Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the association between cognitive function and the results and reliability of standard automated perimetry (SAP) in a middle-aged birth cohort.
Methods
In this cross-sectional analysis of the prospective birth cohort, the reliability and performance of SAP were evaluated in relation to grade point average (GPA), educational attainment, and scores on the Paired Associates Learning (PAL) test among participants of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort Eye Study.
Results
Higher educational level, higher GPA, and fewer errors on the PAL test were consistently associated with better reliability and performance in SAP. However, the observed correlation coefficients were low, and differences between group comparisons were modest, accounting for only a small proportion of the variance in SAP outcomes.
Conclusion
While greater cognitive ability is positively associated with SAP performance and reliability, its impact is minimal and unlikely to be clinically significant. Further studies are warranted to determine whether higher cognitive function facilitates glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring through more reliable SAP results, or conversely, whether it may obscure glaucomatous damage by enhancing test performance beyond what is typical.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
