Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study explores and documents the traditional architecture of the Poumai Naga tribe (an Indigenous group in Northeast India). It seeks to uncover the underlining principles that governs their architectural practices and the role of architecture in sustaining cultural heritage. The research employs multidisciplinary approach combining ethnographic fieldwork, architectural documentation, and cultural analysis. Through ethnographic research and architectural analysis, this study reveals that Poumai Naga architecture is characterized by sustainable building practices using locally available materials. The architecture is intricately linked to the natural landscape, with designs that optimize ventilation, lighting, and structural stability based on Indigenous knowledge passed down through generation. However, despite the rich traditional architectural practices, there has been a noticeable shift towards modernism. Ultimately, the evolving architecture reflects as a dynamic interplay between tradition and modernity, highlighting their ability to adapt while striving to maintain their cultural roots in the phase of contemporary influences.

Keywords

architecture cultural heritage Indigenous knowledge Poumai Naga vernacular

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Ghalib

Sadiq Al-Assadi

(2018). Preservation of the heritage values of Iraqi traditional houses. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 2018(5), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.2018.5.10

Baniowska-Kopacz

(2014). Folk architecture of Podhale. Ethnologia Polona, 35, 79–99.

Begoña

V. A.

(2017). Documenting traditional knowledge: A toolkit. WIPO.

Brunskill

R. W.

(1965). English vernacular architecture. Journal of the Folklore Institute, 2(3), 1965.

Burke

(1790). Reflections on the revolution in France. Penguin.

Government of Manipur. (n.d.). Scheduled royalty. https://monitoring.manipurforest.gov.in/UploadFile/PDF/scheduled%20royalty%20master637026047053681513637110730660908876.pdf

Heath

K. W.

(2003). Defining the nature of vernacular. Material Culture, 35(2), 48–54.

Mann

D. A.

(1985). Between traditionalism and modernism approaches to a vernacular architecture. Journal of Architectural Education, 39(2), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1985.10758388

Marshall

H. W.

(1997). Architecture, folk. In Green

T. A.

(Ed.), Folklore: An Encyclopedia of beliefs, customs, tales, music, and art (pp. 39–47). ABC-CLIO, Inc.

10.

McHenry

P. G.

(1984). Adobe: Building and Living with Earth. University of Arizona Press.

11.

Montell

W. L.

Morse

M. L.

(1976). Kentucky folk architecture. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt130htdx

12.

Nuh

V. K.

(2002). The origin of Naga. Vision Press.

13.

Oliver

(1987). Dwellings: The vernacular house world wide. Phaidon Press.

14.

Patricia

C. M

. (1980). The Igloo: Symbol of the arctic. University of Alaska Press.

15.

Proud

D. A.

(1986). Log cabin construction. Smithsonian Institution Press.

16.

Roberts

W. E.

(1972). Folk architecture. In Dorson

R. M.

(Ed.), Folklore and folklife: An introduction. The University of Chicago Press.

17.

Wells

(1986). Old claims and new demands: Vernacular architecture studies today. Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture, 2, 1–10.

Folk architecture of the Poumai Naga tribe: vernacular styles and building techniques

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References