Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The Eleyele Reservoir is a critical water resource and a source of food and livelihood for Ibadan’s local fishers. However, the reservoir has faced a lot of environmental pollution. Therefore, this study investigated the radiological risk associated with fish and sediment samples from Eleyele Reservoir in Ibadan using a NaI(Tl) gamma-ray spectrometer. Sediment samples were taken from upstream and downstream locations, characterised by different levels of waste and water clarity. The average activity concentrations for⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th in the sediment samples were found to be 597.75 ± 27.50, 40.66 ± 5.75 and 261.84 ± 5.75 Bq kg⁻¹, respectively, for the upstream and 114.92 ± 5.96, 16.11 ± 2.29 and 81.48 ± 2.29 Bq kg⁻¹, for the downstream; while 0.22 mSv/year was calculated for the annual effective dose. The absorbed dose rate has an overall mean of 181 nGy/h, which is significantly higher than the global average value of 59 nGy/h. The radiological hazard indices of the sediment from Eleyele’s Reservoir (downstream) slightly exceeded the recommended limits for construction purposes. The mean activity concentrations of 244.69 ± 13.33, 21.65 ± 1.83, and 27.76 ± 1.56 Bq kg⁻¹ for ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th, respectively, were obtained for the fish samples. The highest Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF) value for ⁴⁰K was found in the flesh of Oreochromis niloticus (1.64). The highest Committed Effective Ingestion Dose (CEID) of 24.13 mSv was obtained in Sanotherodon melanothron Gut, suggesting a significant long-term radiological hazard if consumed frequently, and the lowest CEID (1.98 mSv) was in Gymnarchus niloticus whole fish. Generally, the radiological indices are within safe limits, indicating no appreciable radiological threat to the local population consuming fish from the Reservoir. However, periodic monitoring of sediment and aquatic life is advised, especially downstream, to track long-term changes and mitigate potential exposure risks.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

natural radioactivity sediment fish ingestion dose Eleyele Reservoir Ibadan

Introduction

The safety of aquatic foods for human consumption has been a concern over the years due to the rise in pollutants entering aquatic structures like lakes, rivers, reservoirs and oceans. The contaminants endanger people’s health as marine species can act as a medium for transferring radioactive materials.^1,2 Understanding the quality and the composition of the sediments and the aquatic life within rivers is paramount for assessing environmental health and potential impacts on various aspects of livelihood. Since sediments and fishes are an essential part of the ecosystem, naturally occurring radionuclides are found to be trapped in the sediments, fishes and their biological compartments. Water bodies play a very crucial role in sustaining the ecosystems, agriculture and anthropogenic activities and communities; the aquatic environments are divided into an aqueous phase and a solid phase, which is essentially sediment in surface environments and the host bedrock in groundwater.³

The past few decades have witnessed an increase in the consumption rate of fish and fish products among Nigerians, particularly in light of the widespread awareness of the adverse effects of consuming dairy products. Fish is largely consumed in this part of the world, and it remains an important part of the diet of Nigerians. Fish constitutes about 75% of animal protein consumption in rural communities where fishing is a major source of livelihood. Human radiation exposure can be in 2 forms: internal exposure and external exposure. Internal exposure occurs when radionuclides are ingested or inhaled into the tissue. Naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORMs) are present in the food chains of aquatic species and can be transferred to the human population via ingestion and absorption of seafood. For instance, fish may bioaccumulate radionuclides in their tissues, and human consumption of such fish can lead to internal exposure, where radionuclides emit radiation within the body over time, increasing the risk of cellular damage. The relationship between food intake and exposure level has raised significant concerns about internal exposure to radionuclides. Therefore, the quantity and kind of food ingested directly correlate with internal radiation exposure.⁴ External exposure occurs when the radioactive source is positioned outside the body’s system. Human exposure can result from radionuclides found in rock and soil that build up in sediment and dissolve into drinking water. The Earth’s outer layer contains the primordial radionuclides and heavy elements. The concentrations of these radionuclides and components could be enhanced by various anthropogenic and natural activities, as well as the geology of the surrounding area.⁵

Globally, numerous research studies have been conducted over the past few years to determine the activity concentration of radionuclides in seafood, aquatic organisms, fish, sediment, and staple food.^6
-23 For instance, Taskin et al²³ studied radionuclide concentrations in soil and lifetime cancer risk due to gamma radioactivity in Kirklareli, Turkey. In their study, the average ²²⁶Ra, ²³⁸U, ²³²Th, ¹³⁷Cs and ⁴⁰K activities were 37 ± 18 Bq kg⁻¹, 28 ± 13 Bq kg⁻¹, 40 ± 18 Bq kg⁻¹, 8 ± 5 Bq kg⁻¹ and 667 ± 281 Bq kg⁻¹, respectively. The authors reported that annual effective gamma doses and the excess lifetime risks of cancer were higher than the world’s average. Natural radioactivity in beach sand along the Mediterranean coastline in El-Arish, Egypt and its potential health effects were investigated by Awad et al²⁴ Various radiological hazard parameters were calculated, and the authors concluded that beach sand poses no significant risk for use in building materials.²⁴ Khan et al²⁵ determined the radioactivity concentration of NORMs in edible fin fish and shellfish and their dose in the adult population in South India’s Gulf of Mannar.

Similarly, Desideri et al,²⁶ after measuring activity concentrations of ²⁰⁹Po, ²⁰⁷Pb and ⁴⁰K from different samples of aquatic species from the central Adriatic Sea, found the concentration of ⁴⁰K to be above that of ²⁰⁹Po and ²⁰⁷Pb. Additionally, Alrefae et al²⁷ evaluated the radioactivity concentrations of natural radionuclides in canned seafood eaten in Kuwait. The authors’ results showed that an estimated 5 µSv/y was the annual effective dose from eating canned seafood, which was lower than the 0.29 mSv/y world average value. Abbasi et al¹⁷ investigated the concentrations of natural radionuclides in commercially available algae-based food supplements. Using gamma spectrometry, they measured radionuclides like ²²⁶Ra, ²³²Th and ⁴⁰K. Their study found that although the activity concentrations varied among different algae products, the average values were generally within international safety limits. They also performed a radiological risk assessment (eg, Annual Effective Dose and Hazard Index) and concluded that the ingestion of these supplements did not pose a significant radiotoxicological risk to consumers under normal consumption rates.

In Nigeria, radionuclide assessments have also been carried out to detect the level of NORMs in sediment and fish samples. For instance, Ademola and Ehiedu²⁸ performed a radiological determination of NORMs in sediment and fish specimens from the Igbokoda River, Ondo State, Nigeria. The authors concluded that the equivalent and effective doses were comparable to the ICRP recommended limit. The work of Jibiri and Akomolafe²⁹ focused on evaluating the activity concentration of NORMs and geochemical parameters in the sediments of the Awba Dam situated at the University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. The authors concluded that the radiological parameter indices did not exceed the approved safe limits, indicating that the sediments pose no threat to the university community. In their latest research, Jibiri et al² assessed radionuclide analysis of seafood and sediments from Makoko Lagoon, Lagos State. The authors found that seafood and sediment from the Lagoon are free from any radiological contaminants.

The Eleyele Reservoir in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria, constructed in 1942 by damming the Ona River, serves as a critical resource for both environmental sustainability and socio-economic development. The reservoir has an average depth of 6.0 m and is 125 m above sea level. It is a critical water resource for domestic, agricultural, and recreational activities. It plays a vital role in flood management by regulating water flow during heavy rainfall, thereby mitigating flood risks in Ibadan.³⁰ The reservoir and its surrounding wetlands support diverse aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, providing habitats for various species and maintaining ecological balance. The reservoir is integral to Ibadan’s environmental health and socio-economic vitality, providing essential services ranging from water supply and flood control to supporting livelihoods and biodiversity. However, the rapid industrialisation and urbanisation around the reservoir have raised significant concerns about environmental pollution, particularly radiological contaminants such as NORMs, the release of chemical waste and pollutants from nearby industries, agricultural runoff from farmlands in the catchment area, and improper disposal of solid waste into the reservoir. NORMs can accumulate in sediments and aquatic life, posing potential health risks to the local population through bioaccumulation and consuming contaminated fish.

While previous studies in Nigeria have reported the presence and impact of radionuclides in various environmental components, there is a notable lack of comprehensive data on the specific radiological content in the sediments and fish of Eleyele Reservoir despite the disposal of waste from various home and industrial operations into the reservoir, as well as the economic opportunities it afforded. A few researchers have worked on the various aspects of Eleyele Reservoir, but to the utmost of our understanding, no research work has been undertaken on the radiological analysis of the sediments and fishes in the Reservoir. The few authors who worked on the other components of the Eleyele Reservoir include Ayoade et al,³⁰ Ojelabi et al³¹ and Olokeogun et al.³²

Moreover, due to the quantity of waste migrated from various home and industrial operations into the Reservoir, as well as the economic opportunities it afforded, it becomes crucial to assess the levels of radionuclides in sediment and fish samples from this reservoir and evaluate their potential health risks to the populace. The potential health risks will be evaluated by measuring the types and activity concentrations of radionuclides present in fish and sediment samples. How do the measured concentrations compare with recommended safe limits, and do the radionuclide concentrations in sediment correlate with those detected in fish samples? In addition, no study has been undertaken to the best of our knowledge on the radioactivity levels of the sediments and fishes in Eleyele Reservoir.

Thus, this research aimed to perform a radiological analysis of the sediment and fish samples from Eleyele Reservoir and determine their health risks. The objectives of this research were to determine the activity concentration of natural radionuclides in sediment and fish samples from the Eleyele reservoir, calculate the radiological risk hazard parameters and evaluate the Bioaccumulation Factor.

Materials and Methods

The Location of the Reservoir

The Eleyele Reservoir is located upstream of the River Ona in Ibadan. The Reservoir lies on the Latitude 7°20′-7°25′N and Longitude 3°51′-3°56′E. The detailed description of the Reservoir is stated in the reports of Ayoade et al³⁰ and Ojelabi et al³¹ The map of the study location is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Map of Eleyele Reservoir.

