The object of this study is to investigate the influence of different fabrics’ configurations, of faced polyester-sisal fiber composites, on the mechanical behavior of a vacuum infused polyethylene terephthalate-foam core sandwich panel. Sisal-unidirectional (yarn and combed yarn fabrics) and plain weave fabrics were fabricated and the sandwiches’ performances were compared to faced polyester-unidirectional glass fabric. Comparisons about the morphological aspects and relations with mechanical behavior (flatwise and edgewise compression and 3-point bending) were performed. Different face sheets’ thickness was used for this purpose, aiming to correlate the results found for those sisal and glass sandwich panels. The main results showed that faced sisal fabrics/polyester present competitive performance and sometimes higher than those glass/polyester, due to differences on failure mechanisms of the panels.
ThomsenOT. Sandwich materials for wind turbine blades — present and future. J Sandw Struct Mater2009; 11: 7–26.
3.
GarridoMCorreiaJRKellerT. Effects of elevated temperature on the shear response of PET and PUR foams used in composite sandwich panels. Constr Build Mater2015; 76: 150–157.
4.
CzłonkaSKercheEFNevesRM, et al.Bio-based rigid polyurethane foam composites reinforced with bleached curauá fiber. Int J Mol Sci2021; 22: 11203.
KercheEFde Avila DelucisRPetzholdCL, et al.Rigid bio-based wood/polyurethane foam composites expanded under confinement. J Cell Plast2020; 57: 1–12.
7.
Osei-AntwiMDe CastroJVassilopoulosAP, et al.Shear mechanical characterization of balsa wood as core material of composite sandwich panels. Constr Build Mater2013; 41: 231–238.
8.
de Paula SalgadoIde Andrade SilvaF. Flexural behavior of sandwich panels combining curauá fiber-reinforced composite layers and autoclaved aerated concrete core. Constr Build Mater2021; 286: 122890.
9.
VitaleJPFrancucciGStocchiA. Thermal conductivity of sandwich panels made with synthetic and vegetable fiber vacuum-infused honeycomb cores. J Sandw Struct Mater2016; 19: 66–82.
10.
de Avila DelucisRTonattoMLPTrindadeRS, et al.In situ L-RTM manufacturing of sandwich panels with PET foam core reinforced by polymeric pins. J Sandw Struct Mater2019. DOI: 10.1177/1099636219830145.
11.
GarayACSouzaJAAmicoSC. Evaluation of mechanical properties of sandwich structures with polyethylene terephthalate and polyvinyl chloride core. J Sandw Struct Mater2016; 18: 229–241.
12.
AbbasiMNiaAAAbolfathiM. Experimental study on the high-velocity impact behavior of sandwich structures with an emphasis on the layering effects of foam core. J Sandw Struct Mater2018; 23: 3–22.
13.
ChanKEYongLAKoYF, et al.Experimental and numerical studies of sustainable sandwich bio-composites derived from plant-based resources. J Sandw Struct Mater2017; 19: 192–215.
14.
SatyanarayanaKGGuimarãesJLWypychF. Studies on lignocellulosic fibers of Brazil. Part I: source, production, morphology, properties and applications. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38: 1694–1709.
15.
JariwalaHJainP. A review on mechanical behavior of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites and its applications. J Reinf Plast Compos2019; 38: 441–453.
da SilvaAAXSouzaJAManesA, et al.In-plane permeability and mechanical properties of R-glass/aramid hybrid composites. J Mater Eng Perform2020; 29: 4484–4492.
18.
MantariJLOktemASGuedes SoaresC. A new trigonometric shear deformation theory for isotropic, laminated composite and sandwich plates. Int J Solids Struct2012; 49: 43–53.
19.
RanaSFangueiroR. Advanced composite materials for aerospace engineering processing, properties and applications. 70th ed.Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2016. Epub ahead of print 2016. DOI: 10.3760/ema.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.38.005.
20.
FerreiraSRSilvaFDALimaPRL, et al.Effect of fiber treatments on the sisal fiber properties and fiber–matrix bond in cement based systems. Constr Build Mater2015; 101: 730–740.
21.
ZhuZHaoMZhangN. Influence of contents of chemical compositions on the mechanical property of sisal fibers and sisal fibers reinforced PLA composites. J Nat Fibers2018; 17: 101–112.
22.
KanakannavarSPitchaimaniJ. Fabrication and mechanical properties of braided flax fabric polylactic acid bio-composites. J Text Inst. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2021.1907958.
23.
HuangXNetravaliA. Characterization of flax fiber reinforced soy protein resin based green composites modified with nano-clay particles. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 2005–2014.
24.
ChabbaSNetravaliAN. ‘Green’ composites Part 1: characterization of flax fabric and glutaraldehyde modified soy protein concentrate composites. J Mater Sci2005; 40: 6263–6273.
25.
MaHLiYWangD. Investigations of fiber twist on the mechanical properties of sisal fiber yarns and their composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2014; 33: 687–696.
26.
FarziGLezgy-NazargahMImaniA, et al.Mechanical, thermal and microstructural properties of epoxy-OAT composites. Constr Build Mater2019; 197: 12–20.
27.
EyvazianATaghizadehSAHamoudaAM, et al.Buckling and crushing behavior of foam-core hybrid composite sandwich columns under quasi-static edgewise compression. J Sandw Struct Mater2019; 23: 1–18.
28.
VadakkeVCarlssonLA. Experimental investigation of compression failure mechanisms of composite faced foam core sandwich specimens. J Sandw Struct Mater2016; 6: 327–342.
29.
ZenkertD. An introduction to sandwich construction. London: EMAS, 1997.
30.
MouritzAPThomsonRS. Compression, flexure and shear properties of a sandwich composite containing defects. Compos Struct1999; 44: 263–278.
31.
HägglundRÅslundPECarlssonLA, et al.Measuring thickness changes of edgewise compression loaded corrugated board panels using digital image correlation. J Sandw Struct Mater2011; 14: 75–94.
32.
MansourinikMTaheri-BehroozF. The effect of interface debonding on flexural behaviour of composite sandwich beams. J Sandw Struct Mater2018; 22: 1132–1156.
