3D Kagome lattice sandwich structure is recognized as the most excellent lattice configuration. However, the preparation method of 3D Kagome is complicated and the raw materials for its preparation are limited to materials with high plasticity. In this study, we developed a wood-based 3D Kagome lattice structure that combines discrete rods into a continuous core using reinforcement. Orthogonal tests, theoretical analysis, and finite element simulations were performed to investigate the correlation between the dimensional parameters, the mechanical properties, and the energy absorption capacity. The damage modes were found to be mainly bending fracture, core shear, and panel rupture, with the use of reinforcement affecting the damage modes. Compressive properties of the 3D Kagome lattice structure are increased by increasing core diameter and inclination degree, decreasing core in-cut diameter, and using high-strength reinforcements. Finite element simulations further confirm that the use of high-strength reinforcements changes the stress distribution of the lattice structure. The 3D Kagome lattice structure with an inclination degree of 65°, a core diameter of 10 mm, a reinforcement wall thickness of 2 mm, and a core in-cut diameter of 2 mm has the optimal compression performance and energy absorption capacity.
AhamedMKWangHXHazellPJ. From biology to biomimicry: using nature to build better structures-A review. Constr Build Mater2022; 320: 126195. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126195.
2.
ZhengTTYanHZLiS, et al.Compressive behavior and failure modes of the wood-based double X-type lattice sandwich structure. J Build Eng2020; 30: 101176. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101176.
3.
WoutsJHaugouGOudjeneM, et al.Strain rate effects on the compressive response of wood and energy absorption capabilities - Part A: experimental investigations. Compos Struct2016; 149: 315–328. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.058.
4.
KutnarAKamkeFSernekM. The mechanical properties of densified VTC wood relevant for structural composites. Holz Roh Werkst2008; 66: 439–446. DOI: 10.1007/s00107-008-0259-z.
5.
FanHLZengTFangDN, et al.Mechanics of advanced fiber reinforced lattice composites. Acta Mech Sin2010; 26: 825–835. DOI: 10.1007/s10409-010-0390-z.
GiancasproJBalaguruPNLyonRE. Use of inorganic polymer to improve the fire response of balsa sandwich structures. J Mater Civ Eng2006; 18: 390–397. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2006)18:3(390).
8.
LimJHKangKJ. Wire formed cellular metals. Mater Trans2006; 47: 2154–2160. DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.47.2154.
9.
JiangWCChenHGongJM, et al.Numerical modelling and nanoindentation experiment to study the brazed residual stresses in an X-type lattice truss sandwich structure. Mater Sci Eng A-Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process2011; 528: 4715–4722. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.073.
10.
JinMMHuYCWangB. Compressive and bending behaviours of wood-based two-dimensional lattice truss core sandwich structures. Compos Struct2015; 124: 337–344. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.033.
11.
KooistraGWQueheillaltDTWadleyHNG. Shear behavior of aluminum lattice truss sandwich panel structures. Mater Sci Eng A-Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process2008; 472: 242–250. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.03.034.
12.
MeiJLiuJYLiuJL. A novel fabrication method and mechanical behavior of all-composite tetrahedral truss core sandwich panel. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2017; 102: 28–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.020.
13.
ZhangGQMaLWangB, et al.Mechanical behaviour of CFRP sandwich structures with tetrahedral lattice truss cores. Compos Pt B-Eng2012; 43: 471–476. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.017.
14.
FinneganKKooistraGWadleyHNG, et al.The compressive response of carbon fiber composite pyramidal truss sandwich cores. Int J Mater Res2007; 98: 1264–1272. DOI: 10.3139/146.101594.
15.
QueheillaltDTMurtyYWadleyHNG. Mechanical properties of an extruded pyramidal lattice truss sandwich structure. Scripta Mater2008; 58: 76–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.08.041.
16.
WangBWuLZMaL, et al.Mechanical behavior of the sandwich structures with carbon fiber-reinforced pyramidal lattice truss core. Mater Des2010; 31: 2659–2663. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.061.
17.
KangK-J. Wire-woven cellular metals: the present and future. Prog Mater Sci2015; 69: 213–307, DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.11.003.
18.
LeeBCLeeKWByunJH, et al.The compressive response of new composite truss cores. Compos Pt B-Eng2012; 43: 317–324. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.048.
NiuBLiSJYangR. Manufacturing and mechanical properties of composite orthotropic Kagome honeycomb using novel modular method. Front Mech Eng2020; 15: 484–495. DOI: 10.1007/s11465-020-0593-3.
21.
HyunSKarlssonAMTorquatoS, et al.Simulated properties of Kagome and tetragonal truss core panels. Int J Solids Struct2003; 40: 6989–6998. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(03)00350-0.
22.
KlímekPWimmerRBrabecM, et al.Novel sandwich panel with interlocking plywood Kagome lattice core and grooved particleboard facings. Bioresources2016; 11: 195–208.
23.
LiZSGaoLZhaoXC, et al.Compression behavior and deformation mechanism of 3D-printed Kagome lattice materials. Mech Adv Mater Struct2023; 30: 4450–4458. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2022.2097350.
24.
XieMHGaoLCaoD, et al.All-composite integrated 3D-Kagome lattice cores sandwich structure with flexible mortise-tenon joints. Jnl of Sandwich Structures Materials2022; 24: 1122–1132. DOI: 10.1177/10996362211035424.
25.
GautamRIdapalapatiS. Performance of strut-reinforced Kagome truss core structure under compression fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Des2019; 164: 107541. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107541.
LiZLYeGYBiHJ, et al.Compression and energy absorption of wood-based two-dimensional dowel lattice structures. Eur J Mech A-Solids2022; 96: 104729. DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.104729.
28.
WangLFHuYCLiS, et al.Compression behavior and failure modes of wood-based lattice core sandwich structure with improved relative density. J Reinf Plast Compos2021; 40: 770–782. DOI: 10.1177/07316844211009384.
29.
UspenskyBDereviankoIAvramovK, et al.Experimental and numerical study on fatigue of sandwich plates with honeycomb core manufactured by fused deposition modelling. Appl Compos Mater2022; 29: 2033–2061. DOI: 10.1007/s10443-022-10057-w.
30.
KhorsandniaNValipourHRCrewsK. Nonlinear finite element analysis of timber beams and joints using the layered approach and hypoelastic constitutive law. Eng Struct2013; 46: 606–614. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.08.017.
31.
DastanTJafari NedoushanRSheikhzadehM, et al.Improved compressive performance of lattice truss core sandwich composites with modified Kagome topologies: an experimental and numerical study. Jnl of Sandwich Structures Materials2023; 25: 826–845. DOI: 10.1177/10996362231197684.
32.
HuayongZLinzhiWULiMA, et al.Research on impulse-resistant performance of sandwich panels with Kagome truss core. Eng Mech2007; 24: 86–92.
