In this review we describe current applications and future perspectives of MR angiography, MR flow quantification, and interventional MRI in hemodialysis access management. Each section starts with a brief overview of the main techniques that are currently available or under development. This is followed by a survey of the pertinent literature. Each section concludes with a discussion of the reported findings and an indication of research opportunities.
HartnellG.G., HughesL.A., FinnJ.P., Esterbrook LongmaidH.Magnetic resonance angiography of the central chest veins.A new gold standard? Chest1995; 107: 1053–7.
5.
LebowitzJ.A., RofskyN.M., KrinskyG.A., WeinrebJ.C.Gadolinium-enhanced body MR venography with subtraction technique.Am J Roentgenol1997; 169: 755–8.
6.
ShindeT.S., LeeV.S., RofskyN.M., KrinskyG.A., WeinrebJ.C.Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR venographic evaluation of patency of central veins in the thorax: initial experience.Radiology1999; 213: 555–60.
7.
KroenckeT.J., TaupitzM., ArnoldR., FritscheL., HammB.Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance venography in suspected thrombo-occlusive disease of the central chest veins.Chest2001; 120: 1570–6.
8.
OxtobyJ.W., WidjajaE., GibsonK.M., UzokaK.3D gadolinium-enhanced MRI venography: evaluation of central chest veins and impact on patient management.Clin Radiol2001; 56: 887–94.
ThorntonM.J., RyanR., VargheseJ.C., FarrellM.A., LuceyB., LeeM.J.A three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR venography technique for imaging central veins.Am J Roentgenol1999; 173: 999–1003.
11.
MenegazzoD., LaissyJ.P., DuerrbachA.Hemodialysis access fistula creation: preoperative assessment with MR venography and comparison with conventional venography.Radiology1998; 209: 723–8.
12.
SchumanE.S., QuinnS.F., StandageB.A.Magnetic resonance angiography in evaluation of central and peripheral vasculature prior to dialysis surgery. In: HenryM.L. ed. Vascular access for hemodialysis-VI.Chicago: WL Gore & Associates and Precept Press1999; 103–10.
13.
LaissyJ.P., FernandezP., Karila-CohenP.Upper limb vein anatomy before hemodialysis fistula creation: cross-sectional anatomy using MR venography.Eur Radiol2003; 13: 256–61.
14.
Turmel-RodriguesL., BourquelotP., RaynaudA., BeyssenB., SapovalM.Hemodialysis fistula: preoperative MR venography – a promising but partial view.Radiology2000; 214: 302–3.
15.
RuehmS.G., ZimnyK., DebatinJ.F.Direct contrast-enhanced 3D MR venography.Eur Radiol2001; 11: 102–12.
16.
GehlH.B., BohndorfK., GladziwaU., HandtS., GuentherR.W.Imaging of hemodialysis fistulas: limitations of MR angiography.J Comput Assist Tomogr1991; 15: 271–5.
17.
NakatsukaH., TsubakimotoM., HashimotoH.MR angiography of the forearm – visualization of the internal dialysis shunt.Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi1991; 51: 1105–7.
18.
KonermannM., SannerB., LauferU., JosephsW., OdenthalH.J., HorstmannE.Magnetic resonance angiography as a technique for the visualization of hemodialysis shunts.Nephron1996; 73: 73–8.
19.
WaldmanG.J., PattynamaP.M.T., ChangP.C., VerburghC., ReiberJ.H.C., de RoosA.Magnetic resonance angiography of dialysis access shunts: initial results.Magn Reson Imaging1996; 14: 197–200.
20.
ThurnherS.Magnetic resonance angiography of hemodialysis fistulas and grafts.Semin Interv Radiol1997; 14: 101–10.
21.
LaissyJ.P., MenegazzoD., DebrayM.P.Failing arteriovenous hemodialysis fistulas: assessment with magnetic resonance angiography.Invest Radiol1999; 34: 218–24.
22.
MorimotoA., YoshimuraH., HosokawaC., YoshidaT.MR angiography of hemodialysis access fistula: evaluation before PTA procedure.Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi2000; 60: 526–8.
23.
CavagnaE., D'AndreaP., SchiavonF., TarroniG.Failing hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula and percutaneous treatment: imaging with CT, MRI and digital subtraction angiography.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol2000; 23: 262–5.
24.
PlankenR.N., TordoirJ.H.M., DammersR.Stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae by multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary experience.J Magn Reson Imaging2003; 17: 54–64.
25.
ChiowanichP., MitchellD.G., OrtegaH.V., MohamedF.Arterial pseudostenosis on first-pass gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography: new observation of a potential pitfall.Am J Roentgenol2000; 175: 523–7.
26.
BosC., SmitsJ.H.M., ZijlstraJ.J.MRA of hemodialysis access grafts and fistulae using selective contrast injection and flow interruption.Magn Reson Med2001; 45: 557–61.
27.
SmitsJ.H.M., BosC., ElgersmaO.E.H.Hemodialysis access imaging: comparison of flow-interrupted contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.Radiology2002; 225: 829–34.
28.
