Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The aim of this study was to contribute to the research field of children’s rights in sports by synthesizing the scientific approaches applied and topics addressed in previous social science research focused on children’s rights per se. A scoping literature review was conducted via database searches (Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus). The search strategy yielded 44 articles eligible for inclusion. The analysis showed that the articles covered 17 identified topics in total, most frequently abuse. Fewer than half had a direct focus on children’s rights in sports. The research was mostly descriptive, non-theoretical and encompassed few countries, sports and ages. The sample of empirical studies generally encompassed child participants or international policy and regulations. In conclusion, studies with more explanatory and theoretical designs and a clearer, direct focus on children’s rights would be beneficial for enhancing general and theoretical understanding of children’s rights and explaining associated problems.

Keywords

Children’s sports study design United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child young people youth athletes

Introduction

The concept of children’s rights lacks a universally accepted definition. For the purposes of this review, children’s rights are understood as fundamental claims for the realization of social justice and human dignity for children (Reynaert et al., 2015). Although this definition serves the explicit purpose of our research, we acknowledge that there are variations in meanings of children’s rights associated with contextual differences within and between different societies.

Throughout the extensive history of childhood as a construct (e.g., Ariès, 1962), several steps were taken towards identifying children as rightsholders and conceptualizing childhood as a unique period. This was a process to shift children’s status from property to person status and children’s rights from protection to self-determination rights (Hart, 1991). The change emerged at different times in different social and geographical contexts.

In the early 20th century, industrialized countries lacked standards of protection for children. However, over the last century, growing attention to children’s rights led to the formulation of such standards, beginning with the 1924 Geneva Declaration of the Rights of the Child drafted by Eglantyne Jebb (Kerber-Ganse, 2015; UNICEF, 2023). The declaration was finalized by the UN General Assembly and entered into force in 1989 as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). The UNCRC, defining a child as anyone under 18 years old, consists of 54 articles specifying children’s rights and provisions designed to protect them (United Nations, 1989). Since 1990, almost every country, except the USA, has ratified the UNCRC (United Nations, 2023).

Although the UNCRC is the most widely ratified international human rights treaty, children’s rights are also defined in other international human rights instruments, for example, the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR; Council of Europe, 2023). Relevant instruments in the USA, where the UNCRC is not ratified, include the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, the Bill of Rights for Young People, Title IX, and the Fair Labor Standards Act. International sport organizations have created their own guidelines, such as the International Olympic Committee’s guidelines to safeguard athletes from harassment and abuse (International Olympic Committee [IOC], 2021). Regarding sports, UNICEF together with the Japan Committee for UNICEF developed the Children’s Rights in Sport Principles 2018 (Japan Committee for UNICEF, 2018). To exemplify how children’s rights, as stated in UNCRC, can be realized and mainstreamed in sports, UNICEF recently provided guidelines with examples from the global football industry (UNICEF, 2020). Finally, several national sports confederations (e.g., England, Norway and Sweden) have included the UNCRC in their sports policies.

Within research, previous literature reviews have focused on various topics related to children’s rights, mostly connected to abuse. For example, McPherson et al. (2016) reviewed research on the nature of child abuse and harm in sports based solely on direct experiences among young people (17 articles published in 1990–2014), and Wilinsky and McCabe (2020) reviewed studies of elite child athletes who had been sexually and emotionally abused by their coaches (20 peer-reviewed articles published in 2001–2018). Additionally, Bjørnseth and Szabo (2018) reviewed studies of sexual violence against children participating in sports (seven articles published in 2013–2017).

Although existing reviews have enhanced our understanding of violations of children’s rights (e.g., abuse), we know much less about the extent of research with an explicit focus on children’s rights and what topics it has covered. Drawing on Munn’s et al. (2018) definition of a scoping review, this review explores the scope of studies on children’s rights per se in sports, that is, studies that explicitly mention child/youth rights in their titles, abstracts, or keywords. Furthermore, as the scientific approaches related to studies on sexual abuse and harassment influence how the topic is understood and how it can be countered (Brackenridge & Rhind, 2014), it is of interest to explore what scientific approaches have been used in research on children’s rights in sports. In this article, we explore those scientific approaches, meaning how researchers focus on children’s rights in their studies (directly or indirectly), and the research designs applied in terms of aims, theories, methods, participants and study contexts.

We review studies specifically focused on children’s rights per se, identified as those that explicitly mention child/youth rights in their title, abstract, or keywords. Our goal is to explore existing knowledge about children’s rights in sports and discuss the contribution of the research to understanding how children’s rights constructs can be seen as a solution to the challenges and problems that children encounter in sport contexts. In this article, we aim to contribute to the research field of children’s rights in sports by synthesizing the scientific approaches applied and topics addressed in previous social science research about children’s rights per se as well as to discuss gaps in and potentially fruitful ways to approach the field that can inform future research (see Munn et al., 2018 on main objectives of a scoping review). To fulfil these aims, we address the following research questions:

To what extent and in what ways has research focused on children’s rights directly (including the term in title, aim, or research questions) or indirectly (including the term only in abstract or keywords)?

What topics associated with children’s rights have been addressed in research?

What research designs have been used to investigate children’s rights issues in sports in terms of methods, samples, contexts and theoretical frameworks?

Method

Search Strategy

A systematic search of peer-reviewed published literature was conducted on 3 May 2023 in three different databases (Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus) using the Boolean string ‘child* OR youth* AND right* AND sport*’ (see Figure 1 inspired by PRISMA; Page et al., 2021). Scopus and Web of Science were chosen because they offer the best coverage at journal, article and cited reference level in social sciences (Norris & Oppenheim, 2007) and SPORTDiscus because, according to several university libraries (e.g., Newcastle University, 2023; Swansea University, 2023), it is the most comprehensive source of published articles for sports. These searches returned 2,368 documents from Scopus, 1,629 from Web of Science, and 924 from SPORTDiscus (4,921 in total). However, most documents were within research fields not relevant to this study, such as Medicine (n = 1,802) and Health Professions (n = 489) (in Scopus). Limitation to Social Sciences entries yielded 392 documents from Scopus, 162 from Web of Science, and 245 from SPORTDiscus (799 in total).

Figure 1.

PRISMA Inspired Flow Diagram.

The 799 identified articles were screened based on the inclusion criteria listed below, which left 44 articles included.

Inclusion Criteria

Documents included in the review had to meet specific criteria. First, they had to be peer-reviewed empirical or non-empirical articles and include the search terms in the title, abstract or keywords. The empirical articles were classified into studies with data from human participants and studies with textual content (e.g., documents) only. In line with the arguments of Rocco et al. (2022) about the core difference between conceptual (focusing on one or more concepts) and theoretical studies (focusing on a theory), the non-empirical studies were classified as conceptual, as no theoretical studies were identified. In conceptual articles, literature is used ‘[…] to explain a relationship, provide insight on a problem, or assume a position on an issue’ (Rocco et al., 2022, p. 118). They connect theories and/or disciplines to tackle an area in need of attention (Gilson & Goldberg, 2015). Second, the participants in empirical studies had to be human athletes under 18 years old, older athletes addressing retrospectively their youth and/or adults engaged in youth sporting activities, such as coaches and parents involved in decision-making about young athletes. Third, only documents published in English and categorized as Social Sciences entries were included in the review.

The first author conducted all the searches and screening of titles, abstracts and keywords of the 799 documents. Then, all authors accessed full-text studies and discussed their inclusion in the review to ensure that the included documents met the inclusion criteria.

Data Extraction Strategy

A form was developed to extract key information about each included study (cf., Moulds et al., 2022), encompassing the authors’ names, year of publication, aim, theory, methods, context, key findings and country of study (Tables 1–3). The studies were classified as either empirical (Tables 1 and 2) or conceptual (Table 3) (cf., Stödberg, 2012). Empirical studies with human participants were classified in relation to a qualitative, quantitative or mixed-method research approach (Table 1).

Table 1.

Empirical Child Rights Peer-Review Articles with Human Participants.

