The present approach considers hybrid control strategy to reduce the amount of transmitted sound through a multilayered doubly curved sandwich shell equipped with piezoelectric layer and shunt circuit. The construction is composed of some piezoelectric actuator and sensor layers as an active controller as well as resistance–inductance shunt circuit as passive controller. In addition, a layer made of isotropic material is also sandwiched as a core. Firstly, in order to obtain the electromechanical equations of curved shell integrated with piezoelectric layers, Hamilton’s principle, and shear deformation shallow shell theory are employed. After presenting the sound transmission loss of structure, the reliability of the formulation is checked by the aid of previous outcomes. In the following, the piezoelectric layers coupled with shunt circuit are employed to inspect the influence of these patches on the control of transmitted sound through structure. The results indicate that the shunt circuit is able to enhance the sound transmission loss at resonant frequency with no need source of energy. Since in designing the engineering structures, the transmitted noise control is important especially in the resonant frequency, the influence of using several parallel shunt circuits with each piezoelectric layer is also examined. It is shown that increment of the number of parallel shunt circuits implies substantial reduction of transmitted sound to the structure in the resonant frequency. Finally, the solution process is followed to study the effect of active control on the acoustic transmission. Then, it is found that employing the simultaneous active and passive controllers not only cause to reduce the transmitted noise in the resonant frequency but also make to improve the behavior of sound transmission loss in entire range of frequency.
GhayeshMH.Functionally graded microbeams: simultaneous presence of imperfection and viscoelasticity. Int J Mech Sci2018;
140: 339–350.
2.
GhayeshMH.Nonlinear vibration analysis of axially functionally graded shear-deformable tapered beams. Appl Math Model2018;
59: 583–596.
3.
GhayeshMHFarokhiH.Chaotic motion of a parametrically excited microbeam. Int J Eng Sci2015;
96: 34–45.
4.
GhayeshMHFarokhiHHussainS.Viscoelastically coupled size-dependent dynamics of microbeams. Int J Eng Sci2016;
109: 243–255.
5.
GholipourAFarokhiHGhayeshMH.In-plane and out-of-plane nonlinear size-dependent dynamics of microplates. Nonlinear Dyn2015;
79: 1771–1785.
6.
GhayeshMHFarokhiHAmabiliM.Nonlinear dynamics of a microscale beam based on the modified couple stress theory. Compos Part B: Eng2013;
50: 318–324.
7.
GhayeshMHFarokhiHAmabiliM.In-plane and out-of-plane motion characteristics of microbeams with modal interactions. Compos Part B: Eng2014;
60: 423–439.
8.
FarokhiHGhayeshMH.Thermo-mechanical dynamics of perfect and imperfect Timoshenko microbeams. Int J Eng Sci2015;
91: 12–33.
9.
GhayeshMHFarokhiHAmabiliM.Nonlinear behaviour of electrically actuated MEMS resonators. Int J Eng Sci2013;
71: 137–155.
10.
GhayeshMHAmabiliMFarokhiH.Nonlinear forced vibrations of a microbeam based on the strain gradient elasticity theory. Int J Eng Sci2013;
63: 52–60.
11.
GhayeshMHFarokhiHGholipourA.Vibration analysis of geometrically imperfect three-layered shear-deformable microbeams. Int J Mech Sci2017;
122: 370–383.
12.
FarokhiHGhayeshMH.Supercritical nonlinear parametric dynamics of Timoshenko microbeams. Commun Nonlin Sci Numer Simulat2018;
59: 592–605.
13.
FarokhiHGhayeshMH.Nonlinear mechanics of electrically actuated microplates. Int J Eng Sci2018;
123: 197–213.
14.
GhayeshMH.Dynamics of functionally graded viscoelastic microbeams. Int J Eng Sci2018;
124: 115–131.
15.
FarajpourAGhayeshMHFarokhiH.A review on the mechanics of nanostructures. Int J Eng Sci2018;
133: 231–263.
16.
GhayeshMHFarajpourA.A review on the mechanics of functionally graded nanoscale and microscale structures. Int J Eng Sci2019;
137: 8–36.