Sampling and Processing of Sediments

Twenty-six sediment samples were collected, using a van Veen grab, from different locations of Eleyele Reservoir, both upstream and downstream. The sediments were transferred into Ziploc, sealed, appropriately identified and conveyed to the Laboratory of the National Institute of Radiation Protection and Research (NIRPR) at the University of Ibadan. The sediments were air-dried and oven-dried in the laboratory at 110℃ to achieve constant moisture. After drying, the samples went through a 2 mm sieve using a mortar and pestle after homogenising. Sieved samples weighing 200 g were transferred into containers and sealed to render them impermeable to radon escape. The containers were stored in a dry place for 30 days before gamma-ray spectroscopy. The sealing established a radioactive secular equilibrium among ²²⁶Ra, 232Th and their gaseous progenies.

Fish Collection and Laboratory Analyses

Fin-fishes from Eleyele Reservoir were collected by direct purchase from commissioned fisherfolk during momentary visits between January and February 2024. All the fish harvested by each fisherfolk were collected, packed in an ice chest and conveyed to the Hydrobiology and Fisheries Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Ibadan. Nigeria. Idodo-Umeh,³⁴ Olaosebikan and Raji³⁵ and the Department of Zoology museum collections were consulted to identify fish species. Standard Length (SL), Total Length (TL), and Total Body Weight (TBW) were determined for each individual, and species of fish samples are shown in Figure 2. Bones, flesh, gills, and Gut were dissected and separated, in addition to whole fish, for gamma-ray spectrometry analyses. Similar species’ bones, flesh, gills and Gut were pooled into biological components to achieve a significant weight for each part. They were labelled correctly to avoid mix-ups during further sample preparations. Whole and parts were oven-dried at 90°C to 100°C for 4 days at the Multidisciplinary Central Research Laboratory, University of Ibadan. The dried samples were blended to obtain a powder form of the samples. The blended samples were placed into uniformly sized cylindrical containers, about 30 ml and transferred to NIRPR for analysis. They were sealed with paper tapes to prevent the escape of radon progenies from 232Th and ²³⁸U to attain secular equilibrium and were kept for 30 days before gamma-ray spectroscopy.

Figure 2.

Fish samples from Eleyele Reservoir.

The Counting Assembly

Sodium Iodide doped with Thallium (NaI(Tl)) was used in gamma spectrometry for radionuclide counting at NIRPR. The NaI(Tl) detector (model no. 802, manufacturer: Canberra) system comprises the scintillation detector sealed with a photomultiplier tube and connected to a Canberra series 10+ multichannel analyser. The detector has a dimension of 7.6 cm × 7.6 cm, and it is securely mounted within a 10 cm-thick Canberra lead castle. The multichannel analyser includes all the features required for spectroscopic analysis. A 50-ohm coaxial wire connects the detector to the multichannel analyser, and the detector outputs a positive signal. An analogue-to-digital converter (ADC), spectroscopic amplifier, 4k memory, display and analysis logic, input/output devices and the screen display comprise the multichannel analyser. Additionally, the multichannel analyser features an integrated high-voltage power supply (HVPS) that provides extra stabilised high voltage. A 12 V car battery that can be recharged supports the setup in case of a power outage.

The Counting System’s Energy Calibration

The counting apparatus had to be calibrated to determine which radionuclides were present in the samples and in what quantities. For each pulse height, there is an associated channel number. Genie 2000 software was used for the spectral analysis. The gamma energy that produces a channel directly relates to its number. In the lab, common gamma sources were used to calibrate the spectrometer. The detector exhibits an energy resolution of 7.5% at the 662 keV gamma-ray peak of Cs-137. Standard sources with known radionuclide energies were inserted into the detector to determine the channel numbers. The detected pulses have channel numbers corresponding to the gamma radiation causing them. The radionuclides and their corresponding channel number are presented in Table 1. The graph in Figure 3 illustrates the link between the channel number (N) and the associated energy (MeV). The correlation between the channel numbers and the radionuclide gamma energies is linear; the Equation is shown in equation (1)

E = 0.0222 N + 0.3959

(1)

Where N = channel Number and E = Energy (MeV)

Table 1.

Radionuclides are listed according to their channel number (N) and energy (MeV).

Radionuclide	Energy (MeV)	Channel number (N)
¹³⁷Cs	0.662	14
⁶⁰Co	1.173	34
⁶⁰Co	1.333	41
⁴⁰K	1.460	48
²³⁸U	1.765	62
²³²Th	2.615	101
²²⁶Ra	1.760	60

Figure 3.

Energy calibration demonstrating how energy and channel number are related.

Additionally, the 1.460 MeV photopeak was used to quantify ⁴⁰K, while the 1.760 and 2.614 MeV peaks from ²¹⁴Bi and ²⁰⁸Tl were employed to determine the activity concentrations of ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th, respectively.

Efficiency of the Detector

Calculating the detection efficiency of the counting system is crucial to determining the radionuclide activity levels in the samples. This process involves using reference standard samples to establish the system’s efficiency, ensuring accurate measurements of radionuclide concentrations in the tested samples. The reference standard source with known activity and emission probabilities was used to calculate the detection efficiency according to equation (2):

\in = \frac{A}{t \cdot C \cdot γ \cdot M}

(2)

Where C is the activity concentration, ϵ is the detection efficiency and M is the mass of the sample. A is the net count, t is the counting time, and γ is the gamma yield.

A standard reference food sample acquired from the International Atomic Energy Agency (Ref No IAEA-152) was utilised for fish samples, and a reference sediment sample (IAEA-315) was used for efficiency calibration as recommended by the IAEA.³⁶ The IAEA-315 is a certified reference material provided by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). It is a sediment sample from the Persian Gulf, and it has been used extensively for analytical method validation, quality control and efficiency calibration in environmental radioactivity studies, particularly for gamma spectrometry. As recommended in the IAEA³⁶ guideline, IAEA-315 is appropriate for preparing calibration curves in environmental gamma spectrometry, where sediment matrix matching improves accuracy. The detector detection efficiencies were calculated for different gamma energies at constant sample geometry and matrix. Figures 4 and 5 provide a detailed breakdown of the 3 radionuclides’ detection efficiency in sediment and food samples.

Figure 4.

Efficiency calibration curve showing the relationship between gamma-ray energy (in MeV) and detector efficiency for the radionuclides ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th present in Sediment samples.

Figure 5.

Efficiency calibration curve showing the relationship between gamma-ray energy (in MeV) and detector efficiency for the radionuclides ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th present in fish samples.

The Background Count and Sample Radioactivity Measurements

An empty cylindrical container was placed on the NaI(Tl) detector after calibrating the system. The empty container has the same dimensions as the sample’s container and was counted for 10 hours. Similarly, each sample was counted for 10 hours to estimate radionuclides with minimal activity. The allotted time is sufficient for the detector to display the high peaks of the interested radionuclides. The NaI(Tl) crystal can display a spectrum that highlights the individual peaks of interest within this counting time. Using the multichannel analyser, the area under the ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th photo peaks was calculated. The computed areas show the radionuclide gross counts. Because natural radionuclides are present in the counting setup, background radiation is present. The radiation laboratory building’s radionuclides and solar radiation from space are some of the sources of this background radiation. To account for the background radiation, an empty container with dimensions similar to the one holding the samples was put on the detector and counted for the same hour. The area beneath the photopeak was measured and recorded using the multichannel analyser. The background count was subtracted from the gross count to determine the net count of the samples.

Assessment of Radionuclide Activity Levels in the Samples

The mass of the sample, net area, efficiency, counting time and gamma yield were used to calculate the activity level of each radionuclide in the samples. The activity concentration was calculated using equation (3):

C ({Bqkg}^{- 1}) = \frac{A}{t x γ x m x ε}

(3)

A, m, ε, γ and t represent net count, sample mass, efficiency, gamma yield and counting time, respectively.

For each radionuclide, the minimum detection limit was determined using equation (4) as reported in the literature.^2,18,19,21

M D L (B q k g^{- 1}) = \frac{L L D}{t \cdot γ \cdot ε \cdot m}

(4)

Where lower limit detection (LLD) is given as $a 4.653 \times \sqrt{b a c k g r o u n d c o u n t}$ . their parameters are described in equations (2) and (3).

The MDL of radionuclides in fish samples are given as 1.43, 0.75 and 4.15 Bq kg⁻¹ for ²³²Th, ²²⁶Ra and ⁴⁰K, respectively. Also, the minimum detection limits of radionuclides in sediment samples were calculated as 3.95 Bq kg⁻¹ for ²³²Th, 1.93 Bq kg⁻¹ for ²²⁶Ra and 5.62 Bq kg⁻¹ for ⁴⁰K. Values less than these were assigned BDL, below the detector’s detection limit.

Analysing the Sediment Samples for Radiological Hazard Indices

Absorbed Dose Rate ( $D_{R}$

The absorbed dose is one of the metrics used to evaluate how the activity concentration in environmental samples affects radiological safety. Any radioactive material emits radiation, which is absorbed when it comes into contact with another material. Dose conversion factors can convert the observed activity concentration into the absorbed dose rate. Based on the UNSCEAR¹ report, the dose conversion factor of 0.043, 0.462 and 0.662 nGy/h per Bq kg⁻¹ for ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th, respectively, was used for the absorbed dose calculation.

D = (0.043 {C_{K}}_{+} 0.462 C_{R a} + 0.662 C_{T h}) n G y / h

(5)

Where C_K = Activity concentration of ⁴⁰K, C_Ra = Activity concentration of ²²⁶Ra and C_Th = Activity concentration of ²³²Th.

Annual Effective Dose (AED)

Evaluating the outdoor effective dose corresponding to the population residing in the research area is crucial. The annual effective dose to the population was calculated by converting the absorbed dose rate to the human effective dose using the conversion factor (0.7 Sv/Gy) and the outdoor occupancy factor (0.2) according to the UNSCEAR¹ report. This was achieved using equation (6):

A E D (m S v y^{- 1}) = D_{R} \times 0.7 \times 0.2 \times 8760 \times 1 0^{- 6}

(6)

Where D_R, 0.2, 0.7 represent the absorbed dose, outdoor occupancy factor and conversion factor (SvGy⁻¹), respectively, and 8670 = 24 hours × 365 days (1 year).

