Peripherally inserted central catheter–related thrombosis rate in modern vascular access era—when insertion technique matters: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2020
Peripherally inserted central catheter–related thrombosis rate in modern vascular access era—when insertion technique matters: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Technical factors at the moment of catheter insertion might have a role in peripherally inserted central catheter–related thrombotic risk. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to define the actual rate of peripherally inserted central catheter–related symptomatic deep vein thrombosis in patients in whom catheter insertion was performed according to ultrasound guidance, appropriate catheter size choice, and proper verification of tip location.
Methods:
We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Only prospective observational studies published in peer-reviewed journals after 2010 up to November 2018 reporting peripherally inserted central catheter–related deep vein thrombosis rate were included. All studies were of adult patients who underwent peripherally inserted central catheter insertion. Results were restricted to those studies which included in their methods ultrasound guidance for venipuncture, catheter tip location, and a catheter size selection strategy. Random-effect meta-analyses and arcsine transformation for binomial data were performed to pool deep vein thrombosis weighted frequencies.
Results:
Of the 1441 studies identified, 15 studies involving 5420 patients and 5914 peripherally inserted central catheters fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The weighted frequency of peripherally inserted central catheter–related deep vein thrombosis was 2.4% (95% confidence interval = 1.5–3.3) and remained low in oncologic patients (2.2%, 95% confidence interval = 0.6–3.9). Thrombotic rate was higher in onco-hematologic patients (5.9%, 95% confidence interval = 1.2–10). Considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 74.9) was observed and all studies were considered at high risk of attrition bias.
Conclusions:
A proper technique is crucial at the moment of peripherally inserted central catheter insertion. Peripherally inserted central catheter–related deep vein thrombosis rate appears to be low when evidence-based technical factors are taken into consideration during the insertion procedure.
LoughranSCBorzattaM. Peripherally inserted central catheters: a report of 2506 catheter days. J Parenter Enteral Nutr1995; 19(2): 133–136.
2.
AlhimyaryAFernandezCPicardM, et al. Safety and efficacy of total parenteral nutrition delivered via a peripherally inserted central venous catheter. Nutr Clin Pract1996; 11(5): 199–203.
3.
SriskandarajahPWebbKChisholmD, et al. Retrospective cohort analysis comparing the incidence of deep vein thromboses between peripherally-inserted and long-term skin tunneled venous catheters in hemato-oncology patients. Thromb J2015; 13: 21–21.
4.
LiJFanYYXinMZ, et al. A randomised, controlled trial comparing the long-term effects of peripherally inserted central catheter placement in chemotherapy patients using B-mode ultrasound with modified Seldinger technique versus blind puncture. Eur J Oncol Nurs2014; 18(1): 94–103.
5.
CotogniPPittirutiM. Focus on peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients. World J Crit Care Med2014; 3(4): 80–94.
6.
FunkDGrayJPlourdePJ. Two-year trends of peripherally inserted central catheter-line complications at a tertiary-care hospital: role of nursing expertise. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2001; 22(6): 377–379.
7.
SainathanSHempsteadMAndazS. A single institution experience of seven hundred consecutively placed peripherally inserted central venous catheters. J Vasc Access2014; 15(6): 498–502.
8.
PikwerAÅkesonJLindgrenS. Complications associated with peripheral or central routes for central venous cannulation. Anaesthesia2012; 67: 65–71.
9.
ChopraVAnandSHicknerA, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet2013; 382(9889): 311–325.
10.
FallouhNMcGuirkHMFlandersSA, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis: a narrative review. Am J Med2015; 128(7): 722–738.
11.
ZochiosVUmarISimpsonN, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-related thrombosis in critically ill patients. J Vasc Access2014; 15(5): 329–337.
TrerotolaSOStavropoulosSWMondscheinJI, et al. Triple-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter in patients in the critical care unit: prospective evaluation. Radiology2010; 256(1): 312–320.
14.
LiemTKYanitKEMoseleySE, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheter usage patterns and associated symptomatic upper extremity venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg2012; 55(3): 761–767.
15.
ItkinMMondsheinJIStavropoulosSW, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheter thrombosis—reverse tapered versus non- tapered catheters: a randomized controlled study. J Vasc Interv Radiol2014; 25: 85–91.
16.
FletcherJJStetlerWWilsonTJ. The clinical significance of peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related deep vein thrombosis. Neurocrit Care2011; 15(3): 454–460.
17.
PittirutiMBruttiACelentanoD, et al. Clinical experience with power injectable peripherally inserted central catheters in intensive care patients. Crit Care2012; 16: R21.
18.
MenendezJJVerduCCalderonB, et al. Incidence and risk factors of superficial and deep vein thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in children. J Thromb Haemost2016; 14(11): 2158–2168.
19.
GroveJRPevecWC. Venous thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol2000; 11: 837–840.
20.
NifongTPMcDevittTJ. The effect of catheter to vein ratio on blood flow rates in a simulated model of peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Chest2011; 140(1): 48–53.
21.
SpencerTRMahoneyKJ. Reducing catheter-related thrombosis using a risk reduction tool centered on catheter to vessel ratio. J Thromb Thrombolysis2017; 44(4): 427–434.
22.
LampertiMBodenhamARPittirutiM, et al. International evidence-based recommendations on ultrasound-guided vascular access. Intensive Care Med2012; 38(7): 1105–1117.