17.
FarajpourAFarokhiHGhayeshMH, et al.
Nonlinear mechanics of nanotubes conveying fluid. Int J Eng Sci2018;
133: 132–143.
18.
GhayeshMHFarajpourA.Nonlinear mechanics of nanoscale tubes via nonlocal strain gradient theory. Int J Eng Sci2018;
129: 84–95.
19.
GhayeshMHFarokhiHFarajpourA.Global dynamics of fluid conveying nanotubes. Int J Eng Sci2019;
135: 37–57.
20.
GhayeshMH.Viscoelastic dynamics of axially FG microbeams. Int J Eng Sci2019;
135: 75–85.
21.
FarokhiHGhayeshMH.On the dynamics of imperfect shear deformable microplates. Int J Eng Sci2018;
133: 264–283.
22.
FarokhiHGhayeshMH.Nonlinear mechanical behaviour of microshells. Int J Eng Sci2018;
127: 127–144.
23.
FarokhiHGhayeshMH.Nonlinear resonant response of imperfect extensible Timoshenko microbeams. Int J Mech Mater Des2017;
13: 43–55.
24.
KazemiradSGhayeshMHAmabiliM.Thermo-mechanical nonlinear dynamics of a buckled axially moving beam. Arch Appl Mech2013;
83: 25–42.
25.
FarokhiHGhayeshMHAmabiliM.Nonlinear resonant behavior of microbeams over the buckled state. Appl Phys A2013;
113: 297–307.
26.
FarokhiHGhayeshMHAmabiliM.Nonlinear dynamics of a geometrically imperfect microbeam based on the modified couple stress theory. Int J Eng Sci2013;
68: 11–23.
27.
TzouHSBaoYVenkayyaVB.Parametric study of segmented transducers laminated on cylindrical shells, part 2: actuator patches. J Sound Vib1996;
197: 225–249.
28.
TzouHSTsengCI.Distributed structural identification and control of shells using distributed piezoelectrics: theory and finite element analysis. Dyn Contr1991;
1: 297–320.
29.
TzouHSBergmanLA (eds) Dynamics and control of distributed systems.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2007.
30.
DubeGPDumirPCKumarCB.Segmented sensors and actuators for thick plates and shells part I: analysis using FSDT. J Sound Vib1999;
226: 739–753.
31.
WangQQuekSTSunCT, et al.
Analysis of piezoelectric coupled circular plate. Smart Mater Struct2001;
10: 229.
32.
LiuXWangQQuekST.Analytical solution for free vibration of piezoelectric coupled moderately thick circular plates. Int J Solids Struct2002;
39: 2129–2151.
33.
RayMC.Optimal control of laminated shells using piezoelectric sensor and actuator layers. AiAA J2003;
41: 1151–1157.
34.
KapuriaSAcharyGG.Electromechanically coupled zigzag third-order theory for thermally loaded hybrid piezoelectric plates. AIAA J2006;
44: 160–170.
35.
ZhangYNiuHXieS, et al.
Numerical and experimental investigation of active vibration control in a cylindrical shell partially covered by a laminated PVDF actuator. Smart Mater Struct2008;
17: 035024.
36.
ZhangYHXieSLZhangXN.Vibration control of a simply supported cylindrical shell using a laminated piezoelectric actuator. Acta Mech2008;
196: 87–101.
37.
KumariPNathJKKapuriaS, et al.
An improved third order theory and assessment of efficient zigzag theory for angle-ply flat hybrid panels. Compos Struct2008;
83: 226–236.
38.
ShengGGWangX.Active control of functionally graded laminated cylindrical shells. Compos Struct2009;
90: 448–457.
39.
ShengGGWangX.Studies on dynamic behavior of functionally graded cylindrical shells with PZT layers under moving loads. J Sound Vib2009;
323: 772–789.
40.
HashemiSHEs’haghiMKarimiM.Closed-form solution for free vibration of piezoelectric coupled annular plates using Levinson plate theory. J Sound Vib2010;
329: 1390–1408.
