Soil Nitrous Oxide Emissions Following Crop Residues Management in Corn-Wheat Rotation Under Conventional and No-Tillage Systems

Abstract

Agricultural activity is the major anthropogenic source of nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions from terrestrial ecosystems. Conservation agriculture including crop residue management can play a key role in enhancing soil resilience to climate change and mitigating N₂O emissions. We investigated the effects of crop residue rates, including 100 % (R₁₀₀), 50 % (R₅₀), and residue removal (R₀), on N₂O emissions in corn-wheat rotation under conventional (CT) and no-tillage (NT) systems. The key factors evaluated affecting N₂O emissions included soil temperature, soil moisture, soil ammonium, and soil nitrate concentrations. Results showed that the N₂O emissions increased with the increasing rate of residue under both CT and NT systems. Both R₁₀₀ and R₅₀ significantly (p < .05) increased the N₂O emissions compared to R₀ during the annual rotation cycle. Soil moisture and mineral nitrogen (ammonium and nitrate) were the main driving factors that stimulated N₂O emission in both CT and NT systems. In the NT and CT systems, cumulative N₂O emissions showed a significant increase with R₅₀ (+75.5 % in NT, +36.5 % in CT) and R₁₀₀ (+134 % in NT, +40 % in CT) as compared to R₀. Furthermore, no significant differences were found between R₁₀₀ and R₅₀ in the CT system, while in the NT system significant increases were observed for R₁₀₀ compared to R₅₀. Overall, our study justified as a first approach only during the first year that crop residue removal led to decreased N₂O emissions under semi-arid conditions. However, due to the deteriorating impact of crop residue removal on crop productivity and soil C sequestration, this management method cannot be considered a sustainable agronomic practice. We suggest long-term studies to determine the appropriate rate of postharvest crop residue to achieve less N₂O emissions and climate-friendly agricultural practices.

Keywords

Greenhouse gases crop residue soil management nitrous oxide emission conventional tillage no-tillage global warming

Introduction

The three major GHGs which contribute to global warming are carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), and nitrous oxide (N₂O) (Mirzaei et al., 2022; Mohammed et al., 2022; Snyder et al., 2009). Especially, nitrous oxide is considered a potent GHGs because of its greater global warming potential (298 more powerful than CO₂) (Collins et al., 2017; IPCC, 2007). The N₂O is a long-lived radiatively active greenhouse gas with an atmospheric lifetime of 114 ± 10 years and the major source of ozone-depleting reactions (Prather & Hsu, 2010; Ussiri & Lal, 2012; Zaman et al., 2021). Soil N₂O emissions are highly heterogeneous in space and time, given their association with both climatic factors and agricultural management practices (Brown et al., 2001; Rodrigo-Comino et al., 2022). Management practices can affect N₂O emissions by altering soil temperature and water content (Dusenbury et al., 2008; Liebig et al., 2010).

Crop residue retention is one of the soil management methods that have significant advantages in improving soil quality, yield production, and mitigating GHGs (Cherubin et al., 2021; Johnson et al., 2017; Stewart et al., 2015). Crop residue can directly affect N₂O emissions by regulating mineral nitrogen (N) substrate availability (Essich et al., 2020; Pelster et al., 2013; Seiz et al., 2019), and indirectly by changes in the soil environment (Smith et al., 2007). Enhanced N₂O emissions have been reported after the application of high amounts of crop residue (Schmatz et al., 2020). In contrast, some researchers reported recently that the addition of residues intensifies the recovery of microbial C and increases moisture, microbial activity, and thus oxygen consumption, which consequently leads to anaerobic conditions (Baggs et al., 2006; Taghizadeh-Toosi et al., 2021) and thereby the reduction of N₂O to N₂.

Tillage operations can influence the soil’s physical properties (structure, aeration, moisture, temperature), C and N availability, microbial activity, and oxygen consumption (Baggs et al., 2006; Monti et al., 2021), which likely affect the N₂O emissions (Badagliacca et al., 2018; Plaza-Bonilla et al., 2014). Baggs et al. (2003) and Rochette et al. (2008) have reported higher N₂O emissions under no-tillage compared to conventional tillage systems. Incremental N₂O emissions under the NT system were attributed to the enhanced denitrification, existence of anaerobic conditions, and availability of readily degradable carbon. While others indicated lower emissions for no-tillage systems (Gregorich et al., 2008; Yoo et al., 2016) due to the better aeration, increased nitrification, and sequential denitrification, and nitrification by denitrifiers and nitrifiers under favorable soil environmental conditions.

Corn-wheat rotation is one of the major crop rotations in Iran and large amounts of crop residues are obtained from it annually. Plant residues are removed from agricultural lands after harvest to provide various purposes such as livestock fodder, fuel, construction, etc., and the rest is burned, which reduces soil quality and emits GHGs. Therefore, the optimal management of crop residues, such as maintaining an appropriate amount of crop residues in agricultural lands, in addition, to meeting the above objectives, ensures sustainable agricultural goals in such a system. According to a comprehensive review of the relating literature, there is no available information about the effect of crop residue management practices on GHGs emissions, especially N₂O emissions, from agricultural soils.

We hypothesized that soil N₂O emissions increase with the application of a higher amount of crop residue compared to cases without residue. Crop residue decomposition adds more nitrogen and carbon to the soil and retains higher soil moisture which creates favorable conditions for production and emissions of N₂O from the soil. Further, we hypothesized that N₂O emissions would be higher in the no-tillage (NT) system compared to the conventional tillage (CT) system during the first year of application. In the NT system, lack of soil disturbance and retention of crop residue on the soil surface lead to greater soil moisture, increased microbial activity, and oxygen consumption, and, consequently, higher N₂O emissions. The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of different crop residue rates on N₂O emission in corn–wheat rotation under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) systems.

