In the first part of this paper, a viscoelastic model is used to numerically study the cellular foam core fatigue behaviour. Material’s temperature evolution is quantified with a numerical/experimental confrontation. In the second part, the slamming phenomenon is discussed by measuring the panel flexural strain on a racing sailboat during navigation. Making use of these results, a new slamming test rig was developed to evaluate the fatigue of sandwich structure under realistic loading. Four-point bending and slamming tests were performed on sandwich beams in order to compare their fatigue life and to discuss the physical parameters.
AllenHG.Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels. The commonwealth and international library: structures and solid body mechanics division.
Oxford, England:
Pergamon, 1969.
2.
GerardRAlilaFFajouiJ, et al. Updated fatigue test methods for structural foams and sandwich beams. In: 5th high performance yacht design conference, Auckland, 8–11 March 2015.
3.
YuanCBergsmaOKoussiosS, et al.
Optimization of sandwich composites fuselages under flight loads. Appl Compos Mater2010;
19: 47–64.
4.
AlilaFFajouiJKchaouM, et al.
Mechanical characterization of sandwich composite structure using a new experimental approach. Adv Compos Lett2016;
25: 117–120.
5.
CarlssonLASendleinLSMerrySL.Characterization of face sheet/core shear fracture of composite sandwich beams. J Compos Mater1991;
25: 101–116.
6.
BianchiGAgliettiGSRichardsonG.Static and fatigue behaviour of hexagonal honeycomb cores under in-plane shear loads. Appl Compos Mater2011;
19: 97–115.
7.
AnHChenSHuangH.Optimal design of composite sandwich structures by considering multiple structure cases. Compos Struct2016;
152: 676–686.
8.
SatasivamSBaiY.Mechanical performance of bolted modular GFRP composite sandwich structures using standard and blind bolts. Compos Struct2014;
117: 59–70.
9.
RosenAGarmeK.Model experiment addressing the impact pressure distribution on planing craft in waves. Int J Small Craft Technol2004;
146: 15.
10.
RosénA.Impact pressure distribution reconstruction from discrete point measurements. Int Shipbuild Prog2005;
52: 91–107.
11.
ManganelliP. An experimental investigation of slamming on, ocean racing yachts. In: 15th Chesapeake sailing yacht symposium, Annapolis, Maryland, USA, 26–27 January 2001.
12.
BattleyMAllenT.Servo-hydraulic system for controlled velocity water impact of marine sandwich panels. Exp Mech2011;
52: 95–106.
13.
BattleyMALakeSE. Dynamic performance of sandwich core materials. In: 16th international conference on composite materials, Kyoto, Japan, 8–13 July 2007.
14.
BattleyMAAllenTCasariB, et al. Structural responses of high performance sailing yachts to slamming loads. In: 11th international conference on fast sea transportation, FAST, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 26–29 September 2011.
15.
SteniusI.Finite element modelling of hydroelasticity in hull-water impacts. Licentiate Thesis,
KTH, School of Engineering Sciences (SCI), Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, Stockholm, 2006.
16.
YanCSongX.Effects of foam core density and face-sheet thickness on the mechanical properties of aluminum foam sandwich. Steel Compos Struct2016; 21: 1145–1156.
17.
KhanKAEl-SayedT.A phenomenological constitutive model for the nonlinear viscoelastic responses of biodegradable polymers. Acta Mech2012;
224: 287–305.
18.
DavidNVGaoX-LZhengJQ.Creep of a Twaron®/natural rubber composite. Mech Adv Mater Struct2013;
20: 464–477.
19.
MathiesonHFamA.High cycle fatigue under reversed bending of sandwich panels with GFRP skins and polyurethane foam core. Compos Struct2014;
113: 31–39.
20.
AssararMEl MahiABerthelotJ-M.Evaluation of the dynamic properties of PVC foams under flexural vibrations. Compos Struct2012;
94: 1919–1931.
21.
GerardRFajouiJCasariPet al.
Novel tensile test for polymeric foams in fatigue. J Sandw Struct Mater2015; 18: 135–150.
NguyenSTVuM-HVuMNet al.
Generalized Maxwell model for micro-cracked viscoelastic materials. Int J Damage Mech2015; 26: 697–710.
24.
ZhangSDulieu-BartonJMThomsenOT.The effect of temperature on the failure modes of polymer foam cored sandwich structures. Compos Struct2015;
121: 104–113.
25.
AdessinaAHamdaouiMXuC, et al.
Damping properties of bi-dimensional sandwich structures with multi-layered frequency-dependent visco-elastic cores. Compos Struct2016;
154: 334–343.
26.
KhanKAMulianaAH.Fully coupled heat conduction and deformation analyses of visco-elastic solids. Mech Time Depend Mater2012;
16: 461–489.
27.
RajagopalKRSrinivasaAR.A Gibbs-potential-based formulation for obtaining the response functions for a class of viscoelastic materials. Proc R Soc Lond Math Phys Eng Sci2011;
467: 39–58.
28.
RenaudFDionJ-LChevallierG, et al.
A new identification method of viscoelastic behavior: application to the generalized Maxwell model. Mech Syst Signal Process2011;
25: 991–1010.
29.
CharcaSShafiqBJustF.Repeated slamming of sandwich composite panels on water. J Sandwich Struct Mater2009;
11: 409–424.
30.
CharcaSShafiqB.Damage assessment due to single slamming of foam core sandwich composites. J Sandwich Struct Mater2010;
12: 97–112.
31.
BattleyMAllenTSchierlinkJ, et al.
Hydroelastic behaviour of slam loaded composite hull panels. In 3rd High Performance Yacht Design Conference, HPYD 2008, Auckland, New Zealand, 2–4 December 2008, pp.37–46.
32.
BurmanMZenkertD.Fatigue of foam core sandwich beams—1: undamaged specimens. Int J Fatigue1997;
19: 551–561.
33.
ASTM. ASTM C393/C393M – 11e1 standard test method for core shear properties of sandwich constructions by beam flexure, 2008.
