Abstract
Purpose:
The number of older patients who need vascular access for end-stage renal disease is rapidly increasing. However, determining the optimal vascular access for older patients is difficult. We aimed to compare the outcomes of radiocephalic (RC) and brachiocephalic (BC) arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in patients aged >80 years.
Methods:
This study included 94 patients undergoing hemodialysis who underwent the procedure for the first time between 2013 and 2019 in Korea University Guro Hospital. The primary outcomes were primary patency (PP) and cumulative patency (CP). The secondary outcome was maturation failure and death with functional vascular access.
Results:
Of the 94 patients (mean age, 83.9 ± 2.97 years), 66 (70.2%) and 28 (29.8%) patients belonged to the RC and BC AVF groups, respectively. One-year PP was worse in the RC AVF group than in the BC AVF group (59.6% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.013). However, no significant difference was observed in 1-year CP between the groups (87.4% vs. 91.2%, p = 0.441). The unassisted maturation rate was higher in the BC AVF group than in the RC AVF group (74.2% vs. 96.4%, p = 0.011). During follow-up (649 ± 612 days), only 6 (6.4%) patients required secondary fistula placement. Eighteen patients (19.1%), all of whom had functional AVF, died.
Conclusion:
BC AVF showed better PP and a smaller number of interventions than RC AVF in octogenarians. Therefore, BC AVF could be a primary choice of vascular access in the octogenarian patient. However, further research is warranted to confirm these findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
