Approach for mechanical characteristic experimental analysis of honeycomb core manufactured by fused deposition modelling is suggested. Experimental analyses of shear and tension of the honeycombs specimens fabricated from PLA and ULTEM 9085 materials are performed. The experimental studies are accompanied by the finite element simulations of the shear and the tension experiments of honeycomb core. As follows from experimental and numerical studies, both the geometrical nonlinearity and plasticity behavior of the material must be accounted for the honeycomb tension analysis. The force-displacement response of honeycomb tension has nonlinear behavior.
XuMLiuDWangP, et al.In-plane compression behavior of hybrid honeycomb metastructures: Theoretical and experimental studies. Aerosp Sci Techn2020; 106: 106081.
2.
ChenYLiTJiaZ, et al.3D printed hierarchical honeycombs with shape integrity under large compressive deformations. Mater Des2018; 137: 226–234.
3.
ParsonsEM, Lightweight cellular metal composites with zero and tunable thermal expansion enabled by ultrasonic additive manufacturing: Modeling, manufacturing, and testing. Comp Struc2019; 223: 110656.
4.
MatthewsN, Additive metal technologies for aerospace sustainment. In: Aircraft sustainment and repair2018: 845–862.
5.
BoparaiKSSinghR, Advances in fused deposition modeling. In: Reference module in materials science and materials engineering2017.
6.
BybergKIGebisaAWLemuHG, Mechanical properties of ULTEM 9085 material processed by fused deposition modeling. Polym Test2018; 72: 335–347.
7.
BalawiSAbotJL, The effect of honeycomb relative density on its effective in-plane elastic moduli: An experimental study. Comp Struc2008; 84: 293–299.
8.
BatesSRGFarrowIRTraskRS, Compressive behaviour of 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane honeycombs with graded densities. Mater Des2019; 162: 130–142.
9.
ChenYLiTJiaZ, et al.3D printed hierarchical honeycombs with shape integrity under large compressive deformations. Mater Des2018; 137: 226–234.
10.
ZhangPArceneauxDJKhattabA, Mechanical properties of 3D printed polycaprolactone honeycomb structure. J Appli Pol Scien2018, 135: 46018.
11.
KarakoçAFreundJ, Experimental studies on mechanical properties of cellular structures using Nomex honeycomb cores. Comp Struct2012; 94: 2017–2024.
12.
BianchiGAgliettiGSRichardsonG, Static and fatigue behaviour of hexagonal honeycomb cores under in-plane shear loads. Appl Compos Mater2012; 19: 97–115.
13.
PanSDWuLZSunYG, et al.Longitudinal shear strength and failure process of honeycomb cores. Comp Struc2006; 72: 42–46.
14.
YoshiharaHMarutaM. Measurement of the shear properties of extruded polystyrene foam by in-plane shear and asymmetric four-point bending tests. Polymers2020, 12: 47.
15.
BhandariaSLopez-AnidoR, Finite element analysis of thermoplastic polymer extrusion 3D printed material for mechanical property prediction. Addit Manuf2018; 22: 187–196.
16.
KulkarniPDuttaD, Deposition strategies and resulting part stiffnesses in fused deposition modeling. J Manuf Scien Engin1999; 121: 93–103.
17.
DanielIMIshaiO, Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials. Oxford University Press2006.
18.
PinderaMJHerakovichCT, Shear characterization of unidirectional composites with the off-axis test. Exper Mechan1986; 26: 103–112.
19.
ASTM D 3518, Standard test method for in-plane shear response of polymer matrix composite materials by tensile test of a ±45° laminate. 2018.
20.
ASTM D 3039, Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite. 2017.
21.
PaganoNJHalpinJC, Influence of end constraint in the testing of anisotropic bodies. J Comp Mater1968; 2: 18–31.
22.
ZaldivarRJWitkinDBMcLouthT, et al.Influence of processing and orientation print effects on the mechanical and thermal behavior of 3D-printed ULTEM® 9085 material. Addit Manufac2017; 13: 71–80.
23.
AmabiliM, Nonlinear Mechanics of Shells and Plates in Composite, Soft and Biological Materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK2018.
24.
AvramovKV, Nonlinear forced vibrations of a cylindrical shell with two internal resonances. Int Appl Mech2006; 42: 169–175.
25.
AvramovKVGendelmanOV, Interaction of elastic system with snap-through vibration absorber. Int J of Non-Lin Mech2009; 44: 81–89.
26.
RusanovAMartynenkoGAvramovK, et al.Detection of accident causes on turbine-generator sets by means of numerical simulations. 2018IEEE 3rd International Conference On Intelligent Energy And Power Systems, Kharkov, Ukraine: 51–55.
27.
AvramovKVStrel’nikovaEA. Chaotic oscillations of plates interacting on both sides with a fluid flow. Int Appl Mech2014; 50: 303–309.
28.
Theory reference for mechanical apdl and mechanical applications.ANSYS Inc., Southpointe. 2009.
29.
PerezDBCelikEKarkkainenRL. Investigation of interlayer interface strength and print morphology effects in fused deposition modeling 3D-printed PLA. 3D Printing and Additive Manuf2021; 8.