Radium Equivalent (Ra_eq)

Radium equivalent activity offers a metric for controlling public safety radiation protection requirements. The measured activity concentrations of ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th are expressed as a single entity to derive this radiation danger amount.³⁷ Radium equivalent, according to Beretka and Matthew,³⁸ is determined using the presumption that each of the following sources produces the same gamma dose rate: 370 Bqkg⁻¹ of ²²⁶Ra, 259 Bqkg⁻¹ of ²³²Th and 4810 Bqkg⁻¹ of ⁴⁰K. In addition, the safe limit of 1 mSv/yr for the general population is equivalent to the yearly effective dosage of Ra_eq, which is 370 Bqkg⁻¹.

This yields the radium equivalent:

R a_{e q} = C_{R a} + 1.43 C_{T h} + 0.077 C_{K}

(7)

Where C_k, C_Th and C_Ra are the activity concentrations defined in equation (5).

External Hazard Index (H_ex)

The External hazard index provides the external exposure resulting from ⁴⁰K, ²³²Th and ²²⁶Ra. The following Equation is used to calculate it, and a H_ex is used to signify it.³⁸

H_{ex} = \frac{C_{R a}}{370} + \frac{C_{T h}}{259} + \frac{C_{K}}{4810}

(8)

Where ⁴⁰K, ²³²Th and ²²⁶Ra are defined in equation (5). For radiation risks to be deemed tolerable by the general public, Hex must be less than unity.³⁸

Internal Hazard Index (H_in)

The body’s exposure to radon is indicated by the internal radiation hazard index. It is established by the formula.³⁸

H_{in} = \frac{C_{R a}}{185} + \frac{C_{T h}}{259} + \frac{C_{K}}{4810}

(9)

C_k, C_Th and C_Ra are ⁴⁰K, ²³²Th and ²²⁶Ra activity concentrations, respectively, in Bqkg⁻¹. For a negligible risk to the respiratory organs, the value of H_in should be less than unity.³⁸

The Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF)

The Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF) measures the accumulation of a substance, such as a radionuclide, in an organism from its environment. It can be described as the ratio of the radionuclide content in the organism to that of the environment (sediment, water, etc.). According to IAEA,³⁹ BAF values for various radionuclides are called Concentration Factors (CF). The ratio of the fish’s entire body to its water content with nutritional intake is given by:

BAF = \frac{C_{o r g a n i s m}}{C_{e n v i r o n m e n t}}

(10)

C_organism is the activity concentration of the radionuclide in the organism (Bqkg⁻¹), and C_environment is the activity concentration of the radionuclide in the environment (Bqkg⁻¹).

Activity Concentration of Radionuclides in Fish Samples

The activity concentrations of primordial radionuclides in the fish samples were calculated using equation (3).

Annual Effective Ingestion dose (D_ing) (for Fish Samples)

The ingestion dose is a parameter that estimates the amount of radionuclide intake by adult members via ingestion. It was developed in 1996 by the International Commission for Radiological Protection (ICRP). The ingestion dose is shown in equation (11)

D_{ing} = A_{i} \times I_{i} \times {DC}_{i}

(11)

Where A_i is the activity concentration of radionuclide in Bqkg⁻¹, Standard I_i is the ingestion rate of fish and DC_i is the dose conversion coefficient (SvBq⁻¹) for ingestion of radionuclide i. The ingestion rate of fish consumption in Nigeria is 11.3 kg year⁻¹.⁴⁰ Based on the ICRP report,⁴¹ the dose conversion coefficient for the ingestion of radionuclides for members of the public is $6.2 \times 10^{- 9}, 2.8 \times 10^{- 7}$ and $2.3 \times 10^{- 7}$ Sv Bq⁻¹ for ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th, respectively.⁴²

Committed Effective Dose

The committed effective ingestion dose (CEID) is calculated using the ingestion dose, which accounts for the activity concentration of radionuclides in the consumed material, the consumption rate and the radionuclides’ dose coefficients. The CEID is calculated for the adult population based on the recommendation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.⁴¹ In the present work, an assumption was made that all the fish were consumed at harvesting.

CEID = \sum_{i} A_{i} \times I_{i} \times {DC}_{i}

(12)

Results and Discussion

Fish Assemblage of Eleyele Reservoir

The diversity and morphometrics of fin fish collected from Eleyele Reservoir are presented in Table 2. A total of 9 fin fish species, separated into 6 families, were collected during the study, with Cichlidae (n = 4) having the highest richness. The remaining families had a single species recorded for the study. The diversity abundance observed was similar to previous studies of Olaniran,⁴³ and Akinpelu and Hassana,⁴⁴ where cichlids dominated diversity and abundance. The sizes were also comparable to previously reported sizes from Eleyele Reservoir^43,44 and other Inland Nigerian water bodies.⁴⁵

Table 2.

Diversity and morphometrics of fin-fishes collected from Eleyele Reservoir, Ibadan.

Fin-fish species	Common names	n	TL (cm)	SL (cm)	TBW (g)
Channidae
Parachanna obscura (Günther, 1861)	Snake head	2	31.85 ± 1.20 (31.00-32.70)	26.75 ± 1.06 (26.00-26.75)	328.90 ± 1.56 (327.80-330.00)
Polypteridae
Polypterus senegalus senegalus (Cuvier, 1829)	Sail fin/ Bichir	5	25.88 ± 5.88 (24.00-28.50)	22.58 ± 2.35 (20.20-26.00)	90.46 ± 8.53 (80.50-100.70)
Clariidae
Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822)	Catfish/Mudfish	6	28.50 ± 6.94 (19.00-35.00)	24.50 ± 5.80 (16.50-30.00)	196.73 ± 113.02 (61.70-303.00)
Cichlidae
Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758)	Nile tilapia	7	19.79 ± 2.54 (16.00-23.50)	15.76 ± 2.26 (14.00-17.50)	120.79 ± 90.50 (79.80-259.60)
Hemichromis bimaculatus (Gill 1862)	Jewel fish	6	20.12 ± 1.94 (17.30-22.20)	15.85 ± 1.81 (13.00-17.80)	144.64 ± 58.67 (83.70-217.30)
Sarotherodon melanotherodon (Ruppell, 1852)	Black chin tilapia	10	19.79 ± 2.78 (16.00-24.50)	15.12 ± 1.93 (12.50-17.50)	152.68 ± 52.46 (91.10-249.90)
Sarotherodon galilaeus (Linnaeus, 1758)	Mango tilapia	3	16.93 ± 0.89 (15.90-17.50)	13.17 ± 0.58 (12.50-13.5)	100.60 ± 13.68 (84.90-110.00)
Gymnarchidae
Gymnarchus niloticus (Curvier, 1829)	Trunkfish	3	44.00 ± 3.56 (41.50-46.50)	40.05 ± 38.60 (38.60-41.50)	187.70 ± 18.10 (174.90-200.50)
Hepsetidae
Hepsetus akawo (Decru, Vren & Snoeks, 2011)	African/Kufue pike	5	25.48 ± 2.01 (24.40-29.00)	20.44 ± 1.71 (19.00-23.20)	147.65 ± 52.71 (116.10-241.30)

Abbreviations: SL, standard length; TL, total length; TBW, total body weight.

Range in bracket.

Sediment

The activity concentration of ⁴⁰K ranged from 6.47 ± 0.36 Bqkg⁻¹ (4UPS 002) to 908.34 ± 41.69 Bqkg⁻¹ (1DWS 008), with an overall mean value of 597.75 ± 27.50 Bqkg⁻¹ (downstream) and 114.92 ± 5.96 Bqkg⁻¹ (upstream), while that of ²²⁶Ra ranged from below detection limit (BDL) in (4UPS 003) to 77.95 ± 10.71 Bqkg⁻¹ (1DWS 006), with an overall mean value of 40.66 ± 5.75 Bqkg⁻¹ (downstream) and 16.11 ± 2.29 Bqkg⁻¹ (upstream) as presented in Table 3. The activity concentration of ²³²Th ranged from 38.94 ± 4.94 Bqkg⁻¹ (4UPS 002) to 485.55 ± 8.04 Bqkg⁻¹ (2DWS 002), with an overall mean value of 261.84 ± 5.75 Bqkg⁻¹ (downstream) and 81.48 ± 2.29 Bqkg⁻¹ (upstream) (Table 3). The mean activity concentration of ⁴⁰K in the sediment samples of Eleyele Reservoir (downstream) is significantly above the world average value of 420 Bqkg⁻¹.¹ However, the range shows significant variability, with samples upstream of the Reservoir exhibiting much lower concentrations. Similarly, the mean activity concentration of ²²⁶Ra in the sediment of the Reservoir (downstream) is slightly above the world average value of 33 Bqkg⁻¹, and that of ²³²Th at both streams is far above the world average value of 45 Bqkg⁻¹.¹ Among the three primordial radionuclides, ⁴⁰K has the highest activity concentration in all the sampling locations. The elevated level of potassium-40 in the sediments of Eleyele Reservoir may be due to its relative abundance in the Earth’s crust. The large concentration of thorium and uranium in the geological formation of the Eleyele area may be attributed to the degree of metamictisation of zircons obtained from pegmatitic aquifers of that area. Moreover, the elevated levels of ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th in sediment samples of Eleyele Reservoir could also be attributed to the accumulation of these radionuclides in the sediment. Our findings showed that the sediments from Eleyele Reservoir have not been excavated since the Reservoir’s inception, and many pollutants from different sources have been entering the Reservoir. The percentage distribution of the natural radionuclides from Eleyele Reservoir’s sediment is presented in Figure 6.

Table 3.

Activity concentration of radionuclides in the Eleyele Reservoir’s sediment.