Author	Study Aim	Theory	Methods	Study Context	Key Findings	Country
Qualitative approach
Aina et al., 2021*	To explore the field of child rights in the context of Mega Sports Events (MSEs), focusing on the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games	Lundy’s (2007) model of participation	Mixed methods. Interviews with seven stakeholders and documentary analysis	Tokyo Olympic Games 2020	There is limited evidence that Tokyo 2020 organizers incorporated policies or practices aligning with children’s rights in the planning phase. This deficiency may be due to no requirement to include children’s rights considerations in the bidding or planning phase	UK
Dowse et al., 2018*	To identify which children’s rights are affected by MSEs	No	Mixed methods.11 interviews with a range of events and children-focused experts/representatives and an evidence review	MSEs	MSEs have both positive and negative influence on housing, family and a community life, which are rights safeguarded by Articles 27 and 16 of the UNCRC. Also, MSEs create concerns regarding the violation of child labour rights which are protected of Article 32 of the UNCRC	UK
Eliasson, 2017*	To examine children’s and coaches’ awareness of children’s rights (UNCRC) in the context of sport clubs in Sweden	New Sociology of Childhood (Mayall, 2003)	Interviews with 4 male coaches, 2 female coaches, 7 younger children (12 years), and five older children (16 years)	Floorball and equestrian sport	Limited awareness of the incorporation of the UNCRC into Swedish sport policy and lack of knowledge about its content. Athletes and coaches considered UNCRC significant as a construct but not meaningful as a policy document. No preventive work regarding children’s rights was experienced in the sport clubs	Sweden
Ellingsen & Danielsen, 2017*	To investigate coaches’ views of talent and talent development in relation to children’s rights	No	Interviews with 8 professional coaches	Football, gymnastics, swimming, and skiing	Coaches’ perspectives on talent and talent development aligned with the Norwegian Children’s Rights in Sports regulations. However, the absence of explicit mentions of children’s rights in interviews raises concerns and a need for more systematic investigation of the children’s right perspective in Norwegian sport	Norway
Fenoglio & Taylor, 2014**	To examine the impact of critical reflection, rational discourse and action on shifting from a win-at-all-costs mentality to a child-centered approach	Mezirow’s (2000) Transforma-tional Learning Theory	Interviews with 3 youth sports coaches	Football	Instrumental and communicative learning contributed significantly to a change in the coaches’ approach in terms of their coaching methods, construction of training environments and game forms towards a more child-centred approach	UK
Gleaves & Lang, 2017**	To explore youth swimmers’ parents’ perceptions of appropriate coach–athlete physical contact in competitive swimming	Poststructuralepistemology (Foucault, 1972)	Interviews with 6 parents between 40 and 60 years old, 2 male and 4 female	Swimming	Parents acknowledged context-specific appropriateness of coach-athlete physical contact, identifying three situations: risk minimization or treating physical harm, teaching sport-specific motor skills, and providing pastoral care or moral support	UK
Grenfell & Rinehart, 2003*	To examine the figure skating subculture from national-class skaters’ point of view and to investigate parents’ involvement in this subculture	No	Observations and interviews with youth skaters, parents, and club officials	Figure Skating	There is an acute concern of children’s rights violations in competitive sports environment, since violations often occur gradually without adults being fully aware of the impact on the child’s physical and mental health. Also, the article highlights the work-like environment of competitive figure skating, and the utilization of children from adult coaches to strengthen their coaching status	USA
Hardin & Whiteside, 2009**	To examine the influence of narratives about young adults, sport and gender towards young people’s understanding of gender equality	Liberal Feminism (Hall, 1996)	Focus-group discussions with high-school and university students, between 15 and 25 years old. 11 groups of four or five members.	Sports in USA	The use of narratives in everyday conversations was perceived as essential to increase sporting opportunities for female. These narratives must include conceptualizations of ‘equality’, and challenge gender ideology. Finally, in the US context, such narratives can result to a better understanding of Title IX	USA
Lindgren, et al., 2017**	To analyse messages and values in children’s stories about sports team selection	Bernstein’s code theory (2000)	Interviews with 12 boys and 12 girls aged 10–11	12 different sports clubs	The selection process highlights the significant power of coaches in decision-making. Children’s experiences of team sport selection vary among individuals and can change over time	Sweden
Skirstad et al., 2012**	To explore the evolving dynamics of conflict and cooperation, between children’s sports organizations, and the regulatory measures to protect children from risks related to competitiveness	No	Mixed method.Document analysis and observations from 10 General Assemblies from 1978 to 2007	Sports in Norway	It specifies the need to incorporate children’s rights into development plans for those organizing children’s sports. If coaches or sports clubs are unable to address a children’s rights issue, reaching out to higher-level organizations for resolution is recommended	Norway
Turkeri-Bozkurt, & Bulgy, 2020*	To examine the injury experiences of children playing volleyball in relation children’s rights violations	No	Interviews with 13 male and 8 female active players between 13 and 18 years old	Volleyball	The study found diverse athlete perspectives on injuries, with some seeing them as a normal part of sports and quickly overcoming them with coach support. Others feared losing their position due to injuries. Violations of children’s rights related to injuries included unqualified coaches, normalization of injuries, over-specialization, and coaches making players compete despite pain.	Turkey
Van Blerk et al., 2019*	To investigate the ways in which young people’s lives can be influenced by hosting of MSEs in their cities	No	Participatory drawing, theatre and discussion with 20 young people from favelas in Rio de Janeiro and Recife between 11 and 15 years old	Football World Cup	Four violations against children’s rights emerged: police and army violence, displacement, sexual exploitation and child labour, which is illegal in Brazil	Brazil
Mixed approach
McPherson et al., 2017**	To analyse perspectives offered retrospectively by young adults about their past experiences of organized sport	Topological Model of Ecological Develop-ment (Bron-fenbrenner, 1979)	Questionnaire to 72 females and 35 males and 10 follow-up interviews with young adult aged 18–25	Football, basketball, swimming, gymnastics cycling	Sport has had a positive influence in the lives of these young people. At the same time, incidents of abuse and harm including emotional, sexual and physical harm have occurred	Australia
Stafford et al., 2015**	To examine the way emotionally abusive behaviours were experienced by young people participating in sports	No	Mixed method. Questionnaire to 6124 young people (age 18–22) and 89 follow-up interviews	Swimming, netball, football, dance, hockey, athletics, rugby	The findings highlight the existence of a negative sporting culture, where emotional abuse in terms of humiliation and bullying of young people is present in sports and it is often ignored by young people themselves	UK

Notes: *Articles with direct focus on child rights in sports.

** Articles with indirect focus on child rights in sports.

Table 2.

Empirical Child Rights Peer-Review Articles with Textual Analysis as Method.

Author	Aim	Theory	Methods	Study Context	Key Findings	Country
Brackenridge et al., 2010**	To identify sports content in UN documents and gaps in research about the role of sport in preventing and facilitating violence against children	No	Content analysis of 33 documents archived by UN and surveys returned via the UN Study website	Sports in UN	The UN Study archive has limited representation of violence in children’s sports. Cooperation between governments and sports organizations on this issue is lacking, and there is no evidence of a connection between sports development agencies and those responsible for preventing children’s violence	UK
Donnelly et al., 2016**	To examine the extent of alignment between sport organizations’ policies and Sport Canada’s requirements	No	Content analysis of the harassment policies of 42 National and Provincial Sports Organizations	Canadian national and provincial sport organizations of Ontario	Canada is failing to meet the requirements of Sport Canada for athlete protection. For instance, in many sports, critical information of the complaining process and harassment officers were missing	Canada
Eliasson et al., 2017*	To identify children’s rights topics in project applications from Swedish sports clubs within the Lift for Sport program	Programme theories (Coalter, 2007, 2012; Coalter et al., 2000).	Content analysis of 2563 Project Applications	Martial Arts, Floorball, Gymnastics, Ski, and Parasports	Only 2.4% of applications were related to a children’s rights. Clubs aimed to create a safe environment, include children with disabilities, prevent bad behaviours, focus on children’s views, empower children in activities, and encourage girls’ participation in sports	Sweden
Ng et al., 2022**	To explore the tone and content of media related to Street Child United events	No	Thematic analysis of 92 online media sources	Street Child United Events in South Africa, Brazil, Russia and England	Children’s rights topics are present, but inconsistent, reinforcing a binary between pity and inspiration, limiting opportunities to challenge public perceptions and effect change	UK
Ropret, 2019*	To investigate the development of children’s sports in Serbia	No	Document analysis of laws, declarations, agreements, strategies, action plans, recommendations, conventions, codes, curricula, syllabi and textbooks about youth sports in Serbia	Sports in Serbia	The author highlights the importance of organizing sports in Serbia based on children’s rights, emphasizing their social and intellectual development, and considering the positive and negative influence of sports on children	Serbia
Shinohara, 2020*	To examine if UNCRC can impose legal obligations on the IOC and FIFA	No	Document analysis of UNCRC, Article 3 of the FIFA Statutes and Article 1.4 of the IOC Code of Ethics	FIFA and IOC	FIFA has initiated child rights protection aligned with the UNCRC through the Child Safeguarding Toolkit for Member Associations, establishing minimum requirements for all members. In contrast, the IOC lacks a detailed instrument for enhancing child rights protection under the UNCRC	Switzerland
Shinohara, 2022*	To consider how young athletes may argue for a violation of their human rights under Article 8 of the ECHR	No	Content analysis of ECHR	Children’s sports inEurope	Young athletes can claim a violation of their human rights under the ECHR, and thus, sports’ governing bodies must protect children against such violations by their coaches based on Article 8 of ECHR	Switzerland
White et al., 2019**	To assess the representation of children and young people’ in the decision-making processes of the Rugby Football Union (RFU)	Lundy’s (2007) theoretical framework of youth participation	Institutional analysis of the RFU	Rugby	The RFU’s governance structures primarily favor older white men, even though over 70% of rugby athletes are under 25 years old. There is little opportunity for children or young people to engage in the decision-making process of the RFU, indicating non-compliance with the UNCRC regarding children and youth participation in decision-making	UK
Yelamos et al., 2021*	To identify topics of physical education, activity, and sport in the State Party reporting mechanism related to the UNCRC	No	Content analysis of documents from the Treaty Body reporting mechanisms: State Parties Reports (n=104), List of Issues (n=126), and Concerns/Observations and Recommendations (n=797)	Sports in countries who have ratified UNCRC	There was a very low representation of the concepts of physical education, activity, and sport in these three reporting mechanisms. To develop the status of sport as a human right at international level, States will need to increase their reporting to the Treaty Bodies, including UNCRC, on physical education, activity and sport	Ireland
Yilmaz et al., 2020*	To provide an overview of FIFA’s regulations concerning recruitment processes in terms of UNCRC	No	Systematic documentary review of Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players and the Regulations on Working with Intermediaries	Football	There is a tension between following children’s rights and ensuring a free-flowing and liberal football market, resulting in actions against the best interests of the child. The unintended consequences of regulations, which do not prioritize young players and their rights, are contradictory to the UNCRC	UK

