The bending and springback behaviors of sandwich laminates are more complex than those of monolithic sheet materials because of the differences between the properties of the core and skin materials. In this study, simplified analytical and numerical models were used for analyzing the springback angle and bending force of metal-polymer-metal sandwich laminates under bending. An analytical model was used to predict springback in three-point bending. The springback angles and bending force obtained from the numerical model correlated well with the experimental results. It was found that the finite element model using solid elements in the core was advantageous for predicting the shape after bending. It was demonstrated that these models can be used to design sandwich laminates with desired flexural stiffness by appropriately choosing the volume fraction. Potential weight reduction for sandwich laminates during the air bending process was presented.
CaladoFNPraganaJPMBragançaIMF, et al.Resistance element welding of sandwich laminates with hidden inserts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2022; 118: 1565–1575. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-08063-6.
2.
KhaliliSKhaliliSMRFarsaniRE, et al.Flexural properties of sandwich composite panels with glass laminate aluminum reinforced epoxy facesheets strengthened by SMA wires. Polym Test2020; 89: 106641. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106641.
3.
CzerwinskiF. Current trends in automotive lightweighting strategies and materials. Materials2021; 14: 6631. DOI: 10.3390/ma14216631.
4.
HaraDÖzgenGO. Investigation of weight reduction of automotive body structures with the use of sandwich materials. Transport Res Procedia2016; 14: 1013–1020. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.081.
5.
GeCZhouCXiaoS, et al.Forced vibration response prediction of Miura-ori core sandwich panel with impact defects. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 197: 111597. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2024.111597.
6.
Al KhazrajiMSJweegMJBakhySH. Free vibration analysis of a laminated honeycomb sandwich panel: a suggested analytical solution and a numerical validation. J Eng Des Technol2024; 22: 316–343. DOI: 10.1108/JEDT-10-2021-0536.
7.
DeshmukhABChaitanyaSVWaghS. Case study on sandwich steel application in automotive BIW for NVH Improvements. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng2018: 01-06.
8.
RamnathBVElanchezhianCManickavasagamVM, et al.A review on sandwich composites and their advancements. Mater Today Proc2019; 16: 1146–1151. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.207.
9.
FaidziMKAbdullahSAbdullahMF, et al.Review of current trends for metal-based sandwich panel: failure mechanisms and their contribution factors. Eng Fail Anal2021; 123: 105302. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105302.
10.
BorazjaniSBelingardiG. Development of an innovative design of a composite-sandwich based vehicle roof structure. Compos Struct2017; 168: 522–534. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.015.
11.
YangJHanSYuWR. Detection of delamination of steel–polymer sandwich composites using acoustic emission and development of a forming limit diagram considering delamination. Heliyon2023; 9: e16942. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16942.
12.
ChoiWHChoiBSLeeDY, et al.Development of automotive structural part considering the formability of sandwich Panel. Trans. Korean Soc. Automot. Eng2012; 20: 33–38. DOI: 10.7467/KSAE.2012.20.4.033.
13.
HarhashMPalkowskiH. Incremental sheet forming of steel/polymer/steel sandwich composites. J Mater Res Technol2021; 13: 417–430. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.088.
14.
QadeerAHussainGAlkahtaniM, et al.Springback behavior of a metal/polymer laminate in incremental sheet forming: stress/strain relaxation perspective. J Mater Res Technol2023; 23: 1725–1737. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.088.
15.
KellaCKMallickPK. Springback behavior of aluminum/polypropylene/aluminum sandwich laminates. J Manuf Mater Process2022; 6: 152. DOI: 10.3390/jmmp6060152.
16.
HarhashMGilbertRRHartmannS, et al.Experimental characterization, analytical and numerical investigations of metal/polymer/metal sandwich composites – part 1: deep drawing. Compos Struct2018; 202: 1308–1321. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.066.
17.
HarhashMGilbertRRHartmannS, et al.Experimental characterization, analytical and numerical investigations of metal/polymer/metal sandwich composites – part 2: free bending. Compos Struct2020; 232: 111421. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111421.
18.
LiuJXueW. Unconstrained bending and springback behaviors of aluminum-polymer sandwich sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2017; 91: 1517–1529. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-016-9819-2.
19.
MohammadiSParsaMAghchaiAJ. Simplified springback prediction in Al/PP/Al sandwich air bending. J Sandw Struct Mater2015; 17: 217–237. DOI: 10.1177/1099636214560580.
20.
Ouled Ahmed Ben AliRChattiS. Simplified springback prediction of thick sandwich panel. J Sandw Struct Mater2020; 22: 1019–1038. DOI: 10.1177/1099636218779320.
21.
AghchaiAJAbolghasemiAMoradkhaniB, et al.Experimental, theoretical and numerical investigation of springback behavior of Al/composite/Al sandwich sheet. J Sandw Struct Mater2017; 19: 659–678. DOI: 10.1177/1099636216636099.
22.
Ouled Ahmed Ben AliRChattiS. Springback prediction of sandwich panel using machine learning methods. Mech Adv Compos Struct2023; 10: 11–20. DOI: 10.22075/MACS.2022.25933.1377.
23.
Ouled Ahmed Ben AliRChattiS. Modeling springback of thick sandwich panel using RSM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2019; 103: 3375–3387. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-03653-x.
24.
ASTM E8. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. 2013.
25.
ASTM D638. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. 2010.
26.
ParkSKBaekERParkN. Effect of anisotropy on springback prediction in forming of 590 MPa high strength steel. Korean J Met Mater2018; 56: 210–220. DOI: 10.3365/KJMM.2018.56.3.210.
27.
SchwabRHarterA. Extracting true stresses and strains from nominal stresses and strains in tensile testing. Strain2021; 57: e12396. DOI: 10.1111/str.12396.
28.
SchwabR. Understanding the complete loss of uniform plastic deformation of some ultrafine-grained metallic materials in tensile straining. Int J Plast2019; 113: 218–235. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.10.002.
29.
SchwabRRuffV. On the nature of the yield point phenomenon. Acta Mater2013; 61: 1798–1808. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.12.003.
SeoKYKimJHLeeHS, et al.Effect of constitutive equations on prediction accuracy for springback in cold stamping of TRIP1180. 2017. DOI: 10.20944/preprints201703.0044.v1.
32.
ASTM D790. Flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics. 2017.
33.
HaufeASchweizerhofKDuboisP. Properties & limits: review of shell element formulations. Developer Forum. Germany: Filderstadt, 2013.
34.
BitarIRichardB. Mindlin-Reissner plate formulation with enhanced kinematics: theoretical framework and numerical applications. Eng Fract Mech2020; 225: 106839. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106839.
35.
TakiguchiMYoshidaF. Analysis of plastic bending of adhesive-bonded sheet metals taking account of viscoplasticity of adhesive. J Mater Process Technol2003; 140(1–3): 441–446. DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00744-1.
36.
RadhakrishnanGAl HattaliAHAl YahyaiAM, et al.Experimental study on the effect of aspect ratio on flexural behavior of aluminum sandwich composite. Eng Technol J2022; 40: 1–6. DOI: 10.30684/etj.2022.134317.1234.
