The present study elucidates the association between students’ education type and alcohol use, controlling for other socio-economic background characteristics. A subsample of data from the second International Self-Reported Delinquency Study was used (N= 10,525), collected among adolescents in the seventh to ninth grades of secondary school in four Western European countries (Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany and Austria). Data were analyzed with multilevel logistic regression techniques. There is an indication that type of education affects prevalence rates of drunkenness and heavy episodic drinking; these effects prove robust for differences in socio-economic backgrounds. The results of this study support the literature regarding the role of the educational system in the reproduction of health inequalities and underscore the finding that students from education types of lower status are at greater risk than those from higher status types.
AndersenA.HolsteinB.E.DueP. (2006) ‘School-related risk factors for drunkenness Among Adolescents: Risk Factors Differ Between Socio-Economic Groups’, European Journal of Public Health17(1): 27–32.
2.
AskewS.RossC. (1990) Boys Don’t Cry: Boys and Sexism in Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
3.
BertenH.CardoenD.BrondeelR.VettenburgN. (2012) ‘Alcohol and Cannabis Use Among Adolescents in Flemish Secondary Schools in Brussels: The Effects of Type of Education’, BMC Public Health12(215).
4.
BoudreauB.PoulinC. (2009) ‘An examination of the Validity of the Family Affluence Scale II (FAS II) in a General Adolescent Population of Canada’, Social Indicators Research94(1): 29–42.
5.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ.C. (1977) Reproduction in Education, Society And Culture. London: Sage.
6.
BowlesS.GintisH. (1976) Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
7.
BoyceW.TorsheimT.CurrieC.ZambonA. (2006) ‘The Family Affluence Scale as a Measure of National Wealth: Validation of an Adolescent Self-Report Measure’ Social Indicators Research78: 473–87.
8.
BoyerT.W. (2006) ‘The Development of Risk-Taking: A Multi-Perspective Review’, Developmental Review26(3): 291–345.
9.
CurrieC.EltonR.ToddJ.PlattS. (1997) ‘Indicators of Socioeconomic Status For Adolescents: The WHO Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey’, Health Education Research12(3): 385–97.
10.
CurrieC.MolchoM.BoyceW.HolsteinB.TorsheimT.RichterM. (2008) ‘Researching Health Inequalities in Adolescents: The Development of the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) Family Affluence Scale’, Social Science & Medicine66(6): 1429–36.
11.
DiasP.OliveiraA.LopesC. (2011) ‘Social and Behavioral Determinants of Alcohol Consumption’, Annals of Human Biology38(3): 337–44.
12.
DroomersM.SchrijversC.T.M.CasswellS.MackenbachJ.P. (2003) ‘Occupational Level of the Father and Alcohol Consumption During Adolescence: Patterns And Predictors’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health57(9): 704–10.
13.
DroomersM.SchrijversC.T.M.StronksK.van de MheenD.MackenbachJ.P. (1999) ‘Educational differences in excessive alcohol consumption: The role of psychosocial And Material Stressors’, Preventive Medicine29(1): 1–10.
14.
EllicksonP.L.TuckerJ.S.KleinD.J. (2003) ‘Ten-year prospective study of Public Health Problems Associated With Early Drinking’, Pediatrics111(5): 949–55.
15.
ElliottD.S.HuizingaD.MenardS. (1989) Multiple Problem Youth: Delinquency, Substance Use, and Mental Health Problems. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
16.
EmersonE.GrahamH.HattonC. (2006) ‘Household Income and Health Status in Children and Adolescents in Britain’, European Journal of Public Health16(4): 354–60.
17.
EnzmannD.MarshallI.H.KilliasM.Junger-TasJ.SteketeeM.GruszczynskaB. (2010) ‘Self-reported Youth Delinquency in Europe and Beyond: First Results of the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study in the Context of Police and Victimization Data’, European Journal of Criminology7(2): 159–83.
18.
EpsteinD. (2009) Failing Boys? Issues in Gender and Achievement. Buckingham: Open University Press.
19.
European Commission (2006) Communication from the Commission of 24 October 2006: An EU Strategy to Support Member States in Reducing Alcohol Related Harm. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
20.
