This is a novel interpretation of the dynamics of the historic market of Manek Chowk in Ahmedabad in Gujarat, India. Applying elements of spatial ethnographic methodology, we capture the processes, routines, and unique features of operation among the myriad actors operating here, and the frictionless multiple transformation of this traditional market within the course of a full day. These findings are viewed through the critical geography concept of place making, which is realized to be supported by the economic sociology concept of social capital. In this process of offering a fresh understanding, we examine the meanings that people here have attached to this locale, given their operation here for several decades and across generations. We realize that this traditional market with its characteristic dynamism is not just a commercial space but an entity intertwined with physical elements, activities, relationships, and constructed meanings. Hence, we offer a fresh interpretation of the character and vibrancy of Manek Chowk by understanding its continuing life and sustenance as a social capital–bolstered place-making process.
AnjariaJ. S. (2006). Street hawkers and public space in Mumbai. Economic and Political Weekly, 41, 2140-2146.
2.
ArefiM. (1998). Non-place and placelessness as narratives of loss: Rethinking the notion of place. Journal of Urban Design, 4, 179-193.
3.
Banerjee-GuhaS. (2004). Space, society and geography: Investigating the crisis of postmodern urban space. In Banerjee-GuhaS. (Ed.), Space, society and geography (pp. 61-82). Jaipur, India: Rawat.
4.
BayatA. (1997). Uncivil society: The politics of the informal people. Third World Quarterly, 18, 53-72.
5.
BodinO.BeatriceC.HenrikE. (2006). Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structuralist perspective? [Online]. Ecology and Society, 11(2). Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/resp2/
6.
BorjasG. J. (1992). Ethnic capital and intergenerational mobility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 123-150.
7.
BrownA. (2006). Contested space: Street trading, public space and livelihoods in developing cities. London, England: Intermediate Technology.
8.
BuchananP. (1988). What city? A plea for place in the public realm. Architectural Review, 184, 31-41.
9.
CastreeN.CoeN. M.WardK.SamersM. (2004). Spaces of work: Global capitalism and the geographies of labour. London, England: Sage.
10.
ChanN. K. (2018). Place making and communication practice: Everyday precarity in a night-market in Hong-Kong. Space and Culture, 21, 439-454. doi:10.1177/1206331217741085
11.
ChariS.GidwaniV. (2005). Introduction: Grounds for a spatial ethnography of labour. Ethnography, 6, 267-281.
12.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), S95-S120.
13.
CoxK. R. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17, 1-23.
14.
CrossaV. (2005). Creative resistance: The case of Mexico City’s street artisans and vendors. In GraaffK.HaN. (Eds.), Street vending in the neoliberal city: A global perspective on the practices and policies of a marginalized economy (pp. 59-78). New York, NY: Berghahn.
15.
DasguptaP. (2005). Economics of social capital. The Economic Record, 81(255), S2-S21.
16.
DonovanM. G. (2008). Informal cities and the contestation of public space: The case of Bogota’s street vendors 1988–2003. Urban Studies, 45, 29-51.
17.
DuneierM. (1999). Sidewalk. New York, NY: Straus & Giroux.
18.
EMBARQ. (2014). Re-imagining manek Chowk, visioning report: Public spaces in the historic walled city of Ahmedabad. Bengaluru, India: Embarq India and WRI India.
19.
ForkuorJ. B.AkukoK. O.YeboahE. H. (2017, February1). Negotiation and management strategies of street vendors in developing countries: A narrative review. Sage Open, 7(1). doi:10.1177/2158244017691563
20.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
21.
HarveyD. (1973). Social justice and the city. London, England: Edward Arnold.
22.
HarveyD. (1982). The limits to capital. London, England: Blackwell.
23.
HoK.DouglassM. (2008). Globalization and liveable cities: Experiences in place-making in Pacific Asia. International Development Planning Review, 30, 199-212.
24.
JacobsJ. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
KeswaniK.BhagavatulaS. (2015). Territoriality in urban space: A case of a periodic marketplace in Bangalore. In EversC.SealeK. (Eds.), Informal urban street markets: International perspectives (pp. 136-149). New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
KimA. M. (2015). Sidewalk city: Remapping public space in Ho Chi Minh City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
MahadeviaD.VyasS.MishraA. (2013, March22). Street vendors in Ahmedabad: Status, contribution, and challenges (CEU Working Paper). Budapest, Hungary: Central European University.
29.
MasseyD. (1994). Space, place and gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
30.
MasseyD. (1997). Power geometry and progressive sense of place mapping the future: Local cultures, global change. New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
MasseyD. (2005). For space. London, England: Sage.
32.
MasseyD.AllenJ. (1984). Geography matters! A reader. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MehtaR.GohilC. (2008). Design for natural markets: Accommodating the informal. Built Environment, 39(2), 277-296.
34.
MontgomeryJ. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93-116.
35.
MunozL. (2005). Selling memory and nostalgia in the Barrio: Mexican and Central American women (re)create street vending spaces in Los Angeles. In GraaffK.HaN. (Eds.), Street vending in the neoliberal city: A global perspective on the practices and policies of a marginalized economy (pp.101-117). New York, NY: Berghahn.
36.
NeethiP. (2016). Globalization lived locally: A labour geography perspective. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
37.
PeckJ. (1996). Work-place: The social regulation of labor markets. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
38.
PortesA.SensenbrennerJ. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320-1350.
39.
Rose-RedwoodR.AldermanD.AzaryahuM. (2008). Collective memory and the politics of urban space: An introduction. GeoJournal, 73(3), 61-164.
40.
SacksR. D. (1986). Human territoriality: Its theory and history. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
41.
SahaD. (2017). Informal markets, livelihood and politics: Street vendors in urban India. New Delhi, India: Routledge.
42.
SampsonR. (2004). Neighbourhood and community. New Economy, 11, 106-113.
43.
ShamsuddinS.UjangN. (2008). Making places: The role of attachment in creating the sense of place for traditional streets in Malaysia. Habitat International, 32, 399-409.
44.
ShumanM. H. (1998). Going local: Creating self-reliant communities in a global age. New York, NY: Free Press.
45.
SmaldoneD.HarrisC.SanyalN. (2005). An exploration of place as a process: The case of Jackson Hole, WY. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 397-414.
46.
SwedbergR. (2003). Principles of economic sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
TofflerA. (1970). Future shock. New York, NY: Bantam.