S/N	Sample code	⁴⁰K (Bqkg⁻¹)	²²⁶Ra (Bqkg⁻¹)	232Th (Bqkg⁻¹)
1	1DWS 001	689.82 ± 32.88	17.63 ± 3.08	211.97 ± 3.08
2	1DWS 002	764.53 ± 35.57	25.68 ± 4.25	279.73 ± 4.25
3	1DWS 003	679.75 ± 28.15	34.85 ± 4.40	222.11 ± 4.40
4	1DWS 004	716.21 ± 33.52	44.51 ± 6.62	271.06 ± 6.62
5	1DWS 005	830.69 ± 34.38	28.53 ± 3.70	205.41 ± 3.70
6	1DWS 006	807.14 ± 38.03	77.95 ± 10.71	440.48 ± 10.71
7	1DWS 007	804.89 ± 33.42	29.96 ± 3.87	317.86 ± 3.87
8	1DWS 008	908.34 ± 41.69	39.98 ± 6.65	216.57 ± 6.65
9	2DWS 001	616.39 ± 29.30	67.15 ± 8.68	329.29 ± 8.68
10	2DWS 002	584.84 ± 29.88	58.13 ± 8.04	485.55 ± 8.04
11	2DWS 003	629.97 ± 29.29	54.83 ± 7.32	361.53 ± 7.32
12	2DWS 004	678.54 ± 31.36	59.74 ± 8.20	309.78 ± 8.20
13	2DWS 005	805.86 ± 36.99	75.57 ± 9.88	411.28 ± 9.88
14	3DWS 001	207.58 ± 10.37	26.11 ± 3.98	80.49 ± 3.98
15	3DWS 002	509.37 ± 24.03	41.12 ± 6.09	224.95 ± 6.09
16	3DWS 003	177.62 ± 9.29	19.11 ± 3.12	138.97 ± 3.12
17	3DWS 005	121.36 ± 6.77	27.6 ± 4.22	189.69 ± 4.22
18	3DWS 006	652 ± 30.11	29.59 ± 4.53	153.11 ± 4.53
19	4DWS 007	172.39 ± 7.52	14.43 ± 1.87	125.09 ± 1.87
	Mean	597.75 ± 27.50	40.66 ± 5.75	261.84 ± 5.75
	Range	121.36-908.34	14.43-77.95	80.49-485.55
20	4UPS 001	244.6 ± 13.03	22.11 ± 3.69	169.74 ± 3.69
21	4UPS 002	6.47 ± 0.36	31.53 ± 4.94	38.94 ± 4.94
22	4UPS 003	29.78 ± 1.35	BDL	76.61 ± 5.35
23	4UPS 004	145.42 ± 7.55	6.56 ± 1.32	41.1 ± 1.32
24	4UPS 005	57.66 ± 3.18	14.98 ± 2.40	96.11 ± 2.40
25	4UPS 006	166.67 ± 8.58	2.57 ± 0.56	71.18 ± 1.56
26	4UPS 007	153.87 ± 7.68	18.9 ± 3.16	76.67 ± 3.16
	Mean	114.92 ± 5.96	16.11 ± 2.29	81.48 ± 2.29
	Range	6.47-244.60	BDL-31.53	38.94-169.74

Abbreviations: DWS, downstream; UPS, upstream. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 = location of sample collected.

Figure 6.

Percentage distribution of ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th in Eleyele Reservoir’s sediment.

Moreover, the Eleyele area is prone to flooding, and various industrial waste, fertiliser from farm areas, and effluents are channelled to the river, which might have resulted in the high concentration of radionuclides in the Reservoir. Besides the high pollution associated with the Reservoir, certain minerals such as potash feldspar, biotite, orthoclase and muscovite from weathered rocks around the Eleyele area could have contributed to the elevated activity concentration of ⁴⁰K recorded. The pattern of activity concentration of radionuclides observed in the present study revealed that the area (Downstream of the Reservoir) characterised by excessive waste has a high activity concentration of radionuclides compared with the other part (Upstream), where the water is transparent, with low activity concentration values (Table 3).

A comparative analysis of activity concentration recorded in the present study used data from other locations worldwide, as presented in Table 4. For instance, Isinkaye and Emelue⁴⁶ recorded the activity concentration of radionuclides to be 1023.00, 47.89 and 55.37 Bqkg⁻¹ for ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th, respectively. These values are far higher than the average world value reported by UNSCEAR¹ and what was obtained from this study, except for ²³²Th. Other locations with a higher activity concentration of ⁴⁰K than Eleyele Reservoir include the East Coast region, Cyprus ²¹; Greece, Aegean Sea ⁴⁷; Novaya Zemlya, Russia⁴⁸; while the value obtained from the Mediterranean Sea coast, North Cyprus⁴⁹ is comparable with the finding from this study. The measured activity concentrations of ⁴⁰K and ²³²Th were significantly elevated compared to those reported by,^1,29,50
-53 which may be attributed to the higher granitic content in the studied area. Table 4 presents different locations where the activity concentration of radionuclides is either low, comparable or higher than the present findings. Figure 7 presents the activity concentration of primordial radionuclides from the present investigation compared to the global average.¹

Table 4.

Comparing the worldwide average activity concentration of primordial radionuclides in sediment.

S/N	Location	⁴⁰K (Bq kg⁻¹)	²²⁶Ra (Bq kg⁻¹)	²³²Th (Bq kg⁻¹)	Reference
1	Eleyele Reservoir (Downstream), Ibadan	597.75	40.66	261.84	Present study
1	Eleyele Reservoir (Upstream), Ibadan	114.92	16.11	81.48	Present study
2	Mediterranean Sea, Cyprus	572.00	26.00	40.00	Abbasi et al¹⁸
3	Kastela Bay, Adriatic Sea, Croatia	310.00	25.00	19.20	Mikelić et al⁵⁴
4	Berg River (Right), South Africa	134.00	9.00	12.00	Mtshawu et al⁵⁵
5	Novaya Zemlya, Russia	618.90	25.19	32.39	Yushin et al⁴⁸
6	Chennai megacity Beaches, India	298.00	75.00	182.00	Bharath et al⁵⁶
7	Makoko Lagoon, Lagos	41.04	10.15	4.39	Jibiri et al²
8	Caspian Sea, Iran	310.00	34.40	11.40	Abbasi et al¹⁹
9	Greece Aegean Sea	565.00	15.00	25.00	Shahrokhi et al⁴⁷
10	Barents Sea, Russia	439.10	14.20	21.10	Yakovlev and Puchkov⁵⁷
11	Bree, Klein-Brak, Bakens, uMngeni rivers, South Africa	46.18	7.09	3.28	Ilori et al⁵¹
12	East Coast region, Cyprus	628.10	23.00	19.00	Abbasi et al²¹
13	Mediterranean Sea coast, North Cyprus	467.30	20.10	18.40	Abbasi et al²¹
14	Nile River, Egypt	200.21	16.30	12.94	ElTaher et al⁵⁸
15	Henties Bay, Namibia	349.66	175.59	40.17	Onjefu et al⁵²
16	Awba Dam, U.I., Nigeria	153.30	40.50	54.40	Jibiri and Akomolafe²⁹
17	Ilha Grande Bay, Brazil	678.00	24.00	44.00	Carvalho et al⁵⁹
18	Oguta Lake, Nigeria	1023.00	47.89	55.37	Isinkaye and Emelue⁴⁶
19	Tamilnadu Northeast Coast, India	349.60	35.12	713.16	SureshGandhi et al⁶⁰
20	Malaysia	22.00	189.00	51.00	Muhammad et al⁶¹
21	Egypt	352.00	52.00	76.20	Uosif⁶²
22	Worldwide Average Value	420.00	33.00	45.00	UNSCEAR¹

Figure 7.

Activity concentration of ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th compared with the average world value.¹

The radiological hazard analysis revealed that the absorbed dose rate in Eleyele Reservoir has an overall mean of 181 nGy/h, as presented in Table 5, which is significantly higher than the global average value of 59 nGy/h as reported in UNSCEAR.¹ The significant elevation value of the absorbed dose indicates higher radioactivity levels in Eleyele Reservoir sediments. This calls for serious concern as the sediment may pose a severe radiological threat to the Eleyele community if such sediment is used for construction purposes, and there is a high probability of radionuclides transfer from the sediment to aquatic organisms via ingestion, absorption and inhalation. The calculated average outdoor annual effective dose of sediment from the Eleyele Reservoir was 0.22 mSv/y (Table 5), significantly higher than the outdoor annual effective dose of 0.07 mSv/y as stated in the UNSCEAR report.¹ However, the calculated annual effective dose from the present investigation is less than the total annual effective dose (1.0 mSvy⁻¹) value recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection⁵³ for the general populace. The average Radium Equivalent activity (Ra_eq) values for sediment from Eleyele Reservoir are 461 Bqkg⁻¹ (downstream) and 139 Bqkg⁻¹ (upstream). The value obtained at the downstream part is significantly higher than the safety limit of 370 Bqkg⁻¹ recommended by UNSCEAR,¹ indicating potential radiological hazards associated with the sediment at the downstream section of the Reservoir. The Radium equivalent activity, the internal and external hazard indices of the sediment from Eleyele’s Reservoir (downstream), exceeded slightly recommended limits for construction purposes and, hence, should be used with some caution for building purposes. The external and internal hazard indexes calculated in the sediment downstream of the Reservoir were slightly above the world’s recommended value of unity (>1), as shown in Table 5. This implies that some cautions may be observed by the general populace when using sediment from Eleyele Reservoir for construction purposes. In addition, since sediment acts as a reservoir for radionuclides, high concentrations in sediment can lead to direct biological effects on aquatic organisms through prolonged exposure and bioaccumulation.

Table 5.

The calculated absorbed dose, Annual Effective Dose, Radium Equivalent, External Hazard Index and Internal Hazard Index in the sediment samples of Eleyele Reservoir, Ibadan.