Material and Methods

Methodological framework

This research took place between July 2018 and July 2019 and was conducted at the University of Tehran, Agriculture Research Station of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Two fields with 15 years of cultivation history of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) - corn (Zea mays L.) rotation system were selected for this experiment. The annual average (1980–2019) rainfall and temperature of the area are 245 mm and 13.7 ^oC respectively. The dimension of each of the two fields was 11 × 16 m. Each of them had different strategies of management. The first one is characterized by the conventional tillage (CT) system and the second one by the no-tillage (NT) system.

Each field had been split into nine plots of 3 × 4 m: a complete randomized block strategy was implemented with three replications. The distance between the sites of replications was 2 m and the distance between plots was 1 m. The physicochemical soil properties of both NT and CT fields have been reported previously (Mirzaei et al., 2021).

The soil texture type was sandy loam in the CT system and clay loam in the NT system. The studied soils in both systems had a pH value of more than seven at both 0 to 10 and 10 to 20 cm soil depths and there were no salinity problems. In both soil depths, the amount of organic carbon content in the CT system was almost the same and less than 1 %, while in the NT system its value for both depths was more than 1 %. The amount of total nitrogen was in the range of 0.07 % to 0.09 % and 0.08 % to 0.11 % in the CT and NT systems respectively. The amounts of available phosphorus and potassium were higher than the critical levels in the NT system but less than the critical levels in the CT system.

Field research method

The applied research method was based on the treatment of the soils with winter wheat residue. This treatment was implemented through the homogeneous spreading of wheat residue in different concentrations on both soil types, CT and NT, before the sowing of corn in July 2018. The three concentrations used were 3.5 t ha−1. (100 %, R₁₀₀); 1.75 t ha−1 (50 %, R₅₀); and no-residue (0 %, R₀). These different rates of wheat residue (C:N = 66) were applied on the plots in which the two fields were divided.

In the CT system, the crop residue was incorporated into the soil to the depth of 35 cm using a moldboard plow, while in the NT system, crop residue remained on the soil surface. Corn was planted with a seed density of 8 seeds m⁻². The sowing of corn was done in rows with a 75 cm distance between them.

A seeding machine was adapted to both fields (CT and NT) to maintain the original management style. In the CT field, the sowing was achieved through a previous preparation of the soil using a moldboard plow down to 35 cm depth. The NT field was sowed with a single coulter plow to loosen the soil. After disking and leveling the CT soil, basal NPK fertilizers were uniformly distributed on the soil surface in both fields. For this purpose, 23 kg N ha⁻¹ as Urea, 30 kg K ha⁻¹ as Potassium sulfate, and 30 kg P ha⁻¹ as Superphosphate were used. Irrigation was carried out directly after seeding using the sprinkler method. Subsequent irrigation events were performed based on environmental conditions and 7 to 10-day intervals. At eight leaves and ten leaves stages, extra layers of fertilizer including 37 and 125 kg N ha⁻¹ as Urea were used, respectively. Additionally, at the four leaves and eight leaves stages, weeds were removed by hand. The same process was repeated in October 2018, after the corn harvest.

Winter wheat was planted in November 2018 with a seed density of 350 seeds m⁻². The row spacing for wheat was 13.5 cm. Before the planting, we applied basal fertilizer treatment, furthermore, corn residue (C:N = 58) was spread in three different concentrations on both fields. 1.8 t ha ⁻¹ (100 %, R₁₀₀) and 0.9 t ha ⁻¹ (50 %, R₅₀) corn residue was applied; and there was a plot to study the case of no-residue (0 %, R₀). The fertilization contained 23 kg N ha⁻¹ as Urea, 67 kg K ha ⁻¹ as Potassium sulfate, and 40 kg P ha⁻¹ as Superphosphate. Finally, another dose of N was provided for stem elongation, late tillering, and spiking (51, 51, and 23 kg N ha⁻¹ as Urea, respectively) (Supplemental Table S1).

N₂O emissions measurement

The N₂O emissions were measured using the sampling protocol of GRACEnet Chamber-based Trace Gas Flux Measure-ment (Parkin & Venterea, 2010). The samples were collected in both fields (CT and NT) for 7 to 10 days intervals and every 2 weeks (during wintertime) using the static closed chamber method (Oertel et al., 2012). The chamber was 12.5 cm high and had a diameter of 15 cm constructed on polyvinyl chloride (PVC). It has ports (rubber septum) for gas sampling placed on the top. Collars were only removed during management practices. When plants exceeded the chamber height, they were shortened. Gas sampling was performed during the day from 9 to 10 am at 0, 30, and 60 minutes by inserting a needle attached to a 20 ml syringe in the sampling port and transferring in 12- mL evacuated glass vials sealed with butyl rubber septa (Labco Exetainer, UK). The concentration of N₂O in gas samples inside the vials was determined with a gas chromatograph (Teif Gostar Faraz, TG 2552, Iran; Brucker, Germany) equipped with an electron capture detector (ECD) in the lab. Temperatures of the column, injector, and detector were set at 65, 100, and 280 °C, respectively. Nitrous oxide flux was calculated as changes in linear concentration gradient over time and from the ratio between chamber volume and soil surface area (Liebig et al., 2010). The flux rate of N₂O was calculated based on µg m⁻² h⁻¹. Cumulative amounts of N₂O fluxes (kg N ha⁻¹ year⁻¹) were calculated using linearly interpolating data points and integrating the underlying area (Sainju et al., 2012; Wegner et al., 2018). Before interpolation and integration, the flux rates were converted to daily emissions.