41.
LevinsonM.An accurate, simple theory of the statics and dynamics of elastic plates. Mech Res Commun1980;
7: 343–350.
42.
Hosseini-HashemiSTaherHRAkhavanH, et al.
Free vibration of functionally graded rectangular plates using first-order shear deformation plate theory. Appl Math Model2010;
34: 1276–1291.
43.
YuanLXiangYHuangY, et al.
A semi-analytical method and the circumferential dominant modal control of circular cylindrical shells with active constrained layer damping treatment. Smart Mater Struct2010;
19: 025010.
44.
TorresDAPaulo de TarsoRM.HSDT-layerwise analytical solution for rectangular piezoelectric laminated plates. Compos Struct2010;
92: 1763–1774.
45.
LarbiWDeüJF.A 3D state-space solution for free-vibration analysis of a radially polarized laminated piezoelectric cylinder filled with fluid. J Sound Vib2011;
330: 162–181.
46.
LiJMaZWangZ, et al.
Random vibration control of laminated composite plates with piezoelectric fiber reinforced composites. Acta Mech Solida Sinica2016;
29: 316–327.
47.
SongZGZhangLWLiewKM.Active vibration control of CNT-reinforced composite cylindrical shells via piezoelectric patches. Compos Struct2016;
158: 92–100.
48.
LuJWangPZhanZ.Active vibration control of thin-plate structures with partial SCLD treatment. Mech Sys Signal Process2017;
84: 531–550.
49.
YueHLuYDengZ, et al.
Experiments on vibration control of a piezoelectric laminated paraboloidal shell. Mech Sys Signal Process2017;
82: 279–295.
50.
YueHLuYDengZ, et al.
Distributed microscopic actuation analysis of paraboloidal membrane shells of different geometric parameters. Mech Sys Signal Process2018;
103: 1–22.
51.
SunLLiWWuY, et al.
Active vibration control of a conical shell using piezoelectric ceramics. J Low Freq NoiseVib Active Control2017;
36: 366–375.
52.
KumarRSKundalwalSIRayMC.Control of large amplitude vibrations of doubly curved sandwich shells composed of fuzzy fiber reinforced composite facings. Aerosp Sci Technol2017;
70: 10–28.
53.
KimSJYoonKW.Active control of sound fields from a composite plate using the anisotropy and shape of distributed PVDF actuators. J Sound Vib1997;
202: 461–476.
54.
WangCYVaicaitisR.Active control of vibrations and noise of double wall cylindrical shells. J Sound Vib1998;
216: 865–888.
55.
KimSJSongKY.Active control of sound fields from plates in flow by piezoelectric sensor/actuator. AIAA J1999;
37: 1180–1186.
56.
LaplanteWChenTBazA, et al.
Active control of vibration and noise radiation from fluid-loaded cylinder using active constrained layer damping. Modal Anal2002;
8: 877–902.
57.
LiSZhaoD.Numerical simulation of active control of structural vibration and acoustic radiation of a fluid-loaded laminated plate. J Sound Vib2004;
272: 109–124.
58.
RayMCBalajiR.Active structural–acoustic control of laminated cylindrical panels using smart damping treatment. Int J Mech Sci2007;
49: 1001–1017.
59.
RayMCFayeAPatraS, et al.
Theoretical and experimental investigations on the active structural–acoustic control of a thin plate using a vertically reinforced 1-3 piezoelectric composite. Smart Mater Struct2008;
18: 015012.
60.
LiS.Active modal control simulation of vibro-acoustic response of a fluid-loaded plate. J Sound Vib2011;
330: 5545–5557.
61.
NovakovaKMokryPVaclavikJ.Application of piezoelectric macro-fiber-composite actuators to the suppression of noise transmission through curved glass plates. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Contr2012;
59: 2004–2014.
62.
CaoXShiLZhangX, et al.
Active control of acoustic radiation from laminated cylindrical shells integrated with a piezoelectric layer. Smart Mater Struct2013;
22: 065003.
63.
