Diagnostic capability of optic nerve head rim width and retinal nerve fiber thickness in open-angle glaucoma

Abstract

Purpose:

This study was performed to test the diagnostic capability of the minimum rim width compared to peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in patients with glaucoma.

Methods:

A case control, observer masked study, was conducted. Minimum rim width and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness were assessed using the patient-specific axis traced between fovea-to-Bruch’s membrane opening center axis. For both minimum rim width and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, the regionalization in six sectors (nasal, superior-nasal, superior-temporal, temporal, inferior-temporal, and inferior-nasal) was analyzed. Eyes with at least one sector with value below the 5% or 1% normative limit of the optical coherence tomography normative database were classified as glaucomatous. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive positive and negative values were calculated for both minimum rim width and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.

Results:

A total of 118 eyes of 118 Caucasian subjects (80 eyes with open-angle glaucoma and 38 control eyes) were enrolled in the study. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 79.7%, 77.5%, and 84.2%, respectively, for minimum rim width and 84.7%, 82.5%, and 89.5% for retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. The positive predictive values were 0.91% and 0.94% for minimum rim width and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, respectively, whereas the negative predictive values were 0.64% and 0.70%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.892 for minimum rim width and 0.938 for retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.

Conclusion:

Our results indicated that the sector analysis based on Bruch’s membrane opening and fovea to disk alignment is able to detect glaucomatous defects, and that Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness showed equivalent diagnostic ability.

Keywords

Open-angle glaucoma optic nerve head Bruch’s membrane minimum rim width retinal nerve fiber layer thickness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chen

Zeng

Sun

et al . Spectral domain optical coherence tomography and glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2008; 48(4): 29–45.

Chen

Cense

Pierce

et al . Spectral domain optical coherence tomography: ultra-high speed, ultra-high resolution ophthalmic imaging. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123(12): 1715–1720.

Leung

Cheung

Weinreb

et al . Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a variability and diagnostic performance study. Ophthalmology 2009; 116(7): 1257–1263.

Tan

Chopra

ATH

et al . Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 2305–2314.

Zhang

Tatham

Weinreb

et al . Relationship between ganglion cell layer thickness and estimated retinal ganglion cell counts in the glaucomatous macula. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 2371–2379.

Mwanza

Durbin

Budenz

et al . Glaucoma diagnostic accuracy of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness: comparison with nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 1151–1158.

Reis

Sharpe

Yang

et al . Optic disc margin anatomy in patients with glaucoma and normal controls with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 738–747.

Chauhan

Burgoyne

CF.

From clinical examination of the optic disc to clinical assessment of the optic nerve head: a paradigm change. Am J Ophthalmol 2013; 156: 218–227.

Muth

Hirneiß

CW.

Structure–function relationship between Bruch’s membrane opening–based optic nerve head parameters and visual field defects in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 3320–3328.

10.

Hanley

McNeil

BJ.

A method of comparing the area under receiver operating characteristics curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839–843.

11.

Brusini

Filacorda

Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System (GSS 2) for classifying functional damage in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2006; 15: 40–46. DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000195932.48288.97.

12.

Chauhan

O’Leary

Almobarak

et al . Enhanced detection of open-angle glaucoma with an anatomically accurate optical coherence tomography-derived neuroretinal rim parameter. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 535–543.

13.

Enders

Adler

Schaub

et al . Novel Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim area equalizes disc size dependency and offers high diagnostic power for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57: 6596–6603.

14.

Danthurebandara

Vianna

Sharpe

et al . Diagnostic accuracy of glaucoma with sector-based and a new total profile–based analysis of neuroretinal rim and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57: 181–187.

15.

Enders

Schaub

Hermann

et al . Neuroretinal rim in non-glaucomatous large optic nerve heads: a comparison of confocal scanning laser tomography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2017; 101: 138–142.

16.

Enders

Adler

Schaub

et al . Novel Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim area equalizes disc size dependency and offers high diagnostic power for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57: 6596–6603.

17.

Tay

Seah

Chan

et al . Optic disk ovality as an index of tilt and its relationship to myopia and perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 2: 247–252.

18.

Rebolleda

Casado

Oblanca

et al . The new Bruch’s membrane opening—minimum rim width classification improves optical coherence tomography specificity in tilted discs. Clin Ophthalmol 2016; 10: 2417–2425.

19.

Nowroozizadeh

Cirineo

Amini

et al . Influence of correction of ocular magnification on spectral-domain OCT retinal nerve fiber layer measurement variability and performance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55: 3439–3446.

20.

Girkin

Sample

Liebmann

et al . African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): II. Ancestry differences in optic disc, retinal nerve fiber layer, and macular structure in healthy subjects. Arch Ophthalmol 2010; 128: 541–550.

21.

Seider

Lee

Wang

et al . Optic disk size variability between African, Asian, White, Hispanic, and Filipino Americans using Heidelberg retinal tomography. J Glaucoma 2009; 18: 595–600.