A finite element model (FEM) using a more realistic three-dimensional geometry of lattice truss core was proposed to simulate the flatwise compression test on lattice truss core sandwich composites (LTCSCs). The goal was to reduce the disparity between experimental results and FEM predictions without inclusion of imperfection, as oppose to similar studies. Besides, two modified Kagome topologies were suggested and fabricated by adding vertical composite struts at specific locations. Based on the experimental results, the modified Kagome topologies exhibited superior specific compressive stiffness and strength over the Kagome topology, by about 100%. In addition, facesheet rotation of Kagome topology was found by the FEM, which considerably affect its compressive performance. Facesheet rotation is caused by the arrangement of composite struts of LTCSC. Compressive response of LTCSC was acceptably predicted by the FEM, though there was quite high error for compressive stiffness and strength. Probable sources of discrepancy between experimental and FEM results were discussed.
FinneganKKooistraGWadleyHNG, et al.The compressive response of carbon fiber composite pyramidal truss sandwich cores. Int J Mater Res2007; 98: 1264–1272. DOI: 10.3139/146.101594.
2.
EvansAGHeMYDeshpandeVS, et al.Concepts for enhanced energy absorption using hollow micro-lattices. Int J Impact Eng2010; 37: 947–959. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.007.
3.
DeshpandeVSFleckNAAshbyMF. Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material. J Mech Phys Solid2001; 49: 1747–1769.
4.
LiZGaoLZhaoX, et al.Compression behavior and deformation mechanism of 3D-printed Kagome lattice materials. Mech Adv Mater Struct2022; 9: 1–9. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2022.2097350.
5.
HuntCJMorabitoFGraceC, et al.A review of composite lattice structures. Compos Struct2022; 284: 115120. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115120.
6.
WeiKYangQLingB, et al.Mechanical responses of titanium 3D kagome lattice structure manufactured by selective laser melting. Extreme Mechanics Letters2018; 23: 41–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.eml.2018.07.001.
7.
DragoniE. Optimal mechanical design of tetrahedral truss cores for sandwich constructions. Jnl of Sandwich Structures & Materials2013; 15: 464–484. DOI: 10.1177/1099636213487364.
8.
XieMGaoLCaoD, et al.All-composite integrated 3D-Kagome lattice cores sandwich structure with flexible mortise-tenon joints. Jnl of Sandwich Structures & Materials2022; 24: 1122–1132. DOI: 10.1177/10996362211035424.
9.
HuJZhuSWangB, et al.Fabrication and compression properties of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polyether ether ketone thermoplastic composite sandwich structures with lattice cores. Jnl of Sandwich Structures & Materials2021; 23: 2422–2442. DOI: 10.1177/1099636220909949.
10.
JishiHZUmerRCantwellWJ. The fabrication and mechanical properties of novel composite lattice structures. Mater Des2016; 91: 286–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.112.
11.
FanHLMengFHYangW. Mechanical behaviors and bending effects of carbon fiber reinforced lattice materials. Arch Appl Mech2006; 75: 635–647. DOI: 10.1007/s00419-006-0032-x.
12.
DjamaKMichelLGaborA, et al.Mechanical behaviour of a sandwich panel composed of hybrid skins and novel glass fibre reinforced polymer truss core. Compos Struct2019; 215: 35–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.033.
13.
SunYGuoLWangT, et al.Bending strength and failure of single-layer and double-layer sandwich structure with graded truss core. Compos Struct2019; 226: 111204. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111204.
14.
UmerRBarsoumZJishiH, et al.Analysis of the compression behaviour of different composite lattice designs. J Compos Mater2018; 52: 715–729. DOI: 10.1177/0021998317714531.
15.
GuanCTangZ-JZhaoF, et al.A homogenization method for natural frequencies and damping analysis of composite pyramidal lattice truss sandwich structures based on representative volume elements. Jnl of Sandwich Structures & Materials2023; 25: 572–590. DOI: 10.1177/10996362231169982.
16.
