Lower voter turnout and lack of political empowerment sees Māori engaging less than Pākehā (European New Zealanders) with the political system to the detriment of Māori development. This paper explores the potential of social media to enhance Māori development via political engagement. Mana Party Facebook pages are used as a case study to investigate if social media can encourage Māori political awareness and participation. Results found that social media has both positive and negative implications for political engagement and indigenous development. While social media aligns with tikanga Māori (values/customs) through tino rangatiratanga (self-determination) and whanaungatanga (relationships/networks), other aspects such as cultural misappropriation conflict with Māori values. The paper explores tensions in the use of social media for political engagement among indigenous peoples and offers a framework promoting e-whanaungatanga to illustrate how they might use social media in a way that emphasizes the positive and mitigates the negative aspects of the platform.
AimerP., & VowlesJ. (2004). What happened at the 2002 election? In VowlesJ., AimerP., BanducciS., KarpJ., & MillerR. (Eds.), Voters veto (pp. 26–27). Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland University Press.
2.
AlfredG. R., PitawanakwatB., & PriceJ. (2007). The meaning of political participation for indigenous youth.Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
3.
ArobbaB., McGrathR. E., FutrelleJ., & CraigA. B. (2010). A community-based social media approach for preserving endangered languages and culture. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/17078
4.
BakkerT. P., & de VreeseC. H. (2011). Good news for the future? Young people, internet use, and political participation.Communication Research, 38(4), 451–470.
5.
BishopR. (1999). Kaupapa Māori research: An indigenous approach to creating knowledge. In NikoraL. W., & RobertsonN. (Eds.), Māori and psychology: Research and practice (pp. 1–6). Hamilton, New Zealand: Department of Psychology, University of Waikato.
6.
BrownD., & NicholasG. (2012). Protecting indigenous cultural property in the age of digital democracy: Institutional and communal responses to Canadian First Nations and Māori heritage concerns.Journal of Material Culture, 17(3), 307–324.
CorbettJ., SingletonG., & MuirK. (2009). Web 2.0 for Aboriginal cultural survival: A new Australian outback movement.Participatory Learning and Action, 59(1), 71–78.
11.
CramF. (2001). Rangahau Māori: Tona tika, tona pono. In TolichM. (Ed.), Research ethics in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 35–52). Auckland, New Zealand: Pearson Education.
12.
DreznerD. W. (2009). Weighing the scales: The internet's effect on state-society relations.Brown Journal of World Affairs, 16(2), 31–44.
13.
DurieM. (1998). Te mana te kawanatanga: The politics of Māori self-determination.Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
FitzgeraldE., StevensonB., & TapiataJ. (2007). Māori electoral participation: A report produced for the Electoral Commission.Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University.
16.
FlickerS., HaansD., & SkinnerH. (2004). Ethical dilemmas in research on internet communities.Qualitative Health Research, 14(1), 124–134.
17.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York, NY: Continuum.
18.
FriedmannJ. (1992). Empowerment: The politics of alternative development.Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
19.
GonzálezM. I., SánchezE., & de los SantosE. (2011, May). ViTu: A system to help the Mexican people to preserve and celebrate their culture. In CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 971–976). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
20.
GoodwinI. (2011). Power to the people? Web 2.0, Facebook, and DIY cultural citizenship in Aotearoa New Zealand.New Zealand Journal of Media Studies, 12(2), 110–133.
21.
HarlowS. (2012). Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline.New Media & Society, 14(2), 225–243. doi:10.1177/1461444811410408
22.
HeeksR. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development.Computer, 41(6), 26–33.
23.
HokowhituB., KermoalN., AndersonC., PetersonA., ReillyM., AltamiranoI., & RewiP. (2010). Indigenous identity and resistance: Researching the diversity of knowledge.Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Press.
24.
HookwayN. (2008). Entering the blogosphere: Some strategies for using blogs in social research.Qualitative Research, 8(1), 91–113.
25.
