This paper extends recent work in the geography of youth and childhood with an exploration of the ways that indigenous Māori teenagers who have grown up in regional tribal environments deploy land narratives as they construct a range of fluid socio-spatial cultural identities. The discussion is based on the findings of a multi-tribal study undertaken in the aftermath of government legislation that had led to widespread Māori political protest. Data generated in the course of the study took the form of digital photographs taken by the participants coupled with their explanations about the images. It is argued that Māori young people who are immersed in these environments draw on an extensive repertoire of tropes about the land which in turn influences a territorialized politics of belonging. These politics of belonging become particularly evident during periods of heightened political tension between indigenous peoples and the Crown.
AntonsichM. (2010). Searching for belonging - An analytical framework.Geography Compass, 4(6), 644–659.
2.
BellA. (2009). Dilemmas of settler belonging: Roots, routes and redemption in New Zealand national identity claims.The Sociological Review, 57(1), 145–162.
3.
DalzielP. (2002). New Zealand's economic reforms: An assessment.Review of Political Economy, 14(1), 31–46.
4.
de BreeJ., DavidsT., & de HaasH. (2010). Post-return experiences and transnational belonging of return migrants: A Dutch-Moroccan case study.Global Networks, 10(4), 489–509.
5.
HarrisA. (2004). Hikoi: Forty years of Māori protest.Wellington, New Zealand: Huia Publishers.
KidmanJ. (2007). Engaging with Māori communities: An exploration of some tensions in the mediation of social sciences research. Tihei Oreore Monograph Series, Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
8.
KidmanJ. (2009). Visual methodologies: Exploring indigenous constructions of self and environment. In ZandvlietD. (Ed.), Diversity in environmental education research (pp. 65–76). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
9.
Le HeronE. (2004). Placing geographical imagination in film: New Zealand filmmakers’ use of landscape.New Zealand Geographer, 60(1), 60–66.
10.
MatthewsH., & LimbM. (1999). Defining an agenda for the geography of children: Review and prospect.Progress in Human Geography, 23(1), 61–90.
11.
MeadH. M. (2003). Tikanga Māori: Living by Māori values.Wellington, New Zealand: Huia Publishers.
12.
Ministry of Justice. (2004, December). The Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004. [Brochure]. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Government publication.
13.
MurtonB. (2006). ‘Toheroa wars’: Cultural politics and everyday resistance on a northern New Zealand beach.New Zealand Geographer, 62, 25–38.
14.
NairnK., & HigginsJ. (2007). New Zealand's neoliberal generation: Tracing discourses of economic (ir)rationality.International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 261–281.
15.
OlundE. N. (2002). From savage space to governable space: The extension of United States judicial authority over Indian country in the nineteenth century.Cultural Geographies, 9, 129–157.
16.
OsborneB. S. (2001). Landscapes, memory, monuments, and commemoration: Putting identity in its place - Draft. Report commissioned by Department of Canadian Heritage for the Ethnocultural, Racial, Religious, and Linguistic Diversity Seminar. Halifax, Nova Scotia. November 1-2.
17.
PanelliR. (2008). Social geographies: Encounters with indigenous and more-than-white/anglo geographies.Progress in Human Geography, 32(6), 801–811.
18.
PanelliR., AllenD., EllisonB., KellyA., JohnA., & TipaG. (2008). Beyond Bluff oysters? Place identity and ethnicity in a peripheral coastal setting.Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 41–55.
RoseG. (2006). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual methods.London, England: Sage Publications.
21.
SchnellS. M. (2003). Creating narratives of place and identity in ‘Little Sweden, USA’.The Geographical Review, 93(1), 1–29.
22.
SchnellI., & MishalS. (2008). Place as a source of identity in colonizing societies.Geographical Review, 98(2), 242–259.
23.
SlettoB. (2009). ‘Indigenous people don't have boundaries’: Reborderings, fire management, and productions of authenticities in indigenous landscapes.Cultural Geographies, 16, 253–277.
24.
SmithC. (2007). Cultures of collecting. In BarghM. (Ed.), Resistance: An indigenous response to neoliberalism.Wellington, New Zealand: Huia Publishers.
25.
SmithL. T., SmithG. H., BolerM., KemptonM., OrmondA., ChuehH-C., & WaetfordR. (2002). “Do you guys hate Aucklanders too?” Youth: voicing difference from the rural heartland.Journal of Rural Studies, 18, 169–178.
26.
StanworthK. (2002). In sight of visual culture.Symplokē, 10(1-2), 106–117.
27.
SullivanC. (2009). Mai i Aotearoa - From New Zealand: The effects of living in Australia on Māori identity. Unpublished dissertation, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
28.
TamisariF. (1998). Body, vision and movement: In the footprints of the ancestors.Oceania, 68(4), 249–270.
ThomB. (2009). The paradox of boundaries in Coast Salish territories.Cultural Geographies, 16, 179–205.
31.
TrudeauD. (2006). Politics of belonging in the construction of landscapes: Place-making, boundary drawing and exclusion.Cultural Geographies, 13, 421–443.
32.
United Nations. (2006, March 13). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous people, Rodolfo Stavenhagen. Addendum. Mission to New Zealand. Retrieved from http://img.scoop.co.nz/media/pdfs/0604/srnzmarch06.pdf
33.
Yuval-DavisN. (2006a). Belonging and the politics of belonging.Patterns of Prejudice, 40(3), 197–214.
34.
Yuval-DavisN. (2006b). Secure borders and safe haven and the gendered politics of belonging: Beyond social cohesion.Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(3), 513–535.