YangNSunFZhuP, et al.Mechanical properties of pyramidal lattice sandwich CFRP composites to flat and bending loads. J Reinforc Plast Compos; 2023: 073168442311602. DOI: 10.1177/07316844231160298.
17.
WuQGaoYXiongJ. Quasi-static mechanical properties of composite lattice sandwich structures with enhanced face panels. Eur J Mech Solid2023; 97: 104808. DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.104808.
18.
YangJ-SChenS-YLiS, et al.Dynamic responses of hybrid lightweight composite sandwich panels with aluminium pyramidal truss cores. Jnl of Sandwich Structures & Materials2021; 23: 2176–2195. DOI: 10.1177/1099636220909816.
19.
AbediMMJafari NedoushanRSheikhzadehM, et al.The crashworthiness performance of thin-walled ultralight braided lattice composite columns: experimental and finite element study. Compos B Eng2020; 202: 108413. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108413.
20.
DastanTNedoushanRJSheikhzadehM, et al.Designs of lattice truss core sandwich structures with improved compressive strength and stiffness. J Compos Mater2023; 57: 2367–2387. DOI: 10.1177/00219983231160277.
21.
ASTM D2584. Standard test method for ignition loss of cured reinforced resins, Annual book of ASTM standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1968; 8(1): 328–329.
22.
ASTM D2734-94. Standard methods for void content of reinforced plastics, Annual book of ASTM standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1997; 8(2).
23.
GuoH-CQiuX-MFangD-N. Optimal design of two lattice materials and their effective properties. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer2006; 7: 393–398. DOI: 10.1515/IJNSNS.2006.7.4.393.
24.
D30 Committee. ASTM C365/C365M. Standard test method for flatwise compressive properties of sandwich cores. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2000.
25.
JishiHZUmerRBarsoumZCantwellWJ. The mechanical properties of sandwich structures based with composite column cores, In 20th International Conference on Composite Materials, Copenhagen, 19-24thJuly,2015.
26.
ChamisCC.Simplified composite micromechanics equations for hygral, thermal and mechanical properties. In Annual Conference of the Society of the Plastics Industry (SPI) Reinforced Plastics/Composites Institute1983.
27.
ChamisCC. Simplified composite micromechanics equations for strength, fracture Toughness, Impact resistance and Environmental effects. Sampe Quarterly, 1984, 15.
28.
NaikRA. Analysis of woven and braided fabric reinforced composites NASA CR-194930. Washington, DC, USA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1994.
29.
MasoumiMMansooriHDastanT, et al.Intralayer hybridization of triaxially braided composite lamina using carbon and basalt fibers: experimental and numerical study. Compos Struct2021; 267: 113896. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113896.
30.
MasoumiMMansooriHDastanT, et al.An experimental investigation into flexural properties of hybrid carbon-basalt triaxially braided composite lamina. Compos Struct2022; 284: 115231. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115231.
31.
KodagaliKTessemaAKidaneA. Progressive failure analysis of a composite Lamina using puck failure criteria. In Proceedings of the American Society for Composites: Thirty-second Technical Conference, 2017.
32.
Jafari NedoushanR. Improvement of energy absorption of expanded metal tubular structures under compressive loads. Thin-Walled Struct2020; 157: 107058. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107058.
33.
ŞahinYDe BaetsP. Tribological behaviour of unidirectional carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy composites. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2017; 174: 012009. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/174/1/012009.
34.
HajrasoulihaJJafari NedoushanRSheikhzadehM, et al.Meso-macro numerical modeling of noncircular braided composite parts based on braiding process parameters. Compos Struct2019; 224: 111065. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111065.
35.
KimHChoBHHurH-K, et al.A composite sandwich panel integrally woven with truss core. Mater Des (1980–2015)2015; 65: 231–242. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.064.
36.
RinaldiRGHammetterCIZokFW. Ameliorating property gradients in photocured polymer lattices via thermal curing. Mater Lett2013; 105: 155–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.04.048.