Complementary measurements

For measuring the elemental composition of plant residue, the wheat and corn residues were sampled after the respective harvests. Then, samples were dried and finely powdered to assess them under laboratory conditions (Mirzaei et al., 2021). We analyzed organic carbon (OC) applying the Walkley and Black (1934) method, total nitrogen (TN) in plant residue using the Kjeldahl method (Jones, 2001), and P and K concentrations on dried-ash samples using spectrophotometric and flame photometric methods (Jones, 2001).

Additionally, an analysis of the correlation between gas emission and soil quality was conducted. Soil quality was determined by such properties as water content, temperature, and mineral N, including ammonium (NH₄⁺) and nitrate (NO₃⁻). Soil temperature was measured simultaneously with gas sampling with a thermometer placed at 10 cm depth next to the collars to avoid disturbance. Three soil samples (0–10 cm) were taken from each plot and mixed and homogenized into one pooled soil sample. Volumetric soil moisture of samples was determined using dried soil samples at 105 °C multiplied by soil bulk density. The rest of the soil samples was stored at −4 °C for further analyses. Mineral N (NH₄⁺-N and NO₃⁻-N) of soil samples were determined by the KCl extraction method (Page et al., 1982).

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was conducted using the Analysis of Repeated Measures procedure in general linear models (GLM). The SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used. Duncan’s method allowed us to compare measurements and analyze them at a 0.05 probability level. Pearson linear correlation analysis was used to determine the relationships between measured soil parameters and N₂O emission.

Results and Discussion

Nitrous oxide emissions during the corn-wheat crop rotation under the tillage systems

During corn-wheat crop rotation, N₂O emissions ranged from 0 to 375 and from 0 to 44 μg m^-2 h^-1 in residue treatments under NT and CT systems, respectively (Figures 1A and 2A). Large variability in N₂O emissions has also been reported since production and emission of N₂O occur through the activity of numerous groups of soil microbiota, various microbial processes (denitrification, nitrification, and chemodenitrification), agricultural practices, and soil conditions (Grant & Pattey, 2003; Hénault et al., 2012; Ma, Sun et al., 2013; Ussiri et al., 2009; Zaman et al., 2021). Also, successive periods of drying and wetting cycles as a result of irrigation and rainfall events were among the other causes of fluctuations in N₂O emissions. Brentrup et al. (2000) reported that the presence of wetting and drying sequences can increase N₂O emissions due to their role in oxygen availability in determining the contribution of nitrification and denitrification to N₂O production. Irrigation also can increase N₂O emissions by increasing soil water availability, microbial activity, C and N mineralization, and respiration (Sainju et al., 2010).

Figure 1.

Residue rate effect on daily soil N₂O-N emission (A), NH₄ (B), and NO₃ (C) at the time of greenhouse gas measurement in corn-wheat rotation under the no-tillage (NT) system. Bars represent standard error. The bold black arrows indicate fertilization events. Asterisk (*) shows a significant difference between residue levels within a day at p < .05. Zero values are from measurements.

Figure 2.

Residue rate effect on daily soil N₂O-N emission (A), NH₄ (B), and NO₃ (C) at the time of greenhouse gas measurement in corn-wheat rotation under conventional tillage (CT) system. Bars represent standard error. The bold black arrows indicate fertilization events. Asterisk (*) shows a significant difference between residue levels within a day at p < .05. Zero values are from measurements.

N₂O emissions were observed in summer during the corn growing season as well as in late winter and at the beginning of spring during the wheat growing season in both tillage systems. In the NT system, the highest recorded emissions were observed at two sampling times: 16/08/2018 (during the corn growing season), and 11/5/2019 (during the wheat growing season) (Figure 1A). Also, in this system, zero emissions of N₂O were observed in late winter 2019. In the CT system, two peak sampling dates (23/3/2019, and 12/4/2019) were observed during the wheat growing season with the highest N₂O emission (Figure 2A). In addition, at several sampling times, mainly from early autumn 2018 to late winter 2019, the emission rates were zero in this system. The lack of N₂O emissions at the mentioned times is probably due to decreasing fertilizer effect as well as low temperature for nitrification and denitrification processes (Ussiri et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2011). Increased emissions in spring can be the consequence of reduced biological activity due to temperature restrictions (Supplemental Figure S1, Figure 3) for microbial activity in winter, which leads to accumulation of available substrate, changing the season to spring and favorable conditions increases microbial activity and production and emissions of gas (Christensen & Tiedje, 1990). Previous studies have also reported the increase in N₂O emissions due to the change of seasons from winter to spring mainly due to the increase in air and soil temperature (Jacinthe & Lal, 2004; Ussiri et al., 2009). The rate of N₂O emissions was increased after fertilization events (Figures 1 and 2) due to the abundant availability of substrate for nitrification and denitrification. The reason for the increase in N₂O emissions after fertilization is the provision of N as one of the essential components for the production and release of N₂O (Zaman et al., 2021), and it was justified by the positive and strong correlation of N₂O emissions with the ammonium and nitrate (Table 1, Figures 1 and 2).

Table 1.

Correlations of N₂O Emission With Selected Soil Properties for Different Rates of Plant Residues Under a No-Tillage (NT) and Conventional Tillage (CT) Systems.

