Burke W
, Daly M, Garber J, Botkin J, Kahn M, Lynch P, McTiernan A, Offit K, Perlman J, Peterson G, Thomson E, Varricchio C. 1997. Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited disposition to Cancer-II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Am Med Ass277:997-1003.
7.
Collins F
, Galas D. 1993. Anewfive-year plan for the U.S. Human Genome Project. Sci262(5130):43-48.
8.
Collins F
, Jenkins J. 1997. Implications of the human genome project for the nursing profession. In: The genetics revolution: Implications for nursing, edited by FR Lashley. Washington, DC: American Academy of Nursing. p 9-14.
9.
Donaldson SK
. 1997. Future of nursing scholarship. Image: J Nurs Sch29(2):117-121.
10.
Donaldson SKB
, Crowley DM. 1978. The discipline of nursing. Nurs Outlook26(2):113-120.
11.
Feetham SR
. 1997. The genetics revolution: Outcomes and recommendations. In: The genetics revolution: Implications for nursing, edited by FR Lashley. Washington, DC: American Academy of Nursing. p 39-35.
12.
Feetham SR
, Meister SB. 1999. Nursing research of families: State of the science directions to sustain programs and inform policy. In: Handbook of clinical nursing research, edited by AS Hinshaw, S Feetham, J Shaver. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Grady PA
. 1997. The genetics revolution: The role of the National Institute of Nursing Research. In: The genetics revolution: Implications for nursing, edited by FR Lashley. Washington, DC: American Academy of Nursing. p 27-32.
14.
Institute of Medicine
. 1988. The future of public health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15.
Institute of Medicine
. 1994. Assessing genetic risks: Implications for health and social policy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16.
Institute of Medicine
. 1995. Nursing, health, and the environment: Strengthening the relationship to improve the public’s health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17.
International Society of Nurses in Genetics, Inc., and American Nurses Association
. 1998. Statement on the scope and standards of genetics nursing practice. Washington, DC: American Nurses Association.
18.
King IM
. 1971. Toward of theory of nursing. New York: John Wiley.
19.
Lea DH
, Jenkins JF, Francamano CA. 1998. Genetics in clinical practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
20.
McKusick V
. 1992. Human genetics: The last 35 years, the present, and the future. Am J Human Genet504:663-670.
21.
Newman MA
. 1995. A developing discipline. New York: National League for Nursing Press.
22.
Phillips JR
. 1990. The different views of health. Nurs Sci Quart33:103-104.
23.
Scanlon C
. 1997. Genetic advances: Policy and peril. In: The genetics revolution: Implications for nursing, edited by FR Lashley. Washington, DC: American Academy of Nursing. p 33-38.
24.
Scanlon C
, Fibison W. 1995. Managing genetic information: Implications for nursing practice. Washington, DC: American Nurses Association.
25.
Smith J
. 1981. The idea of health: Aphilosophic inquiry. Adv Nurs Sci3:43-50.
26.
Thomson EJ
. 1997. Ethical, legal, social, and policy issues in genetics. In: The genetics revolution: Implications for nursing, edited by FR Lashley. Washington, DC: American Academy of Nursing. p 15-26.
27.
Watson JD
, Crick, FNC. 1953. Molecular structure of nucleic acids: A structure for deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature171:737-738.
28.
World Health Organization
. 1994. Forty-seventh World Health Assembly: Executive Summary. Geneva: Author.