HuamanE. S., & StokesP. (2011). Indigenous language revitalization and new media: Postsecondary students as innovators.Global Media Journal, 11(18), 1–15.
26.
Iseke-BarnesJ., & DanardD. (2007). Indigenous knowledges and worldview: Representations and the internet. In DysonL. E., HendriksM., & GrantS. (Eds.), Information technology and indigenous people (pp. 27–37). London, England: Information Science Publishing.
27.
JosephS. (2012). Social media, political change and human rights.Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 35(1), 145–188.
28.
KamiraR. (2003). Te mata o te tai—The edge of the tide: Rising capacity in information technology of Māori in Aotearoa New Zealand.The Electronic Library, 21(5), 465–475.
29.
KralI. (2011). Youth media as cultural practice: Remote indigenous youth speaking out loud.Australian Aboriginal Studies, 2011(1), 4–16.
30.
LandzeliusK. (2006). The meta-native and the militant activist: Virtually saving the rainforest. In LandzeliusK. (Ed.), Native on the net: Indigenous and diasporic peoples in the virtual age (pp. 112–131). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
LongweS. (1991). Gender awareness: The missing element in the Third World development project. In WallaceT., & MarchC. (Eds.), Changing perceptions: Writings on gender and development (pp. 149–157). Oxford, England: Oxfam.
McLennanS. (2012). An alternative model for development? Promise and politics in the projecthonduras network (Unpublished PhD thesis). Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
34.
MeadH. M. (2003). Tikanga Māori: Living by Māori values.Wellington, New Zealand: Huia.
35.
O'CarrollA. D. (2013). Virtual whanaungatanga: Māori utilizing social networking sites to attain and maintain relationships.AlterNative, 9(3), 230–245.
36.
PeaseB. (2002). Rethinking empowerment: A postmodern reappraisal for emancipatory practice.British Journal of Social Work, 32(2), 135–147.
37.
PetrayT. L. (2011). Protest 2.0: Online interactions and Aboriginal activists.Media, Culture & Society, 33(6), 923–940.
38.
PihamaL. (2001). Tihei mauri ora. Honouring our voices: Mana wahine as kaupapa Māori theoretical framework (Unpublished PhD thesis). Auckland University, Auckland, New Zealand.
39.
PrestonJ. (2013). Neoliberal settler colonialism, Canada and the tar sands.Race & Class, 55(2), 42–59.
40.
PutnamR. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital.Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.
41.
RheingoldH. (2008). Using participatory media and public voice to encourage civic engagement. In BennettW. L. (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 97–118). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
RowlandsJ. (1997). Questioning empowerment: Working with women in Honduras.Oxford, England: Oxfam.
43.
ScheyvensR. (1999). Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities.Tourism Management, 20, 245–250.
44.
ScheyvensR. (2009). Empowerment. In KitchinR., & ThriftN. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 464–470). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
45.
SingletonG., Rola-RubzenM. F., MuirK., MuirD., & McGregorM. (2009). Youth empowerment and information and communication technologies: A case study of a remote Australian Aboriginal community.GeoJournal, 74(5), 403–413.
46.
SmithG. H. (1997). Kaupapa Māori: Theory and praxis (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
47.
SmithL. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples.London, England: Zed Books.
48.
SolisB., & BreakenridgeD. K. (2009). Putting the public back in public relations.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
49.
SorianoC. R. (2011). The arts of indigenous online dissent: Negotiating technology, indigeneity, and activism in the Cordillera.Telematics and Informatics, 29(1), 33–44.
50.
ThompsonM. (2008). ICT and development studies: Towards development 2.0.Journal of International Development, 20(6), 821–835. doi:10.1002/jid.1498
51.
ValenzuelaS., ArriagadaA., & SchermanA. (2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile.Journal of Communication, 62(2), 299–314.
52.
WalkerR. (1990). Ka whawhai tonu mātou: Struggle without end.Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin Books.