Tillage system	Residue rate	Soil parameters	N₂O emission
Tillage system	Residue rate	Soil parameters	Pearson correlation (R)	p Value
NT	R₁₀₀	Temperature	0.336	.081
		Moisture	0.513**	.005
		NH₄-N	0.818**	.000
		NO₃-N	0.837**	.000
	R₅₀	Temperature	0.348	.070
		Moisture	0.464*	.013
		NH₄-N	0.880**	.000
		NO₃-N	0.828**	.000
	R₀	Temperature	0.410*	.030
		Moisture	0.509**	.006
		NH₄-N	0.847**	.000
		NO₃-N	0.668**	.000
CT	R₁₀₀	Temperature	0.049	.806
		Moisture	0.752**	.000
		NH₄-N	0.752**	.000
		NO₃-N	0.768**	.000
	R₅₀	Temperature	0.078	.692
		Moisture	0.756**	.000
		NH₄-N	0.739**	.000
		NO₃-N	0.676**	.000
	R₀	Temperature	0.027	.890
		Moisture	0.645**	.000
		NH₄-N	0.655**	.000
		NO₃-N	0.728**	.000

Correlation is significant at the .01 level.

Correlation is significant at the .05 level.

Figure 3.

Residue rate effect on daily soil moisture (M) and temperature (T) at the time of greenhouse gas measurement in corn-wheat rotation under a no-tillage (NT) (A) and conventional tillage (CT) (B) systems. Bars represent standard error.

The effect of crop residue on nitrous oxide emissions under the tillage systems

In general, N₂O emissions increased with the increasing residue retention at all sampling times in both tillage systems. Complete residue retention treatment (R₁₀₀) and 50 % residue retention (R₅₀) resulted in a significant increase (p ⩽ .05) compared to the residue removal treatment (R₀). Differences were not significant between R₁₀₀ and R₅₀ treatments at several sampling times. Also, N₂O emissions increased with the increasing residue rate, and R₁₀₀ and R₅₀ resulted in significant increases (p ⩽ .05) in N₂O emissions compared to residue removal treatment (R₀) at most sampling times. Furthermore, the difference between R₁₀₀ and R₅₀ treatments was not significant at any sampling times.

Considering the whole crop rotation period, under both CT and NT systems, significant increases in N₂O emission were observed in treatments R₁₀₀ and R₅₀ compared to R₀. In the NT system, significant differences in the average amount of N₂O emission were observed among residue treatments where R₁₀₀ and R₅₀ resulted in significant increases of 132 and 74.5 % in N₂O emissions compared to the residue removal treatment (R₀), respectively (Figure 4A). Also, in this system, significant increases (p ⩽ .05) in N₂O emission were observed in R₁₀₀ compared to R₅₀. In the CT system, R₁₀₀ and R₅₀ led to significant increases of 41 and 37.5 % compared to R₀, respectively (Figure 4B), but the differences between R₁₀₀ and R₅₀ were not significant.

Figure 4.

The effect of crop residue rates on mean N₂O-N emission during corn-wheat rotation under a no-tillage (NT) (A) and conventional tillage (CT) (B) systems. Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Bars represent standard error (n = 3).

Accelerated crop residue decomposition in the CT system due to tillage, reduced their effects on moisture retention as one of the main drivers of N₂O emissions, which consequently led to no significant differences between R₁₀₀ and R₅₀. A significant increase in N₂O emissions in R₁₀₀ compared to R₅₀ under the NT system could be attributed to higher soil moisture in higher residue rates (R₁₀₀) and a more pronounced effect on nitrous oxide emissions. Higher N₂O emissions, as a result of increased crop residue, were in line with previous research findings in the United States, Australia, and Germany (Barton et al., 2016; Jin et al., 2014; Seiz et al., 2019). In this study, the increase in N₂O emissions with increasing residue could be attributed to various factors, including the direct effect of plant residues in providing C and N for microorganisms responsible for N₂O production processes (nitrification and denitrification) (Schmatz et al., 2020; Weiler et al., 2018).

Crop residues directly stimulate the emission of N₂O through the input of N content from the plant residue, which was confirmed by a positive and significant correlation between N₂O emission and moisture content in both CT and NT systems (Table 1). In residue removal treatment (R₀), due to factors such as reduced moisture and reduced availability of substrate due to lack of proper soil cover, N₂O emissions are reduced. Jin et al. (2014) attributed lower greenhouse gas emissions in plant residue removal treatment to reduced C and N uptake into the soil, as well as microclimatic differences related to changes in soil cover. However, other studies reported different findings when removing crop residues from agricultural land increased the N₂O emissions.

Tenesaca and Al-Kaisi (2015) found that the complete removal of crop residue from the soil increases the emission of N₂O gas compared to the maintenance of large amounts of crop residue, which is contrary to the findings of the current study. Also, the research of Johnson and Barbour (2010) showed that removing corn residues compared to their preservation did not change the amount of N₂O emissions. In addition, studies by Zhang et al. (2015) on the integrative effects of soil tillage and straw management on crop yields and greenhouse gas emissions in a rice-wheat cropping system showed that in comparison with the control, returning residue to the soil had no significant effect on N₂O emissions during the wheat season and the entire rice-wheat cycle.

Cumulative N₂O emissions

In the corn-wheat rotation under the tillage systems, with an increasing amount of residues, the cumulative N₂O emission also increased (Figure 5). Significant increases (p < .05) in cumulative N₂O emission were observed for R₁₀₀ and R₅₀ compared to R₀. The annual cumulative N₂O emissions in R₁₀₀ (6.7 kg N ha⁻¹ year⁻¹) and R₅₀ (5 kg N ha⁻¹ year⁻¹) were respectively 134 % and 75.5 % higher than R₀ (2.87 kg N ha⁻¹ year⁻¹) under NT system (Figure 5A). In the CT system, compared to R₀ (0.47 kg N ha⁻¹ year⁻¹), R₁₀₀ (0.66 kg N ha⁻¹ year⁻¹), and R₅₀ (0.64 kg N ha⁻¹ year⁻¹) resulted in 40 and 36.5% increases for cumulative N₂O-N emissions (Figure 5B). Also, cumulative N₂O emissions were significantly (p < .05) higher in the NT system than in the CT system (Supplemental Figure S2).

