From the definition of landscape offered in the European Landscape Convention, this study explores the various facets of the term and the many ways in which the perception of landscape by different people can be influenced by different factors, such as socioterritorial belonging and tourism promotion. The study aims to analyze and understand the perspectives of insiders and outsiders on the same territorial area. Analysis of questionnaires, qualitative interviews, and visual images reveals a different significance of the landscape and its natural and human elements. The study concludes with some reflections about the meanings that insiders and outsiders assign to different elements by virtue of the symbolic-cultural system of the community they belong to or the influence of the destination image proposed by tourist promotion.
AntropM.SevenantM.TagliaferroC.Van EetveldeV.WirloxF. (2013). Setting a framework for valuing the multifunctional landscape and its perceptions. In Van Der HeideC. M.HeijmanW. J. M. (Eds.), The economic value of landscape (pp. 23-52). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
AtikM.SwaffieldS. (2017). Place names and landscape character: A case study from Otago Region, New Zealand. Landscape Research, 42, 455-470.
4.
BarthesR. (1988). Semiology and urbanism. In BarthesR. (Ed.), The semiotic challenge (pp. 191-201). New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
5.
BenediktssonK. (2007). “Scenophobia,” geography and the aesthetic politics of landscape. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 89, 203-217.
6.
BertauxD. (1998). Les Récits de vie [Life stories: Tools for understanding and catalysts for action]. Paris, France: Editions Nathan.
7.
BorerM. I. (2013). Being in the city: The sociology of urban experiences. Sociology Compass, 7, 965-983.
8.
BrehmJ. M.EisenhauerB. W.KrannichR. S. (2006). Community attachments as predictors of local environmental concern: The case for multiple dimensions of attachment. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 142-165.
9.
BurckhardtL. (2012). Why is landscape beautiful? In FezerJ.SchmitzM. (Eds.), Lucius Burckhardt writings: Rethinking man-made environments (pp. 133-141). Vienna, Austria: Springer. (Original work published 1979)
10.
ButlerA.BerglundU. (2014). Landscape character assessment as an approach to understanding public interests within the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, 39, 219-236.
11.
CastiglioniB. (2009). Aspetti sociali del paesaggio: Schemi di riferimento [Social aspects of the landscape: Schemes of reference]. In CastiglioniB.De MarchiM. (Eds.), Di chi è il paesaggio? La partecipazione degli attori nella individuazione, valutazione e pianificazione [Whose is the landscape: The participation of the actors in the identification, evaluation, and planning?] (pp. 73-86). Padova, Italy: CLEUP.
12.
ChoayF. (1992). L’allégorie du patrimoine [The allegory of heritage.]. Paris, France: Éditions du Seuil.
Dall’AraG.GrandiG. (2003). Quindici anni di “farfalla”: L’esperienza dell’Apt del Trentino [Fifteen years of butterfly: The experience of Trentino’s APT]. Rimini, Italy: Guaraldi.
15.
DupontL.AntropM.Van EetveldeV. (2015). Does landscape related expertise influence that visual perception of landscape photographs? Implications for participatory landscape planning and management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 141, 68-77.
16.
EdensorT. (2017). Rethinking the landscapes of the Peak District. Landscape Research, 42, 595-600.
17.
EspinosaC. S. (2016). Narrativizing cities, localizing urban memories: The (re)construction of place through Urban Cueca in Santiago de Chile (1990-2010). Space and Culture, 19, 94-109.
GartnerW. C. (1993). Image formation process. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 2, 191-215.
20.
GilbertD.HancockC. (2006). New York City and the Transatlantic imagination: French and English tourism and the spectacle of modern metropolis, 1893-1939. Journal of Urban History, 33, 77-107.
21.
GiordanoA. (2006). Per un codice del progetto nel paesaggio [For a project code in the landscape]. In GiordanoA.ZanchettaC. (Eds.), Frames: Frammenti di architettura e paesaggio [Frames: Fragments of architecture and landscape] (vol. 1, pp. 9-13). Padua, Italy: Cortina Editore.
22.
GubertR. (1986). Il contributo della sociologia all’analisi e alla pianificazione dei centri storici [The contribution of sociology to the analysis and planning of historical centers]. In GubertR.GadottiG. (Eds.), La struttura socio-spaziale di Trento: Contributi sociologici alla pianificazione del centro storico [The socio-spacial structure of Trento: Sociological contributions to the planning of the historic center] (pp. 13-40). Milan, Italy: FrancoAngeli.
23.
GunnC. A. (1972). Vacationscape: Designing Tourist Regions. Austin, TX: University of Texas, Bureau of Business Research.
24.
HaasT.OlssonK. (2014). Transmutation and reinvention of public spaces through ideals of urban planning and design. Space and Culture, 17, 59-68.
25.
HuijbensE.BenediktssonK. (2013). Inspiring the visitor? Landscapes and horizons of hospitality. Tourist Studies, 13, 189-208.
26.
HullR. B.LamM.VigoG. (1994). Place Identity: Symbols of self in the urban fabric. Landscape and Urban Planning, 28(2-3), 109-120.
27.
Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale. (2015). Il consumo di suolo in Italia [Land consumption in Italy]. Roma, Italy: Author.
28.