S/N	Sample code	Absorbed dose (nGy/h)	Annual effective dose (mSv/y)	Radium equivalent (Bqkg⁻¹)	External Hazard Index	Internal Hazard Index
1	1DWS 001	178	0.22	374	1.01	1.06
2	1DWS 002	230	0.28	485	1.31	1.38
3	1DWS 003	192	0.24	405	1.09	1.19
4	1DWS 004	231	0.28	487	1.32	1.44
5	1DWS 005	185	0.23	386	1.04	1.12
6	1DWS 006	362	0.44	770	2.08	2.29
7	1DWS 007	259	0.32	546	1.48	1.56
8	1DWS 008	201	0.25	420	1.13	1.24
9	2DWS 001	276	0.34	585	1.58	1.76
10	2DWS 002	373	0.46	797	2.15	2.31
11	2DWS 003	292	0.36	620	1.68	1.82
12	2DWS 004	262	0.32	555	1.50	1.66
13	2DWS 005	342	0.42	726	1.96	2.16
14	3DWS 001	74	0.09	157	0.42	0.50
15	3DWS 002	190	0.23	402	1.09	1.20
16	3DWS 003	108	0.13	232	0.63	0.68
17	3DWS 005	144	0.18	308	0.83	0.91
18	3DWS 006	143	0.18	299	0.81	0.89
19	4DWS 004	97	0.12	207	0.56	0.60
	Mean	218	0.27	461	1.25	1.35
	Range	74-373	0.09-0.46	157-797	0.42-2.15	0.50-2.31
20	4UPS 001	133	0.16	284	0.77	0.83
21	4UPS 002	41	0.05	88	0.24	0.32
22	4UPS 003	52	0.06	113	0.30	0.31
23	4UPS 004	36	0.04	77	0.21	0.22
24	4UPS 005	73	0.09	157	0.42	0.46
25	4UPS 006	55	0.07	117	0.32	0.32
26	4UPS 007	66	0.08	140	0.38	0.43
	Mean	65	0.08	139	0.38	0.41
	Range	36-133	0.04-0.16	77-284	0.21-0.77	0.22-0.83
	Overall
	Mean	181	0.22	384	1.01	1.1
	Range	(36-373)	(0.04-0.46)	(77-797)	(0.21-2.15)	(0.22-2.31)

Fish Samples

The activity concentrations of primordial radionuclides in the fish samples, as presented in Table 6, revealed that the concentration of ⁴⁰K ranged from 36.67 ± 1.99 to 717.56 ± 38.92 Bqkg⁻¹, with the highest value of 717.56 ± 38.92 Bqkg⁻¹ found in H. bimaculatus flesh and the lowest value of 36.67 ± 1.99 Bqkg⁻¹ found in S. galilaeus whole fish. The average value of 244.69 ± 13.33 Bqkg⁻¹ was recorded for ⁴⁰K in all the fish samples. Similarly, the activity concentration of ²²⁶Ra ranged from BDL to 70.97 Bqkg⁻¹, with the highest activity concentration (70.97 ± 6.43 Bq kg⁻¹) occurring in O. niloticus bones and the lowest (BDL) in P. obscura and O. niloticus whole fish. The average value recorded for ²²⁶Ra was 21.65 ± 1.83 Bqkg⁻¹. The activity concentration of ²³²Th ranged from BDL to 97.83 ± 5.53 Bqkg⁻¹, with O. niloticus flesh being the lowest with a value below the detectable limit and O. niloticus bone below the detectable limit. In comparison, S. melanotheron Gills have the highest activity concentration (97.83 ± 5.53 Bqkg⁻¹) for ²³²Th. The average activity concentration of ²³²Th in the fish samples was 27.76 ± 1.56 Bqkg⁻¹. The average activity concentration of ⁴⁰K in the fish samples from Eleyele Reservoir is within the typical range seen globally but higher than most other locations in Nigeria except for Niger State and Ado Ekiti. As presented in Table 7, the activity concentrations of ²²⁶Ra are moderate, with some locations in Nigeria except Niger Delta and Lagos showing significantly higher values. ²³²Th levels in Eleyele Reservoir are within the lower end of the global range and are comparable to some other locations in Nigeria, such as Lagos.

Table 6.

Activity concentration of ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th in the fish samples of Eleyele Reservoir, Ibadan.

S/N	Species	Part	⁴⁰K (Bq kg⁻¹)	²²⁶Ra (Bq kg⁻¹)	232Th (Bq kg⁻¹)
1	C. gariepinus	Bones	154.83 ± 8.42	10.78 ± 1.01	16.17 ± 0.91
2	C. gariepinus	Flesh	376.02 ± 20.33	27.09 ± 2.53	23.32 ± 1.32
3	G. niloticus	Whole fish	162.95 ± 8.56	1.95 ± 0.19	3.13 ± 0.18
4	H. bimaculatus	Bones	275.43 ± 17.71	5 ± 0.38	18.5 ± 1.03
5	H. bimaculatus	Flesh	717.56 ± 38.92	8.85 ± 0.87	18.97 ± 1.07
6	H. bimaculatus	Whole fish	78.85 ± 4.29	4.65 ± 0.47	21.69 ± 1.23
7	H. bimaculatus	Whole fish	252.96 ± 13.73	32.2 ± 2.93	21.43 ± 1.21
8	H. bimaculatus	Gills	103.73 ± 5.64	BDL	8.92 ± 0.5
9	H. akawo	Flesh	400 ± 21.33	10.17 ± 0.73	24.22 ± 1.34
10	H. akawo	Whole fish	284.68 ± 15.19	60.86 ± 4.12	20.03 ± 1.11
11	O. niloticus	Flesh	337.4 ± 18.35	13.9 ± 1.35	BDL
12	O. niloticus	Bones	199.72 ± 10.87	70.97 ± 6.43	BDL
13	O. niloticus	Flesh	246.23 ± 13.34	30.73 ± 2.67	20.12 ± 1.14
14	O. niloticus	Whole fish	316.78 ± 17.25	BDL	20 ± 1.13
15	O. niloticus	Whole fish	52.23 ± 2.79	18.84 ± 1.3	38.17 ± 2.12
16	P. obscura	Flesh	282.57 ± 15.08	58.5 ± 4.04	46.19 ± 2.56
17	P. obscura	Whole fish	280.28 ± 15.21	BDL	10.99 ± 0.62
18	P. senegalus	Whole fish	59.16 ± 3.16	1.84 ± 0.14	18.51 ± 1.03
19	S. galilaeus	Whole fish	36.67 ± 1.99	12.19 ± 1.26	22.27 ± 1.26
20	S. melanotheron	Bone	257.74 ± 13.76	2.22 ± 0.16	25.13 ± 1.39
21	S. melanotheron	Flesh	222.89 ± 12.09	42.57 ± 3.78	0.78 ± 0.04
22	S. melanotheron	Gills	201.24 ± 10.96	16.03 ± 1.69	97.83 ± 5.53
23	S. melanotheron	Gutt	450.64 ± 24.47	17.88 ± 1.8	80.29 ± 4.53
24	S. melanotheron	Whole fish	122.05 ± 6.52	7.45 ± 0.53	54.01 ± 2.99
		Mean	244.69 ± 13.33	21.65 ± 1.83	27.76 ± 1.56
		Range	(36.67-717.56)	(BDL-70.97)	(BDL-97.83)
		Kurtosis	2.98	0.59	3.62
		Skewness	1.22	1.25	1.90

Table 7.

Comparing the average activity concentration of primordial radionuclides in Fish from Eleyele Reservoir with other locations.

S/N	Location	⁴⁰K (Bq/kg)	²²⁶Ra (Bq/kg)	²³²Th (Bq/kg)	Reference
1	Eleyele Reservoir, Ibadan	244.69 ± 13.33	21.65 ± 1.83	27.76 ± 1.56	Present Study
2	Makoko Lagoon, Lagos	41.04 ± 6.41	10.15 ± 3.19	4.39 ± 2.10	Jibiri et al²
3	Serbia	105.00 ± 23.00	NA	NA	Milenkovic et al⁴²
4	Rivers	29.01 ± 5.38	22.64 ± 4.78	8.45 ± 2.91	Ononugbo and Amah⁶³
5	Ado Ekiti	533.30 ± 37.00	17.80 ± 0.60	3.50 ± 0.40	Fasae and Isinkaye⁶⁴
6	Gombe State	30.19 ± 3.43	10.85 ± 1.74	6.70 ± 0.97	Orosun et al⁶⁵
7	Niger Delta	37.40 ± 3.06	85.90 ± 3.38	11.00 ± 3.38	Babatunde et al⁶⁶
8	Niger State	618.20 ± 26.81	37.22 ± 4.31	94.82 ± 3.82	Adamu et al⁶⁷
9	Ogun	89.13 ± 6.83	3.06 ± 0.26	11.55 ± 3.38	Sowole⁶⁸
10	Lagos & Ondo	218 ± 14.76	50.92 ± 7.04	24.60 ± 6.47	Ojo and Ojo⁶⁹
11	Asia	300-700	30-100	50-150	IAEA³⁶
12	Europe	200-600	20-60	30-90	UNSCEAR¹

Table 8 presents the calculated radiological indices and annual ingestion doses for fish samples from the Eleyele Reservoir. The index measured includes the Annual Effective Ingestion Dose (D_ing), Committed Effective Ingestion Dose (CEID) and Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF). These metrics comprehensively understand the radiological safety and potential health risks of consuming the investigated fish samples. The finding from the present study revealed that average annual effective ingestion dose (D_ing) of 0.02, 0.07 and 0.07 mSvy⁻¹ were determined for ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th, respectively, from the ingestion of these radionuclides. The average committed effective ingestion dose of 0.14 mSvy⁻¹ was calculated from ingesting the investigated radionuclides from the fish samples at Eleyele Reservoir. The calculated total D_ing was less than the global average value of 0.29 mSvy⁻¹, as reported by UNSCEAR.¹ The average committed effective ingestion dose in all the fish samples was 0.07, 0.09, 0.08, 0.15 and 0.25 mSvy⁻¹ for bones, flesh, whole fish, gills and Gut, respectively. Snakehead, being a predator, may consume other contaminated organisms, leading to higher concentrations of radionuclides in its biological compartments, resulting in biomagnification; as a higher trophic level predator, the P. obscura can accumulate higher levels of radionuclides through its diet, leading to more significant internal radiation doses. From Table 8, the flesh of the Snakehead has a high CEID value (0.17 mSvy⁻¹) due to its considerable accumulation of these radionuclides. The highest CEID, as indicated in Table 8, was in S. melanotheron Gills and Gut; this could be because the Gut is directly involved in the digestion and absorption of food, which can include radionuclides present in ingested materials. This process can lead to higher concentrations of radionuclides in the Gut than in other tissues. Also, Black chin tilapia may ingest sediment while feeding, primarily if it feeds on benthic organisms or detritus. In addition, natural radionuclides from the sediment samples could be transferred to the aquatic species via ingestion, leading to increased accumulation of these radionuclides in the Gut.