Figure 5.

Residue rate effect on annual cumulative N₂O-N (kg N ha⁻¹ year⁻¹) under a no-tillage (NT) (A) and conventional tillage (CT) (B) systems. Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Bars represent standard error (n = 3).

Increased cumulative N₂O emissions in R₁₀₀ and R₅₀ treatments compared to R₀ treatment could be due to high soil moisture and N from residue decomposition in these treatments, all of which ultimately create favorable conditions to increase production and emissions. Whereas, low soil moisture content and mineral N are the reasons for decreased emission in residue removal (Sainju et al., 2012; Toma & Hatano, 2007). Previous studies have also reported that the differences in cumulative emissions of GHGs are due to differences in soil moisture and temperature (Lu et al., 2015; Sainju et al., 2010). The findings of this study are consistent with the results of Vasconcelos et al. (2018). They reported the lowest cumulative emission of N₂O in residue removal compared to other treatments.

Drury et al. (2021) reported that reducing residue rate increased the cumulative emissions of N₂O under both conventional and no-tillage systems and the highest emissions were related to the complete removal of residue. They attributed the reduction of N₂O emissions in residue conservation treatments to N immobilization, which reduced the N required to produce N₂O. Also, higher amounts of available C under residue treatments that lead to the conversion of N₂O to N₂ were other reasons given by these researchers for reduced N₂O emissions. Guzman et al. (2015) found no significant differences in the cumulative emissions of N₂O among the 100% and 50% residue, and the residue removal due to the reason that the soil moisture status under these treatments was not a limiting factor for N₂O emissions.

Higher cumulative N₂O emissions in the NT system compared to the CT system have also been reported in previous studies (Ma, Sun et al., 2013; Pelster et al., 2011; Rochette et al., 2008; van Kessel et al., 2013). Higher oxygen concentration in the soil due to soil disturbance under the CT system could be mentioned for lower cumulative N₂O emissions (Baggs et al., 2003, 2006). In the NT system, higher soil density and water content provide favorable anaerobic conditions for the production and emission of N₂O emissions. Previous studies have also reported the strong effect of soil moisture content on the magnitude of N₂O emissions under no-tillage and tillage systems (Almaraz et al., 2009; Boeckx et al., 2011; Ma, Sun et al., 2013). Furthermore, in the current study, soil texture type in the NT system (clay loam) could also be another reason for higher N₂O emissions compared to that in the CT system (soil texture: sandy loam). The existence of more capillary pores in finer textured soils than in light-textured soil helps them to retain soil water more strongly and create and maintain long-term anaerobic conditions which consequently led to higher emissions of N₂O than in sandy soils (Bouwman et al., 2002; Lesschen et al., 2011; Parton et al., 1996; Stehfest & Bouwman, 2006; Weier et al., 1993; Zaman et al., 2021). Soil texture influences N₂O emissions due to its effect on aerobic or anaerobic conditions, microbial population, and availability of nitrogen and soil organic carbon (Charles et al., 2017; Lesschen et al., 2011; Meurer et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2013).

Conclusions

The N₂O emissions during corn-wheat rotation were highly variable which is mainly attributed to the nature of N₂O gas production and release as well as environmental and soil factors. Regardless of tillage systems, crop residue significantly increased N₂O emissions compared to residue removal. Greater N₂O emissions coincided with the application of higher residue rates, where full retention of crop residue induced the highest N₂O emissions in both tillage systems. Furthermore, cumulative N₂O emissions were higher in no-tillage systems than in conventional tillage systems. We conclude that to develop more efficient management strategies in agricultural systems, long-term field studies are needed to better assess the GHGs emissions, better soil quality, and crop performance following crop residue management.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-asw-10.1177_11786221221128789 – Supplemental material for Soil Nitrous Oxide Emissions Following Crop Residues Management in Corn-Wheat Rotation Under Conventional and No-Tillage Systems

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-asw-10.1177_11786221221128789 for Soil Nitrous Oxide Emissions Following Crop Residues Management in Corn-Wheat Rotation Under Conventional and No-Tillage Systems by Morad Mirzaei, Manouchehr Gorji Anari, Arezoo Taghizadeh-Toosi, Mohammad Zaman, Nermina Saronjic, Safwan Mohammed, Szilard Szabo and Andrés Caballero-Calvo in Air, Soil and Water Research

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors greatly acknowledge Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) and the NKFI TNN 123457 project for financing this study.

ORCID iD

Andrés Caballero-Calvo

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Almaraz

J. J.

Zhou

Mabood

Madramootoo

Rochette

B. L.

Smith

D. L.

(2009). Greenhouse gas fluxes associated with soybean production under two tillage systems in southwestern Quebec. Soil and Tillage Research, 104(1), 134–139.

Badagliacca

Benítez

Amato

Badalucco

Giambalvo

Laudicina

V. A.

Ruisi

(2018). Long-term effects of contrasting tillage on soil organic carbon, nitrous oxide, and ammonia emissions in a Mediterranean Vertisol under different crop sequences. The Science of the Total Environment, 619–620, 18–27.