ShahPHRayMC.Active structural-acoustic control of laminated composite truncated conical shells using smart damping treatment. J Vib Acoust2013;
135: 021001.
64.
MaXJinGLiuZ.Active structural acoustic control of an elastic cylindrical shell coupled to a two-stage vibration isolation system. Int J Mech Sci2014;
79: 182–194.
65.
TalebitootiRZarastvandMRGheibiMR.Acoustic transmission through laminated composite cylindrical shell employing Third order Shear Deformation Theory in the presence of subsonic flow. Compos Struct2016;
157: 95–110.
66.
TalebitootiRChoudari KhamenehAMZarastvandMR, et al.
Investigation of three-dimensional theory on sound transmission through compressed poroelastic sandwich cylindrical shell in various boundary configurations. J Sandw Struct Mater2018; 21(7): 2313–2357.
67.
TalebitootiRGohariHDZarastvandMR.Multi objective optimization of sound transmission across laminated composite cylindrical shell lined with porous core investigating non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Aerosp Sci Technol2017;
69: 269–280.
68.
TalebitootiRJohariVZarastvandM.Wave transmission across laminated composite plate in the subsonic flow investigating two-variable refined plate theory. L Am J Solids Struct2018;
15.
69.
TalebitootiRZarastvandMRouhaniAH.Investigating hyperbolic shear deformation theory on vibroacoustic behavior of the infinite functionally graded thick plate. L Am J Solids Struct2019;
16.
AssafSGuerichM.Numerical prediction of noise transmission loss through viscoelastically damped sandwich plates. J Sandw Struct Mater2008;
10: 359–384.
72.
TalebitootiRDarvish GohariHZarastvandM, et al.
A robust optimum controller for suppressing radiated sound from an intelligent cylinder based on sliding mode method considering piezoelectric uncertainties. J Int Mat Sys Struct2019;
30(20): 3066–3079.
73.
TalebitootiRZarastvandMRGohariHD.Investigation of power transmission across laminated composite doubly curved shell in the presence of external flow considering shear deformation shallow shell theory. J Vib Control2018;
24: 4492–4504.
74.
TalebitootiRZarastvandMR.Vibroacoustic behavior of orthotropic aerospace composite structure in the subsonic flow considering the Third order Shear Deformation Theory. Aerosp Sci Technol2018;
75: 227–236.
75.
TalebitootiRZarastvandMR.The effect of nature of porous material on diffuse field acoustic transmission of the sandwich aerospace composite doubly curved shell. Aerosp Sci Technol2018;
78: 157–170.
76.
TalebitootiRZarastvandMRGohariHD.The influence of boundaries on sound insulation of the multilayered aerospace poroelastic composite structure. Aerosp Sci Technol2018;
80: 452–471.
GhassabiMZarastvandMRTalebitootiR.Investigation of state vector computational solution on modeling of wave propagation through functionally graded nanocomposite doubly curved thick structures. Eng with Comput. Epub ahead of print 21 May 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00366-019-00773-6.
79.
TalebitootiRZarastvandMDarvishgohariH.Multi-objective optimization approach on diffuse sound transmission through poroelastic composite sandwich structure. J Sandw Struct Mater. Epub ahead of print 12 June 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1099636219854748.
80.
MallikNRayMC.Effective coefficients of piezoelectric fiber-reinforced composites. AIAA J2003;
41: 704–710.
81.
AbidMAbbesMSChazotJD, et al.
Acoustic response of a multilayer panel with viscoelastic material. Int J Acoust Vib2012;
17(2): 82.
82.
XinFXLuTJ.Analytical modeling of sound transmission across finite aeroelastic panels in convected fluids. J Acoust Soc Am2010;
128: 1097–1107.
83.
RoussosLA.Noise transmission loss of a rectangular plate in an infinite baffle. J Acoust Soc Am1984;
75: S2–S3.
84.
HowardCQKidnerMR. Experimental validation of a model for the transmission loss of a plate with an array of lumped masses. In: Proceedings of acoustics 2006, pp. 169–177.