HagquistC. (2000) ‘Socioeconomic Differences in Smoking Behaviour Among Adolescents—The Role of Academic Orientation’, Childhood—A Global Journal of Child Research7(4): 467–78.
21.
HagquistC. (2006) ‘Health Inequalities Among Adolescents—The Impact of Academic Orientation and Parents’ Education’, European Journal of Public Health17(1): 21–26.
22.
HallinanM.T. (1994) ‘Tracking: From Theory to Practice’, Sociology of Education67(2): 79–84.
23.
HansonM. D.ChenE. (2007) ‘Socioeconomic Status and Health Behaviors in Adolescence: A Review of the Literature’, Journal of Behavioral Medicine30(3): 263–85.
24.
HawkinsJ.D.CatalanoR.F.MillerJ.Y. (1992) ‘Risk and Protective Factors for Alcohol and Other Drug Problems in Adolescence and Early Adulthood—Implications for Substance-Abuse Prevention’, Psychological Bulletin112(1): 64–105.
25.
HibellB.GuttormssonU.AhlströmS.BalakirevaO.BjarnasonT.KokkeviA.KrausL. (2007) The 2007 ESPAD Report: Substance Use Among Students in 35 European Countries. Stockholm: ESPAD.
26.
HuckleT.YouR.Q.CasswellS. (2010) ‘Socio-economic Status Predicts Drinking Patterns but not Alcohol-Related Consequences Independently’, Addiction105(7): 1192–202.
27.
HumenskyJ.L. (2010) ‘Are adolescents with High Socioeconomic Status More Likely to Engage in Alcohol and Illicit Drug Use in Early Adulthood?’, Substance Use Treatment, Prevention and Policy, 5, 9.
28.
IrwinC.E.IgraV.EyreS.MillsteinS. (1997) ‘Risk-taking Behavior in Adolescents: The Paradigm’, Adolescent Nutritional Disorders: Prevention and Treatment, 817: 1–35.
JacobsD.ReaA. (2011) Verspild talent: De prestatiekloof in het secundair onderwijs tussen allochtone en andere leerlingen volgens het PISA-onderzoek 2009 [Wasted talent: The Performance Gap in Secondary School Between Minority and Other Students According to the PISA Study 2009]. Brussels: Koning Boudewijnstichting.
31.
Junger-TasJ.MarshallI.H.EnzmannD.KilliasM.SteketeeM.GruszczynskaB. (2010) Juvenile Delinquency in Europe and Beyond: Results of the Second International Delinquency Self-Report Study. Berlin: Springer.
32.
KinableH. (2010) VAD-leerlingenbevraging in het kader van een drugbeleid op school: Syntheserapport schooljaar 2008–2009 [VAD Student Questionnaire as Part of the Drug Policy on School: Synthesis Report for the School Year 2008–2009]. Brussels: Vereniging voor Alcohol—en andere Drugproblemen (VAD).
33.
KulisS.MarsigliaF.F.Chase LingardE.NieriT.VillarP. (2008) ‘Gender Identity and Substance Use among Students in Two High Schools in Monterrey, Mexico’, Drug and Alcohol Dependence95(3): 258–68.
34.
LinY. (2011) ‘Assessing the Use of the Family Affluence Scale as Socioeconomic Indicators for Researching Health Inequalities in Taiwan Adolescents’, Social Indicators Research102(3), 463–75.
35.
LiuW.M.IwanotoD.K. (2007) ‘Conformity to Masculine Norms, Asian Values, Coping Strategies, Peer Group Influences and Substance Use among Asian American Men’, Psychology of Men & Masculinity8(1): 25–39.
36.
Mac an GhaillM. (1994) The Making Of Men: Masculinities, Sexualities and Schooling. Buckingham: Open University Press.
37.
MagklaraK.SkapinasP.NiakasD.BellosS.ZissiA.StylianidisS.MavreasV. (2010) ‘Socioeconomic Inequalities in General and Psychological Health Among Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study in Senior High Schools in Greece’, International Journal of Equity in Health9(1–9).
NicaiseI. (2008) ‘Ongelijkheid en sociale uitsluiting in het onderwijs: een onuitroeibaar kwaal? [Inequality and Social Exclusion in Education: An Uneradicated Evil?]’, in NicaiseI.DesmedtE. (eds) Gelijke kansen op school: het kan! Zestien sporen voor praktijk en beleid [Equal School Chances: It is Possible! Sixteen Trails for Practice and Policy], pp. 21–53. Mechelen, Belgium: Plantyn.