Notes: *Articles with direct focus on child rights in sports.

** Articles with indirect focus on child rights in sports.

Results

Among the 44 included studies, 14 were classified as empirical with human participants (Table 1), 10 as empirical based on textual analysis (Table 2) and 20 as conceptual (Table 3). Further analysis indicated that 21 of the 44 articles had a direct focus on children’s rights in sports (i.e., included ‘children’s rights’ in their title, aims or research questions). The other 23 articles were interpreted as having an indirect focus on children’s rights in sports (i.e., included ‘children’s rights’ only in abstract or keywords). In the following, the analysis of the included articles will be presented in relation to those two categories, that is, direct focus and indirect focus.

Table 3.

Conceptual Child Rights Peer-Review Articles.

Author	Aim	Theory	Methods	Study Context	Key Findings	Country
Aine et al., 2022*	To highlight the prevalence and implications of violence towards children’s rights in sports	No	Discussing UNCRC’s implementation in connection to children’s safeguarding combining jurisprudence and sport psychology	Sports in Finland	The UNCRC prohibits violence against children in all sectors, including sports. Both member states and sports bodies share the responsibility for enforcement, emphasizing the role of adults. The full understanding of children’s rights requires action on several levels: legislation, information, education and resources	Finland
Arellano & Downey, 2019**	To assess lacrosse’s role in sport-for-development initiatives and its potential as a decolonizing force and resurgence-based tool	No	Discussing the Right to Play and PLAY programme taking lacrosse as an example	Lacrosse	Lacrosse, when played in its rightful epistemology by Indigenous nations and community members serves as catalyst in resurgence. Ongoing resurgence initiatives, particularly in lacrosse, should maintain diversity in practice and implementation, extend beyond the realm of sports and be community driven	Canada
Austin, 2007*	To investigate the existence of the children’s right to play	No	Discussing children’s right to play, as recognized by the UNCRC	Not specified	The ‘win-at-all-costs’ approach is unjustified in children’s sport. This approach is not in the best interests of children, as their fundamental interests are less likely to be met in a highly competitive context	USA
Brackenridge & Kirby, 1997**	To examine the role of the ‘stage of imminent achievement’ in child protection initiatives by sports organizations	No	Reviewing previous research and arguing for the use of ‘stage of imminent achievement’	Sports inter-nationally	The ‘stage of imminent achievement’ is period before the athletes reach their peak and it is the period with the highest risk for sexual abuse in sports, occurring when young athletes have achieved a high-performance level but not yet reached the elite level	UK
Brackenridge & Rhind, 2014**	To examine literature on state and third sector agency responses to child abuse in sports and the child protection agenda	No	Discussion of state and third sector agencies, child protection agencies, and literature	Sports inter-nationally	Differences in sport organizational focus led to different child protection approaches and solutions, including education, training, support and advocacy. However, we cannot ignore the impact of social conditions on the issue of child abuse	UK
Dixon, 2007*	To examine if parents adhere to legitimate authority when they put their children into sports	No	Discussing the impact of parents and competitive sports on children in relation to children’s right to an open future	North American sports context	Competitive sports demand substantial time and energy from a young age, potentially limiting future options for talented children. The disappointment of failure may further restrict their engagement in activities better suited to their abilities	USA
Donnelly, 2008**	To discuss the philosophical, academic, political, and international debates of human rights	No	Discussion and analysis of various literature	Sports Inter-nationally	The article considers international foreign policy initiatives and the ways they include human rights in sports. It argues that the status of children should be the next major international foreign policy initiative in sport	Canada
Donnelly & Petherick, 2004**	To consider the issue of child labour in sports	No	Discussing the issue of child labour in sports in relation to children’s rights	Sports Inter-nationally	While negative examples of child labour in sports are emphasized, it’s crucial to also highlight positive and successful outcomes. Developing policies and recommendations can further enhance success in children’s sports	Canada
Hadley & McNamara, 2020*	To examine the use and regulation of genetic testing in sport considering human rights implications in testing children for talent identification and performance enhancement	No	Reviewing uses of genetic testing in sports and discussing legal and policy framework that testing occurs within	Sports in Australia	While genetic testing in youth sports can potentially enhance health and performance, it lacks sufficient regulatory oversight. Identifying genetic abnormalities in talented athletes is crucial, but it necessitates addressing human rights concerns within the legal and policy framework	Australia
Hong, 2004*	To analyse the system and the relationship between child athletes and human rights in the context of culture and politics in China	No	Historically reviewing the system of athletes’ development in China and discussing its problems	Sports in China	Influenced by communist authority, Confucian education, and global commercialism, China’s sports system generates young stars for national pride, ideological dominance, social conformity, and financial gains. However, the civil, legal, and human rights of child athletes are often overlooked	China
Kidd & Donnelly, 2000**	To discuss the issue of athletes’ human rights to participate in sports	No	Discussing issues of racism, gender equity and children’s rights in relation to sports	Sports Inter-nationally	Children’s participation in high level sports has been treated as child labour and child welfare issue. The UNCRC is a valuable tool for safeguarding children’s rights in relation to both child labour and ensuring a healthy development	Canada
Knox & Anderson, 2022**	To explore children’s involvement in Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) and consider whether it should be banned for children	Anderson’s (2007) harm likelihood and severity rubric; zone of parental discretion (Gillam, 2010); child’s right to open future (Feinberg, 1980)	Assessing empirical evidence about benefits and harms of kid’s MMA in relation to the theoretical frameworks	MMA	While the harm linked to kids’ MMA is deemed significant, considering the best interest’s framework, parental discretion zone, and a child’s right to an open future, the authors argue that parents should have the ability to permit their children to engage in MMA	New Zealand
Lang, 2022*	To discuss how the new sociology of childhood and Hart’s participatory model help change the view of the child as vulnerable and incompetent to active citizen of equal worth to adults and rights bearer	New sociology of childhood (Mayall, 2003)	Discussing how specific theories can advance children’s rights in sports	Sports inter-nationally	Dominant constructions of children as innocent and vulnerable largely result from developmentalist conceptualizations of childhood, preclude adults from seeing children as rights bearers, distance children from their rights, and increase children’s vulnerability to abuse	Australia
Mason et al., 2019*	To examine tensions between football’s recruitment practices and children’s rights	Global Production Networks Framework (Darby, 2013)	Discussing children’s rights implementation in football combining Global Production Network and UNCRC	Football	Recruitment practices in football will continue to challenge children’s protection from economic exploitation, children’s right to education as well as the right to be protected from abuse	UK
Miah & Rich, 2006**	To problematise genetic testing in physical activity and potentially physical education	Feinberg’s (1980/1992) legitimacy of selection.	Discussing how the development of genetic tests may impact educational practices related to sport	Sports Inter-nationally	Authors argue that genetic testing for performance can change how ability is realized, measured and evaluated. They also argue that when read uncritically, the concept of ability in such genetic testing can lead to forms of determinism, potentially becoming a means to monitor, regulate, and measure children	UK
Rhind et al., 2013*	To address challenges faced by the youth hockey system to incorporating a human rights approach	No	Overview of media debates of challenges for sport governing bodies to incorporate UNCRC into youth hockey	Ice hockey	Children and youth are exposed to harm in sports system which fails to protect them from physical and mental abuse. The lack of a human rights perspective and monitoring abuse and violations is a significant problem of hockey and youth sports	Canada
Tamburrini, 2010**	To discuss the objection to germ-line genetic modifications asserting that such a practice is a violation of individual autonomy	No	Arguing that the objection based on autonomy is flawed	Sports Inter-nationally	Germ-line modifications are seen as a prerequisite for individuals to gain control over their life options. Advocates argue that such modifications might enhance personal autonomy, justifying the demand placed on adults by their children	Sweden
Teetzel & Mazzucco, 2014**	To examine young athletes role in the development of the anti-doping movement in sport	No	Historical examination of drug testing policies	Sports Inter-nationally (IOC, WADA)	The literature lacks focus on: (a) holding child athletes accountable for doping actions, (b) applying equivalent punishments to child and adult athletes for doping violations and (c) testing child athletes using methods where they cannot provide informed consent	Canada
Vicˇar & Moudr, 2021**	To discuss controversies related to talent identification from the liberal position placing the individual at the centre of the focus	Rawls’ (1995) Theory of Justice	Discussing previous research and controversies related to talent identification and early specialization	Sports Inter-nationally	Talent identification creates unequal opportunities for children, restricting their participation in sports and overall development. Additional concerns include an excessive focus on effort, resource limitations, pressure for early specialization, the obligatory nature of the identification process, potential for erroneous decisions, and the resulting self-fulfilling prophecies	Czech Republic
Weber, 2009**	To examine shortcomings of national and international regulations to protect child elite athletes in sport	No	Overview of four international standards to serve protection of the child	National and international regulations to protect child elite athletes in sport	The existing international regulations are not satisfactory to guarantee effective protection of child athletes. The best way to achieve overall obedience to standards is to establish a new legally binding international convention	Switzerland

