It is less than a decade since the Irish government published the McAleese Report, which accepted the state’s role in facilitating abuse in Catholic Church-run Magdalen Laundries. At the time the then Taoiseach Enda Kenny tearfully apologizing for the state’s involvement, alongside promising redress for survivors. Although much has been achieved since that time, one aspect that has not been resolved is how we remember and memorialize that past. Of the 10 Magdalen Laundries that operated in postindependence Ireland, seven have been demolished or substantially redeveloped and three are currently in various degrees of dereliction. This article considers the potential for extant Magdalen Laundries to become sites of conscience. It will explore this potential through the lens of temporality, materiality, and spatiality and will ultimately argue for the need to explore scalar power relations if Magdalen Laundries are to truly reflect past injustices as well as become meaningful places in the contemporary.
CasellaE. (2007). The archaeology of institutional confinement. University Press of Florida.
8.
CasellaE. (2001). To watch or restrain: Female convict prisons in 19th century Tasmania. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 5(1), 45–72.
9.
De CunzoL. A. (1995). Reform, respite, ritual: An archaeology of institutions: The Magdalen Society of Philadelphia, 1800-1850. Historical Archaeology, 29(3), 1–168.
10.
DeetzJ. (1977/1996). In small things forgotten: An archaeology of early American life. Anchor.
FischerC. (2016). Gender, nation and the politics of shame: Magdalen laundries and the institutionalization of feminine transgression in modern Ireland. Signs, 41(4), 821–843.
13.
FranklinJ. (2013). Convent Slave Laundries? Magdalen Asylums in Australia. Journal of Australian Catholic Historical Society, 34, 70–90.
14.
GlassieH. (1976). Folk Housing Middle Virginia: Structural analysis historical artifacts. University of Tennesse Press.
15.
HallM. (2000). Archaeology and the modern world: Colonial transcripts in South Africa and Chesapeake. Routledge.
JohnsonN. (2015). Heritage and geography. In WatertonE.WatsonS. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research (pp. 159–170). Palgrave Macmillan.
McAleeseM. (2013). Report of the Inter-Departmental Committee to establish the facts of state involvement with the Magdalen laundries. Department of Justice and Equality. http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/MagdalenRpt2013
30.
McAlindenA-M. (2013). An inconvenient truth: Barriers to truth recovery in the aftermath of institutional child abuse in Ireland. Legal Studies, 33(2), 189–214.
31.
McAtackneyL. (2014). An archaeology of the troubles: The dark heritage of Long Kesh/Maze. Oxford University Press.
32.
McAtackneyL. (2020). Materials and memory: Archaeology and heritage as tools of transitional justice at a former Magdalen laundry. Éire-Ireland, 55(1-2), 221–244.
NelsonA.PharaonS. (2017). Introduction: Reframing the historical narrative at sites of conscience. Forum Journal: Preserving Difficult Histories, 31(3), 3–8.
38.
OlsenB.PétursdóttirÞ. (2014). Ruin memories: Materialities, Aesthetics and the Archaeology of the recent past. Routledge.
39.
O’DonnellK.McGettrickC.SmithJ. M.O’RourkeM.MoriartyC. (2020). Dublin honours Magdalenes listening exercise report volume 1: Report on key findings. Justice for Magdalenes Research.
40.
O’DonnellK.O’RourkeM.SmithJ. M. (2020). Editors’ introduction: Toward transitional justice in Ireland? Addressing legacies of harm. Éire-Ireland, 55(1-2), 9–16.
PruntyJ. (2017). The monasteries, Magdalen asylums and reformatory schools of our lady of charity in Ireland 1853–1973. Columba Press.
49.
QuirkeJ. (2013). The Magdalen Commission Report: Report of Mr Justice John Quirke. On the establishment of an ex gratia Scheme and related matters for the benefit of those women who were admitted to and worked in the Magdalen Laundries. Department of Justice. https://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/PB13000255