Baggs

E. M.

Chebii

Ndufa

J. K.

(2006). A short-term investigation of trace gas emissions following tillage and no-tillage of agroforestry residues in western Kenya. Soil and Tillage Research, 90(1–2), 69–76.

Baggs

E. M.

Stevenson

Pihlatie

Regar

Cook

Cadisch

(2003). Nitrous oxide emissions following application of residues and fertiliser under zero and conventional tillage. Plant and Soil, 254(2), 361–370.

Barton

Hoyle

F. C.

Stefanova

K. T.

Murphy

D. V.

(2016). Incorporating organic matter alters soil greenhouse gas emissions and increases grain yield in a semi-arid climate. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 231, 320–330.

Boeckx

Van Nieuland

Van Cleemput

(2011). Short-term effect of tillage intensity on N₂O and CO₂ emissions. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 31(3), 453–461.

Bouwman

A. F.

Boumans

L. J. M.

Batjes

N. H.

(2002). Modeling global annual N₂O and NO emissions from fertilized fields. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16, 28–31.

Brentrup

Küsters

Lammel

Kuhlmann

(2000). Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 5(6), 349–357.

Brown

Armstrong Brown

Jarvis

S. C.

Syed

Goulding

K. W.

Phillips

V. R.

Sneath

R. W.

Pain

B. F.

(2001). An inventory of nitrous oxide emissions from agriculture in the UK using the IPCC methodology: Emission estimate, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 1439–1449.

10.

Charles

Rochette

Whalen

J. K.

Angers

D. A.

Chantigny

M. H.

Bertrand

(2017). Global nitrous oxide emission factors from agricultural soils after addition of organic amendments: A meta-analysis. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 236, 88–98.

11.

Cherubin

M. R.

Bordonal

R. O.

Castioni

G. A.

Guimarães

E. M.

Lisboa

I. P.

Moraes

L. A. A.

Menandro

L. M. S.

Tenelli

Cerri

C. E. P.

Karlen

D. L.

Carvalho

J. L. N.

(2021). Soil health response to sugarcane straw removal in Brazil. Industrial Crops and Products, 163, 113315.

12.

Christensen

Tiedje

J. M.

(1990). Brief and vigorous N₂O production by soil at spring thaw. Journal of Soil Science, 41(1), 1–4.

13.

Collins

H. P.

Fay

P. A.

Kimura

Fransen

Himes

(2017). Intercropping with switchgrass improves net greenhouse gas balance in hybrid poplar plantations on a sand soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 81, 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.09.0294

14.

Drury

C. F.

Woodley

A. L.

Reynolds

W. D.

Yang

X. M.

Phillips

L. A.

Rehmann

Calder

(2021). Impacts of corn stover removal on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 85(5), 1334–1348.

15.

Dusenbury

M. P.

Engel

R. E.

Miller

P. R.

Lemke

R. L.

Wallander

(2008). Nitrous oxide emissions from a northern Great Plains soil as influenced by nitrogen management and cropping systems. Journal of Environmental Quality, 37, 542–550. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0395

16.

Essich

Nkebiwe

P. M.

Schneider

Ruser

(2020). Is crop residue removal to reduce N₂O emissions driven by quality or quantity? A field study and meta-analysis. Agriculture, 10(11), 546.

17.

Grant

R. F.

Pattey

(2003). Modelling variability in N2O emissions from fertilized agricultural fields. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35(2), 225–243.

18.

Gregorich

E. G.

Rochette

St-Georges

McKim

U. F.

Chan

(2008). Tillage effects on N₂O emission from soils under corn and soybeans in eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 88(2), 153–161.

19.

Guzman

Al-Kaisi

Parkin

(2015). Greenhouse gas emissions dynamics as influenced by corn residue removal in continuous corn system. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 79(2), 612–625.

20.

Hénault

Grossel

Mary

Roussel

Léonard

(2012). Nitrous oxide emission by agricultural soils: A review of spatial and temporal variability for mitigation. Pedosphere, 22(4), 426–433.

21.

IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007. The physical science basis. 4th Assessment Report. IPCC Secretariate. Retrieved January 27, 2011, from http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml

22.

Jacinthe

P. A.

Lal

(2004). Effects of soil cover and land-use on the relations flux-concentration of trace gases. Soil Science, 169(4), 243–259.

23.

Jin

V. L.

Baker

J. M.

Johnson

J. M. F.

Karlen

D. L.

Lehman

R. M.

Osborne

S. L.

Sauer

T. J.

Stott

D. E.

Varvel

G. E.

Venterea

R. T.

Schmer

M. R.

Wienhold

B. J.

(2014). Soil greenhouse gas emissions in response to corn stover removal and tillage management across the US Corn Belt. Bioenergy Research, 7(2), 517–527.

24.

Johnson

J. M.

Barbour

N. W.

(2010, August). Crop yield and greenhouse gas responses to stover harvest on glacial till Mollisol [Conference session]. Proceedings from the 19th World Congress of, Soil Science (pp. 36–39).

25.

Johnson

J. M. F.

Strock

J. S.

Barbour

N. W.

Tallaksen

J. E.

Reese

(2017). Stover harvest impacts soil and hydrologic properties on three Minnesota farms. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 81(4), 932–944.

26.

Jones

J. B.

(2001). Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. CRC Press.

27.

Lesschen

J. P.

Velthof

G. L.

de Vries

Kros

(2011). Differentiation of nitrous oxide emission factors for agricultural soils. Environmental Pollution, 159(11), 3215–3222.

28.