Notes: *Articles with direct focus on child rights in sports.

** Articles with indirect focus on child rights in sports.

Empirical Studies with Human Participants

According to our interpretation and our criteria for direct–indirect focus, seven empirical studies with human participants had a direct focus on children’s rights in sports, while the remaining seven approached the topic indirectly (Table 1).

Topics Addressed in Studies with a Direct Focus on Children’s Rights

These empirical articles addressed Mega Sports Events (MSEs) (n = 3), talent (n = 1), sports injury (n = 1), children’s rights’ awareness (n = 1) and win-at-all-costs mentality/competitiveness (n = 1). More specifically, Aina et al. (2021) addressed the implementation of children’s rights in MSEs, whereas Dowse et al. (2018) and Van Blerk et al. (2019) addressed the influence of MSEs on children’s lives in relation to the UNCRC. Ellingsen and Danielsen (2017) examined Norwegian coaches’ perspectives on talent concerning children’s rights. Eliasson (2017) addressed Swedish children’s and coaches’ awareness and knowledge of children’s rights and their experiences of sport practices regarding specific articles of the UNCRC (3, 12, and 19). Turkeri-Bozkurt and Bulgy (2020) assessed children’s injury experiences in relation to their rights. Finally, Grenfell and Rinehart (2003) addressed the work-like and competitive environment of figure skating in the USA.

Research Design of Studies with a Direct Focus on Children’s Rights

These seven empirical studies were conducted by researchers based in the UK (n = 2), Sweden (n = 1), Norway (n = 1), USA (n = 1), Brazil (n = 1) and Turkey (n = 1).

All seven studies employed a qualitative approach, predominantly utilizing interviews for data collection. Three of these studies included only adults (Aina et al., 2021; Dowse et al., 2018; Ellingsen & Danielsen, 2017), two included only young people (Turkeri-Bozkurt & Bulgy, 2020; Van Blerk et al., 2019), and two included both adults and children (Eliasson, 2017; Grenfell & Rinehart, 2003). Athletes from both team sports (n = 4) and individual sports (n = 4) were included in the samples. One study included children between 10 and 12 years old (Van Blerk et al., 2019) and four included athletes between 12 and 18 years old (Eliasson, 2017; Grenfell & Rinehart, 2003; Turkeri-Bozkurt & Bulgy, 2020; Van Blerk et al., 2019). Regarding adult participants, two studies included MSE stakeholders and children’s rights advocates in sports organizations (Aina et al., 2021; Dowse et al., 2018), two included coaches (Eliasson, 2017; Ellingsen & Danielsen, 2017), and one included parents and club officials (Grenfell & Rinehart, 2003). Two studies were designed with a theoretical perspective (Aina et al., 2021; Eliasson, 2017).

Topics Addressed in Studies with an Indirect Focus on Children’s Rights

These empirical articles addressed abuse (n = 3), win-at-all-costs mentality/competitiveness (n = 2), selection (n = 1) and gender equity (n = 1). More specifically, Gleaves and Lang (2017), McPherson et al. (2017), and Stafford et al. (2015) addressed the topics of physical contact and abuse in sports. Fenoglio and Taylor (2014) and Skirstad et al. (2012) addressed coaches’ win-at-all-costs mentality and the competitive pressures of sports. Lindgren et al. (2017) focused on Swedish children’s experiences of selection processes in sports and Hardin and Whiteside (2009) examined the use of positive narratives about gender equity in public discourse to increase sporting opportunities for female athletes.

Research Design of Studies with an Indirect Focus on Children’s Rights

These seven empirical studies were conducted in the UK (n = 3), Sweden (n = 1), Norway (n = 1), USA (n = 1) and Australia (n = 1). In five studies, a qualitative approach was applied with interviews as the main data source, and in the other two a mixed-method approach was applied with both questionnaires and interviews. Three studies included only adults (Fenoglio & Taylor, 2014; Gleaves & Lang, 2017; Skirstad et al., 2012) and four included children and youths (Hardin & Whiteside, 2009; Lindgren et al., 2017; McPherson et al., 2017; Stafford et al., 2015). Athletes from both team sports (n = 5) and individual sports (n = 5) were included in the samples. One study included children between 10 and 12 years old (Lindgren et al., 2017) and three included youths or young adults speaking retrospectively about their youth (Hardin & Whiteside, 2009; McPherson et al., 2017; Stafford et al., 2015). Of the three studies with adult participants, one included coaches (Fenoglio & Taylor, 2014), one included parents (Gleaves & Lang, 2017) and one included members of the Norwegian Olympic and Paralympic Committee and Confederation of Sports (Skirstad et al., 2012). Five studies were based on a theoretical perspective (Fenoglio & Taylor, 2014; Gleaves & Lang, 2017; Hardin & Whiteside, 2009; Lindgren et al., 2017; McPherson et al., 2017).

Synthesis

The results indicate that direct and indirect studies were similar in terms of roles and ages of participants as well as representation of team and individual sports. Their main difference seemed to be that studies with direct focus were all qualitative, while two studies with an indirect focus had a mixed-method approach, including questionnaires. Further, the studies with an indirect focus were more often designed based on a theoretical framework. The addressed topics varied, with children’s rights implementation in MSEs being the most common in the studies with a direct focus and abuse being the most common in the studies with an indirect focus.

Empirical Studies Based on Textual Analysis

According to our interpretation and our criteria for direct–indirect focus, six studies utilizing textual analysis had a direct focus on children’s rights in sports, while the remaining four approached the topic indirectly (Table 2).

Topics Addressed in Studies with a Direct Focus on Children’s Rights

These articles addressed children’s rights’ awareness (n = 2), legal issues (n = 2), economic exploitation/child labour (n = 1) and national sports systems (n = 1). More specifically, Eliasson et al. (2017) assessed children’s rights awareness in sport clubs’ funding applications from sports federations, to develop children’s sports in Sweden. Yelamos et al. (2021) examined the representation of sports-related topics in UN documents related to children’s rights. Yilmaz et al. (2020) addressed children’s representation in recruitment processes and the issue of economic exploitation in football by analysing FIFA regulations. Ropret (2019) addressed the necessity to organize the Serbian sports system around children’s rights. Shinohara addressed legal issues of children’s rights in two articles (Shinohara, 2020; Shinohara, 2022).

