In this article, I theorize an Indigenous media framework drawn from conversations with journalists and Indigenous activists in Guåhan (Guam). I refer to this framework as I Fanhigaiyan, a Fino’CHamoru (CHamoru language) term which can mean a thing which weaves or a place for weaving. This term captures the essence of CHamoru (the Indigenous people of the Marianas) media activism as a grounded and resurgent practice which establishes and maintains networks of reciprocity in Guåhan and in translocal spaces for Indigenous sovereignty and demilitarization. While in critical studies it is a given that news media serve an ideological function of state power, few researchers have examined the settler ideological power of media in American territories such as Guåhan. This article draws attention to the role of mainstream news media in concealing and reproducing settler logics of territoriality and elimination, and the mediated CHamoru resistance to American settler governance and discourse.
AlexanderR. (2016). Living with the fence: Militarization and military spaces on Guahan/Guam. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(6), 869–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2015.1073697
2.
ArvinM. (2019). Possessing Polynesians: The science of settler colonial whiteness in Hawai’i and Oceania. Duke University Press.
3.
BelottoM. J. (2018). Data analysis methods for qualitative research: Managing the challenges of coding, interrater reliability, and thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2622–2633.
BevacquaM. L.CruzM. L. (2020). The banality of American empire: The curious case of Guam, USA. The Journal of Transnational American Studies, 11(1), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.5070/T8111046995
6.
CallisonC.YoungM. L. (2020). Reckoning: Journalism’s limits and possibilities. Oxford University Press.
7.
CaseE. (2021). Everything ancient was once new: Indigenous persistence from Hawai’i to Kahiki. University of Hawai’i Press.
DalisayF. (2009). Social control in an American Pacific island: Guam’s local newspaper reports on liberation. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 33(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859909333694
11.
DalisayF. (2014). Colonial debt, resistance to U.S. military presence, trustworthiness of pro-U.S. military information sources, and support for the military buildup on Guam. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 8(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2014.2
12.
DalisayF.YamamotoM. (2012). Local newspaper coverage and endorsement of a U.S. military buildup in the Pacific. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2780–2800.
13.
DavisS. (2020). Islands and oceans: Reimagining sovereignty and social change. The University of Georgia Press.
14.
DeLisleC. T. (2016). Destination Chamorro culture: Notes on realignment, rebranding, and post-9/11 militourism in Guam. American Quarterly, 68(3), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2016.0052
15.
Dunbar-OrtizR. (2021). Not a nation of immigrants: Settler colonialism, white supremacy, and a history of erasure and exclusion. Beacon Press.
16.
GitlinT. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. University of California Press.
17.
Goodyear-Ka’ōpuaN. (2013). The seeds we planted: Portraits of a Native Hawaiian charter school. University of Minnesota Press.
18.
GuestG.MacQueenK. M.NameyE. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. SAGE.
19.
HermanE. S.ChomskyN. (2002). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media (2nd ed.). Pantheon Books.
KauanuiJ. K.WolfeP. (2012). Settler colonialism then and now: A conversation between J. Kehaulani Kauanui and Patrick Wolfe. Politica & Societa, 1, 235–258.
KilS. H. (2020). Reporting from the whites of their eyes: How whiteness as neoliberalism promotes racism in the news coverage of “All Lives Matter.”Communication Theory, 30, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz019
25.
LechugaM. (2020). An anticolonial future: Reassembling the way we do rhetoric. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 17(4), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2020.1829659
Na’putiT. R. (2022). Disaster militarism and Indigenous responses to Super Typhoon Yutu in the Mariana Islands. Environmental Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2026798
28.
Na’putiT. R.FrainS. C. (2017). Decolonize Oceania! Free Guåhan!: Communicating resistance at the 2016 Festival of Pacific Arts. Amerasia Journal, 43(3), 2–34. https://doi.org/10.17953/aj.43.3
29.
NebolonJ. (2021). Settler-military camps: Internment and prisoner of war camps across the Pacific Islands during World War II. Journal of Asian American Studies, 24(2), 299–335. https://doi.org/10.1353/jaas.2021.0025
WhaangaH.MatoP. (2021). The Indigenous digital footprint. In HokowhituB.Moreton-RobinsonA.Tuhiwai-SmithL.AndersenC.LarkinS. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of critical Indigenous studies (pp. 447–464). Routledge.
44.
ZelizerB. (2021). Why journalism’s default neglect of temporality is a problem. Media Culture & Society, 43(7), 1213–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211015846