Liebig

M. A.

Tanaka

D. L.

Gross

J. R.

(2010). Fallow effects on soil carbon and greenhouse gas flux in central North Dakota. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 74, 358–365. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0368

29.

Liang

Wang

Qin

Zhong

(2015). Effect of mowing on N2O and CH4 fluxes emissions from the meadow-steppe grasslands of Inner Mongolia. Earth Science Frontiers, 9(3), 473–486.

30.

Sun

Zhang

Yang

Wang

Yin

Yan

Xiong

(2013). Mitigation of nitrous oxide emissions from paddy soil under conventional and no-till practices using nitrification inhibitors during the winter wheat-growing season. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 49(6), 627–635.

31.

Meurer

K. H. E.

Franko

Stange

C. F.

Rosa

J. D.

Madari

B. E.

Jungkunst

H. F.

(2016). Direct nitrous oxide (N ₂ O) fluxes from soils under different land use in Brazil—A critical review. Environmental Research Letters, 11, 23001.

32.

Mirzaei

Gorji Anari

Razavy-Toosi

Asadi

Moghiseh

Saronjic

Rodrigo-Comino

(2021). Preliminary effects of crop residue management on soil quality and crop production under different soil management regimes in corn-wheat rotation systems. Agronomy, 11(2), 302.

33.

Mirzaei

Gorji Anari

Razavy-Toosi

Zaman

Saronjic

Zamir

S. M.

Mohammed

Caballero-Calvo

(2022). Crop residues in corn-wheat rotation in a semi-arid region increase CO₂ efflux under conventional tillage but not in a no-tillage system. Pedobiologia, 93-94, 150819.

34.

Mohammed

Mirzaei

Pappné Törő

Á.

Anari

M. G.

Moghiseh

Asadi

Szabó

Kakuszi-Széles

Harsányi

(2022). Soil carbon dioxide emissions from maize ( Zea mays L.) fields as influenced by tillage management and climate. Irrigation and Drainage, 71(1), 228–240.

35.

Monti

Badagliacca

Romeo

Gelsomino

(2021). No-till and Solid Digestate Amendment selectively affect the potential denitrification activity in two Mediterranean Orchard Soils. Soil Systems, 5(2), 31.

36.

Oertel

Herklotz

Matschullat

Zimmermann

(2012). Nitric oxide emissions from soils: A case study with temperate soils from Saxony, Germany. Environmental Earth Sciences, 66(8), 2343–2351.

37.

Page

A. L.

Miller

R. H.

Keeneyy

D. R.

(1982). Methods of soil analysis, Part 2, chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. .Soil Science of America, Inc.

38.

Parkin

T. B.

Venterea

R., T.

(2010). USDA-ARS GRACEnet project protocols, chapter 3. Chamber-based trace gas flux measurements. In Follett

R. F.

(Ed.), Sampling protocols, Beltsville, MD (pp. 1–39).

39.

Parton

W. J.

Mosier

A. R.

Ojima

D. S.

Valentine

D. W.

Schimel

D. S.

Weier

Kulmala

A. E.

(1996). Generalized model for N₂ and N₂O production from nitrification and denitrification. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10, 401–412.

40.

Pelster

D. E.

Chantigny

M. H.

Rochette

Angers

D. A.

Laganière

Zebarth

Goyer

(2013). Crop residue incorporation alters soil nitrous oxide emissions during freeze–thaw cycles. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 93(4), 415–425.

41.

Pelster

D. E.

Larouche

Rochette

Chantigny

M. H.

Allaire

Angers

D. A.

(2011). Nitrogen fertilization but not soil tillage affects nitrous oxide emissions from a clay loam soil under a maize–soybean rotation. Soil and Tillage Research, 115–116, 16–26.

42.

Plaza-Bonilla

Álvaro-Fuentes

Arrúe

J. L.

Cantero-Martínez

(2014). Tillage and nitrogen fertilization effects on nitrous oxide yield-scaled emissions in a rainfed Mediterranean area. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 189, 43–52.

43.

Prather

M. J.

Hsu

(2010). Coupling of nitrous oxide and methane by global atmospheric chemistry. Science, 330, 952–954.

44.

Rochette

Angers

D. A.

Chantigny

M. H.

Bertrand

(2008). Nitrous oxide emissions respond differently to No-till in a loam and a heavy clay soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 72(5), 1363–1369.

45.

Rodrigo-Comino

Salvia

Egidi

Salvati

Giménez-Morera

Quaranta

(2022). Desertification and degradation risks vs poverty: A key topic in Mediterranean Europe. Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica, 48(1), 23–40.

46.

Sainju

U. M.

Stevens

W. B.

Caesar-TonThat

Jabro

J. D.

(2010). Land use and management practices impact on plant biomass carbon and soil carbon dioxide emission. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 74(5), 1613–1622.

47.

Sainju

U. M.

Stevens

W. B.

Caesar-Tonthat

Liebig

M. A.

(2012). Soil greenhouse gas emissions affected by irrigation, tillage, crop rotation, and nitrogen fertilization. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41(6), 1774–1786.

48.

Schmatz

Recous

Adams Weiler

Elias Pilecco

Luiza Schu

Lago Giovelli

José Giacomini

(2020). How the mass and quality of wheat and vetch mulches affect drivers of soil N2O emissions. Geoderma, 372, 114395.

49.

Seiz

Guzman-Bustamante

Schulz

Müller

Ruser

(2019). Effect of crop residue removal and straw addition on nitrous oxide emissions from a horticulturally used soil in South Germany. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 83(5), 1399–1409.

50.