40.
PaavolaM.VertanenE.HaukkalaA. (2004) ‘Smoking from Adolescence to Adulthood. The Effects of Parental and Own Socioeconomic Status’, European Journal of Public Health14(4): 417–21.
41.
PelleriauxK. (2001) Demotie en burgerschap: De culturele constructie van ongelijkheid in de kennismaatschappij [Demotion and Citizenship: The Cultural Construction of Inequality in the Knowledge Society]. Brussels: VUB Press.
42.
RaudenbushS.BrykA. (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
RichterM.LeppinA.GabhainnS.N. (2006) ‘The Relationship Between Parental Socio-Economic Status and Episodes of Drunkenness Among Adolescents: Findings from a Cross-National Survey’, BMC Public Health6: 9.
44.
RosenthalR.JacobsonL. (1968) Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils’ Intellectual Development’. New York, NY: Rinehart and Winston.
45.
SchaferW.OlexaC. (1971) Tracking and Opportunity: The Locking-Out Process and Beyond. Scranton, PA: Chandler.
46.
ShawC.R.McKayH.D. (1942) Juvenile Delinquency in Urban Areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47.
SpothR.GreenbergM.TurrisiR. (2009) ‘Overview of Preventive Interventions Addressing Underage Drinking State of the Evidence and Steps Toward Public Health Impact’, Alcohol Research & Health32(1): 53–66.
48.
STAP
(2003) Alcohol: Gezondheidsrisico’s voor kinderen [Alcohol: Health Risks for Children]. Utrecht: STAP.
49.
Van HoutteM. (2005) ‘Global Self-Esteem in Technical/Vocational Versus General Secondary School Tracks: A Matter of Gender?’, Sex Roles53(9–10): 753–61.
50.
Van HoutteM. (2006) ‘School Type and Academic Culture: Evidence for the Differentiation-Polarization Theory’, Journal of Curriculum Studies38(3): 273–92.
51.
Van HoutteM.StevensP.A.J. (2008) ‘Sense of Futility: The Missing Link Between Track Position and Self-Reported School Misconduct’, Youth & Society40(2): 245–64.
52.
Van OersJ.A.M.BongersI.M.B.Van De GoorL A.M.GarretsenH.F.L. (1999) ‘Alcohol Consumption, Alcohol-Related Problems, Problem Drinking, and Socioeconomic Status’, Alcohol & Alcoholism34(1): 78–88.
53.
Van RossemR.BertenH.Van TuyckomC. (2010) AIDS Knowledge and Sexual Activity among Flemish Secondary School Students: A Multilevel Analysis of the Effects of Type of Education. BMC Public Health10: 30.
54.
VereeckenC.A.MaesL.De BacquerD. (2004) ‘The Influence of Parental Occupation and the Pupils’ Educational Level on Lifestyle Behaviors Among Adolescents in Belgium’, Journal of Adolescent Health34(4): 330–38.
55.
VettenburgN. (1988) School ervaringen, delinquentie en maatschappelijke kwetsbaarheid. Een theoretische en empirisch onderzoek in het beroepsonderwijs [School Experiences, Delinquency and Societal Vulnerability. A Theoretical and Empirical Study in Vocational Education]. Leuven: KUL. Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid, Afdeling Strafrecht, Strafvordering en Criminologie.
56.
VettenburgN. (1998) ‘Juvenile Delinquency and the Cultural Characteristics of the Family’, International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health10(3): 193–209.
57.
WestP. (1997) ‘Health Inequalities in the Early Years: Is There Equalization in Youth?’, Social Science & Medicine44(6): 833–58.
58.
Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid (2009) Vertrouwen in de school: Over de uitval van ‘overbelaste’ jongeren [Confidence in School: About Attrition of ‘Overburdened’ Young People]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
59.
WHO (2011) Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
60.
WilliamsJ.CurrieC.WrightP.EltonR.BeattieT. (1997) ‘Socioeconomic Status and Adolescent Injuries’, Social Science Medicine44(12): 1881–91.
61.
WillisP. (1977) Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
