Transition from straight lateral to direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective single-centre study

Abstract

Introduction:

The muscle-sparing direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has gained popularity for reduced postoperative pain and faster rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefits of transitioning from straight lateral approach (SLA) THA to DAA THA, and investigate whether these benefits outweigh potential disadvantages of the DAA learning curve.

Method:

Patients undergoing surgery between 2015 and 2020 (n = 2275) were categorised into three periods: pre-transition period (2015-2016) utilizing SLA exclusively, transition period (2017–2018) incorporating both SLA and DAA, and post-transition period (2019–2020) employing only DAA. The Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score – Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS) was recorded pre-surgery and one-year post-surgery. Furthermore, complications, blood loss, duration of surgery and length of stay were compared between groups.

Results:

A larger improvement in HOOS-PS score was found for DAA in comparison with SLA (37.13 ± 18.62 vs. 32.55 ± 22.83; p < 0.001). Significant improvements were found for the DAA group regarding duration of surgery (70:02 ± 15:54 min vs. 79:47 ± 15:03 min; p < 0,001) and length of stay (1.68 ± 1.80 days vs. 3.39 ± 1.85 days; p < 0,001) compared to the SLA group. Total number of complications was higher for SLA (n = 87 (9.2%)) compared to DAA (n = 77 (6.5%); p = 0.018), with more femoral fractures for SLA (n = 35 (3.7%) vs. n = 6 (0.5%); p < 0.001) whereas more dislocations were found for DAA (n = 24 (2.0)% vs. n = 7 (0.7%); p = 0.017). More specifically, a higher number of dislocations occurred during the DAA transition period when compared to the SLA pre-transition period (n = 12 (2.7%) vs. n = 4 (0.6%); p = 0.008).

Conclusions:

Transitioning from SLA to DAA for THA improves patient-reported outcomes but does not seem to result in a higher overall complication rate. Suggesting the advantages of the DAA outweigh the potential disadvantages of the learning curve.

Keywords

Complications direct anterior approach HOOS-PS questionnaire learning curve retrospective single-centre straight lateral approach total hip arthroplasty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kelmanovich

Parks

Sinha

, et al. Surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 2003; 12: 90–94.

Moretti

Post

ZP.

Surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop 2017; 51: 368–376.

Aggarwal

Iorio

Zuckerman

, et al. Surgical approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty from Charnley to now: the quest for the best approach. JBJS Rev 2020; 8: e0058.

Ethgen

Bruyerè

Richy

, et al. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 963–974.

Yue

Kang

Pei

Comparison of direct anterior and lateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA). Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94: e2126.

Learmonth

Young

Rorabeck

The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 2007; 370: 1508–1519.

Chang

Pellissier

Hazen

GB.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. JAMA 1996; 275: 858–865.

Lavernia

Alcerro

JC.

Quality of life and cost-effectiveness 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26: 705–709.

Petis

Howard

Lanting

, et al. Surgical approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: anatomy, technique and clinical outcomes. Can J Surg 2015; 58: 128–139.

10.

Laaksonen

Lorimer

Gromov

, et al. Trabecular metal acetabular components in primary total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2018; 89: 259–264.

11.

Peters

van Steenbergen

Bulstra

, et al. Nationwide review of mixed and non-mixed components from different manufacturers in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2016; 87: 356–362.

12.

Silva

Heisel

Schmalzried

TP.

Metal-on-metal total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 430: 53–61.

13.

Chechik

Khashan

Lador

, et al. Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133: 1595–600.

14.

Alecci

Valente

Crucil

, et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J Orthop Traumatol 2011; 12: 123–129.

15.

Mirza

Lombardi

Jr Morris

, et al. A mini-anterior approach to the hip for total joint replacement: optimising results: improving hip joint replacement outcomes. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B(11 Suppl. A): 32–35.

16.

Horne

Olson

SA.

Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using the fracture table. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2011; 4: 139–145.

17.

Berend

Lombardi

Jr Seng

, et al. Enhanced early outcomes with the anterior supine intermuscular approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91(Suppl. 6): 107–120.

18.

Flevas

Tsantes

Mavrogenis

AF.

Direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty revisited. JBJS Rev 2020; 8: e0144.

19.

Meermans

Konan

Das

, et al. The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B: 732–740.

20.

Graves

Dropkin

Keeney

, et al. Does surgical approach affect patient-reported function after primary THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474: 971–981.

21.

Amlie

Havelin

Furnes

Baste

, et al. Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. A cross-sectional questionnaire study of 1,476 patients 1-3 years after surgery. Acta Orthop 2014; 85: 463–469.

22.

Nairn

Gyemi

Gouveia

, et al. The learning curve for the direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop 2021; 45: 1971–1982.

23.

Peters

Ten Have

BLEF

Rykov

, et al. The learning curve of the direct anterior approach is 100 cases: an analysis based on 15,875 total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2022; 93: 775–782.

24.

Davis

Perruccio

Canizares

, et al. The development of a short measure of physical function for hip OA HOOS-Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16: 551–559.

25.

Huang

Liu

Jia

, et al. Comparisons between direct anterior approach and lateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty in postoperative orthopaedic complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Surg 2021; 13: 1707–1720.

26.

Matta

Shahrdar

Ferguson

Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 441: 115–124.

27.

Mjaaland

Kivle

Svenningsen

, et al. Do postoperative results differ in a randomized trial between a direct anterior and a direct lateral approach in THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477: 145–155.

28.

Mjaaland

Kivle

Svenningsen

, et al. Comparison of markers for muscle damage, inflammation, and pain using minimally invasive direct anterior versus direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Orthop Res 2015; 33: 1305–1310.

29.

Siljander

Whaley

Koueiter

, et al. Length of stay, discharge disposition, and 90-day complications and revisions following primary total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the direct anterior, posterolateral, and direct superior approaches. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35: 1658–1661.

30.

Rivera

Comba

Bardelli

Direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty: how to reduce complications - a 10-years single center experience and literature review. World J Orthop 2022; 13: 388–399.

31.

Rodriguez

Deshmukh

Rathod

, et al. Does the direct anterior approach in THA offer faster rehabilitation and comparable safety to the posterior approach? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 472: 455–463.

32.

Sali

Marmorat

Gaudot

, et al. Perioperative complications and causes of 30- and 90-day readmission after direct anterior approach primary total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop 2019; 17: 69–72.

33.

Selten

EMH

Geenen

Schers

, et al. Treatment beliefs underlying intended treatment choices in knee and hip osteoarthritis. Int J Behav Med 2018; 25: 198–206.