JenkinsO. (2003). Photography and travel brochures: The circle of representation. Tourism Geography, 5, 305-328.
29.
JohnsonN. C. (2002). Mapping monuments: The shaping of public space and cultural identities. Visual Communication, 1, 293-298.
30.
Kirshenblatt-GimblettB. (1998). Destination culture: Tourism, museums, and heritage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
LefebvreH. (1974). La production de l’espace [The production of space]. Paris, France: Anthropos.
32.
LeviD.KocherS. (2013). Perception of sacredness at heritage religious sites. Environment & Behaviour, 45, 912-930.
33.
LewickaM. (2005). Ways to make people active: The role of place attachment, cultural capital, and neighborhood ties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 381-395.
34.
LowenthalD. (1986). Introduction. In Penning-RoswellE.LowenthalD. (Eds.), Landscape meanings and values (pp. 1-2). London, England: Allen & Unwin.
35.
LynchK. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge: MIT Press.
36.
MacKayK. J.FesenmaierD. R. (1997). Pictorial element of destination in image formation. Annals of Tourism Research, 24, 537-565.
37.
MarkwickM. (2001). Postcards from Malta: Image, consumption, context. Annals of Tourism Research, 28, 417-439.
38.
MartiniU. (2010). Destinazione turistica e territorio [Tourist destination and territory]. In FranchM. (Ed.), Marketing delle destinazioni turistiche: Metodi, approcci e strumenti [Marketing of tourist destinations: methods, approaches and tools] (pp. 23-57). Milan, Italy: McGraw-Hill.
39.
McCoolS. F.MartinS. R. (1994). Community attachment and attitudes towards tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 32(3), 29-34.
40.
MichaelidouN.SiamagkaN. T.MoraesC.MicevskiM. (2013). Do marketers use visual representations of destinations that tourists value? Comparing visitors’ image of a destination with marketer-controlled images online. Journal of Travel Research, 56, 789-804.
41.
MilmanA. (2012). Postcards as representation of a destination image: The case of Berlin. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 18, 157-170.
42.
MiossecJ. (1977). Un modele de l’espace touristique [A model of the tourist area]. L’Espace Geographique, 6, 41-48.
43.
MorganN.PritchardA. (2005). On souvenirs and metonymy: Narratives of memory, metaphor and materiality. Tourist Studies, 5, 29-53.
44.
OdeÅ.TveitM. S.FryG. (2008). Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: Touching base with landscape aesthetic theory. Landscape Research, 33, 89-117.
45.
OlwigK. (2008). The “actual landscape” or actual landscape? In DeLueR. Z.ElkinsJ. (Eds.), Landscape theory (pp. 158-177). New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
ParsonsT. (1959). The social system (2nd ed.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
47.
PineB. J.GilmoreG. H. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre and every business a stage. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
PolliniG. (2005). Elements of a theory of place attachment and socio-territorial Belongin. International Review of Sociology, 15, 497-515.
49.
PrettoA. (2013). Travel stories: sustainable and unaware tourists. In La TorreM. A. (Eds.), From Sustainable Tourism to Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 495-514). Napoli, Italy: Suor Orsola Benincasa University Press.
50.
PrettoA.BattelloV. (2016). The socio-territorial belonging in a cross-border area: a sociological approach. Space & Polity, 20, 177-193.
51.
RelphE. (1976). Place and placelessness. London, England: Pion.
52.
SackR. (1986). Human territoriality, its theory and history. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
53.
ScarlesC. (2004). Mediating landscapes: The processes and practices of image construction in tourist brochures of Scotland. Tourist Studies, 4, 43-67.
54.
ShilsE. (1971). Tradition. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 13, 122-159.
55.
SinghN.FormicaS. (2007). Level of congruency in photographic representations of destination marketing organizations’ websites and brochures. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 15(3), 71-86.
56.
StjernøS. (2004). Solidarity in Europe: The history of an idea. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
57.
SwensenG.JerpåsenG. B.SæterO.TveitM. S. (2013). Capturing the intangible and tangible aspects of heritage: Personal versus official perspectives in cultural heritage management. Landscape Research, 38, 203-221.
58.
TaftC. (2013). Wishing upon a star: Christmas tourism and urban renewal in Bethlehem, PA. Journal of Planning History, 12, 54-178.
59.
TecillaG.AltieriG.AneseM.CaloviM. (Eds.). (2015). Rapporto sullo stato del paesaggio: Ricerca sulle dinamiche di urbanizzazione e sul consumo di suolo in Trentino [Report on the state of the landscape: Research on the dynamics of urbanization and on the consumption of soil in Trentino]. Trento, Italy: Osservatorio del Paesaggio Trentino.
60.
Treccani. (1989). Vocabolario della lingua italiana [Vocabulary of the Italian language]. Rome, Italy: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana Treccani.
61.
TuanY. (1980). The significance of artifact. Geographic Review, 70, 462-472.
62.
TurriE. (1998). Il paesaggio come teatro [The landscape as a theater]. Venice, Italy: Marsilio Editore.
63.
WallissJ. (2014). Transformative landscapes: Postcolonial representations of Uluru-Kata Tjuta and Tongariro National Parks. Space and Culture, 17, 280-296.