Table 8.

The annual effective ingestion dose, committed effective ingestion dose and bioaccumulation factor of the fish samples at Eleyele Reservoir, Ibadan.

S/N	Species	Part	Annual Effective Ingestion dose (mSv/y)			CEID (mSv/y)	BAF
S/N	Species	Part	⁴⁰K	²²⁶Ra	²³²Th	CEID (mSv/y)	⁴⁰K	²²⁶Ra	²³²Th
1	C. gariepinus	Bones	0.011	0.034	0.042	0.087	0.224	0.611	0.076
2	C. gariepinus	Flesh	0.026	0.086	0.061	0.173	0.492	1.055	0.083
3	G. niloticus	Whole fish	0.011	0.006	0.008	0.026	0.240	0.056	0.014
4	H. bimaculatus	Bones	0.019	0.016	0.048	0.083	0.385	0.112	0.068
5	H. bimaculatus	Flesh	0.050	0.028	0.049	0.128	0.864	0.310	0.092
6	H. bimaculatus	Whole fish	0.006	0.015	0.056	0.077	0.098	0.060	0.049
7	H. bimaculatus	Whole fish	0.018	0.102	0.056	0.175	0.314	1.075	0.067
8	H. bimaculatus	Gills	0.007	BDL	0.023	0.030	0.114	BDL	0.041
9	H. akawo	Flesh	0.028	0.032	0.063	0.123	0.649	0.151	0.074
10	H. akawo	Whole fish	0.020	0.193	0.052	0.265	0.487	1.047	0.041
11	O. niloticus	Flesh	0.024	0.044	BDL	0.068	0.536	0.254	BDL
12	O. niloticus	Bones	0.014	0.225	BDL	0.239	0.294	1.188	BDL
13	O. niloticus	Flesh	0.017	0.097	0.052	0.167	0.306	0.407	0.049
14	O. niloticus	Whole fish	0.022	BDL	0.052	0.074	1.526	BDL	0.248
15	O. niloticus	Whole fish	0.004	0.060	0.099	0.162	0.103	0.458	0.170
16	P. obscura	Flesh	0.020	0.185	0.120	0.325	1.591	3.061	0.332
17	P. obscura	Whole fish	0.020	BDL	0.029	0.048	2.309	BDL	0.058
18	P. senegalus	Whole fish	0.004	0.006	0.048	0.058	0.091	0.062	0.121
19	S. galilaeus	Whole fish	0.003	0.039	0.058	0.099	0.213	0.845	0.178
20	S. melanotheron	Bone	0.018	0.007	0.065	0.090	1.054	0.100	0.148
21	S. melanotheron	Flesh	0.016	0.135	0.002	0.152	34.450	1.350	0.020
22	S. melanotheron	Gills	0.014	0.051	0.254	0.319	6.758	BDL	1.277
23	S. melanotheron	Gutt	0.032	0.057	0.209	0.297	3.099	2.726	1.954
24	S. melanotheron	Whole fish	0.009	0.024	0.140	0.172	2.117	0.497	0.562
	Mean		0.017	0.069	0.072	0.158	2.43	0.77	0.26

The highest BAF value for ⁴⁰K was found in the flesh of Black chin tilapia (34.450), suggesting significant accumulation, likely due to the fish’s diet and metabolic processes that favour potassium uptake, and the lowest was in P. senegalus whole fish (0.099). High BAF values for ²³⁸Ra are seen in the flesh of P. obscura (3.061) and the Gut of S. melanotheron (2.726), indicating these species are particularly effective at accumulating ²³⁸Ra, which may be related to their feeding habits and the geochemistry of their habitat. Different species and parts of the fish show varying BAF values, reflecting differences in feeding habits, metabolic processes and environmental conditions. For example, the flesh of Black chin tilapia showed an exceptionally high BAF for ⁴⁰K due to its diet, while the Gut of Black chin tilapia showed a high BAF of ²³²Th due to sediment ingestion. This suggests a detritivore or omnivorous feeding habit, where ingestion of contaminated sediments and detritus significantly increases radionuclide exposure. The gut content is directly exposed to contaminated particulate matter, explaining high BAFs in non-muscular tissues. Similarly, P. obscura showed a high accumulation in flesh for the three radionuclides. Bioaccumulation may occur through biomagnification from contaminated prey, as higher trophic levels tend to accumulate more radionuclides, especially in metabolically active tissues. In contrast, P. senegalus, which has a benthic carnivorous diet, shows relatively low BAFs for all radionuclides, possibly due to reduced exposure to suspended radionuclide-bearing particles and a slower metabolism.

The environmental conditions of fish species can influence their radionuclide exposure. C. gariepinus and H. bimaculatus, which dwell near or within sediments, show moderate to high BAFs for ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th in bones and flesh. Bones accumulate ²²⁶Ra due to their chemical similarity to calcium, facilitating incorporation into skeletal structures. Physiological differences such as metabolic rate, osmoregulatory capacity and gill architecture influence radionuclide uptake. For instance, species with higher metabolic rates (eg, tilapia) may take up more ⁴⁰K due to its role in cellular activity. Differences in gut physiology also explain varied radionuclide retention. For instance, S. melanotheron shows a high ²³²Th in the gut, likely due to particulate ingestion and prolonged digestive processing. A BAF ⩾ 1 signifies that an organism accumulates the substance at a higher concentration than the environment, indicating a potential risk. Some fish species with a more excellent BAF value exhibited this characteristic. Conversely, a BAF ⩽ 1 indicates lower accumulation, suggesting a lesser risk. Radionuclide bioaccumulation in fish is governed by a synergy of feeding behaviour, habitat preference, tissue biochemistry and species physiology. Benthic and detritivore species are more susceptible to high radionuclide uptake, particularly for sediment-bound isotopes like ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th. Conversely, pelagic and carnivorous species may exhibit lower accumulation unless biomagnification plays a role. Tissue-specific patterns further highlight the role of functional biology in determining radionuclide distribution, with bones, gills and guts serving as key reservoirs depending on the isotope in question.

Statistical Analysis and Pearson’s Correlation Studies

The statistical analysis of the activity concentrations and radiological hazard indices was performed using the Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet. In addition, the Pearson correlation was done using IBM SPSS-29 (Statistical Package for Social Science). The present study computed and presented statistical metrics such as skewness, kurtosis, standard deviation, mean and range. The degree of correlation between the activity concentration and the radiological hazard indices in the sediment samples was investigated using the Pearson correlation. Skewness is a measure of the symmetrical distribution of the sediment samples. A skewness of 0 indicates a fully symmetrical distribution, while a negative skewness means the distribution is to the left side. A positive skewness value suggests a right-skewed distribution with a longer right-side distribution tail. In the present study, the skewness of the activity concentration, absorbed dose and other radiological hazard indices from the sediment samples was positive except for ⁴⁰K, whose skewness was negative (Table 9). The skewness findings suggest that the calculated primordial radionuclide concentrations may have comparatively greater values near the higher end of the distribution. Figure 8a to c show the frequency histograms and corresponding distribution curves for ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th in sediment samples from Eleyele Reservoir.

Table 9.

Kurtosis and skewness of the activity concentration of primordial radionuclides and radiological hazard indices from Eleyele Reservoir’s sediment.

Variables	⁴⁰K (Bq kg⁻¹)	²²⁶Ra (Bq kg⁻¹)	²³²Th (Bq kg⁻¹)	Absorbed dose (nGy/h)	Annual Effective Dose (mSv/y)	Ra_eq (Bq kg⁻¹)	H_ex	H_in
Kurtosis	−1.7	−0.3	−0.6	−0.8	−0.8	-1.0	−0.9	−0.9
Skewness	−0.2	0.7	0.5	0.4	0.4	0.4	0.4	0.5

Figure 8.

(a) Sediment samples from the Eleyele Reservoir showing the frequency distribution of the ⁴⁰K activity concentration. (b) The frequency distribution of the activity concentration of 226Ra in the Eleyele Reservoir sediment samples. (c) The frequency distribution of the activity concentration of 232Th in the Eleyele Reservoir sediment samples.

Similarly, kurtosis is a distribution’s peakness metric, usually calculated by comparing it to a normal distribution. Leptokurtic distributions have a very high peak, while platykurtic distributions have a flat top. Mesokurtic refers to a normal distribution that is neither flat-topped nor excessively peaked. In the sediment samples from the present study (Table 9), the kurtosis of the activity concentrations and other radiological hazard indices was negative, producing smaller peaks than the standard curve. The Pearson correlation analysis is presented in Table 10. A statistically significant positive correlation (P < .05) was observed among the radiological hazard indices, absorbed dose, annual effective dose and activity concentrations. The strong positive Pearson correlation indicates that as the activity concentration of the radionuclides in the sediment samples increases, the radiological hazard indices also increase proportionally. In addition, the strong correlation may also indicate that radionuclides play a significant role in the gamma radiation emission at the Eleyele Reservoir area.

Table 10.

Pearson’s correlation of primordial radionuclides (⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra, ²³²Th), annual effective dose, absorbed dose, and radiological hazards indices in the sediment samples of Eleyele Reservoir, Ibadan.

