Fracture mechanics analysis of a face/core interface crack in a honeycomb core sandwich under mode I-dominated loading conditions is considered. The main objective of the study is to examine how to represent the homogenized in-plane extensional properties of hexagonal honeycomb core under deformation constraints due to bonding of the core to the face sheets. 2D parametric finite element analysis is conducted over a wide range of homogenized in-plane extensional properties of the core. The results show that plane stress assumption may lead to crack closure effects and highly distorted core elements for core with low in-plane modulus, while plane strain stabilizes the core deformation. Experimental results from SCB testing of a honeycomb core sandwich support the plane strain constrained modulus approach to face/core debond analysis.
ZenkertD.An introduction to sandwich construction.
West Midlands, UK:
Engineering Materials Advisory Services Ltd, 1995.
2.
GibsonLJAshbyMF.Cellular solids: structure and properties.
Cambirdge:
Cambridge University Press, 1999.
3.
MastersIGEvansKE.Models for the elastic deformation of honeycombs. Compos Struct1996;
35: 403–422.
4.
SueJWWhitcombJ.Effect of sandwich configuration on behavior of honeycomb core. J Sandwich Struct Mater2008;
10: 311–329.
5.
AllenHG.Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels.
Oxford:
Pergamon Press, 1969.
6.
CarlssonLAKardomateasGA.Structural and failure mechanics of sandwich composites.
Vol. 121.
Berlin, Germany:
Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
7.
SchäubleRPetersilgeM. FEA studies on disbond of honeycomb sandwich at Fraunhofer IMWS – Influence of honeycomb core in-plane Poisson’s ratio. In: EASA/FAA sandwich structure meeting and CMH-17 disbond/delamination TG meeting, Cologne, 18–20 October 2016.
8.
SaseendranV. Fracture characterization and analysis of debonded sandwich composites. PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 2017.
9.
BeckerW.The in-plane stiffnesses of a honeycomb core including the thickness effect. Arch Appl Mech1998;
68: 334–341.
10.
HoheJBeckerW.Effective stress-strain relations for two-dimensional cellular sandwich cores: homogenization, material models, and properties. Appl Mech Rev2002;
55: 61–87.
11.
TauhiduzzamanMCarlssonLA.Influence of constraints on the effective inplane extensional properties of honeycomb core. Compos Struct2019;
209: 616–624.
12.
CantwellWJDaviesP.A test technique for assessing core-skin adhesion in composite sandwich structures. J Mater Sci Lett1994;
13: 203–205.
13.
ASTM Draft Standard, Mode I Dominant Facesheet-to-Core Fracture Toughness of Sandwich Constructions, 2018, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.
14.
OkadaRKortschotMT.The role of the resin fillet in the delamination of honeycomb sandwich structures. Compos Sci Technol2002;
62: 1811–1819.
15.
ShiSSSunZHuXZ, et al.
Carbon-fiber and aluminum-honeycomb sandwich composites with and without Kevlar-fiber interfacial toughening. Compos Part A2014;
67: 102–110.
16.
UralAZehnderATIngraffeaAR.Fracture mechanics approach to facesheet delamination in honeycomb: measurement of energy release rate of the adhesive bond. Eng Fract Mech2003;
70: 93–103.
17.
GrauDLQiuXSSankarBV.Relation between interfacial fracture toughness and mode-mixity in honeycomb core sandwich composites. J Sandwich Struct Mater2006;
8: 187–203.
18.
BerggreenCSimonsenBCBorumKK.Experimental and numerical study of interface crack propagation in foam-cored sandwich beams. J Compos Mater2007;
41: 493–520.
19.
SaseendranVCarlssonLABerggreenC.Shear and foundation effects on crack root rotation and mode-mixity in moment-and force-loaded single cantilever beam sandwich specimen. J Compos Mater2018;
52: 2537–2547.
20.
HutchinsonJW. Mixed mode fracture mechanics of interfaces. In: M. Ruhle et al. (eds.) Metal – ceramic interfaces. Pergamon Press. New York, 1990, pp. 295–306.
21.
HeMYHutchinsonJW.Kinking of a crack out of an interface. J Appl Mech1989;
56: 270–278.
22.
SuoZ.Singularities, interfaces and cracks in dissimilar anisotropic media. Proc R Soc Lond A1990;
427: 331–358.