ElgersmaO.E.H., BartelsL.W., BosC.Imaging the central veins of hemodialysis accesses: comparison of direct contrast-enhanced MR venography with conventional venography.Am J Roentgenol (submitted).
29.
HanK.M., DuijmL.E.M., ThelissenG.R.P.Failing hemodialysis access grafts: evaluation of complete vascular tree with 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography with high spatial resolution: initial results in 10 patients.Radiology2003; 227: 601–5.
PrinceM.R., ArnoldusC., FrisoliJ.K.Nephrotoxicity of high-dose gadolinium compared to iodinated contrast.J Magn Reson Imaging1996; 6: 162–6.
32.
RungeV.M.Safety of approved MR contrast media for intravenous injection.J Magn Reson Imaging2000; 12: 205–13.
33.
OkadaS., KatagiriK., KumazakiT., YokoyamaH.Safety of gadolinium contrast agent in hemodialysis patients.Acta Radiol2001; 42: 339–41.
34.
TombachB., BremerC., ReimerP.Using highly concentrated gadobutrol as an MR contrast agent in patients also requiring hemodialysis: safety and dialysability.Am J Roentgenol2002; 178: 105–9.
35.
DawsonP.Contrast agents in patients on dialysis.Semin Dial2002; 15: 232–6.
36.
SpinosaD.J., AngleJ.F., HagspielK.D., SchenkW.G.III, MatsumotoA.H.CO2 and gadopentetate dimeglumine as alternative contrast agents for malfunctioning dialysis grafts and fistulas.Kidney Int1998; 54: 945–50.
37.
GeoffroyO., TassartM., Le BlancheA.F.Upper extremity digital subtraction venography with gadoterate meglumine before fistula creation for hemodialysis.Kidney Int2001; 59: 1491–7.
38.
Le BlancheA.F., TassartM., DeuxJ.F., RossertJ., BigotJ.M., BoudgheneF.P.Gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction angiography of hemodialysis fistulas: a diagnostic and therapeutic approach.AJR2002; 179: 1023–8.
39.
OuhlousM., LethimonnierF., DippelD.W.Evaluation of a dedicated dual phased-array surface coil using a black-blood FSE sequence for high resolution MRI of the carotid vessel wall.J Magn Reson Imaging2002; 15: 344–51.
40.
BartelsL.W., SmitsH.F.M., BakkerC.J.G., ViergeverM.A.MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents.J Vasc Interv Radiol2001; 12: 365–71.
41.
BartelsL.W., BakkerC.J.G., ViergeverM.A.Improved lumen visualization in metallic vascular implants by reducing RF artifacts.Magn Reson Med2002; 47: 171–80.
42.
OudenhovenLFIJ, PattynamaP.M.T., de RoosA., SeeverensH.J.J., RebergenS.A., ChangP.C.Magnetic resonance, a new method for measuring blood flow in hemodialysis fistulae.Kidney Int1994; 45: 884–9.
43.
GutberletM., VenzS., KahlA.Blood flow quantification in hemodialysis fistulae by phase contrast MR angiography (PC-MRA) in comparison to duplex sonography.Fortschr Roentgenstr1998; 169: 163–9.
44.
BosmanP.J., BoereboomF.T.J., BakkerC.J.G.Access flow measurements in hemodialysis patients: In vivo validation of an ultrasound dilution technique.J Am Soc Nephrology1996; 7: 966–9.
45.
BosC., SmitsJ.H.M., ZijlstraJ.J., BlankestijnP.J., BakkerC.J.G., ViergeverM.A.Underestimation of access flow by ultrasound dilution flow measurements.Phys Med Biol2002; 47: 481–9.
46.
BakkerC.J.G., BosmanP.J., BoereboomF.T., BlankestijnP.J., MaliWPTM. Measuring flow in hemodialysis grafts by non-triggered 2DPC magnetic resonance angiography.Kidney Int1996; 49: 903–5.
47.
Van KempenB.P.M., SmitsH.F.M., BlankestijnP.J.Haemodialysis access graft with shunting through an iatrogenic fistula – the diagnostic role of magnetic resonance flow measurement.Nephrol Dial Transplant1999; 14: 444–6.
48.
BakkerC.J.G., HoogeveenR.M., ViergeverM.A., MaliWPTM. Construction of a protocol for measuring blood flow by 2D phase contrast MR angiography.J Magn Res Imaging1999; 9: 119–27.
49.
DebatinJ.F., AdamG (eds). Interventional magnetic resonance imaging.Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 1998.
BartelsL.W., BakkerC.J.G.Endovascular interventional magnetic resonance imaging.Phys Med Biol2003; 48: R37–R64.
52.
SmitsH.F.M., BosC., van der WeideR., BakkerC.J.G.Endovascular interventional MR: Balloon angioplasty in a flow phantom of a hemodialysis access graft taped onto the forearm of a volunteer.J Vasc Intervent Radiol1998; 9: 840–5.
53.
SmitsH.F.M., BosC., van der WeideR., BakkerC.J.G.Interventional MR: vascular applications.Eur Radiol1999; 9: 1488–95.