Smith

Martino

Cai

Gwary

Janzen

Kumar

McCarl

Ogle

O’Mara

Rice

Scholes

Sirotenko

(2007). Agriculture. In Metz

(Ed.), Climate change 2007: Mitigation (pp. 497–540). Cambridge Univ. Press.

51.

Snyder

C. S.

Bruulsema

T. W.

Jensen

T. L.

Fixen

P. E.

(2009). Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 133(3–4), 247–266.

52.

Stehfest

Bouwman

(2006). N₂O and NO emission from agricultural fields and soils under natural vegetation: Summarizing available measurement data and modeling of global annual emissions. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 74, 207–228.

53.

Stewart

C. E.

Follett

R. F.

Pruessner

E. G.

Varvel

G. E.

Vogel

K. P.

Mitchell

R. B.

(2015). Nitrogen and harvest effects on soil properties under rainfed switchgrass and no-till corn over 9 years: Implications for soil quality. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 7(2), 288–301.

54.

Taghizadeh-Toosi

Janz

Labouriau

Olesen

J. E.

Butterbach-Bahl

Petersen

S. O.

(2021). Nitrous oxide emissions from red clover and winter wheat residues depend on interacting effects of distribution, soil N availability and moisture level. Plant and Soil, 466, 121–138.

55.

Tenesaca

C. G.

Al-Kaisi

M. M.

(2015). In-field management of corn cob and residue mix: Effect on soil greenhouse gas emissions. Applied Soil Ecology, 89, 59–68.

56.

Toma

Hatano

(2007). Effect of crop residue C:N ratio on N₂O emissions from Gray Lowland soil in Mikasa, Hokkaido, Japan. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 53(2), 198–205.

57.

Ussiri

Lal

(2012). Soil emission of nitrous oxide and its mitigation. Springer Science & Business Media.

58.

Ussiri

D. A. N.

Lal

Jarecki

M. K.

(2009). Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from long-term tillage under a continuous corn cropping system in Ohio. Soil and Tillage Research, 104(2), 247–255.

59.

van Kessel

Venterea

Six

Adviento-Borbe

M. A.

Linquist

van Groenigen

K. J

. (2013). Climate, duration, and N placement determine N₂O emissions in reduced tillage systems: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 19(1), 33–44.

60.

Vasconcelos

A. L. S.

Cherubin

M. R.

Feigl

B. J.

Cerri

C. E. P.

Gmach

M. R.

Siqueira-Neto

(2018). Greenhouse gas emission responses to sugarcane straw removal. Biomass & Bioenergy, 113, 15–21.

61.

Walkley

Black

I. A.

(1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1), 29–38.

62.

Wang

Amon

Schulz

Mehdi

(2021). Factors that influence nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils as well as their representation in simulation models: A review. Agronomy, 11(4), 770.

63.

Wang

J. Y.

Jia

J. X.

Xiong

Z. Q.

Khalil

M. A.

Xing

G. X.

(2011). Water regime–nitrogen fertilizer–straw incorporation interaction: Field study on nitrous oxide emissions from a rice agroecosystem in Nanjing, China. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 141, 437–446.

64.

Wegner

B. R.

Chalise

K. S.

Singh

Lai

Abagandura

G. O.

Kumar

Osborne

S. L.

Lehman

R. M.

Jagadamma

(2018). Response of soil surface greenhouse gas fluxes to crop residue removal and cover crops under a corn–soybean rotation. Journal of Environmental Quality, 47(5), 1146–1154.

65.

Weier

K. L.

Doran

J. W.

Power

J. F.

Walters

D. T.

(1993). Denitrification and the dinitrogen/nitrous oxide ratio as affected by soil water, available carbon, and nitrate. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57, 66–72.

66.

Weiler

D. A.

Giacomini

S. J.

Recous

Bastos

L. M.

Pilecco

G. E.

Dietrich

Aita

(2018). Trade-off between C and N recycling and N2O emissions of soils with summer cover crops in subtropical agrosystems. Plant and Soil, 433(1), 213–225.

67.

Cai

Reverchon

(2013). Review of denitrification in tropical and subtropical soils of terrestrial ecosystems. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 13, 699–710.

68.

Yoo

Woo

S. H.

Park

K. D.

Chung

K. Y.

(2016). Effect of no-tillage and conventional tillage practices on the nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions in an upland soil: Soil N₂O emission as affected by the fertilizer applications. Applied Biological Chemistry, 59(6), 787–797.

69.

Zaman

Heng

Müller

(2021). Measuring emission of agricultural greenhouse gases and developing mitigation options using nuclear and related techniques: Applications of nuclear techniques for GHGs. Springer.

70.

Zhang

Zheng

Chen

Shen

Zhang

Bian

Zhang

(2015). Integrative effects of soil tillage and straw management on crop yields and greenhouse gas emissions in a rice–wheat cropping system. European Journal of Agronomy, 63, 47–54.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB

Soil Nitrous Oxide Emissions Following Crop Residues Management in Corn-Wheat Rotation Under Conventional and No-Tillage Systems

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Material and Methods

Methodological framework

Field research method

N2O emissions measurement

Complementary measurements

Statistical analysis

Results and Discussion

Nitrous oxide emissions during the corn-wheat crop rotation under the tillage systems

The effect of crop residue on nitrous oxide emissions under the tillage systems

Cumulative N2O emissions

Conclusions

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-asw-10.1177_11786221221128789 – Supplemental material for Soil Nitrous Oxide Emissions Following Crop Residues Management in Corn-Wheat Rotation Under Conventional and No-Tillage Systems

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

Supplemental Material

References

Supplementary Material

N₂O emissions measurement

Cumulative N₂O emissions