In this paper, the aeroelastic behavior of a composite wing is investigated in the compressible flow using the analytical method. The composite wing is simulated as a thin-walled single-cell closed cross-section beam with circumferentially asymmetric stiffness (CAS) configuration. The best layup configuration for the maximum flutter speed is determined by analyzing four layups configuration where the fiber orientation angle varies within the range of 0–90 degrees. Moreover, an included foam layer between composite layers resulted in higher bending stiffness and improved stability characteristics of the wing. It was shown that there is a significant improvement in the flutter speed for layup. Numerical results demonstrate the advantages of foam filled model over the model without foam in terms of the flutter speed to the weight ratio.
TimoshenkoSX.On the transverse vibrations of bars of uniform cross-section. Philos Magaz Series1922;
43: 125–131.
2.
MansfieldEHSobeyAJ.Fibre composite helicopter blade: part I: stiffness properties: Part II: prospects for aeroelastic tailoring. Aeronaut Q1979;
30: 413–449.
3.
WeisshaarTA. Aeroelastic tailoring-creative use of unusual materials. In: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 28th structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Monterey, CA, USA, 1987, pp.87–97.
4.
LazarusKBCrawleyEFBohlmannJD.Static aeroelastic control using strain actuated adaptive structures. J Intell Mater Syst Struct1991;
2: 386–410.
5.
EhlersSMWeisshaarTA. Static aeroelastic behavior of an adaptive laminated piezoelectric composite wing. In: 31st structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Long Beach, CA, 2–4 April 1990.
6.
CrawleyEFDugundjiJ.Frequency determination and nondimensionalization for composite cantilever plates. J Sound Vib1980;
72: 1–10.
7.
CrawleyEFJensenDW.Frequency determination techniques for cantilevered plates with Bending-Torsion coupling. Aiaa1984;
22: 415–420.
8.
LibrescuLSongO.Behavior of thin-walled beams made of advanced composite materials and incorporating non-classical effects. Appl Mech Rev1993;
44: 174–180.
9.
SongOLibrescuL.Free vibration of anisotropic composite thin-walled beams of closed cross-section contour. J Sound Vib1993;
167: 129–147.
10.
QinZLibrescuL.Dynamic aeroelastic response of aircraft wings modeled as anisotropic thin-walled beams. J Aircraft2003;
40: 532–543.
11.
QinZLibrescuL.Aeroelastic instability of aircraft wings modelled as anisotropic composite thin-walled beams in incompressible flow. J Fluids Struct2003;
18: 43–61.
12.
QinZMarzoccaPLibrescuL.Aeroelastic instability and response of advanced aircraft wings at subsonic flight speeds. Aerosp Sci Technol2002;
6: 195–208.
13.
HaddadpourHKouchakzadehMAShadmehriF.Aeroelastic instability of aircraft composite wings in an incompressible flow. Compos Struct2008;
83: 93–99.
14.
Jafari-TalookolaeiRAAbediMAttarM.In-plane and out-of-plane vibration modes of laminated composite beams with arbitrary lay-ups. Aerosp Sci Technol2017;
66: 366–379.
15.
GhasemiATaheriBFarahaniS, et al.
Nonlinear free vibration of an Euler-Bernoulli composite beam undergoing finite strain subjected to different boundary conditions. J Vib Control2016;
22: 799–811.
16.
ShokriehMMTaheriB.Wing instability of a full composite aircraft. Compos Struct2001;
54: 335–340.
17.
TorabiKAfshariH.Optimization of flutter boundaries of cantilevered trapezoidal functionally graded sandwich plates. J Sandw Struct Mater2019;
21: 503–531. Feb
18.
DonadonMVde FariaR.Aeroelastic behavior of composite laminated shells with embedded SMA wires under supersonic flow. Aerosp Sci Technol2016;
52: 157–166.
19.
GhasemiAMohandesM.Nonlinear free vibration of laminated composite Euler-Bernoulli beams based on finite strain using generalized differential quadrature method. Mech Adv Mater Struct2017;
24: 917–923.
20.
ArunkumarMPitchaimaniJGangadharanK.Bending and free vibration analysis of foam-filled truss core sandwich panel. J Sandw Struct Mater2018;
20: 617–638. Jun
21.
HosseiniSMHabibolahzadehANěmečekJ.Static and dynamic responses of a novel Al nanocomposite foam/sandwich structure under bending, impact and quasi-static compression tests. J Sandw Struct Mater2017;
21: 1–22.
22.
ÇınarOErdalMKayranA.Accurate equivalent models of sandwich laminates with honeycomb core and composite face sheets via optimization involving modal behavior. J Sandw Struct Mater2017;
19: 139–166.
23.
ArunkumarMPPitchaimaniJGangadharanK, et al.
Influence of nature of core on vibro acoustic behavior of sandwich aerospace structures. Aerosp Sci Technol2016;
56: 155–167.
24.
YinHWenGLiuZ, et al.
Crashworthiness optimization design for foam-filled multi-cell thin-walled structures. Thin-Walled Struct2014;
75: 8–17.
25.
YinHXiaoYWenG, et al.
Multiobjective optimization for foam-filled multi-cell thin-walled structures under lateral impact. Thin-Walled Struct2015;
94: 1–12.
26.
YuJLWangXWeiZG, et al.
Deformation and failure mechanism of dynamically loaded sandwich beams with aluminum-foam core. Int J Impact Eng2003;
28: 331–347.
27.
JingLYanQWangZ, et al.
The dynamic mechanical behavior of sandwich beams with aluminum honeycomb cores. Adv Sci Lett2011;
4: 731–735.
28.
ChengSQiaoPChenF, et al.
Free vibration analysis of fiber-reinforced polymer honeycomb sandwich beams with a refined sandwich beam theory. J Sandw Struct Mater2016;
18: 242–260.
29.
ZhangY.Bending resistance analysis and multi-objective optimization design of foam filled thin-walled structure. JME2016;
52: 115.
30.
SunGLiGHouS, et al.
Crashworthiness design for functionally graded foam-filled thin-walled structures. Mater Sci Eng A2010;
527: 1911–1919.
31.
MathewAPAthulSBarathP, et al.
Structural analysis of composite wind turbine blade. Int Res J Eng Technol2018;
5(5): 1377–1388.
32.
LibrescuLSongO. Thin-walled composite beams: theory and application. Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2006. Springer.
33.
QinZ.Vibration and aeroelasticity of advanced aircraft wings modeled as thin-walled beams. PhD Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2001.
34.
BisplinghoffRLAshleyHHalfmanRL.Aeroelasticity.
New York:
Dover Publications, 1996.
35.
KrausBDasRBanerjeeB.Anisotropy and variability in polyurethane foams: experiments and modeling.
New Zealand:
University of Auckland, 2013.
36.
StanfordBKJutteCVWiesemanCD.Trim and structural optimization of subsonic transport wings using nonconventional aeroelastic tailoring. AIAA J2016;
54: 293–309. Oct 7
37.
HaddadpourHZamaniZ.Curvilinear fiber optimization tools for aeroelastic design of composite wings. J Fluids Struct2012;
33: 180–190. 1
38.
JutteCVStanfordBWiesemanCD, et al. Aeroelastic tailoring of the NASA common research model via novel material and structural configurations. In: 52nd aerospace sciences meeting National Harbor, Maryland, 2014, p.0598.
