds.), Koht ja Paik/place and location II: Estonian academy of arts proceedings (pp. 381–388). Research Group of Contemporary Estonian Culture.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB