Historically, scholarship of and about Mā’ohi Nui (French Polynesia) has been conducted using western methods, methodologies, and frameworks which has, to a large extent, resulted in inaccurate and degrading representations of the people and the islands. In accordance with the empowering trends of Critical Pacific Studies, this article proposes a new way forward by advocating for the creation of Mā’ohi (French Polynesian) methodologies and frameworks and the incorporation of values and protocols in an effort to re-centre and de-centralise the historical inaccuracies of European scholarship, encouraging scholarship founded within the principles of for Mā’ohi researchers, by Mā’ohi researchers, or for Mā’ohi, by Mā’ohi.
AnguéC. (2018). The narrative and poetical role of a Polynesian literary myth: Canoes and the origins in contemporary texts from French Polynesia, New Zealand, and Samoa. Ab-Original. Journal of Indigenous Studies and First Nations and First Peoples’ Cultures, 2(1), 97–109.
ChowdhuryR. (2019). Embarking on research in the social sciences: Understanding the foundational concepts. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 35(1), 99–113. https://10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4340
4.
DenzinN.LincolnY.SmithL. T. (2008). Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies. SAGE.
5.
DiamondJ. (2005). Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. W.W. Norton.
6.
GatesC. E. (1922). The Polynesians: Caucasians of the Pacific. The Scientific Monthly, 15(3), 257–262.
7.
GonschorL. (2005). Mana Vahine Ma’ohi against French colonialism. Littérama’ohi: Ramées de Littérature Polynésienne [Littérama’ohi: Paddles of Polynesian Literature], 8, 66–107.
8.
GonschorL. (2008). Law as a tool of oppression and liberation: Institutional histories and perspectives on political independence in Hawaiʻi, Tahiti Nui/French Polynesia and Rapa Nui[Master’s thesis, University of Hawaiʻi]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/docview/304606125?pq-origsite=primo
9.
GrandS. (2014). Rerera’a varua envol des âmes: récit en Tahitien et Francais inspiré de Passage de Vénus de Rowan Metcalfe [Flight of souls: narrative in Tahitian and French inspired by Rowan Metcalfe’s book Transit of Venus]. L’Association des descendants du Bounty.
10.
GrantC.OsanlooA. (2016). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your house. Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.5929/2014.4.2.9
11.
HarawayD. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
12.
HardingS. (1987). Feminism and methodology. Indiana University Press.
13.
HerenikoV. (1995). Woven gods: Female clowns and power in Rotuma. University of Hawaiʻi Press.
14.
HeyerdahlT. (1975). Fatu Hiva: Back to nature. Doubleday & Company.
15.
HikuroaD. (2017). Mātauranga Māori—the ūkaipō of knowledge in New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 47(1), 5–10.
16.
Ho‘omanawanuiK. (2010). Mana Wahine, education and nation-building: Lessons from the epic of Pele and Hi’iaka for Kanaka Maoli Today. Multicultural Perspectives, 12(4), 206–212.
17.
HughesP. (2001). Paradigms, methods and knowledge. In MacNaughtonG.RolfeS. A.Siraj-BlatchfordI. (Eds.), Doing early childhood research: International perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 31–55). Allen & Unwin.
18.
HvidingE. (2003). Between knowledges: Pacific studies and academic disciplines. The Contemporary Pacific, 15(1), 43–73.
19.
KahnM. (2011). Tahiti beyond the postcard: Power, place, and everyday life. University of Washington Press.
20.
KoyaC. F. (2013). Tapa mo tatau: An exploration of Pacific concepts of ESD through a study of Samoan and Tongan Heritage Arts [Doctoral thesis, University of the South Pacific].
21.
Lergeaud-OrtegaS. (2018). The Bounty from the beach: Cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary essays. Australian National University Press.
Mateata-AllainK. (2006). Bridging our sea of islands: French Polynesian literature within an oceanic context. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of New Mexico.
24.
MensahR. O.AgyemangF.AcquahA.BabahP. A.DontohJ. (2020). Discourses on conceptual and theoretical frameworks in research: Meaning and implications for researchers. Journal of African Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(5), 53–64.
25.
MetcalfeR. (2004). Transit of Venus. Pandanus Books.
26.
Nabobo-BabaU. (2008). Decolonising framings in Pacific Research: Indigenous Fijian vanua research framework as an organic response. Alternative, 4(2), 140–154.
NurseL. A.McLeanR. F.AgardJ.BriguglioL. P.Duvat-MagnanV.PelesikotiN.TompkinsE.WebbA. (2014). Small islands. In BarrosV. R.FieldC. B.DokkenD. J.MastrandreaM. D.MachK. J.BilirT. E.ChatterjeeM.EbiK. L.EstradaY. O.GenovaR. C.GirmaB.KisselE. S.LevyA. N.MacCrackenS.MastrandreaP. R.WhiteL. L. (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1613–1654). Cambridge University Press.
29.
OliveiraK.WrightE. (2016). Kanaka ‘Ōiwi methodologies: Mo’olelo and metaphor. University of Hawai‘i Press.
30.
PasisiJ. (2019). Kitiaga mo fakamahani e hikihikiaga matagi he tau fifine Niue: tau pūhala he tau hiapo [Niue women’s perspectives and experiences of climate change: A hiapo approach] [Doctoral thesis, University of Waikato]. Research Commons at University of Waikato. https://hdl.handle.net/10289/13380
31.
PihamaL. (2011). A conversation about Kaupapa Māori theory and research. In HutchingsJ.PotterH.TaupoK. (Eds.), Kei Tua O Te Pae Hui Proceedings—The challenges of Kaupapa Māori research in the 21st century, Pipitea Marae, Wellington, New Zealand 5-6 May 2011 (pp. 49–55). Te Wāhanga. https://www.nzcer.org.nz/nzcerpress/kei-tua-o-te-pae-hui-proceedings
32.
Ra’apotoT. (1988). Mā’ohi: On being Tahitian. In PollockN. J.CrocombeR. (Eds.), French Polynesia: A book of selected readings (pp. 3–7). Institute of Pacific Studies of the University of the South Pacific.
33.
ReynoldsP. (2008). Pitcairn tapa: ’Ahu no Hitiaurevareva. ’ana’ana Publishing.
34.
ReynoldsP. (2016). Tapa cloths and beaters: Tradition, innovation and the agency of the Bounty women in shaping a new culture on Pitcairn Island from 1790 to 1850. Textile History, 47(2), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00404969.2016.1211435
35.
ReynoldsP. (2018). Piecing together the past: Reflections on replicating an ancestral tiputa with contemporary fabrics. In CarreauL.ClarkA.JelinekA.LiljeE.ThomasN. (Eds.), Pacific presences: Oceanic art and European museums (Vol. 2, pp. 375–385). Sidestone Press. https://www.sidestone.com/books/pacific-presences-vol-2
36.
ReynoldsP. (2021). Forgotten women: A new Bounty-Pitcairn narrative [Doctoral thesis, University of New England].
37.
RyderC.MackeanT.CoombsJ.WilliamsH.HunterK.HollandA.IversR. (2019). Indigenous research methodology—Weaving a research interface. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1669923