Research Design of Studies with a Direct Focus on Children’s Rights

The studies were conducted by researchers from Switzerland (n = 2), the UK (n = 1), Ireland (n = 1), Sweden (n = 1) and Serbia (n = 1). However, only two studies referred to the sports context of the researchers’ countries, Serbia (Ropret, 2019) and Sweden (Eliasson et al., 2017). The remaining studies referred to wider contexts, such as countries that have ratified the UNCRC (Yelamos et al., 2021), member countries of FIFA (Shinohara, 2020; Yilmaz et al., 2020), and countries that have ratified the ECHR (Shinohara, 2022).

The six studies analysed texts from three levels: Global (Shinohara, 2020; Yelamos et al., 2021; Yilmaz et al., 2020), European (Shinohara, 2022) and national (Eliasson et al., 2017; Ropret, 2019). Moreover, three analysed them in relation to specific sports: Football (n = 2) and martial arts, floorball, gymnastics, skiing and parasports (n = 1). The other three considered children’s sports in general. Only one of those studies used a theoretical framework to analyse the documents (Eliasson et al., 2017).

Topics Addressed in Studies with an Indirect Focus on Children’s Rights

These articles addressed abuse (n = 2), children’s rights’ awareness (n = 1) and decision-making (n = 1). More specifically, Brackenridge et al. (2010) and Donnelly et al. (2016) addressed topics related to child harassment and abuse. Ng et al. (2022) examined children’s rights awareness in online media and White et al. (2019) addressed children’s participation in decision-making in the English Rugby Football Union.

Research Design of Studies with an Indirect Focus on Children’s Rights

These four studies were conducted by researchers from the UK (n = 3) and Canada (n = 1). Only two referred to the sports context of the researchers’ country, Canada (Donnelly et al., 2016) and the UK (White et al., 2019). The other two referred to wider contexts: Countries that have ratified the UNCRC (Brackenridge et al., 2010) and events in Brazil, England, Russia and South Africa (Ng et al., 2022).

The texts analysed in these studies were from international sources (Brackenridge et al., 2010), national sources (Donnelly et al., 2016; White et al., 2019) and online media sources (Ng et al., 2022). The study by White et al. (2019) was the only one that focused on a specific sport and the only one in which a theoretical framework was used in the analysis.

Synthesis

The results indicate that direct and indirect studies were similar in terms of design, that is, context, representation of international, European and national sources, representation of specific sports and use of theoretical frameworks. Their main difference was related to the topics addressed, with most studies with a direct focus addressing children’s rights’ awareness and legal issues and most indirect studies focusing on the topic of abuse.

Conceptual Studies

According to our interpretation and our criteria for direct-indirect focus, eight conceptual studies had a direct focus on children’s rights in sports, while the remaining 12 approached the topic indirectly (Table 3).

Topics Addressed in Studies with a Direct Focus on Children’s Rights

These articles addressed legal issues (n = 2), abuse (n = 1), economic exploitation/child labour (n = 1), win-at-all-costs mentality (n = 1), genetic testing/modifications (n = 1), national sports system (n = 1) and construction of children as the concept (n = 1). More specifically, Aine et al. (2022) addressed legal issues related to children’s rights and Dixon (2007) considered the bounds of legitimate parental authority. Mason et al. (2019) focused on children’s recruitment processes in football in relation to economic exploitation. Austin (2007) addressed the win-at-all-costs mentality in sports and Rhind et al. (2013) focused on the UNCRC’s incorporation in hockey to prevent abusive behaviours. Hadley and McNamara (2020) addressed human rights concerns associated with genetic testing in youth and children’s sports. Hong (2004) explored the Chinese sports system in relation to child athletes’ civil, legal and human rights. Lang (2022) focused on the dominant constructions of children as vulnerable and innocent.

Research Design of Studies with a Direct Focus on Children’s Rights

These eight studies were conducted in the USA (n = 2), Australia (n = 2), Canada (n = 1), the UK (n = 1), Finland (n = 1) and China (n = 1). Two studies addressed issues in specific sports, football (Mason et al., 2019) and ice hockey (Rhind et al., 2013) and the rest referred to youth and children’s sports generally. A theoretical approach was explicitly applied in only two studies (Lang, 2022; Mason et al., 2019).

Regarding conceptual methods, five articles were considered as discussion/argument papers (Aine et al., 2022; Austin, 2007; Dixon, 2007; Lang, 2022; Mason et al., 2019), two articles as historical reviews of given topics (Hadley & McNamara, 2020; Hong, 2004) and one study as media debates overview (Rhind et al., 2013).

Topics Addressed in Studies with an Indirect Focus on Children’s Rights

These articles addressed abuse (n = 3), genetic testing/modifications (n = 2), human rights (n = 2), child labour (n = 1), talent (n = 1), decolonizing/resurgence (n = 1), doping (n = 1) and sports injury/harm (n = 1). More specifically, Brackenridge and Rhind (2014), Weber (2009), and Brackenridge and Kirby (1997) addressed topics related to child protection and abuse in sports. Donnelly (2008) and Kidd and Donnelly (2000) considered human rights in sports and finally, Donnelly and Petherick (2004) addressed the topic of child labour in sports. Miah and Rich (2006) addressed the topic of genetic testing for performance, whereas Tamburrini (2010) focused on germ-line modifications in sports. Vičar and Moudr (2021) addressed talent identification and Teetzel and Mazzucco (2014) focused on drug testing policies in relation to doping. Arellano and Downey (2019) addressed the possible role of lacrosse in the resurgence of indigenous nations and community members in Canada, whereas Knox and Andersson (2022) examined possible sports-related harms to children and parents’ rights to allow their children to participate in Mixed Martial Arts (MMA).

Research Design of Studies with an Indirect Focus on Children’s Rights

These 12 studies were conducted in Canada (n = 5), the UK (n = 3), Czech Republic (n = 1), New Zealand (n = 1), Sweden (n = 1) and Switzerland (n = 1). However, all but one study (Arellano & Downey, 2019) had an international perspective, discussing relevant global issues.

Two of these studies focused on specific sports, lacrosse (Arellano & Downey, 2019) and MMA (Knox & Anderson, 2022), and the rest referred generally to youth and children’s sports. Moreover, a theoretical framework was applied in only three studies (Knox & Anderson, 2022; Miah & Rich, 2006; Vičar & Moudr, 2021).

Regarding conceptual methods, five articles were considered as discussion/argument papers (Arellano & Downey, 2019; Donnelly & Petherick, 2004; Kidd & Donnelly, 2000; Miah & Rich, 2006; Tamburrini, 2010), six combined an argument with a review of previous research (Brackenridge & Kirby, 1997; Brackenridge & Rhind, 2014; Donnelly, 2008; Knox & Anderson, 2022; Vičar & Moudr, 2021; Weber, 2009) and one as a historical review (Teetzel & Mazzucco, 2014).

Synthesis

The results indicate that direct and indirect studies were similar in terms of methods to analyse concepts and the use of theoretical frameworks. One difference was that most direct studies focused on the context of a specific country, whereas most indirect studies had an international perspective. The topics addressed were varied, with legal issues of children’s rights being the most common in the studies with a direct focus and abuse being the most common in the studies with an indirect focus.

Discussion

Our scoping literature review on children’s rights in sports, synthesizing identified topics and scientific approaches, revealed patterns within the included studies that will be discussed further in relation to the three research questions.

Regarding the first question, to what extent research has focused on children’s rights directly and indirectly, the findings showed that few scholars included in this review have designed research with a direct aim to investigate children’s rights. Compared with indirect studies, studies with a direct focus (‘children’s rights’ in titles, aims or research questions) covered more varied topics beyond violations of the rights. They focused on children’s rights constructs and, for example, their implementation in MSEs (n = 3) or national sports systems (n = 2), as well as on the awareness and knowledge of such constructs (n = 3). Therefore, although indirect studies reflected on topics related to children’s rights in sport, especially abuse (n = 8), greater prioritization of children’s rights research with a direct focus would be beneficial for the field. This indicates that research addressing children’s rights directly needs to consider how to formulate titles, aims and research questions, to improve the logic and transparency of studies, as the main ideas of a study should be included in its title, aim and research questions (cf., Newman & Covrig, 2013).

The findings indicated that both the direct and indirect studies were largely descriptive. The included research has provided knowledge on people’s understandings and views of children’s rights and how children’s rights are embedded in legal and sports systems as well as in children’s sports practices (direct studies), or on abuse, regulations of children, talent and selection in relation to children’s rights (indirect studies). However, this suggests that there is a need for more analytically oriented research to gain increased insights into the underlying mechanisms that affect, for example, people’s actions relating to children’s rights.

