More than 1 million peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are placed annually in the US and are used to provide convenient vascular access for a variety of reasons including long term antibiotic treatment, chemotherapy, parenteral nutrition, and blood draws. Although they are relatively easy to place and inexpensive, PICC line use is associated with many complications such as phlebitis/thrombophlebitis, venous thrombosis, catheter-related infection, wound infection, and central vein stenosis. These complications are far more deleterious for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) whose lives depend on a functioning hemodialysis access once they reach end stage kidney disease (ESKD). Despite recent guidelines to avoid PICC lines in CKD and ESKD patients, clinical use remains high. There is an ongoing urgency to educate and inform health care providers and the CKD patients themselves in preserving their venous real estate. In this article, we review AV access and PICC line background, complications associated with PICC lines in the CKD population, and recommendations for alternatives to placing a PICC line in this vulnerable patient population.
O’GradyNPAlexanderMBurnsLA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis2011; 52(9): e162–e193.
2.
KallooSWishJB.Nephrologists versus peripherally inserted central catheters: are the PICCs winning?Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2016; 11(8): 1333–1334.
3.
Vascular Access 2006 Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis2006; 48(Suppl. 1): S176–S246.
4.
El TersMSchearsGJTalerSJ, et al. Association between prior peripherally inserted central catheters and lack of functioning arteriovenous fistulas: a case-control study in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis2012; 60(4): 601–608.
5.
GuthrieDDreherDMunsonM.What you need to know about PICCs-Part II. Nursing2007; 37(9): 14–15.
6.
DuwadiSZhaoQSingh BudalB.Peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients; complications and its prevention: a review. Int J Nurs Sci2019; 6(1): 99–105.
7.
GonsalvesCFEschelmanDJSullivanKL, et al. Incidence of central vein stenosis and occlusion following upper extremity PICC and port placement. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol2003; 26: 123–127.
8.
McGillRLRuthazerRMeyerKB, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters and hemodialysis outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2016; 11: 1434–1440.
9.
FallouhNMcGuirkHMFlandersSA, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis: a narrative review. Am J Med2015; 128: 722–738.
10.
AllenAWMegargellJLBrownDB, et al. Venous thrombosis associated with the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol2000; 11: 1309–1314.
11.
ShingarevRAllonM.Peripherally inserted central catheters and other intravascular devices: how safe are they for hemodialysis patients?Am J Kidney Dis2012; 60: 510–513.
12.
ChopraVFlandersSASaintS.The problem with peripherally inserted central catheters. JAMA2012; 308: 1527–1528.
13.
GreeneMTFlandersSAWollerSC.The association between PICC use and venous thromboembolism in upper and lower extremities. Am J Med2015; 128: 986–993.
14.
WilliamsAWDwyerACEddyAA, et al. Critical and honest conversations: the evidence behind the “Choosing Wisely” campaign recommendations by the American Society of Nephrology. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2012; 7(10): 1664–1672.
15.
TangriNGramsMELeveyAS, et al. Multinational assessment of accuracy of equations for predicting risk of kidney failure: a meta-analysis [published correction appears in JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):822]. JAMA2016; 315(2): 164–174.
16.
BrundigeMLStaicuMLLaguio-VilaM.Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs): an opportunity for antimicrobial stewardship. Open Forum Infect Dis2017; 4(Suppl 1): S276.
17.
ChopraVFlandersSASaintS, et al. The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): results from a multispecialty panel using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Ann Intern Med2015; 163(6 Suppl): S1–S40.
18.
ChickJFReddySNYamBL, et al. Institution of a hospital-based central venous access policy for peripheral vein preservation in patients with chronic kidney disease: a 12-year experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol2017; 28(3): 392–397.
19.
BhutaniGEl TersMKremersWK, et al. Evaluating safety of tunneled small bore central venous catheters in chronic kidney disease population: a quality improvement initiative. Hemodial Int2017; 21(2): 284–293.
20.
SasadeuszKJTrerotolaSOShahH, et al. Tunneled jugular small-bore central catheters as an alternative to peripherally inserted central catheters for intermediate-term venous access in patients with hemodialysis and chronic renal insufficiency. Radiology1999; 213(1): 303–306.
21.
WilsonTJStetlerWRJrFletcherJJ.Comparison of catheter-related large vein thrombosis in centrally inserted versus peripherally inserted central venous lines in the neurological intensive care unit. Clin Neurol Neurosurg2013; 115(7): 879–882.
22.
WasseHHuangRNaqviN, et al. Inflammation, oxidation and venous neointimal hyperplasia precede vascular injury from AVF creation in CKD patients. J Vasc Access2012; 13(2): 168–174.
NifongTPMcDevittTJ.The effect of catheter to vein ratio on blood flow rates in a simulated model of peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Chest2011; 140: 48–53.
25.
EvansRSSharpJHLinfordLH, et al. Reduction of peripherally inserted central catheter-associated DVT. Chest2013; 143: 627–633.
26.
HoggardJSaadTSchonD, et al. Guidelines for venous access in patients with chronic kidney disease. Semin Dial2008; 21(2): 186–191.
27.
Uptodate. Catheters used for venous and arterial access.
DrewDWeinerD.Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCS) in CKD: PICC’ing the best access for kidney disease patients. Am J Kidney Dis2016; 67(5): 724–727.
30.
ChopraVAnandSHicknerA, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet2013; 382(9889): 311–325.
31.
AsifAAgarwalAYevzlinA, et al. Interventional nephrology. New York: McGraw Hill Medical, 2012, p.76.