Parameters	⁴⁰K	²²⁶Ra	²³²Th	DR	AED	H_ex	H_in	Ra_eq
⁴⁰K	1.000
²²⁶Ra	.644	1.000
²³²Th	.755	.854	1.000
DR	.803	.909	.981	1.000
AED	.805	.909	.981	1.000	1.000
H_ex	.788	.909	.984	.995	.995	1.000
H_in	.780	.913	.983	.994	.994	1.000	1.000
Ra_eq	.790	.906	.984	.994	.994	1.000	.999	1.000

Conclusion

Sediment and fish samples from Eleyele Reservoir, Ibadan, Oyo state, have been studied using gamma-ray spectroscopy and data on radionuclides’ activity concentrations and other radiological hazard indices were calculated. In sediment, the examined primordial radionuclides (⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th) have average activity concentrations significantly above the global average value (downstream), as presented in the UNSCEAR report.¹ Comparison of these activity concentrations with reported global values revealed significant elevation, except for a few locations, as presented in Table 6. The Radium equivalent activity, the internal and external hazard indices of the sediment from Eleyele’s Reservoir (downstream), slightly exceeded the recommended limits for construction purposes and, hence, should be used by the general populace with some caution for building purposes. The average annual effective dose (0.22 mSvy⁻¹) was significantly lower than the worldwide average of 0.48 mSvy⁻¹, according to the UNSCEAR report.¹

In the fish samples, the average Committed Effective Ingestion Dose (CEID) was 0.143 mSv/y, less than that of 1 mSv/y according to IAEA⁷⁰ and ICRP⁷¹ publications. These publications gave a dose criterion of 1 mSv/y as a reference level for ingesting natural radionuclides. Moreover, the highest CEID was obtained in the S. melanotheron Gut; this could be because the Gut is directly involved in the digestion and absorption of food, which can include radionuclides present in ingested materials. This process can lead to higher concentrations of radionuclides in the Gut compared to other tissues. In addition, the high CEID values in the fish gut suggest that internal organs may pose higher ingestion risks than flesh alone. Also, Blackchin tilapia may ingest sediment while feeding, primarily if it feeds on benthic organisms or detritus. Different species and parts of the fish show varying BAF values, reflecting differences in feeding habits, metabolic processes and environmental conditions. This study emphasises the significance of ongoing monitoring and assessment of radiological parameters in aquatic environments to ensure public health safety. While fish appears generally safe for consumption under current exposure assumptions, caution is advised regarding sediment use for construction purposes. Based on the findings of this study, it is recommended that periodic monitoring of sediment and aquatic life is advised, especially downstream, to track long-term changes and mitigate potential exposure risks. The present results could serve as reference data for future research on the Reservoir, the environment and marine life to highlight any significant changes in radiological hazard parameters. It could also contribute to generating a wider set of data that will help to ascertain the radiological risk posed by exposure to radionuclides in the sediment and aquatic organisms. This study adds to the growing body of knowledge on NORMs in freshwater systems and underscores the need for integrated aquatic ecosystem protection.

The limitation of this study, which could be addressed in future research, is that it only considered the measurement of natural radionuclides in fish and sediment of Eleyele Reservoir and not water in the study area. This current study can be viewed as a baseline investigation of radionuclide content in the sediment and fish samples of Eleyele Reservoir, Ibadan. Future research could focus on the assessment of the natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in the water of the study area. In addition, further studies across multiple seasons and incorporating water samples are recommended to validate and expand upon these findings. Moreover, the measurement of radon levels in the reservoir could also be investigated since the reservoir is a major water source for the Eleyele community.

Footnotes

ORCID iDs

Akindayo Abiodun Sowunmi

Idowu Richard Akomolafe

Nnamdi Norbert Jibiri

Author Contributions

James Silo Sunday: Methodology, Data curation, Investigation, Project administration. Akindayo Abiodun Sowunmi: Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Validation, and editing. Idowu Richard Akomolafe: Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Nnamdi Norbert Jibiri: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Funding acquisition, Visualization, and editing.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

UNSCEAR – United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Ionising. Sources and Effects of Ionising Radiation. In: Report to the General Assembly With Annex, Vol. 1. UNSCEAR; 2000.

Jibiri

Ugbechie

Sowunmi

Akomolafe

. Radionuclide contents in sediment and seafood from Makoko Lagoon, Lagos State, Nigeria. Mar Pollut Bull. 2023;192:114992.

Khatri

Tyagi

. Influences of natural and anthropogenic factors on surface and groundwater quality in rural and urban areas. Front Life Sci. 2015;8(1):23-39.

Gharbi

Baccouche

Abdelli

Samaali

Oueslati

Trabelsi

. Uranium isotopes in Tunisian bottled mineral waters. J Environ Radioact. 2010;101(8):589-590.

Piñero-García

Thomas

Mantero

Forssell-Aronsson

Isaksson

. Concentration of radionuclides in Swedish market basket and its radiological implications. Food Control. 2022;133:108658.

Isinkaye

Fasanmi

Osman

Khandaker

. Naturally occurring radionuclides and potentially toxic elements in mine waters from artisanal mining sites within the Ife-Ilesha schist-belt in Nigeria. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C. 2025;139:103902.

Basith

Krishnamoorthy

Priyadharshini

Duong

Musthafa

. Health risk assessment of natural radionuclides through the consumption of fish species in Pazhaverkadu Lagoon, Southeast Coast of India. Appl Radiat Isot. 2025;220:111753.

Santhanabharathi

Ahmed

Chandrasekaran

, et al. Spatial distribution and radiological risk assessment of natural radionuclides in sediments from Kayamkulam Estuary, Kerala. Environ Pollut Manag. 2025;2:77-86.

Şirin

Karslı

Öğretmen

ÖY

Baltaş

. Assessment of radioactive contamination in Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) along the coast of Turkey, Georgia, and Abkhazia in the Black Sea: A status assessment for human health risks. Mar Environ Res. 2025;209:107168.

10.

Zheng

Wang

, et al. Radionuclides in marine food web along China’s coastal waters: activity, distribution and trophic level bio-magnification. Environ Res. 2025;275:121370.

11.

Muhammad

Ismail

Garba

. Evaluation of total effective dose and excess lifetime cancer risk associated with tin mining activities in Nigeria using generic and resrad simulation methods. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2024;17(1):100768.

12.

Srilerd

Kungskulniti

Tumnoi

Charoenca

. Radiological risk assessment in the Asian green mussel (Perna viridis) and the Thai seafood consumers. Environ Adv. 2024;15:100487.

13.

Risal

Islam

Ferdous

Siddik

MNA

Bakshi

. Natural radioactivity and heavy metal contamination in edible fish, shellfish and mollusks at the Bay of Bengal, Kuakata, Bangladesh. Heliyon. 2024;10(18):e37787.

14.

Piñero-García

Thomas

Mantero

Forssell-Aronsson

Isaksson

. Biodistribution of naturally occurring radionuclides and radiocesium in wild European perch (Perca fluviatilis). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023;260:115085.

15.

Zorer

ÖS

Yorgun

Özdemir

ÖF

, et al. Comprehensive natural radioactivity and pollution risk assessments of aquatic media and sediment in Lake Van (Türkiye). Mar Pollut Bull. 2023;186:114449.

16.

Nduka

Kelle

Umeh

Okafor

Iloka

Okoyomon

. Ecological and health risk assessment of radionuclides and heavy metals of surface and ground water of Ishiagu–Ezillo quarry sites of Ebonyi, Southeast Nigeria. J Hazard Mater Adv. 2023;10:100307.

17.

Abbasi

Issa

SAM

Mirekhtiary

Algethami

Zakaly

HMH

. Radioactivity concentration levels and potential radiotoxicity risk assessment of aquatic superfoods case study of algae supplements. Mar Pollut Bull. 2024;205:116610.

18.

Abbasi

Almousa

Zakaly

HMH

. The distribution of radiotoxic 137Cs concentrations in seaweed and mussel species in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Pollut Bull. 2023;197:115737.

19.

Abbasi

Algethami

Bawazeer

Zakaly

HMH

. Distribution of natural and anthropogenic radionuclides and associated radiation indices in the southwestern coastline of the Caspian Sea. Mar Pollut Bull. 2022;178:113593.

20.

Abbasi

Zakaly

HMH

Badawi

. The anthropogenic radiotoxic element of 137Cs accumulate to biota in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021;164:112043.

21.

Abbasi

Zakaly

HMH

Mirekhtiary

. Baseline levels of natural radionuclides concentration in sediments, East coastline of North Cyprus. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020;161:111793.

22.

Zakaly

Uosif

Madkour

, et al. Assessment of natural radionuclides and heavy metal concentrations in marine sediments in view of tourism activities in Hurghada city, northern Red Sea, Egypt. J Phys Sci. 2019;30:21-47.

23.

Taskin

Karavus

Topuzoglu

Hidiroglu

Karahan

. Radionuclide concentrations in soil and lifetime cancer risk due to gamma radioactivity in Kirklareli, Turkey. J Environ Radioact. 2009;100(1):49-53.

24.

Awad

El Mezayen

El Azab

Alfi

Ali

Hanfi

. Radioactive risk assessment of beach sand along the coastline of the Mediterranean Sea at El-Arish area, North Sinai, Egypt. Mar Pollut Bull. 2022;177:113494.

25.

Khan

Raj

Ross

Wesley

. Concentration of natural radionuclides (⁴⁰K, ²²⁸Ra and ²²⁶Ra) in seafood and their dose to coastal adult inhabitants around Kudankulam, Gulf of Mannar, South India. Int J Low Radiat. 2007;4(3):217-231.

26.

Desideri

Meli

Roselli

. Natural radionuclides in seafood from the central Adriatic Sea (Italy). Health Phys. 2011;100(2):160-166.

27.

Alrefae

Nageswaran

Al-Shemali

. Radioactivity of long-lived gamma emitters in canned seafood consumed in Kuwait. J Assoc Arab Univ Basic Appl Sci. 2014;15:6-9.

28.

Ademola

Ehiedu

. Radiological analysis of ⁴⁰K, ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th in fish, crustacean and sediment samples from fresh and marine water in the oil exploration area of Ondo State, Nigeria. Afr J Biomed Res. 2010;13(2):99-106.

