In recent decades, along with an increasing recognition of the unique place of Te iwi Māori in New Zealand society has come a search for a sense of belonging as a European New Zealander. This has opened the discourse for re-examination of the term Pākehā, and what that means in relation to Māori and to a national identity. The findings of several recent studies indicate that in the current socio-cultural context what it means to claim an identity as Pākehā is being redefined by individuals who engage extensively with Te Ao Māori. Based on the results of a study carried out by the author in 2013, this article examines the theoretical underpinnings of cultural identity transformation in relation to the experiences of individuals who have engaged extensively with Te Ao Māori, and discusses the implications of their definition of what it means to be Pākehā.
BaumeisterR. (1998). The self. In GilbertD.FiskeS.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology ( vol. 1, pp. 680–740). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
BentleyT. (1999). Pakeha Maori. Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin Books.
3.
BentleyT. (2007). Images of pakeha-maori (Doctoral Thesis). University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
4.
BerryJ.KimU.MindeT.MokD. (1987). Comparative studies of acculturation stress. International Migration Review, 21, 491–511.
5.
BerryJ. W. (1990). Psychology of acculturation. In BermanJ. J. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation ( vol. 37, pp. 201–234). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
6.
BhabhaH. (1994). The location of culture. London, England: Routledge.
7.
BlackR. (2000). Political implications of the name “Pakeha.”Living Justly in Aotearoa Newsletter.
8.
BrownM. (2011). Decolonizing Pākehā ways of being: revealing third space Pākehā experiences (Doctoral Thesis). The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
CooleyC. (1956). Human nature and the social order. New York, NY: Free Press.
11.
CrossS.MadsonL. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.
12.
HarreR. (1998). The singular self. London, England: SAGE.
13.
JellieM. (2001). The formation of Pakeha identity in relation to te reo Maori and te ao Maori (Master’s Thesis). University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
14.
HallowellI. (1963). American Indians white and black: The phenomen of transculturalization. Current Anthropology, 4, 519–531.
15.
KingM. (1985). Being Pakeha: An encounter with New Zealand and the Maori renaissance. Auckland, New Zealand: Hodder & Stoughton.
16.
KingM. (1999). Being pakeha now. Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin Books.
17.
KosmitzkiC. (1996). The reaffirmation of cultural identity in cross-cultural encounters. Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 238–248.
18.
KrebsN. B. (1999). Edgewalkers: Defusing cultural boundaries on the new global frontier. Far Hills: New Horizons Press.
19.
LaFromboiseT.ColemanH.GertonJ. (1993). Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 395–412.
20.
McLennanG.McManusR.SpoonleyP. (Eds.) (2010). Exploring society: Sociology for New Zealand students. Auckland, New Zealand: Pearson.
21.
MeadG. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
MitcalfeM. (2008). Understandings of being Pakeha: Exploring the perspective of six Pakeha who have studied in Maori cultural learning contexts (Master’s Thesis). Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
23.
NeisserU. (1988). Five kinds of self-knowlegde. Philosophical Psychology, 1, 35–59.
24.
OysermanD.MaekusH. (1993). The sociocultural self. In SulsJ.PratkanisA. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (vol. 4, pp. 187–220). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
OysermanD.SakamotoI.LaufferA. (1998). Cultural accommodation: Hybridity and the framing of social obligation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1606–1618.
26.
PhinneyJ.Devich-NavarroM. (1997). Variations in bicultural identification among African American and Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescents, 7, 3–32.
27.
RoccasS.BrewerM. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88–106.
SpoonleyP. (1991). Pakeha ethnicity: A response to Maori Sovereignty. In SpoonleyP.PearsonD.MacPhersonC. (Eds.), Nga take: Ethnic relations and racism in Aotearoa/New Zealand (pp. 154–170). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
31.
SpoonleyP.MacPhersonC.PearsonD. (Eds.) (2004). Tangata tangata: The changing ethnic contours of New Zealand. Southbank, UK: Thomson.
32.
SussmanN. (2000). The dynamic nature of cultural identity throughout cultural transitions: Why home is not so sweet. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 355–373.
33.
TadmorC.TetlockP.PengK. (2009). Acculturation strategies and integrative complexity: The cognitive implications of biculturalism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 105–139.
34.
TilburyF. (2001). Haunting traces of difference: Derrida and Kiwi identity. In SimmonsL.WorthH. (Eds.), Derrida downunder (pp. 198–215). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
35.
VasilR. (2000). Biculturalism: Reconciling Aotearoa with New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Institute of Policy Studies.
36.
WebberM. (2008). Walking the space between: Identity and Māori/Pākehā. Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER Press.