In conclusion, the included research on children’s rights suggests that few scholars have designed research with a direct aim to investigate children’s rights, although children’s rights are part of the sports research discourse, often appearing in the introduction or discussion section of articles. Considerations could be given to the need for research on how children’s rights per se are embedded, given meaning and implemented in children’s sports, to possibly enhance understanding of effective ways to safeguard them and for understanding the impact of a formalized children’s rights constructs such as the UCNRC in sports.

Findings regarding the second and third research questions about topics and research designs revealed patterns within the included studies in relation to what has been investigated and how which will be discussed further.

What has been investigated? On the question of what has been investigated, the results showed that 17 different topics appeared in the 44 included articles (see Table 4).

Table 4.

The Number of Times (N) that Specific Topics of Child Rights Appeared in the Included Articles.

Topics	N	Direct Focus			Indirect Focus
Topics	N	Human Objects	Textual Analysis	Conceptual	Human Objects	Textual Analysis	Conceptual
Abuse	9	–	–	1	3	2	3
Children’s Rights’ Awareness	4	1	2	–	–	1	–
Legal Issues	4	–	2	2	–	–	–
Win-at-all-costs/Competitiveness	4	1	–	1	2	–	–
Economic Exploitation/Child Labour	3	–	1	1	–	–	1
Mega Sports Events	3	3	–	–	–	–	–
Genetic Testing/Modifications	3	–	–	1	–	–	2
Human Rights	2	–	–	–	–	–	2
Talent	2	1	–	–	–	–	1
Sport Injury/Harm	2	1	–	–	–	–	1
National Sports Systems	2	–	1	1	–	–	–
Selection	1	–	–	–	1	–	–
Doping	1	–	–	–	–	–	1
Construction of children	1	–	–	1	–	–	–
Gender Equity	1	–	–	–	1	–	–
Decolonizing/Resurgence	1	–	–	–	–	–	1
Decision Making	1	–	–	–	–	1	–
Total (17 topics)	44	7	6	8	7	4	12

As already mentioned, the most frequent topic in the analysed studies was abuse (n = 9), followed by an awareness of children’s rights (n = 4), legal issues associated with rights (n = 4) and win-at-all-costs mentality (n = 4). Although studies on abuse and other violations of rights have been important for highlighting problems and their complexity, future studies on children’s rights per se as a construct could be helpful for advancing the knowledge on, for example, how policies concerning children’s rights are implemented in practice and how rights are understood and applied in efforts to enhance social justice and the human dignity of children engaged in sports. Within these investigated topics, frames (laws, guidelines, regulations, resources) and contextual ideologies (values and goals) have been a central interest (see Nilsson, 1988 on components in frame factor theory). Nine of ten textual analysis studies were about frames, and both conceptual studies and interview studies focused strongly on people’s views and values regarding children’s rights. This review suggests that sports practices have been scarcely investigated in relation to children’s rights. Accordingly, we propose that more studies on patterns related to the realities of everyday life in children’s sports practices (e.g., observations) would be beneficial.

Turning to who has been at the centre of interest in the empirical studies with human participants, adults were notably underrepresented within the included studies, comprising only 41 out of 6,358 participants. Stafford et al. (2015) contributed a significant share of athletes (6,124), while the remaining studies included 234 athletes and 41 adults. The studies considering adults’ perspectives included coaches (n = 3), parents (n = 2) and officials (n = 1), leaving out perspectives from representatives of national sports federations, team managers or governmental employees in key positions for children’s sports. A broadening of whom to investigate, that is, capturing the voices of adults in different decision-making roles, could enhance understanding of the mechanisms surrounding children’s rights in sports, which would be helpful in working towards caring for the children’s right perspective. Investigating adults’ perspectives on policy implementation, their needs for support and the roles of coaching education and sports federations in that process could shed light on why the children’s rights perspective is not optimally applied, as indicated by previous studies.

Within such a broadening attempt, that is, including adults’ voices, as suggested by Gleaves and Lang (2017), exploring effects of differences in sociocultural backgrounds (e.g., in terms of age, ethnicity, gender or educational level) in both adults, such as coaches, and athletes may help to develop the research field. Only two of the included studies highlighted the importance of contextuality, by highlighting how children’s rights are viewed and valued by different people in different contexts (Eliasson, 2017; Lang, 2022). Greater emphasis on the effects of contextual factors and associated variations among groups on views of children’s rights, related values, and their implementation in different contexts could therefore be beneficial.

How has research been carried out? Regarding methods of data collection, our analysis suggested a prevalence of qualitative approaches within the included studies, with only two empirical studies with human participants utilizing quantitative methodology as part of a mixed-method approach (McPherson et al., 2017; Stafford et al., 2015). These studies offered larger participant numbers and potentially more generalized results than the qualitative studies. Both quantitative studies focused on the sensitive topic of abuse, but quantitative approaches could be valuable for obtaining information on how widespread other sensitive aspects of children’s rights in sports are thanks to large samples and anonymity. They also have the possibility to capture needs addressed by researchers such as sociocultural and contextual factors and associated variations between groups. For example, quantitative research can contribute to a mapping of the different cultures created in relation to children’s rights in different sports contexts, such as different age groups, genders and types of sports. A greater use of quantitative methods, together with continued in-depth qualitative investigations, could advance research in the field.

Only one of the included studies used observations regarding coach–athlete relationships, offering possibilities to acquire insights into the real-life implementation of children’s rights rather than relying solely on people’s articulated opinions. However, observing children, deemed a vulnerable group, raises significant ethical concerns and necessitates ethical approval. Ethical considerations might contribute to the limited participation of children under 12 years old in the included studies. Nevertheless, to provide new insights and generate new pertinent knowledge, it would be beneficial to develop solutions to overcome ethical challenges linked to specific research methods or participants.

Finally, regarding the role of theory in the carried-out research, the findings indicated that 30 of the 44 studies were not rooted in any clear theoretical framework. Theory in social science research is well-understood and may have been implicitly used by the authors of those studies, but only 14 made explicit use of a theory to design the study’s aim and research questions and/or analyse the collected data.

The use of theoretical models enhanced the understanding of important concepts directly related to children’s rights, such as the nature of ‘touch’ in sports based on post-cultural epistemology (Gleaves & Lang, 2017), gender equity based on liberal feminism (Hardin & Whiteside, 2009), the role of children as agents and rightsholders based on the (new) sociology of childhood (Eliasson, 2017; Lang, 2022) and development of children’s rights in sports using programme theories (Eliasson et al., 2017). Moreover, theories provided possible explanations for topics related to children’s rights, such as children’s participation in sports based on Lundy’s model of participation (Aina et al., 2021; White et al., 2019), the power of decision-making in sports based on Bernstein’s code theory (Lindgren et al., 2017), and the process of recruiting children into sports based on the global production networks framework (Mason et al., 2019).

The non-theoretical studies discussed concepts and presented results descriptively, which is valuable when there is a lack of knowledge, but at best provides limited explanations of identified problems. A comparison of the non-theoretical study of Yilmaz et al. (2020) and the theoretical study of Mason et al. (2019) on children’s recruitment in sports provides a clear example. The former presented an overview of relevant regulations and described tensions between implementing children’s rights and ensuring a free-flowing, liberal market. The latter provided an explanation, based on a global production networks framework, of the recruitment process into sports and potential risk factors for harm, such as early exposure to a sport or moving away from the family at a young age. Thus, we suggest that the research field appears sufficiently mature to contribute to the development of theories or apply theoretical frameworks more explicitly in studies of children’s rights in sports in order to enhance understanding of the issues and effective strategies to address associated challenges.

Limitations

The use of specific keywords and databases, the exclusion of grey literature and the use of only one search strategy inevitably influenced the sample of documents included in this review. We screened entries in three of the biggest pertinent databases, Scopus and Web of Science, which offer the best coverage at journal, article and cited reference level in social sciences (Norris & Oppenheim, 2007) and SPORTDiscus, the premier source of sports-related research (e.g., Newcastle University, 2023; Swansea University, 2023). Nevertheless, we certainly cannot exclude the possibility that searches of other databases and/or with other keywords (e.g., abuse, harassment, specialization, discrimination, overtraining, participation, selection and synonyms of child such as kid and adolescent) might have identified articles related to children’s rights in sports. However, such a review would not be directly focused on children’s rights, since keywords, as Uddin and Khan (2016) put forth, communicate information about the content of an article. Moreover, searches for, extraction of data from, and analysis of all articles related to all those keywords would exceed typical space and time constraints and require unavailable resources. Although the number of the included studies and their heterogeneity make the generalizability of the patterns difficult, we are optimistic that the results of the full-text analysis of the 44 included articles strongly related to children’s rights offer valuable insights into the field and suggest potentially fruitful avenues for further research.