29.

Jibiri

Akomolafe

. Radiological assessment and geochemical characterisation of the sediments of Awba Reservoir, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Radiat Prot Environ. 2016;39(4):222-232.

30.

Ayoade

Owolabi

Patience

Adeduntan

Kujooro

. Species diversity and catch per unit effort of fish in a perturbed tropical lake, Ibadan, Nigeria. Acad Biol. 2024;2(1):10.

31.

Ojelabi

Agbede

Wahab

Aiyelokun

Ojelabi

. Water quality assessment of Eleyele Reservoir, Ibadan, South-Western Nigeria. Civ Environ Res. 2018;10(8):52-59.

32.

Olokeogun

Ayanlade

Popoola

. Assessment of riparian zone dynamics and its flood-related implications in the Eleyele area of Ibadan, Nigeria. Environ Syst Res. 2020;9(1):6.

33.

Kareem

Olanrewaju

Orisasona

. Aspect of the reproductive biology of Parachanna obscura, Gunther 1861 in a southwestern Nigerian reservoir. Int J Environ Impacts. 2019;2(3):272-282.

34.

Idodo-Umeh

. Freshwater Fishes of Nigeria: Taxonomy, Ecological Notes, Diet and Utilisation. Idodo Umeh Publishers; 2003:232

35.

Olaosebikan

Raji

, eds. Field Guide to Nigerian Freshwater Fishes. Revised ed. Federal College Freshwater Fisheries Technology; 2013:144.

36.

IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency. Reference Sheet: Reference Material IAEA-327 Radionuclides in Soil. IAEA; 2001.

37.

Tahir

Jamil

Zaidi

Arif

Ahmed

Ahmad

. Measurements of activity concentrations of naturally occurring radionuclides in soil samples from Punjab province of Pakistan and assessment of radiological hazards. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;113(4):421-427.

38.

Beretka

Matthew

. Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and by-products. Health Phys. 1985;48(1):87-95.

39.

International Atomic Energy Agency. Sediment Distribution Coefficients and Concentration Factors for Biota in the Marine Environment (Technical Report Series No. 422). IAEA; 2004.

40.

WorldFish. Nigeria. Country Profile. Fast Facts. Accessed on May 2, 2025. Available at: https://worldfishcenter.org/where-we-work/africa/nigeria

41.

ICRP. Compendium of dose coefficients based on ICRP Publication 60 (ICRP Publication 119, Ann ICRP 41 [Suppl.]). Ann Int Comm Radiol Prot. 2012;40:1-257.

42.

Milenkovic

Stajic

Stojic

Pucarevic

Strbac

. Evaluation of heavy metals and radionuclides in fish and seafood products. Chemosphere. 2019;229:324-331.

43.

Olaniran

. Fishing activities and fish species diversity assessment in Eleiyele Lake, Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr J Livest Ext. 2003;2:72-74.

44.

Akinpelu

Hassana

. Impact of physicochemical characteristics on fishery status of Eleyele and Asejire Reservoir. Eur Exp Bio. 2023;13:20-24.

45.

King

. Length-weight relationship of Nigerian freshwater water fishes. NAGA, The ICLARM Quart. 1996;19:53-58.

46.

Isinkaye

Emelue

. Natural radioactivity measurements and evaluation of radiological hazards in the sediment of Oguta Lake, South East Nigeria. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2015;8(3):459-469.

47.

Shahrokhi

Adelikhah

Chalupnik

Kovács

. Multivariate statistical approach on the distribution of natural and anthropogenic radionuclides and associated radiation indices along the north-western coastline of Aegean Sea, Greece. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021;163:112009.

48.

Yushin

Jakhu

Chaligava

Grozdov

Zinicovscaia

. Natural and anthropogenic radionuclides concentration with heavy metals analysis of the sediments collected around Novaya Zemlya. Mar Pollut Bull. 2023;194:115346.

49.

Abbasi

Mirekhtiary

. Heavy metals and natural radioactivity concentration in sediments of the Mediterranean Sea coast. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020;154:111041.

50.

Osiga-Aibangbee

Enaroseha

OOE

Agbajor

. Potential health risk assessment of sediment and water in some Niger Delta areas of Nigeria. Nucl Anal. 2025;4(1):100159.

51.

Ilori

Chetty

Adeleye

. Activity concentration of natural radionuclides in sediments of Bree, Klein-Brak, Bakens, and uMngeni rivers and their associated radiation hazard indices. Trans R Soc S Afr. 2020;75(3):258-265.

52.

Onjefu

Taole

Kgabi

Grant

Antoine

. Assessment of natural radionuclide distribution in shore sediment samples collected from the North Dune beach, Henties Bay, Namibia. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2017;10(4):301-306.

53.

International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103;2007.

54.

Mikelić

Oreščanin

Cukrov

Tomašić

Rubčić

Barišić

. Relationships between radionuclides, metals, and sediment properties in the sediment of a bay exposed to anthropogenic pressure and mixed sediment sources (Kaštela Bay, Adriatic Sea, Croatia). Mar Pollut Bull. 2023;197:115731.

55.

Mtshawu

Bezuidenhout

Kilel

. Spatial autocorrelation and hotspot analysis of natural radionuclides to study sediment transport. J Environ Radioact. 2023;264:107207.

56.

Bharath

Natesan

Chandrasekaran

, et al. Geochemometrics of primordial radionuclides and their potential radiological risk in coastal sediments of the southeast coast of India. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2023;16(1):100525.

57.

Yakovlev

Puchkov

. Assessment of current natural and anthropogenic radionuclide activity concentrations in the bottom sediments from the Barents Sea. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020;160:111571.

58.

ElTaher

Najam

Hussian

Ali Omar

. Evaluation of natural radionuclide content in Nile River sediments and excess lifetime cancer risk associated with gamma radiation. Iran J Med Phys. 2019;16(1):27-33.

59.

Carvalho

FMD

Lauria

DDC

Ribeiro

FCA

Fonseca

Peres

SDS

Martins

NSF

. Natural and man-made radionuclides in sediments of an inlet in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Mar Pollut Bull. 2016;107(1):269-276.

60.

SureshGandhi

Ravisankar

Rajalakshmi

Sivakumar

Chandrasekaran

Pream Anand

. Measurements of natural gamma radiation in beach sediments of the northeast coast of Tamilnadu, India, by gamma-ray spectrometry with a multivariate statistical approach. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2014;7(1):7-17.

61.

Muhammad

Jaafar

Abdul Rahman

Ingawa

. Determination of radioactive elements and heavy metals in sediments and soil from domestic water sources in northern peninsular Malaysia. Environ Monit Assess. 2012;184:5043-5049.

62.

Uosif

. Gamma-ray spectroscopic analysis of selected samples from Nile river sediments in upper Egypt. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2007;123(2):215-220.

63.

Ononugbo

Amah

. Radioactivity concentrations and their radiological significance in sediments of some communities in Andoni, Rivers State, Nigeria. Asian J Adv Res Rep. 2019;6(3):1-11.

64.

Fasae

Isinkaye

. Radiological risks assessment of ²³⁸U, ²³²Th and ⁴⁰K in fish feeds and catfish samples from selected fish farms in Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2018;11(4):317-322.

65.

Orosun

Adewale

Cornelius

, et al. Measurement of natural radionuclides concentration and radiological impact assessment of fish samples from Dadin Kowa Dam, Gombe State Nigeria. Afr J Med Phys. 2018;1(1):25-35.

66.

Babatunde

Sikoki

Hart

. Human health impact of natural and artificial radioactivity levels in the sediments and fish of Bonny Estuary, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Challenges. 2015;6(2):244-257.

67.

Adamu

Zakari

Ahmed

Abubakar

Vatsa

. Analysis of activity concentrations due to natural radionuclides in the fish of Kainji Lake. Adv Appl Sci Res. 2013;4(4):283-287.

68.

Sowole

. Dose rates of natural radionuclides in fishes from rivers in Sagamu Ogun State Nigeria. Can J Pure Appl Sci. 2011;5(3):1729-1732.

69.

Ojo

. Radiological study of brackish and freshwater food samples in Lagos and Ondo States. In: Southwestern Nigeria NIP 30th Annual Conf. Book of Abstract, NIP-LASU-E22; 2007.

70.

Joint FAO, World Health Organisation. Criteria for Radionuclide Activity Concentrations for Food and Drinking Water. Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture; 2016.

71.

ICRP. Foundation docs optimisation; dose to the individual; 2020:15-19. https://www.icrp.org/consultation_viewitem.asp?guid=%7BAA637952-8C7E-4FDF-92B7-10F14A67AACF%7D

Evaluation of Radiological Risks From Radionuclides in Fish and Sediment of Eleyele Reservoir,Ibadan,Nigeria

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and Methods

The Location of the Reservoir

Sampling and Processing of Sediments

Fish Collection and Laboratory Analyses

The Counting Assembly

The Counting System’s Energy Calibration

Efficiency of the Detector

The Background Count and Sample Radioactivity Measurements

Assessment of Radionuclide Activity Levels in the Samples

Analysing the Sediment Samples for Radiological Hazard Indices

Absorbed Dose Rate ( D R

Annual Effective Dose (AED)

Radium Equivalent (Raeq)

External Hazard Index (Hex)

Internal Hazard Index (Hin)

The Bioaccumulation Factor (BAF)

Activity Concentration of Radionuclides in Fish Samples

Annual Effective Ingestion dose (Ding) (for Fish Samples)

Committed Effective Dose

Results and Discussion

Fish Assemblage of Eleyele Reservoir

Sediment

Fish Samples

Statistical Analysis and Pearson’s Correlation Studies

Conclusion

Footnotes

ORCID iDs

Author Contributions

Funding

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

References

Absorbed Dose Rate ( $D_{R}$

Radium Equivalent (Ra_eq)

External Hazard Index (H_ex)

Internal Hazard Index (H_in)

Annual Effective Ingestion dose (D_ing) (for Fish Samples)