This article analyzes the heterotopic space of Weldon Spring, Missouri, a site that juxtaposes cultural heritage and recreational activities with a publicly available radioactive and toxic waste dump. The article argues for the value of actor-network theory as a supplement to heterotopia, an addition especially productive given the highly complex networks and configurations that order many contemporary spaces. Specifically, actor-network theory can make visible the range of actors and associations that work to establish specific social orders and practices that attempt to normalize reclaimed landscapes.
AckermanJ. (2003). The space for rhetoric in everyday life. In NystrandM.DuffyJ. (Eds.), Towards a rhetoric of everyday life: New directions in research on writing, text, and discourse (pp. 84-117). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
EdensorT. (2005). Waste matter: The debris of industrial ruins and the disordering of the material world. Journal of Material Culture, 10, 311-332. doi:10.1177/1359183505057346
6.
FoucaultM. (1986). Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias (MiskowiecJ., Trans.). Diacritics, 16(1), 22-27.
7.
FoucaultM. (1994). The order of things: An archeology of the human sciences. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
8.
GenocchioB. (1996). Discourse, discontinuity, difference: The question of “other” spaces. In WatsonS.GibsonK. (Eds.), Postmodern cities and spaces (pp. 35-46). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
9.
GrossA. (1994). The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of science. Public Understanding of Science, 3, 3-23.
10.
HealyS. (2004). A “post-foundational” interpretation of risk: Risk as performance. Journal of Risk Research, 7, 277-296. doi:10.1080/1366987042000176235
11.
HelbingD. (2012). Systemic risks in society and economics. In HelbingD. (Ed.), Social self-organization: Agent-based simulations and experiments to study emergent social behavior (pp. 261-284). New York, NY: Springer.
12.
HershR.StraussP. (2005). Re-evaluating remedies: Strengthening public involvement in long-term stewardship. Retrieved from http://www.cpeo.org/pubs/pub.html#2005
13.
HetheringtonK. (1997). The badlands of modernity: Heterotopia and social ordering. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
HirdM. (2013). Waste, landfills, and an environmental ethic of vulnerability. Ethics and the Environment, 18(1), 105-124.
15.
JohnsonP. (2006). Unravelling Foucault’s “different spaces.”History of the Human Sciences, 19(4), 75-90.
16.
KaspersonJ.KaspersonR. (2005). The social contours of risk: Publics, risk communication and the social amplification of risk. London, England: Earthscan.
17.
KirkA. (2012). Rereading the nature of atomic doom towns. Environmental History, 17, 635-647. doi:10.1093/envhis/ems049
18.
KruparJ. (2007). Burying atomic history: The mound builders of Fernald and Weldon Spring. Public Historian, 29(1), 31-58.
19.
KruparJ.DePoeS. (2007). Cold War triumphant: The rhetorical uses of history, memory, and heritage preservation within the Department of Energy’s nuclear weapons complex. In TaylorB. (Ed.), Nuclear legacies: Communication, controversy, and the U.S. nuclear weapons complex (pp. 135-166). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
20.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
Law.J. (2002). Aircraft stories: Decentering the object in technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
22.
LawJ. (2009). Actor-network theory and material semiotics. In WileyB. T. (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141-158). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23.
LefebvreH. (1991). The production of space (Nicholson-SmithD., Trans.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
24.
LightA. (2000). Ecological restoration and the culture of nature: A pragmatic perspective. In GobsterP.HullR. B. (Eds.), Restoring nature: Perspectives from the social sciences and humanities (pp. 49-70). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
25.
MillerC. (2003). The presumptions of expertise: The role of ethos in risk analysis. Configurations, 11, 163-202.
26.
MölleringG. (2001). The nature of trust: From Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation, and suspension. Sociology, 35, 403-420.
PellizonniL. (2011). The politics of facts: Local environmental conflicts and expertise. Environmental Politics, 20, 765-785. doi:10.1080/09644016.2011.617164
34.
PezzulloP. (2007). Toxic tourism: Rhetorics of pollution, travel, and environmental justice. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
SaindonB. (2010). A doubled heterotopia: Shifting spatial and visual symbolism in the Jewish museum Berlin’s development. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 98, 24-48. doi:10.1080/00335630.2011.638657
37.
SandinG. (2008). Keys to heterotopia: An actantial approach to landfills as societal mirrors. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 20(2), 75-87.
TaylorB. (2010). Radioactive history: Rhetoric, memory, and place in the Post-Cold War nuclear museum. In DickinsonG.BlaireC.OttB. (Eds.), Places of public memory: The rhetoric of museums and memorials (pp. 57-86), Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
40.
TomE.SircarP. (1994). Conceptual design of the Weldon Spring Site Disposal Cell: A modified value engineering approach. Retrieved from http://www.wmsym.org/archives/1994/V2/127.pdf
41.
TopinkaR. (2010). Foucault, Borges, heterotopia: Producing knowledge in other spaces. Foucault Studies, 9, 54-70.
42.
WesselmanD. (2013). The high line, “The Balloon,” and heterotopia. Space and Culture, 16, 16-27. doi:10.1177/1206331212451669
43.
WrightE. (2005). Rhetorical spaces in memorial places: The cemetery as a rhetorical memory place/space. Rhetorical Society Quarterly, 35(4), 51-81.