Conclusion

Following De Vaus (2001), who divides research into descriptive, explanatory and explorative, this review indicates that research on children’s rights has been mostly descriptive and somewhat explorative. The studies examined were mostly non-theoretical, primarily including children’s voices and analysing international policy. As discussed, this scoping review suggests that the children’s rights in the sports research field will benefit from more varied scientific approaches that enhance possibilities to explain the phenomena and relationships seen. This is no critique of previous research, as good descriptive studies typically raise ‘Why?’ questions (De Vaus, 2001). Thus, as what we can call a first wave of research, has described and highlighted the lack of a rights-based perspective, this scoping review proposes a second wave of more explanatory research into children’s rights in sports, rooted in relevant theories aiming to understand why violations of children’s rights occur and why a children’s rights-based perspective has not yet been established fully in the sports contexts.

Moreover, this review indicates a deficiency in social science knowledge about how children’s rights as constructs contribute to prevent challenges or solve problems faced by children in various sports contexts. This gap appears clearly in this review where only 21 articles with a direct focus on children’s rights in sports were identified. There is also limited knowledge regarding how specific aspects of children’s rights constructs (e.g., UNCRC) are implemented in sports, including the four basic principles; that all children have the same rights and equal value (Article 2 UNCRC), that the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration (Article 3 UNCRC), that every child has the inherent right to life and development (Article 6 UNCRC), and that all children have the right to express their opinion and have it respected (Article 12 UNCRC). This applies to all the other sports-relevant articles of the UNCRC. Thus, we suggest more studies with a direct focus on children’s rights constructs, exploring how they are understood, embedded and respected at various levels of sports systems to enhance children’s sense of dignity and worth.

One finding not previously discussed is that out of 44 articles, 35 came from four specific parts of the world (13 from the UK, 11 from Canada/USA, 7 from Scandinavia and 4 from Australia/New Zealand). Thus, entire continents (Africa, South America and Asia) and large regions, including southern Europe, were underrepresented (or not represented at all) in research about children’s rights in sports. This raises concerns and indicates a need for more studies from those parts, especially as the UNCRC has been ratified by every country except the USA (United Nations, 2023). Notably, countries that had embedded the UNCRC in their sports policies or even in their legal system (e.g., England, Norway and Sweden) produced most research related to children’s rights. Hypothetically, ratifying the UNCRC may not be enough. It is possible that the amount of research in these countries reflects the topic’s societal embeddedness and therefore the interest in financing such research among research councils. This is something for future research to follow up.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

References

Aina

, McGillivray

, Carnicelli

, & McPherson

(2021). Embedding child rights principles and practises in mega sport event planning. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 3, 254. 10.3389/fspor.2021.695666

Aine

, Muhonen

, & Toivonen

(2022). Children’s right to play sports in a safe and healthy environment. The International Sports Law Journal, 22, 93–104. 10.1007/s40318-022-00217-2

Arellano

, & Downey

(2019). Sport-for-development and the failure of aboriginal subjecthood: Re-imagining lacrosse as resurgence in indigenous communities. Settler Colonial Studies, 9(4), 457–478. 10.1080/2201473X.2018.1537078

Ariès

(1962). Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life. 1960. Trans. Baldick

Robert

. Vintage.

Austin

M. W.

(2007). Do children have a right to play? Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 34(2), 135–146. 10.1080/00948705.2007.9714717

Bjørnseth

, & Szabo

(2018). Sexual violence against children in sports and exercise: A systematic literature review, Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 27(4), 365–385. 10.1080/10538712.2018.1477222

Brackenridge

C. H.

, Fasting

, Kirby

, Leahy

, Parent

, & Sand

(2010). The place of sport in the UN study on violence against children (Discussion Paper No. 2010-10). UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre Florence.

Brackenridge

, & Kirby

(1997). Playing safe: Assessing the risk of sexual abuse to elite child athletes. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 32(4), 407–418.

Brackenridge

C. H.

, & Rhind

(2014). Child protection in sport: Reflections on thirty years of science and activism. Social Sciences, 3(3), 326–340. 10.3390/socsci3030326

10.

Council of Europe (2023, June 6). The European Convention on Human Rights—How does it work? https://www.coe.int/en/web/impact-convention-human-rights/how-it-works

11.

De Vaus

(2001). Research design in social research. Sage Publications.

12.

Dixon

(2007). Sport, parental autonomy, and children’s right to an open future. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 34(2), 147–159. 10.1080/00948705.2007.9714718

13.

Donnelly

(2008). Sport and human rights. Sport in Society, 11(4), 381–394. 10.1080/17430430802019326

14.

Donnelly

, Kerr

, Heron

, & DiCarlo

(2016). Protecting youth in sport: An examination of harassment policies. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 8(1), 33–50. 10.1080/19406940.2014.958180

15.

Donnelly

, & Petherick

(2004). Workers’ playtime? Child labour at the extremes of the sporting spectrum. Sport in Society, 7(3), 301–321. 10.1080/1743043042000291659

16.

Dowse

, Powell

, & Weed

(2018). Mega-sporting events and children’s rights and interests—towards a better future. Leisure Studies, 37(1), 97–108. 10.1080/02614367.2017.1347698

17.

Eliasson

(2017). The gap between formalised children’s rights and children’s real lives in sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 52(4), 470–496. 10.1177/1012690215608516

18.

Eliasson

, Karp

, & Wickman

(2017). Developing sports with a children’s rights perspective? Intentions, methods, and priorities of development projects in local Swedish sports clubs. European Journal for Sport and Society, 14(3), 244–264. 10.1080/16138171.2017.1349056

19.

Ellingsen

J. E.

, & Danielsen

A. G.

(2017). Norwegian children’s rights in sport and coaches’ understanding of talent. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 25(2), 412–437. 10.1163/15718182-02502006

20.

Fenoglio

, & Taylor

(2014). From winning-at-all-costs to give us back our game: Perspective transformation in youth sport coaches. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(2), 191–204. 10.1080/17408989.2012.748737

21.

Gilson

L. L.

, & Goldberg

C. B.

(2015). Editors’ comment: So, what is a conceptual paper?. Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 127–130. 10.1177/1059601115576425

22.

Gleaves

, & Lang

(2017). Kicking ‘no-touch’ discourses into touch: Athletes’ parents’ constructions of appropriate coach–child athlete physical contact. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 41(3), 191–211. 10.1177/0193723517705543

23.

Grenfell

C. C.

, & Rinehart

R. E.

(2003). Skating on thin ice: Human rights in youth figure skating. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 38(1), 79–97. 10.1177/1012690203038001729

24.

Hadley

, & McNamara

(2020). Genetic testing in sport: Considerations for young athletes. Alternative Law Journal, 45(4), 303–308. 10.1177/1037969X20956260.

25.

Hardin

, & Whiteside

E. E.

(2009). The power of ‘small stories’: Narratives and notions of gender equality in conversations about sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 26(2), 255–276. 10.1123/ssj.26.2.255

26.

Hart

S. N.

(1991). From property to person status: Historical perspective on children’s rights. American Psychologist, 46(1), 53–59. 10.1037/0003-066X.46.1.53

27.

Hong

(2004). Innocence lost: Child athletes in China. Sport in Society, 7(3), 338–354. 10.1080/1743043042000291677

28.

International Olympic Committee (2021). Assistance for olympic movement stakeholders (IOC athlete safeguarding toolkit). https://olympics.com/ioc/safe-sport/assistance-for-olympic-movement-stakeholders

29.

Japan Committee for UNICEF (2018). Children’s rights in sport principles. 2nd ed.

30.

Kerber-Ganse

(2015). Eglantyne Jebb—A pioneer of the convention on the rights of the child. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 23(2), 272–282. 10.1163/15718182-02302003

31.

Kidd

, & Donnelly

(2000). Human rights in sports. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 35(2), 131–148. 10.1177/101269000035002001

32.

Knox

, & Anderson

(2022). Kid’s cage-fighting: It should be banned, right? Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 16(3), 300–317. 10.1080/17511321.2021.1933153

33.

Lang

(2022). Advancing children’s rights in sport: Coaching, childhood agency and the participatory agenda. Sports Coaching Review, 11(1), 41–63. 10.1080/21640629.2021.1990655

34.

