Nylon fabrics are used as the reinforcing upper layer. A warp-knitted spacer fabric that is saturated with flexible polyurethane foam is used as the lower layer. They are combined in order to form innovative impact energy absorbent composite sandwiches employing a two-step foam process. The quasi-static compressive strength, bursting strength, and dynamic shock cushioning characteristic of the composite sandwiches are evaluated, the latter of which is tested using a drop weight impact tester in order to simulate the impact resistance corresponding to complex environments. The experimental results suggest that a combination of warp-knitted spacer fabric increases the compressive strength and bursting strength of composite sandwiches by 107% and 60%, respectively. The shapes of impactors determine the contact force and dynamic impact time. The greater contact area results in the smaller contact force, indicating that the composite sandwiches have greater cushioning efficacy. Designed with a gradient combination, the flexible polyurethane foam strongly bonds the upper polyamide nonwoven fabric and the lower warp-knitted spacer fabric. The optimal compression resistance, a bursting strength of 1677 N, and a maximum energy absorption of 90% at a 15 J impact energy are presented. The innovative composite sandwiches have a promising perspective in packaging and individual impact protection in the future.
ZhengJQinQWangTJ.Impact plastic crushing and design of density-graded cellular materials. Mech Mater2016;
94: 66–78.
7.
GholamiMSDoutresOAtallaN.Effect of microstructure closed-pore content on the mechanical properties of flexible polyurethane foam. Int J Solids Struct2017;
112: 97–105.
8.
RostamiyanYNorouziH.Flatwise compression strength and energy absorption of polyurethane foam-filled lattice core sandwich panels. Strength Mater2016;
48: 801–810.
9.
GanNFengYYinH, et al.
Quasi-static axial crushing experiment study of foam-filled CFRP and aluminum alloy thin-walled structures. Compos Struct2016;
157: 303–319.
10.
SachseSPoruriMSilvaF, et al.
Effect of nanofillers on low energy impact performance of sandwich structures with nanoreinforced polyurethane foam cores. J Sandw Struct Mater2013;
16: 173–194.
11.
SharmaRSRaghupathyVP.Influence of core density, core thickness, and rigid inserts on dynamic characteristics of sandwich panels with polyurethane foam as core. J Reinf Plast Compos2010;
29: 3226–3236.
12.
YeXFangueiroRHuH, et al.
Application of warp-knitted spacer fabrics in car seats. J Text Inst2007;
98: 337–344.
13.
LiuYHuHLongH, et al.
Impact compressive behavior of warp-knitted spacer fabrics for protective applications. Text Res J2011;
82: 773–788.
14.
GuoXLongHZhaoL.Investigation on the impact and compression-after-impact properties of warp-knitted spacer fabrics. Text Res J2013;
83: 904–916.
15.
YousefpourMAhmadiMSPayvandyP.Experimental study on compressive, flexural and fatigue behavior of warp-knitted spacer fabrics reinforced polyurethane cast elastomer composites. Fibers Polym2017;
18: 1346–1352.
16.
VelosaJCRanaSFangueiroR, et al.
Mechanical behavior of novel sandwich composite panels based on 3D-knitted spacer fabrics. Reinf Plast Compos2012;
31: 95–105.
17.
PanYLouCHsiehC, et al.
Nonwoven fabric/spacer fabric/polyurethane foam composites: physical and mechanical evaluations. Fibers Polym2016;
17: 789–794.
18.
HuangSLouCYanR, et al.
Investigation on structure and impact-resistance property of polyurethane foam filled, three-dimensional fabric reinforced sandwich flexible composites. Compos Part B: Eng2017;
131: 43–49.
19.
ChenSLongHLiuY, et al.
Mechanical properties of 3D-structure composites based on warp-knitted spacer fabrics. Autex Res J2015;
15: 127–137.
20.
BalaganesanGKumarVAKhanVC, et al.
Energy-absorbing capacity of polyurethane/SiC/glass-epoxy laminates under impact loading. J Eng Mater-T ASME2017;
139.
21.
MitrevskiTMarshallIHThomsonR, et al.
The effect of impactor shape on the impact response of composite laminates. Compos Struct2005;
67: 139–148.
22.
LeeSCheonJImY.Experimental and numerical study of the impact behavior of SMC plates. Compos Struct1999;
47: 551–561.
23.
ChaydarrehKCShalbafanAWellingJ.Effect of ingredient ratios of rigid polyurethane foam on foam core panels properties. J Appl Polym Sci2017;
134.
24.
GwonJGSungGKimJH.Modulation of cavities and interconnecting pores in manufacturing water blown flexible poly (urethane urea) foams. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2015;
16: 2299–2307.
25.
SerbanDWeissenbornOGellerS, et al.
Evaluation of the mechanical and morphological properties of long fibre reinforced polyurethane rigid foams. Polym Test2016;
49: 121–127.
26.
AvalleMBelingardiGMontaniniR.Characterization of polymeric structural foams under compressive impact loading by means of energy-absorption diagram. Int J Impact Eng2001;
25: 455–472.
27.
ScarfatoPDi MaioLIncarnatoL.Structure and physical-mechanical properties related to comfort of flexible polyurethane foams for mattress and effects of artificial weathering. Compos Part B: Eng2017;
109: 45–52.
28.
LiuYHuH.Compressive mechanics of warp-knitted spacer fabrics. Part II: a dynamic model. Text Res J2015;
85: 2020–2029.
29.
GamaNVSoaresBFreireCSR, et al.
Bio-based polyurethane foams toward applications beyond thermal insulation. Mater Design2015;
76: 77–85.
30.
GardnerNWangEShuklaA.Performance of functionally graded sandwich composite beams under shock wave loading. Compos Struct2012;
94: 1755–1770.
31.
ChenSZhangXChenH, et al.
An experimental study of the compression properties of polyurethane-based warp-knitted spacer fabric composites. Autex Res J2017;
17: 199–205.
32.
YuHGuoZLiB, et al.
Research into the effect of cell diameter of aluminum foam on its compressive and energy absorption properties. Mater Sci Eng A-Struct2007;
454: 542–546.
33.
ZhangGWangBMaL, et al.
Energy absorption and low velocity impact response of polyurethane foam filled pyramidal lattice core sandwich panels. Compos Struct2014;
108: 304–310.
34.
GuptaNWoldesenbetE.Characterization of flexural properties of syntactic foam core sandwich composites and effect of density variation. J Compos Mater2005;
39: 2197–2212.
35.
WangXKZhengZJYuJL, et al.
Impact resistance and energy absorption of functionally graded cellular structures. Appl Mech Mater2011;
69: 73–78.
36.
LiuYAuWMHuH.Protective properties of warp-knitted spacer fabrics under impact in hemispherical form. Part I: impact behavior analysis of a typical spacer fabric. Text Res J2013;
84: 422–434.
37.
ZhiCLongH.Flexural properties of syntactic foam reinforced by warp knitted spacer fabric. Autex Res J2016;
16.