23.
GilonDSchechterDReinAJ, et al. Right atrial thrombi are related to indwelling central venous catheter position: insights into time course and possible mechanism of formation. Am Heart J1998; 135(3): 457–462.
24.
SaberWMouaTWilliamsEC, et al. Risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients: a patient-level data (IPD) meta-analysis of clinical trials and prospective studies. J Thromb Haemost2011; 9(2): 312–319.
25.
DebourdeauPFargeDBeckersM, et al. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of thrombosis associated with central venous catheters in patients with cancer. J Thromb Haemost2013; 11(1): 71–80.
26.
EmoliACappuccioSMarcheB, et al. The ISP (Safe Insertion of PICCs) protocol: a bundle of 8 recommendations to minimize the complications related to the peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC). Assist Inferm Ric2014; 33(2): 82–89.
27.
BozzettiFMarianiLBertinetDB, et al. Central venous catheter complications in 447 patients on home parenteral nutrition: an analysis of over 100.000 catheter days. Clin Nutr2002; 21(6): 475–485.
28.
GallieniMPittirutiMBiffiR. Vascular access in oncology patients. CA Cancer J Clin2008; 58: 323–346.
29.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJ, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med2009; 151: W65–W94.
30.
Von ElmEAltmanDGEggerM, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ2007; 335: 806–808.
31.
MantarroSRossiMBonifaziM, et al. Risk of severe cardiotoxicity following treatment with trastuzumab: a meta-analysis of randomized and cohort studies of 29,000 women with breast cancer. Intern Emerg Med2016; 11(1): 123–140.
32.
FreemanMFTukeyJW. Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann Math Stat1950; 21: 607–611.
33.
CotogniPPittirutiMBarberoC, et al. Catheter-related complications in cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition: a prospective study of over 51,000 catheter days. J Parenter Enteral Nutr2013; 37(3): 375–383.
34.
CotogniPBarberoCGarrinoC, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters in non-hospitalized cancer patients: 5-year results of a prospective study. Support Care Cancer2015; 23(2): 403–409.
35.
LiuYGaoYWeiL, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheter thrombosis incidence and risk factors in cancer patients: a double-center prospective investigation. Ther Clin Risk Manag2015; 11: 153–160.
36.
BellesiSChiusoloPDePascaleG, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in the management of oncohematological patients submitted to autologous stem cell transplantation. Support Care Cancer2013; 21(2): 531–535.
37.
BertoglioSFacciniBLalliL, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in cancer patients under chemotherapy: a prospective study on the incidence of complications and overall failures. J Surg Oncol2016; 113(6): 708–714.
38.
CornillonJMartignolesJATavernier-TardyE, et al. Prospective evaluation of systematic use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC lines) for the home care after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation. Support Care Cancer2017; 25(9): 2843–2847.
39.
DeLemosCAbi-NaderJAkinsPT. Use of peripherally inserted central catheters as an alternative to central catheters in neurocritical care units. Crit Care Nurse2011; 31(2): 70–75.
40.
DupontCGouyaHPanzoR, et al. Complications of peripherally inserted central catheters in adults with cystic fibrosis or bronchiectasis. J Vasc Access2015; 16: 245–249.
41.
EvansRSSharpJHLinfordLH, et al. Risk of symptomatic DVT associated with peripherally inserted central catheters. Chest2010; 138(4): 803–810.
42.
EvansRSSharpJHLinfordLH, et al. Reduction of peripherally inserted central catheter-associated DVT. Chest2013; 143(3): 627–633.
43.
KangJChenWSunW, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in cancer patients: a prospective study of over 50,000 catheter days. J Vasc Access2017; 18(2): 153–157.
44.
MermisJDStromJCGreenwoodJP, et al. Quality improvement initiative to reduce deep vein thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in adults with cystic fibrosis. Ann Am Thorac Soc2014; 11(9): 1404–1410.
45.
PittirutiMEmoliAPortaP, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of three different types of valved and non-valved peripherally inserted central catheters. J Vasc Access2014; 15(6): 519–523.
46.
SharpRCummingsMFielderA, et al. The catheter to vein ratio and rates of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in patients with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC): a prospective cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud2015; 52(3): 677–685.
47.
TianGZhuYQiL, et al. Efficacy of multifaceted interventions in reducing complications of peripherally inserted central catheter in adult oncology patients. Support Care Cancer2010; 18(10): 1293–1298.
48.
ZerlaPACanelliACerneL, et al. Evaluating safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of PICC securement by subcutaneously anchored stabilization device. J Vasc Access2017; 18(3): 238–242.
49.
LiuKZhouYXieW, et al. Handgrip exercise reduces peripherally-inserted central catheter-related venous thrombosis in patients with solid cancers: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud2018; 86: 99–106.
50.
SauerlandSLeferingRNeugebauerEA. Retrospective clinical studies in surgery: potentials and pitfalls. J Hand Surg Br2002; 27(2): 117–121.
51.
OwensCABuiJTKnuttinenMG, et al. Pulmonary embolism from upper extremity deep vein thrombosis and the role of superior vena cava filters: a review of the literature. J Vasc Interv Radiol2010; 21(6): 779–787.
52.
ElmanEEKahnSR. The post-thrombotic syndrome after upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in adults: a systematic review. Thromb Res2006; 117(6): 609–614.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