Lindgren

E. C.

, Hildingh

, & Linnér

(2017). Children’s stories about team selection: A discourse analysis. Leisure Studies, 36(5), 633–644. 10.1080/02614367.2016.1272624

35.

Mason

, Darby

, Drywood

, Esson

, & Yilmaz

(2019). Rights, risks and responsibilities in the recruitment of children within the global football industry. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 27(4), 738–756. 10.1163/15718182-02704005

36.

McPherson

, Atkins

, Cameron

, Long

, Nicholson

, & Morris

M. E.

(2016). Children’s experience of sport: What do we really know? Australian Social Work, 69(3), 348–359. 10.1080/0312407X.2015.1055508

37.

McPherson

, Long

, Nicholson

, Cameron

, Atkins

, & Morris

M. E.

(2017). Children’s experience of sport in Australia. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 52(5), 551–569. 10.1177/101269021560851

38.

Miah

, & Rich

(2006). Genetic tests for ability?: Talent identification and the value of an open future. Sport, Education and Society, 11(3), 259–273. 10.1080/13573320600813432

39.

Moulds

, Galloway

, Abbot

, & Cobley

S. P.

(2022). Youth sport dropout according to the process person-context-time model: A systematic review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 10.1080/1750984X.2021.2012817

40.

Munn

, Peters

M. D.

, Stern

, Tufanaru

, McArthur

, & Aromataris

(2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 1–7. 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

41.

Newcastle University (2023, August 31). Sports and exercise science. Your subject-specific guide to library resources. https://libguides.ncl.ac.uk/sport/journals

42.

Newman

, & Covrig

D. M.

(2013). Building consistency between title, problem statement, purpose, & research questions to improve the quality of research plans and reports. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 25(1), 70–79. 10.1002/nha.20009

43.

S. Y. C.

, Bloom

, Corcoran

S. L.

, Fletcher

, & Sibley

(2022). ‘If you respect us…listen to us’: How sporting event media reframes or reinforces representations of street-connected children. Leisure Studies, 41(6), 757–774. 10.1080/02614367.2022.2088830

44.

Nilsson

(1988). Tävlingsidrotten som uppfostringsmiljö. [Competitive sports as a fostering arena]. HLS, Institutionen för Pedagogik, Rapport 1/1988.

45.

Norris

, & Oppenheim

(2007). Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 161–169. 10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001

46.

Page

M. J.

, McKenzie

J. E.

, Bossuyt

P. M.

, Boutron

, Hoffmann

T. C.

, Mulrow

C. D.

, Shamseer

, Tetzlaff

J. M.

, Akl

E. A.

, Brennan

S. E.

, Chou

, Glanville

, Grimshaw

J. M.

, Hróbjartsson

, Lalu

M. M.

, Li

, Loder

E. W.

, Mayo-Wilson

, McDonald

, McGuinness

L. A.

, Stewart

L. A.

, Thomas

, Tricco

A. C.

, Welch

V. A.

, Whiting

, & Moher

(2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906.

47.

Reynaert

, Desmet

, Lembrechts

, & Vandenhole

(2015). A critical approach to children’s rights. In Vandenhole

, Desmet

, Reynaert

, & Lembrechts

(Eds.). Routledge international handbook of children’s rights studies. Routledge.

48.

Rhind

, Cook

, & Dorsch

K. D.

(2013). Looking at youth hockey from a human rights perspective. Sport in Society, 16(3). 10.1080/17430437.2013.779857

49.

Rocco

T. S.

, Plakhotnik

M. S.

, & Silberman

(2022). Differentiating between conceptual and theory articles: Focus, goals, and approaches. Human Resource Development Review, 21(1), 113–140. 10.1177/15344843211069795

50.

Ropret

(2019). Youth sports in the national documents: Between children’s rights and needs and the development of sports according to adults. Fizička Kultura, 73(1), 134–150. 10.5937/fizkul1901134R

51.

Shinohara

(2020). Child rights and sports law: How can we protect young athlete’s human rights under the UN Convention on the rights of the child?. International Sports Law Review Pandektis, 13.

52.

Shinohara

(2022). Physical and sexual abuse against young athletes in sport in light of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The International Sports Law Journal, 22(1), 51–61. 10.1007/s40318-021-00197-9

53.

Skirstad

, Waddington

, & Säfvenbom

(2012). Issues and problems in the organization of children’s sport: A case study of Norway. European Physical Education Review, 18(3), 309–321. 10.1177/1356336X12450790

54.

Stafford

, Alexander

, & Fry

(2015). ‘There was something that wasn’t right because that was the only place I ever got treated like that’: Children and young people’s experiences of emotional harm in sport. Childhood, 22(1), 121–137. 10.1177/0907568213505625

55.

Stödberg

(2012). A research review of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 591–604. 10.1080/02602938.2011.557496

56.

Swansea University (2023, September 4). Sport Science: Journals & Databases. https://libguides.swansea.ac.uk/sportsscience/journals

57.

Tamburrini

(2010). Born to be an athlete? The impact of genetic technology on autonomy. Sport in Society, 13(2), 212–220. 10.1080/17430430903522939

58.

Teetzel

, & Mazzucco

(2014). Minor problems: The recognition of young athletes in the development of international anti-doping policies. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 31(8), 914–933. 10.1080/09523367.2013.854774

59.

Turkeri-Bozkurt

, & Bulgu

(2020). Is injury part of sports? A children’s rights perspective. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 55(1), 98–114. 10.1177/1012690218778536

60.

Uddin

, & Khan

(2016). The impact of author-selected keywords on citation counts. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1166–1177. 10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.004

61.

UNICEF (2020). Children before players. Protecting and realising children’s rights: A guide for professional football clubs. https://www.unicef.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Children-before-Players-Guide.pdf

62.

UNICEF (2023, September 5). History of child rights. https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/history-child-rights

63.

United Nations (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child

64.

United Nations (2023, January 17). United Nations treaty collection. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&clang=_en

65.

Van Blerk

, Mendel

, Rodriguez

, Fernandes

F. L.

, & Rizzini

(2019). ‘Let’s win this game together’: Children’s rights violations, macro-securitisation and the transformative potential of the 2014 FIFA world cup in Brazil. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 38(3), 284–299. 10.1111/blar.12840

66.

Vičar

, & Moudr

(2021). Ethical principles for talent identification in sports from the liberal perspective. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 15(4), 463–480. 10.1080/17511321.2020.1813796

67.

Weber

(2009). Protection of children in competitive sport: Some critical questions for London 2012. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 44(1), 55–69. 10.1177/1012690208101485

68.

White

A. J.

, Robinson

, Anderson

, Bullingham

, Pollock

, & Scoats

(2019). The lack of age representation in the governance of rugby union in England. Sociology of Sport Journal, 36(4), 300–310. 10.1123/ssj.2018-0149

69.

Wilinsky

C. L.

& McCabe

(2020). A review of emotional and sexual abuse of elite child athletes by their coaches. Sports Coaching Review, 10(1), 84–109. 10.1080/21640629.2020.1775378

70.

Yelamos

G. M.

, Carney

, Carty

, & MacLachlan

(2021). A thematic analysis of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) State Party reporting mechanisms related to physical education, physical activity and sport. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 29(3), 765–794. 10.1163/15718182-29030011

71.

Yilmaz

, Esson

, Darby

, Drywood

, & Mason

(2020). Children’s rights and the regulations on the transfer of young players in football. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 55(1), 115–124. 10.1177/1012690218786665

Exploring the Landscape of Children’s Rights in Sports: A Scoping Review of Research Topics and Approaches in Social Sciences

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Method

Search Strategy

PRISMA Inspired Flow Diagram.

Inclusion Criteria

Data Extraction Strategy

Results

Empirical Studies with Human Participants

Topics Addressed in Studies with a Direct Focus on Children’s Rights

Research Design of Studies with a Direct Focus on Children’s Rights

Topics Addressed in Studies with an Indirect Focus on Children’s Rights

Research Design of Studies with an Indirect Focus on Children’s Rights

Synthesis

Empirical Studies Based on Textual Analysis

Topics Addressed in Studies with a Direct Focus on Children’s Rights

Research Design of Studies with a Direct Focus on Children’s Rights

Topics Addressed in Studies with an Indirect Focus on Children’s Rights

Research Design of Studies with an Indirect Focus on Children’s Rights

Synthesis

Conceptual Studies

Topics Addressed in Studies with a Direct Focus on Children’s Rights

Research Design of Studies with a Direct Focus on Children’s Rights

Topics Addressed in Studies with an Indirect Focus on Children’s Rights

Research Design of Studies with an Indirect Focus on Children’s Rights

Synthesis

Discussion

Limitations

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References